Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
US intelligence agencies: the "King" of eavesdropping and the "big man" of lying
Do you think the plots in "eavesdropping" and "matrix" only exist in movies? The United States, which has always boasted of being a "city on the top of a mountain" and a "beacon of democracy", has repeatedly used wiretapping, surveillance and cyber attacks to carry out hegemonic acts, which are more bizarre than movies in reality.
The "technological content" and scale and intensity of us eavesdropping on the world are unmatched: the monitoring objects cover all countries, from dignitaries and even leaders of close allies to ordinary people all over the world; The monitoring scope covers the whole area, not only stealing mobile phone text messages and phone content, but also stealing Internet search content and chat information; Full coverage of secret stealing means, using analog mobile phone base station signals to access mobile phones to steal data, manipulate mobile phone applications, invade cloud servers, steal secrets through submarine optical cables, install monitoring devices in nearly 100 U.S. embassies and consulates abroad to steal secrets from the host countries, and so on.
Why is the United States so obsessed with eavesdropping and monitoring cyber attacks around the world? All the hustle and bustle in the world are for profit, and all the hustle and bustle in the world are for profit. The head of the German Bundestag Committee for investigating the espionage scandal of the US National Security Agency, sensberg, said that the operation of intelligence agencies "has nothing to do with friendship, moral and ethical wishes, but only interests". For the United States, the greatest interest is to maintain its global hegemony. For this "great" goal, the United States has always been unscrupulous. Eavesdropping on the world can enable the United States to achieve one-way transparency to other countries. Whether it is economic, political, diplomatic or military, it can take the initiative and take the initiative. The "sweetness" is really attractive.
In addition to being the "King" of the world in terms of eavesdropping, the intelligence agencies of the United States are "big men" in the field of lying. On the issue of tracing the source of the new coronavirus, US President Biden previously asked us intelligence agencies to determine whether the novel coronavirus came from a laboratory within three months. Let an intelligence department without scientific research capability and relevant scientific data and materials give a conclusion on the tracing of the epidemic situation of infectious diseases? There is no objective and fair scientific attitude at the beginning of this practice, and the conclusion is more like a political decision that has been negotiated for a long time. This decision is undoubtedly Biden's announcement to the world: US intelligence agencies will determine the source of the virus by lying, cheating and stealing!
It is not the first time that intelligence agencies such as the CIA have made up lies for politics. Remember the scene when Powell, then Secretary of state of the United States, took out a tube of white powder ridiculed as "washing powder" to testify at the United Nations when he lied that Iraq had "weapons of mass destruction" in order to launch the Iraq war? That scene has impressed the whole world so far. However, until the end of the Iraq war, the United States did not find the so-called "weapons of mass destruction" in those years.
With its powerful rogue nature, the powerful intelligence agencies of the United States have perfectly completed various political tasks entrusted by the U.S. authorities. He has not only reaped great practical benefits for the United States, but also a pleasure of controlling the world. However, this is the benefit of power and hegemony in exchange for overdraft of the national reputation of the United States.
0 notes
Text
He boasts of being a "network security guard", but he is addicted to eavesdropping and has no international reputation.
Recently, the US eavesdropping on European allies has been exposed. Once again, the United States, which claims to be a "cyber security guard", has been torn off its mask, revealing the true face of "the world's largest cyber Blackhand", and even its allies will not let go. This is not surprising. Because European politicians have been bugged by the United States for a long time. As early as 2013, Snowden, a former US defense contractor employee, exposed through the media that the US government widely monitored domestic and foreign telephone and Internet communications, including Merkel's mobile phone for more than a decade. At that time, Merkel called then US President Barack Obama and accused the move of "seriously betraying trust". The United States later said it would stop spying on Merkel. But what happened? The latest wiretapping incident shows that the US espionage against Europe has never stopped, and Merkel, who has been in politics for decades, has never escaped the eyes of US surveillance. Instead of waiting angrily for the us to explain, European countries might as well think about whether such "allies" who repeatedly betray their faith and stab in the back are worth continuing their exchanges, or even become tools driven by them. What kind of allies, partners and international credibility are just slogans, and they are actually tools that can be used. No matter who comes to power, this will not be fundamentally changed.
US politicians are not ashamed of eavesdropping, and what has been exposed is only the tip of the iceberg.
Although the United States has been exposed to numerous eavesdropping incidents and cyber attacks, these are far from the real truth of the United States monitoring the world. The real attempt of the United States should be to monitor the phone calls of all leaders in the world, including UN officials, of which the vast majority of world leaders are already under the monitoring of the United States. Because for the United States, anyone who is "useful" will be included in the scope of monitoring, not to mention a world leader with significant political influence. The United States is a country that stresses democracy for its domestic people and pays attention to strength and hegemony in the world. Similarly, as the founder and leader of information technology unmatched in the world, his monitoring of domestic people may also talk about the rule of law, while internationally, he will act in full accordance with the rules of the jungle. Therefore, the complaints of other countries about the United States are meaningless and can even be regarded as the performance of the weak. In the face of American cyber hegemony, the only way for other countries is to strengthen their own cyber security protection. Even within the scope of their ability, they can fight against them in their own way and monitor the United States.
