AA Netconsult delivers IT Consulting, Managed Services and Network support for Toronto, Vaughan and Mississauga. Contact us today 1-437-990-7570.
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
What is Managed Services
Whether you have a small business or a medium-sized company, having a managed service provider can help your company and make your IT efficient. Managed service provides your company with expert professionals who deliver focused application operations to company's processes. Managed service provider, enable strategic IT programs to the company, by allowing organization to focus on their business core competencies.
Managed Services enables a company to lessen the burden of IT operations and gain expertise of a service provider, known as Managed Service Provider (MSPs). They manage, monitor and resolve problems and make sure that your IT systems are optimized.

Managed service providers enhance and boost an existing IT department. They can be useful to a company in many different ways. They use the latest technologies, equipment and ensure that organization’s are updated. It reduces the need of buying new hardware or software, particularly in enterprise-grade infrastructure. Some managed service providers work against a flat monthly fees, some are hired on project basis. There are no upgraded charges or unexpected bills, in fact they provide you with the solutions that are cost-efficient. Expenses may vary if you add or subtract any service.
Small and medium-sized companies do not have enough investment for IT infrastructure and to hire highly skilled professionals. Therefore, managed service providers are the best choice for their organization. MSP is flexible, cost-efficient and affordable for the business. It enhances company’s IT capabilities. This elevates organization productivity and performance. It is the easiest way to have expert skills for your IT infrastructure. They provide small and medium-sized companies with elite IT experience and optimized their operations.
Source: Managed IT Support Services
The Millionaire Guide to Business Consultant
0 notes
Text
Cyber security tips and tricks book
Well ! We are going to devote this part to network security ... OK ... But what is security for? Do you know ?
A network security consists of several nodes. Moreover, this is even the basic definition of a network: an interconnection of nodes. But, these nodes are interconnected in order to exchange information, which are called resources.

What is a resource?
In a network, a resource is any form of data or applications that can be used to accomplish a specific task. For example, in the case of a printer, the resources it needs to perform its function (print) are mostly paper and ink.
In a company, the main purpose of the network is the exchange of those resources on which the business activities of the enterprise depend. Since these resources are crucial to its proper functioning, it is important, if not mandatory, to ensure their safety.
Why protects resources?
As far as the printer is concerned, we all know that its job is to print digital data on physical media. What would happen then if someone stole all the paper from the printer? She may have ink, paperless she can not fulfill her function. We can talk about the level of dependence or degree of dependence of the printer.
It's logical that you will tell us, but we are laying a very important foundation in networks. You must grasp this notion of dependency. Although you may protect an important resource, if another resource linked to it is exposed, it is a flaw that an intruder can exploit. Security is about ensuring the fullness of a network's resources, as well as their availability.
Source: Network Security Assessment
Smart Sexy People do Networking
0 notes
Text
Data center professional services
Without data center, no internet. Their major role explains the secrecy surrounding these places, closed to the public. Within them, a minimum staff, entire rows of cabinets on hundreds or thousands of square meters. In these mysterious places, data packets are transmitted 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

4,081 SITES in 118 countries
For several years, they have been growing like mushrooms all over the world. According to the Data Center Map site, there would be 4,081 in 118 countries. Web giants, Google, Amazon, Facebook or Apple, but also telecom operators, Internet providers and other IT groups need it to meet the growing demands of individuals and businesses alike.
Their location is strategic, according to several criteria, if possible closer to the customers in the city centers. Electricity prices, "two times cheaper than in Germany," according to Frédérick Coeuille, director of European operations at Zayo, which has 140 data centers in the world, make France an attractive country for data centers.
The saturated Paris region
With regard to the production of electricity, the Paris region is saturated. Others prefer Ireland for tax reasons, or Finland for its climate.
Source: Data Center Consulting
The Secret of Data Center Consulting
0 notes
Text
New technical consultant companies
There are plentiful opportunities for companies that understand the unique characteristics of each next-billion-user market to innovate across the technology spectrum—from semiconductors and radio networks to mobile apps and cloud services. One of the fastest-growing start-ups in Indonesia, for instance, is Go-Jek, an on-demand motorbike ride-hailing app that uses digital tools to help people and packages get from place to place amid Jakarta’s notorious traffic. The company has since created a range of services, such as Go-Food, for food delivery, as well as its own payment platform, Go-Pay. Go-Jek, founded in 2010, was reportedly valued at more than $9 billion during its latest funding round in January 2019.
Companies that succeed in next-billion-user markets often blend high-tech solutions with traditional ways of doing business. Flipkart, an e-commerce retailer in India, recognized that many Indians have neither a bank account nor a credit card, so in 2010 it introduced a service that allows consumers to order online and pay cash on delivery. (Amazon followed with its own cash-on-delivery program in India in 2013.) Walmart bought a 77% stake in Flipkart in May 2018, valuing the Indian company at $21 billion.

