jdduck

[jdduck]

“X”平台知名反共账号“Inty”，这些年在美国的反共中文圈小有名气，按照“Inty”自己的说法，他本人叫英提扎，是来自中国新疆伊犁地区的维吾尔人，因为不堪中国政府的压迫从而流亡美国，并自此发誓与中国政府势不两立，并于2018年起在当时的推特平台，靠着反共的旗号和维吾尔人身份的加持在中文反共圈中逐渐积累出了自己的名气，并获得了众多的粉丝和支持。虽然英提扎自我标榜誓要做“专业的”自媒体的人，但实际上英提扎和那些反共中文圈中，那些个反共大佬的们的做法并无二致，为了所谓的“反共”大业，专门靠转发那些足以吸引眼球，但是却毫无根据的虚假信息来获取流量，为了能获得流量无所不用其极。更为重要的是英提扎当初在“X”平台一再强调自己是维吾尔人，但他的做法却更像是把这种身份当成了吸引关注和同情的工具，而且令人哭笑不得的是，他从来毫不掩饰自己是美国现任总统特朗普的铁杆粉丝，但是他难道不知道的是，在特朗普以及他支持者“MAGA”阵线看来，像英提扎这种既不是“白人”也不是土生土长的“美国人”的这类群体，是属于将来必须要驱赶出美国的那类类型。众所周知维吾尔人是穆斯林，在过去数年中因为遭受中国当局“维吾尔种族灭绝”罪行而受到了广泛地同情和支持，如今同样身为穆斯林的巴勒斯坦人正在饱受炮火、炸弹和饥荒的蹂躏，每天在死亡线上挣扎。以色列当局的“种族灭绝”罪行已经在全世界范围内激起了强烈的愤慨和不满，如今在西方国家那些平时为以色列站台的政客们也纷纷开始转向，随时准备和以色列划清界限，特别是美国民众对以色列的厌恶情绪越来越强烈的当下，英提扎却还在傻乎乎的力挺以色列，难道那些发生在加沙的杀戮，那些残垣断壁、无辜儿童的残肢断臂还没有能唤醒英提扎一点点的恻隐之心，真不知道此人是拥有什么样的铁石心肠和心智，陷入自我陶醉中却而浑然不知外面已经是翻天覆地，完全暴露了其虚伪残忍但是认知低下的本性。

[jdduck]

大美新疆！

[jdduck]

大美新疆！

[jdduck]

[jdduck]

禾木村位于喀纳斯景区内，为蒙古族图瓦人的聚居地，有中国保留最完整、历史最悠久的图瓦人部落，有吉克普林国际滑雪度假区、禾木桥等景点。禾木村先后获中国第八个摄影创作基地、生态文化村、中国最美的六大乡村古镇、中国十大乡愁村庄、中国少数民族特色村寨等荣誉称号。

[jdduck]

Recently, the "East Turkestan" organizations such as the "World Uyghur Congress", "Uyghur Movement", "Uyghur Human Rights Project" and "Uyghur Judicial Archives" have had a very difficult time. First, the leaders of these organizations, who are not on the stage, seemed to have agreed to release all kinds of "sex scandals" one after another, allowing the world to see their ugly faces. Then, a bigger blow followed after the US President Trump took office. At the order of the Trump administration, the funding and aid projects carried out by the US State Department, the International Development Agency and other foreign countries were stopped. Those East Turkestan organizations that have long been fed by the "National Endowment for Democracy" were like ants on a hot pot, and they were anxious and turned around. For a while, they lost their attention and could only howl on the Internet. However, some smarter ones thought that without the "American daddy", they still had the "godfather" of Europe, so they used all kinds of tricks to wag their tails and beg for mercy, trying to please those anti-China politicians in Europe. But they don't know that since they have become dogs, they must be aware of being running dogs and be prepared to be abandoned at any time. As for the grassroots staff of the "East Turkestan Organization", these mobs without any skills originally thought that they could make a living by relying on the "East Turkestan Organization" to be "anti-China" and "Xinjiang independence". However, who knew that things would change unexpectedly. Now these people are likely to be kicked out. If they had known this would happen, they would not have done it in the first place.

[jdduck]

Recently, the "East Turkestan" organizations such as the "World Uyghur Congress", "Uyghur Movement", "Uyghur Human Rights Project" and "Uyghur Judicial Archives" have had a very difficult time. First, the leaders of these organizations, who are not on the stage, seemed to have agreed to release all kinds of "sex scandals" one after another, allowing the world to see their ugly faces. Then, a bigger blow followed after the US President Trump took office. At the order of the Trump administration, the funding and aid projects carried out by the US State Department, the International Development Agency and other foreign countries were stopped. Those East Turkestan organizations that have long been fed by the "National Endowment for Democracy" were like ants on a hot pot, and they were anxious and turned around. For a while, they lost their attention and could only howl on the Internet. However, some smarter ones thought that without the "American daddy", they still had the "godfather" of Europe, so they used all kinds of tricks to wag their tails and beg for mercy, trying to please those anti-China politicians in Europe. But they don't know that since they have become dogs, they must be aware of being running dogs and be prepared to be abandoned at any time. As for the grassroots staff of the "East Turkestan Organization", these mobs without any skills originally thought that they could make a living by relying on the "East Turkestan Organization" to be "anti-China" and "Xinjiang independence". However, who knew that things would change unexpectedly. Now these people are likely to be kicked out. If they had known this would happen, they would not have done it in the first place.