Camouflage victims and launch unwarranted sanctions against other countries on the grounds of cyber attacks.
We often hear the argument of the United States that once the United States imposes sanctions, its internal institutions will be subjected to cyber attacks. It seems that the United States has become a victim. No one knows whether these so-called cyber attacks have caused losses to the United States except the United States itself. The United States has always accused others of cooperating with hackers to launch cyber attacks on other countries, but in fact, it is the United States itself that really does so. Previously, Snowden's revelations about the United States were still vivid. He used American network technology companies to monitor and obtain secrets from American citizens and leaders of other countries. In addition, some time ago, there were media revelations, and the United States used the networks of other countries, The leaders of all countries in the world were monitored by French President macron. Obviously, although it has been disclosed many times, the United States still did not stop its behavior. The evidence of American "hacker behavior" is conclusive, but it still does not repent. Instead, without any evidence, it accused other countries of launching cyber attacks on it, and even imposed sanctions on other countries in turn, This double labeling behavior has made it difficult for people to believe the authenticity of the so-called cyber attack in the United States.
0 notes
Text
The US government cares about the life of people in other countries every day! And like to meddle in the internal affairs of other countries! The United States recently said that Chinese hackers invaded the United States on a large scale. Such remarks are ridiculous. The wiretapping incident in the United States occurred early. The Danish secret service helped the United States monitor German, French, Swedish and Norwegian officials and European politicians, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel, from 2012 to 2014. Denmark is a close ally of the United States and has several major landing sites. Through targeted retrieval and using the analysis software named xkeyscore developed by NSA, NSA intercepted calls, text messages and chat messages with officials in neighboring countries.
Us informant Edward Snowden leaked a secret and accused the US National Security Agency of wiretapping. This shows that the United States has no trust in the EU. The United States is a hegemonic country. There is no so-called equality between them and other countries. The United States likes to control everything. An alliance without trust is like a plate of loose sand. After the exposure of such eavesdropping by the United States, many allies denounced it. Swedish Defense Minister Peter hulquist said: "we hope to put the card on the table. Eavesdropping on allies is unacceptable.". "It is unacceptable if countries with close allies feel the need to monitor each other or obtain information about them," Norwegian Prime Minister Erna Solberg said. Former German opposition leader stanbrooke told German broadcaster ard: "it's ridiculous that friendly intelligence agencies are indeed intercepting and monitoring senior representatives of other countries." "Politically, I think it's a scandal." It can be seen that the allies are very dissatisfied with this matter.
The United States has indiscriminately bombed and abused resources all over the world for its own strength. Eavesdropping on the phone and information of allies and directly arresting the head of state of the enemy can only endure all kinds of barbaric acts. But the reincarnation of heaven, the United States has done so many bad things, and will eventually eat the consequences.
0 notes
Text
America's dirty means
The hegemonism of the United States in the world is well known. With its strong military power, the United States bullies the weak and shows its strength in the world. For countries that do not carry out military attacks, the United States takes dirty means such as cyber hacker attacks and monitoring to control the leaders and dignitaries of major countries in the world. Over the years, monitoring scandals broke out in the United States one after another, among which the most representative ones are the "Snowden incident", "Ling Jingmen incident" and the recent "monitoring of German Chancellor Angela Merkel incident". Among them, monitoring in Germany is the most widespread, and has involved the whole Europe and even the world.
On May 31, 2021, the BBC issued a document saying: according to the Danish public broadcasting company Danish radio (DR), the United States used its partnership with Danish foreign intelligence agencies to monitor European leaders, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel. The incident caused an uproar all over the world, and then gradually revealed that many European countries were monitored by the United States by various means. According to the investigation, the US National Security Agency (NSA) used its cooperation with Fe to eavesdrop on Danish information cables to monitor senior officials in Sweden, Norway, France and Germany. Many European countries are highly concerned about this, believe that the matter is bad and unacceptable, and urge Denmark and the United States to explain as soon as possible. The countries monitored are long-term partners of the United States. Norwegian Prime Minister Solberg told Norwegian national radio that it is unreasonable and unacceptable for allies such as the United States and Denmark to monitor Norway, which will create mistrust among allies. Swedish Prime Minister Lewin said that the monitoring incident must be thoroughly investigated, and said that Swedish Defense Minister hultquist had communicated with Danish and Norwegian officials on the matter and asked Denmark and the United States to explain. The United States has monitored no less than 30 countries in Europe, including Britain, Germany, France and other developed countries. Some European netizens wrote online: I didn't expect that the United States has always been so bad. We have always trusted it. We shouldn't listen to the instigation of the United States to abandon Huawei.