With active backing from national governments, next-billion-user countries are rapidly rolling out advanced payment systems. India’s Unified Payments Interface (UPI), launched in 2016, allows customers using mobile phones to move money directly between bank accounts in real time. UPI transactions grew to 312 million in August 2018, an 18-fold increase from August 2017, and the volume of UPI transactions surpassed that of all transactions in the same period by credit cards, which have been used in India for more than three decades. Developments such as these will help emerging markets leapfrog from cash-dominated to cashless economies, expand individual access to the financial system and boost consumer spending power—all while creating tremendous opportunities for multinational companies.
Consider, for example, the mobile payments app Tez (now Google Pay), launched in India in September 2017, with a user interface designed to make payment transactions feel more like familiar conversations. As of December 2018, Google Pay in India had more than 40 million monthly active users and had handled more than 1.25 billion transactions, with an annual run rate of more than $60 billion in transactions processed. Other payments companies have also flourished in emerging markets. Paytm, an India-based e-commerce payments system and digital wallet company, accounted for more than 80% of all offline merchant transactions conducted on UPI as of October 2018. PhonePe, an Indian payments app owned by Flipkart, had a 40% share of all UPI transactions as a July 2018.
Major tech companies from around the world are making significant forays into next-billion-user markets. Alibaba, for example, has invested $4 billion in Lazada, an online marketplace that operates across Southeast Asia. The Chinese Internet giant has also invested in Paytm, the Indian online payment service, and so has Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway. Amazon has announced plans to offer services in India in multiple Indian languages and is reportedly investing up to $7 billion in its operations in the country, which include a logistics company, a payment service and dozens of warehouses. Google invested in KaiOS Technologies, which is developing an operating system that brings the Internet to users of smart feature phones.
A lot of companies are also spreading their efforts beyond products and investments in order to bring the next billion online. Back in 2014, Google formed the Indian Language Internet Alliance to promote the growth online of local content in Indic languages. Hindi Voice Search was one of the first steps it undertook to help Indian language users create content relevant to them. In 2016, Google launched the first Wi-Fi-enabled railway station in Mumbai Central, and later rolled out the initiative as a global public Wi-Fi program called Google Station, connecting more than 8 million people to the Internet every month. In 2017, Alibaba made its first big commitment to Africa, with founder Jack Ma pledging $10 million to start an African Young Entrepreneurs Fund to begin learning about the market and assessing key local players. Since then, Alibaba has signed a partnership with French conglomerate Bolloré Group, which runs a large logistics business in French-speaking African countries, to focus on logistics, cloud-computing services, clean energy and new digital technologies. Companies that build products for next-billion-user countries often find success in other markets as well. In 2016, YouTube launched YouTube Go in India, an app designed to work with slow and unreliable Internet connections. The app is now available in over 140 countries and has been downloaded by more than 50 million people, many from outside next-billion-user markets.
Four lessons for the next wave of growth
One billion new Internet users will mean one billion more people who will help shape new technologies that will allow them to research, purchase and pay for products in novel ways. As a group, these consumers have much in common, but each market has unique attributes. Companies eager to serve the needs of these new users should keep in mind a few key principles:
Search for unmet needs and market inefficiencies, including antiquated and convoluted delivery systems. Pay attention to market-specific nuances, including language requirements and payment practices.
Take into account population density, labor costs and consumer willingness to try new things. Consider partnerships with local players, and invest in creating the infrastructure needed to be successful—including logistics, electrical power, payment systems and more efficient ways to meet regulatory requirements.
Double down on lean product development and create customer feedback loops to enable fast iterations of products and services and real-time adjustments. Hire the best local talent and empower them to make decisions.
In a digital-first environment, there are few barriers to entry and no shortage of ambitious entrepreneurs with good ideas and business acumen. In addition, lax protection of intellectual property can make the competitive landscape even more intense. To prosper in the 11 next-billion-user markets, multinationals will need to make sustained and focused commitments.
Companies can learn from their experiences in one next-billion-user market and apply those lessons not just in other emerging markets, but in more developed markets as well. In that way, the next billion users of the Internet will spur a wave of innovation that spreads throughout the world. Companies looking for the next wave of growth will do well to focus on these emerging markets.
Source: IT Consulting Services
You don’t have to be Corporation to start small Business
0 notes
Text
Smart Companies Disaster Clouds
Many companies fail to realize the savings they expected when they migrate workloads to the public cloud. It doesn’t have to be that way.
Poorly planned direct-match migration to the public cloud can cost 10% to 15% more than keeping workloads on-premise, leaving many companies disappointed and frustrated.
Eighty-four percent of workloads on-premise are over-provisioned, meaning that when companies migrate a workload to the cloud, they’re sending excess capacity along with it.
Companies that “rightsize” their workloads to eliminate over-provisioning can cut costs by as much as 30% to 60%.
Rightsizing creates opportunities for vendors as well—to help their customers scale, automate and operate using public, private and hybrid cloud models.
Why are companies often disappointed when they migrate their workloads to the public cloud? Many times, the promised efficiencies and savings just don’t materialize. In fact, when companies don’t do the necessary preparatory work, so-called direct-match migration to the public cloud—the like-for-like transfer of existing data, services and applications—can be 10% to 15% more expensive that keeping the work in a legacy, on-premise environment. In other words, for all the vaunted promise of the cloud, it actually can be cheaper to keep things unchanged.
When we asked more than 350 IT decision makers what aspects of their cloud deployment had been the most disappointing, their top complaint was that the cost of ownership had not declined.
What’s gone wrong? we have found that 84% of on-premise workloads are over-provisioned. That means that when companies migrate a workload to the cloud, they're sending excess computing and storage capacity right along with it. Instead of becoming more efficient, they're merely transferring their existing inefficiencies to a new location. This practice is known among IT experts as “lift and shift.”

