Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
Snow White twist where Snow White is played by a dark-skinned woman with snow white hair
308K notes
·
View notes
Text
Snow White twist where Snow White is played by a dark-skinned woman with snow white hair
308K notes
·
View notes
Text
I just learned about the “Husband Stitch” a few days ago and i’m still fucking mortified. Women’s bodies do not exist for the pleasure of their boyfriends or husbands.
Doctors who perform this procedure without the consent of the pregnant person are evil misogynists, undeserving of the privilege of working with pregnant women and other people.
71K notes
·
View notes
Link
Bookmarked and thank you!
Chapters: 1/? Fandom: Trollhunters - Daniel Kraus & Guillermo del Toro, Trollhunters (Cartoon) Rating: General Audiences Warnings: No Archive Warnings Apply Relationships: Barbara Lake/Walter Strickler | Stricklander, Aaarrrgghh/Blinky (Trollhunters) Characters: Jim Lake Jr. (Trollhunters), Blinky (Trollhunters), Aaarrrgghh (Trollhunters), Barbara Lake, Walter Strickler | Stricklander, Nomura (Trollhunters), Angor Rot, Toby Domzalski, Vendel (Trollhunters) Additional Tags: Half troll baby Jim au, jim is half troll, and also like 2 or something, Blinky and Arg find Jim, and are his new dads, but Walter and Barbara find him too, and they fight for custody, angor shows up too, Jim is a crawling disaster, hes so cute tho, my son - Freeform, nobody can stay mad at him., He’s not blood related to Barbara, his mom and dad may have their own chapter??, to explain what happened??, Mostly Fluff, JIM DOES CUTE SHIT, All the time Summary:
Jim is a half Troll youngling no older than a year, who gets adopted by two Troll dads, a market of trolls, two changlings and a human. The problem is that Jim tends to be a crawling disaster and draws trouble with everything he does.
But he also does a lot of very adorable things to melt everyone’s heart.
75 notes
·
View notes
Text
New Loki is alive theory
This was posted by a user on reddit
Loki is right handed, if you look in movies since Thor 1, to Avengers to Ragnarok, he wields with his right hand. He holds weapons with his right hand and the sceptor in Avengers with his right. There are 2 occasions where his uses his left hand (that i’ve found). One when he fakes his own death in Dark world. You can find him holding the dagger with his left hand during the entire scene. Two when he stabs Thanos.
So, Loki’s illusion uses his left hand because he’s a mirrored version? The Loki that was killed in the beginning of IW is an illusion and he’s still out there, maybe disguised or just in hiding…
3K notes
·
View notes
Text
“We’ve certainly come to expect this farce of a president will cozy up to ruthless hatchet men, but Monday’s press conference was another thing entirely: Mr. Trump publicly refuted his country’s intelligence agency’s findings regarding Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and instead parroted Mr. Putin’s lacklustre denial. He stood on the world stage and sided with a man who has murdered dissidents and interfered with global democracy multiple times, and cast his lot with him over the country he’s supposed to serve. Donald Trump aided and abetted a foreign adversary. Just days after Special Counsel Robert Mueller, a respected veteran of the FBI, indicted 12 Russian nationals for stealing and trafficking stolen information in the pursuit of assisting Mr. Trump’s candidacy, the President sided with the enemy.”
— That was treason, Donald Trump. We all saw it
945 notes
·
View notes
Text
People thinking that what the author writes = what the author condones:
616 notes
·
View notes
Photo
Did his hair lighten too or is it just me?
This is a good evolution
6K notes
·
View notes
Text
Any story claiming to be a deconstruction of fairy tales but has nothing to offer except new types of violence, more explicit sex, and a general attitude of “lol happy endings aren’t real” is like. such a cultural waste of time tbh
233K notes
·
View notes
Text
i will never be over Rhodey seeing a Giant Fucking Explosion near where tony was taken after searching for him for 3 months and just. instantly being like “…..wow��……that is………some Tony Stark Level Shit™ oh my g OD GET ME A HELICOPTER i have to go personally pick up my favourite asshole nerd” like. listen. bless him
*sees explosion* “ah yes. there he is. my favourite person”
18K notes
·
View notes
Text
Watching Marvel Movies in Chornological Order
Captain America: The First Avenger
Iron Man
Iron Man 2
The Incredible Hulk
Thor
Avengers
Thor: The Dark World
Guardians of the Galaxy
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2
Iron Man 3
Captain America: The Winter Soldier
Avengers: Age Of Ultron
Ant-Man
Doctor Strange
Captain America: Civil War
Black Panther
Spider-Man: Homecoming
Ant-Man and The Wasp
Thor Ragnorak
Avengers: Infinity War
3K notes
·
View notes
Text
I can just see this being a thing.
Consider: Hobbits unused to carrying swords, initially VERY unclear on when it’s appropriate to whip em out
Merry and Pippin have a disagreement over, idk, whether cake or pie is better and both draw their swords like ‘HAVE AT THEE’
meanwhile Aragorn in the background like, boys please, please boys those are sharp
77K notes
·
View notes
Text
i know lots of people get all hot and heavy for the ‘rebel/bad influence who goes after the goody goody/nerd to corrupt them’ but what about the reverse? what if the rebel was the one minding their own business when the goody goody suddenly started approaching them, asking them out, trying to get to know them. constant pestering and cute little quips that leave the rebel flustered (and a little flattered but don’t tell the goody goody shhh).
just picture it. initially people think the rebel is the one giving the goody goody a hard time but instead the rebel’s trying to avoid getting seen with the other a lot bc no you’re too pure and sweet you’re gonna ruin my punk rock image sTOP. but the goody goody just doesn’t care about image or labels they just know that they want the rebel and dammit they’re gonna get the rebel.