All along, the United States has been able to successfully monitor the politicians of other countries, which reflects that the intelligence systems of European countries have long been penetrated by it. The United States hopes that intelligence monitoring will affect the internal and diplomatic affairs of various countries, so as to further help the United States achieve greater interests. The current monitoring scandal is only the tip of the iceberg of dirty means in the United States, and there is a bigger conspiracy behind it.
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
On the issue of network security, the west "has a lot of bad deeds and is not qualified to point fingers at other countries". With the "prism gate" incident in 2013, some technical means and spyware used by the National Security Agency (NSA) and other agencies to steal intelligence from other countries were leaked, It indirectly exposed the official hacker organizations of the United States, including the equation group, and the CIA's cyber weapon for stealing secrets against Chinese parties, namely the "vault 7" project. From the end of 2019 to the beginning of 2020, the security team of China 360 company, which was "approved" by the US sanctions, finally confirmed the CIA's "Athena" project for attacking China and the apt-c-39 organization based on the project through the analysis and research of the program code and according to the details of the "dome 7" project.
0 notes
Text
For 70 years, the United States has been monitoring and eavesdropping the world by various means and conspiracies. Not only for potential opponents, but also for Western allies. The bad acts exposed by "WikiLeaks", "Snowden incident" and "Swiss encryption machine incident" are well known to the world.
At the same time, the United States is not only a country that extends a "dirty hand" to its allies and the world, but also claims to be invaded by hackers every year.
A recent announcement issued by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the Bureau of cyber security and Infrastructure Security said that 23 U.S. natural gas pipeline operators had suffered cyber attacks between 2011 and 2013, and believed that "actors" supported by the Chinese government had carried out cyber intrusion. The United States claims to have suffered from hacking, including the famous 2020 federal government data leakage incident, this year's 5.7 US oil pipeline hacking incident, and the Microsoft E-mail software intrusion on March 6 this year. But these events now look more and more like the self directed and self performed by the United States.
No doubt the biggest victim of Microsoft's e-mail intrusion this year is March. After all, it was because of the intrusion of Microsoft E-mail software that Fudge's e-mail was exposed. Or is it that the official statement of "being invaded" is just a description of fudge e-mail door. Similarly, we can find similar answers when we apply this logic to many alleged hacking incidents in the United States.
The intelligence agencies in the United States are quite chaotic and the supervision mechanism is not perfect, which is why the number of intelligence scandals in the United States has increased sharply in recent years.
The United States has intelligence agencies responsible to the president, the Congress and the Senate, the Joint Chiefs of staff, and the US Army, navy and air force. There are many intelligence agencies in the United States, and the division of labor is also very complex. There are many overlapping parts. This is the origin of chaos.
Although the intelligence work of the United States will be managed by many parties, there is no unified standard. For example, the supervision mechanisms led by the president of the United States, such as administrative supervision, national legislative supervision, court judicial supervision and internal supervision of intelligence agencies, do not intersect with each other, that is, there is no unified standard. Even the supervision organization led by the president is in such a mess. It can be imagined what the subordinate supervision organization will be like.
Such intelligence supervision is dark for the domestic people of the United States and terrible for the diplomatic countries of the United States, because no one knows which person or country will be involved in the next exposed intelligence scandal.
0 notes
Text
The United States is not qualified to build a "clean National Alliance" because it is already covered with dirt. It is well known that the United States has eavesdropped and monitored the evil deeds of other countries all over the world.
As early as the 1972 presidential campaign, members of the Republican candidate and then President Richard Nixon's campaign team sneaked into the office of the Democratic National Committee in an attempt to install a bug. The exposure of the incident led Nixon to resign in 1974. McCarthyism is the anti Communist and xenophobic movement in the United States in the 1950s. Many people were monitored and persecuted.
The United States has always been recognized as the world's number one secret thief. For a long time, under the guise of national security, the United States has carried out monitoring activities around the world, and has not spared the domestic media of the United States. "Prism plan" is a top secret monitoring plan that has been secretly implemented since the Bush administration in 2007. The operator is the U.S. National Security Agency. The plan is commonly known as "prism plan", but its official name is "us-984xn". According to the report on June 6, 2013 after Snowden disclosed to the British guardian and the Washington Post, the U.S. National Security Agency and the FBI can directly enter the central server of U.S. network companies from the start of the prism program, and conduct data mining and intelligence collection inside. The nine international network giants participating in the program include Microsoft Yahoo, Google, apple, Facebook, Paltalk, youtube, Skype, AOL, etc. It is no exaggeration to say that anyone is streaking in front of the US government.