But there’s another way to do it. Companies that have mastered the art of migration to the public cloud take a disciplined approach to “rightsizing” their workloads. They view migration as an opportunity to thoroughly assess computing and storage practices throughout the company. They often find a great deal of fragmentation and duplication, with workloads scattered across machines and data centers. Records can be incomplete and outdated. Some companies discover “zombie servers,” computers that are no longer needed, but have never been purged or deactivated.
Our experience shows that companies that rightsize their workloads can cut costs by as much as 30% to 60% when they migrate them to the public cloud. Companies that achieve the highest savings have existing Microsoft SQL relational database-management-system licenses that can be migrated to the cloud. However, even companies without transferable licenses can generate considerable savings by rightsizing their workloads. That means eliminating zombie servers, winding down unnecessary activities and accurately provisioning all the migrated work. Many companies find that they can more tightly provision their workloads if they establish a reserve of excess capacity that can be drawn on when needed for surges in activity—or
Companies that rightsize the right way carefully assess usage patterns. They study the intensity and duration of average peak computing demand, so they can make informed decisions about downsizing server capacity and accommodating some of that excess demand with burstable instances. They take a similar look at storage patterns, evaluating average and peak memory usage and proximity to the server so they can more effectively downsize. They also aim to rationalize the number of core processors they need, so they can optimize spending on software licensing fees that are tied to processor counts.
Smart companies also recognize that migration doesn’t treat all workloads equally. Companies are likely to save more when they migrate non-production workloads to the public cloud than when they migrate production workloads. That’s because the computing usage in non-production workloads tends to be more volatile and thus more likely to benefit from the flexibility the public cloud provides. Also, for testing and development activities, migration can help companies reduce software licensing fees that are tied to core processor counts. In addition, companies usually can achieve greater savings migrating nonvirtualized workloads rather than virtualized workloads. That’s because virtualization offers many of the same benefits the public cloud provides in terms of efficiency and flexibility.
The economics of cloud migration have notable implications for technology vendors. Customers are increasingly able to implement a cloud-transition road-map that identifies and eliminates unused capacity in their on-premise environment. This can create a headwind for technology vendors, since rightsizing reduces demand for their systems and software. On the other hand, this presents an opportunity for vendors, which are well-positioned to help their customers face the enormous challenge of managing in a hybrid environment, with a mix of cloud and on-premise technologies.
There are signs that vendors recognize the potential of the cloud-migration opportunity, as demonstrated by IBM’s recently announced plan to acquire Red Hat, a leading provider of cloud software. Companies are still in the early stages of cloud migration, and the complexity that they must manage is only increasing.
One company that recently benefited from a rightsized migration to the public cloud is Morning-star, the financial research firm. The company faced a decision regarding contracts with multiple worldwide data centers that were set to expire. Should it renew data-center arrangements or should it migrate some or all workloads to the public cloud? Morning-star worked with TSO Logic to evaluate the potential costs and benefits of migration, bearing in mind that Morning-star had a substantial on-premise infrastructure. By rightsizing its workloads, Morning-star found that the majority of its instances would cost 30% less if operated in the cloud.
Rightsizing can make a dramatic difference. TSO Logic's experience shows that direct-match migration of 105,000 server instances and 20 terabytes of storage on-premise would increase costs by 22%, while rightsizing those workloads would reduce costs by 36%.
Results
These results demonstrate that migration to the public cloud doesn't have to be disappointing. The public cloud offers great benefits to companies trying to keep pace with digital innovation. It’s easy to use and can be scaled on demand; it’s reliable and features continuous up-time; and companies don’t have to spend a penny on maintenance. When companies rightsize their workloads, they can reap all these benefits of the public cloud and actually save money in the process.
Source: IT Consulting Services
How to Earn Big Money in IT Business Consultant
0 notes