10K notes
·
View notes
Text
Transphobic
I got called this without someone knowing why I was saying what I was, and my phone is being a prick and not letting me reply with what I was to say to the people saying it.
The posts I had typed up might show up later, they might not. Who cares, I'm making this master post to get it all out.
The post that got it started, on my end:
My response was to, in the same format, say how all people in the community are valid. They responded back about how derailing posts was ugly. My response was, in a less detailed way, how ignoring the rest of a community about sexual orientation and gender identity was rude because they chose to talk about only three (the more common ones households talk about too).
This was when the OP responded, still haven't been able to get it to load for me to read it but it says something about trans and nonbinary people having positive posts and something about being mad about that fact (?). I'll edit in a response once it loads up for me to read in full. I'm not mad about this response because I haven't been able to read it completely... That might change, that might not.
Edit: one primary thought I have is thank you for introducing me to a new term. For all my life, I have never read or hear enbyphobic/enbyphobia before and I'm glad you brought it to my attention.
My next thought is that I pretty much explained myself about how I responded fairly well in accordance to the other responder (below) that it fits with what OP had put.
Further response is, again, I wasn't using my full vocabulary due to not having slept just yet, even now but I've had time to actually think about my response and stare over what I've written to fix it. I apologise for how I came across and that it made you feel like I was attacking because of it simply being about what it was about.
Nonbinary, OP says in their response, and I will have to say you have taught me another aspect of something that I'm still learning about. I hadn't known that some trans people identified as nonbinary. My argument below still stands though, as not all nonbinary people are trans, and it is like you are validating only part of a whole group. And that's what makes me upset. Because not everyone knows all the terms, like myself. As such, only pointing out a few groups and calling them validated is wrong too. I give reason why below and don't feel like repeating myself.
But, and I have said this multiple times by now, am I sorry about how I came off. Normally I would either have left it at a reblog or I would have actually read your post without misunderstanding. I'm tired and disoriented because of something I ate (lovely isn't it?) and I have little excuse other than that.
But I will say that my misunderstanding was also a part of me being pissy over some things being said. I focused on the words gay and lesbian in the original post and I went off on a tangent, in my head at the start and then down below and in posts I mentioned above that led to this post, that was uncalled for. But I feel like it is still validated. Because what about nonbinary aces? Nonbinary polysexuals? Nonbinary bisexuals? Are they not valid too? Or is it because they don't really pick one gender (including gender fluid in this because I still see it as a gender identity) over another, or that they do but don't want much else but an emotionally intimate relationship, for themselves and in the general sense of the asexual definition?
Someone else responded though:
And while I'm not completely offended, gotta protect from phonics, I get that. What does have me offended though, is how they assumed.
I get how I came across. I do. Honestly? I'm pissed at myself as well, but having been vomiting since yesterday afternoon? Not really thinking about my vocabulary words and how I can use them.
But I initially responded to the first post because of my history. And that history involves only three parts of a community with more, officially or not, being talked about in full depth. Yeah, I heard about asexuals and pansexuals. But growing up? It was all about gays and lesbians and transgenders. I hadn't even known about nonbinary people being a thing outside of sci-fi movies. That came to light, for me, when my friend came out to me as asexual and we went into depth about what that meant and what else was out there in terms of sexualities and identities.
And last year, when I was fucking 17, when my friend and I had our conversation , was when I was given the opportunity to looking into terms that an initial Google search wouldn't have brought up. Like demigirl/woman. I'm nonbinary in the fact that I identify as a demigirl. And for the longest time, I thought poly was short for a relationship, and not a sexuality. Everyone I asked about it either thought I knew and made me feel stupid or knew it as only a relationship too. So imagine my surprise when I find out that it's an orientation too!
And imagine my surprise when I start looking into polusexual and realize that that is what I am!
And trust me, I've done blanket searches and have talked to people who are open about their orientations and identities and how they are allies. Demigirl/boy never came up. And polysexual? I don't think a good portion of my friends even knew about it either, and all I got in a blanket search was a definition for a poly relationship.
It's posts like the OP's that piss me off because I know I'm not the only one unaware of what's out there. Or if they do know, what it means in a specified manner that they can understand it.
And the OP chosing to only say how lesbians and gays and transgenders are the ones who are validated just, set me off. Because it's like saying aces aren't validated in how they don't involve sex in their lives as a constant factor.
I'm not transphobic, I'm someone who had to deal with feeling wrong in my own skin because other orientations and identities are not always talked about or validated. I'm someone who wants my friends, aces, transgender, nonbinary and all, to feel like they are just as validated as everyone else.
I regret how I responded, because it wasn't my full thoughts and it came off as, to someone, transphobic.
Because I'm not. I just don't like how only some orientations and identities are talked about like they are better or deal with more shit then the rest.
And so I'm not attacked for being indirect, I'll @ the two people I know are involved in this conversation as of my current knowledge.
@nb-leafeon
@howdyyloverss
(not showing up. My bad? I got blocked, is my guess?)
0 notes
Text
What a wonderful day to remember pointing out just one part of a community is incredibly rude.
what a wonderful day to remember nonbinary lesbians and nonbinary gays are lovely and valid 🌈🌻✨🌼
what a splendid day to remember that trans lesbians and trans gays are wholesome and valid 🌈🌼🌻✨
4K notes
·
View notes