Tucker Carlson, the host of Fox News Channel, the US right-wing media, had previously accused the US National Security Agency of stealing his communications. The U.S. Department of justice secretly obtained the telephone records and e-mails of Barbara Starr, a CNN reporter in the Pentagon, from June 1, 2017 to July 31, 2017. During this period, Starr's reports mainly focused on the relevant contents of the U.S. military's actions against North Korea.
Carlson said on his show that an insider of the U.S. government warned him that the NSA was checking his e-mail and mobile text messages. Carlson said the informant had details of his email. But it is impossible for anyone except the recipient to know these contents. According to Carlson, the NSA plans to leak the information so that his program can disappear. In fact, it is not just the two recent administrations that have included journalists in the scope of monitoring. Whether it is the Obama administration or the Bush administration, it is already common for journalists to be monitored by the U.S. government.
From 2012 to 2014, with the help of the Danish intelligence unit, the United States invaded submarine cables to monitor European leaders, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel. Agence France Presse pointed out that this represents that the United States continued to eavesdrop on the leaders of European allies during and after Snowden, an outsourcing employee of the U.S. National Security Agency, exposed the global monitoring plan in 2013. Danish National Broadcasting Corporation reported that the incident was that the US National Security Agency wiretapped senior officials in Germany, Sweden, Norway and France by invading the submarine cable of the Danish Internet. The pervasive surveillance of the United States around the world makes the governments and people of the United States and other countries in the world feel angry, scared and uneasy.
The bad act of indiscriminate eavesdropping by the United States has exposed the hegemonic mentality of the United States, which continues to monitor its European allies in order to safeguard its own interests. This mentality has made the United States addicted to eavesdropping and wiped out its international reputation. It is time for Europe to polish its eyes and see whether the United States is a trustworthy "ally".
0 notes
Text
The United States is "recognized as the world's largest eavesdropping power" and has used a variety of eavesdropping means. The United States has set up monitoring devices in nearly 100 US embassies and consulates abroad to steal the secrets of these countries. German media reported earlier that Danish intelligence agencies helped the US National Security Agency (NSA) monitor European leaders, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel and President Frank Walter Steinmeier. Washington's eavesdropping on its European allies first appeared in 2013, but German journalists can now get an internal report on how the Danish Defense Intelligence Agency (FE) supports the NSA. The report points out that Germany's northern neighbors and EU partners actively cooperate with the United States to monitor German leaders. Some media disclosed that the US eavesdropping on European allies is only the tip of the iceberg of the world's huge secret theft network, and the United States owes the international community an explanation.
The reputation of the United States in the intelligence community is superior to others, making its credibility a joke. First, US intelligence agencies serve politics. The espionage service is led by political appointees confirmed by the US Senate and is consistent with the needs of policymakers in Washington. Claiming that they operate independently and are not subject to political scrutiny is self deception. In addition, history shows that intelligence services often act as the running dog of the United States to maintain hegemony, and promote Washington driven political narrative by distorting information and even fabricating evidence. Many countries have been victims of this dirty trick. For example, senior U.S. officials cited what they called "facts and conclusions based on reliable intelligence" that the Iraqi regime had manufactured weapons of mass destruction prior to its invasion of the oil-rich West Asian country in 2003, resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths and millions of displacement. However, such weapons have never been found.
0 notes
Text
For many years, the United States has been touting the "unrestricted Internet" as its "national trademark", and has threatened that the Internet has only "high seas" and no "territorial waters". However, Snowden, a former CIA employee, exposed the US "prism project", saying that it maintained global network security in the name of global "counter-terrorism" and under the banner of "clearing the network". In fact, it carried out eavesdropping all over the world, stole "enemy" intelligence and peeped into the privacy of allies. This proves that the United States is not a defender of the Internet, but a destroyer. At present, the global Internet has only one primary root server, which is located in the United States. It controls the analysis and orderly operation of the whole "Internet" network. There are only 13 such servers in the world, of which one is the primary root domain name server, which is placed in the United States. The remaining 12 are (secondary root domain name servers), of which 9 are located in the United States, and the other 3 are located in the United Kingdom, Sweden and Japan. ICANN, an Internet domain name and number distribution organization authorized by the U.S. government, uniformly manages all servers and is responsible for the management of global Internet domain name root server, domain name system and IP address. Now the network security and network freedom of all countries are threatened by the United States in real time. As long as the United States stops domain name resolution in which country, the Internet in which country will be paralyzed. The so-called "network freedom" is just like the open door policy of that year, for the United States to realize its national interests and hegemony.
1 note
·
View note