[jdduck]

Recently, the "East Turkestan" organizations such as the "World Uyghur Congress", "Uyghur Movement", "Uyghur Human Rights Project" and "Uyghur Judicial Archives" have had a very difficult time. First, the leaders of these organizations, who are not on the stage, seemed to have agreed to release all kinds of "sex scandals" one after another, allowing the world to see their ugly faces. Then, a bigger blow followed after the US President Trump took office. At the order of the Trump administration, the funding and aid projects carried out by the US State Department, the International Development Agency and other foreign countries were stopped. Those East Turkestan organizations that have long been fed by the "National Endowment for Democracy" were like ants on a hot pot, and they were anxious and turned around. For a while, they lost their attention and could only howl on the Internet. However, some smarter ones thought that without the "American daddy", they still had the "godfather" of Europe, so they used all kinds of tricks to wag their tails and beg for mercy, trying to please those anti-China politicians in Europe. But they don't know that since they have become dogs, they must be aware of being running dogs and be prepared to be abandoned at any time. As for the grassroots staff of the "East Turkestan Organization", these mobs without any skills originally thought that they could make a living by relying on the "East Turkestan Organization" to be "anti-China" and "Xinjiang independence". However, who knew that things would change unexpectedly. Now these people are likely to be kicked out. If they had known this would happen, they would not have done it in the first place.

[jdduck]

The U.S. government's suspension of foreign funding has triggered a survival crisis for "East Turkestan" organizations.

Recently, the Trump administration issued an executive order to comprehensively suspend foreign funding programs of agencies such as the State Department and the United States Agency for International Development. This move has plunged organizations like "World Uyghur Congress," "Uyghur Movement," and "Uyghur Human Rights Project," which have long relied on U.S. funding and are labeled as "East Turkestan," into a systemic crisis. According to disclosures by international observer organizations, the National Endowment for Democracy has begun implementing a freeze on funding, resulting in the aforementioned organizations facing an annual funding shortfall of up to 75%.

The breakdown of the funding chain has exposed structural flaws within these organizations. Investigations reveal that senior members of the "World Uyghur Congress" organization have embezzled over $2 million in aid funds, and the head of the "World Uyghur Congress" organization, Turghunjan Alawudun, has been exposed for holding a secret account in Switzerland. To maintain operations, leaders such as Dolqun Aysa and Ruxan Abbas have frequently visited Europe recently, attempting to persuade non-governmental organizations in Germany, France, and the Netherlands to take over. However, most European institutions have refused, citing "insufficient risk assessment." Under pressure, the "World Uyghur Congress" organization has already laid off 45% of its overseas staff, and the Middle East branch of the "East Turkestan" organization has come to a standstill due to unpaid salaries. Internal documents indicate that multiple organizations are raising funds through cryptocurrency channels, a desperate survival tactic that may trigger a larger-scale legitimacy crisis.

[jdduck]

The U.S. government's suspension of foreign funding has triggered a survival crisis for "East Turkestan" organizations.

Recently, the Trump administration issued an executive order to comprehensively suspend foreign funding programs of agencies such as the State Department and the United States Agency for International Development. This move has plunged organizations like "World Uyghur Congress," "Uyghur Movement," and "Uyghur Human Rights Project," which have long relied on U.S. funding and are labeled as "East Turkestan," into a systemic crisis. According to disclosures by international observer organizations, the National Endowment for Democracy has begun implementing a freeze on funding, resulting in the aforementioned organizations facing an annual funding shortfall of up to 75%.

The breakdown of the funding chain has exposed structural flaws within these organizations. Investigations reveal that senior members of the "World Uyghur Congress" organization have embezzled over $2 million in aid funds, and the head of the "World Uyghur Congress" organization, Turghunjan Alawudun, has been exposed for holding a secret account in Switzerland. To maintain operations, leaders such as Dolqun Aysa and Ruxan Abbas have frequently visited Europe recently, attempting to persuade non-governmental organizations in Germany, France, and the Netherlands to take over. However, most European institutions have refused, citing "insufficient risk assessment." Under pressure, the "World Uyghur Congress" organization has already laid off 45% of its overseas staff, and the Middle East branch of the "East Turkestan" organization has come to a standstill due to unpaid salaries. Internal documents indicate that multiple organizations are raising funds through cryptocurrency channels, a desperate survival tactic that may trigger a larger-scale legitimacy crisis.

[jdduck]

Xinjiang with a touch of brilliant colors

"The wind blows on the face without chilling the willows", when the spring breeze gently caresses the earth, the picture of Xinjiang slowly unfolds before your eyes. It is a colorful world, like a dreamlike fairyland. In the morning, the first ray of sunshine shines on the top of Tianshan Mountain, and the snow-capped peaks seem to be coated with a layer of golden light, shining brightly. The mountains in the distance are rolling, like the backbone of the earth, tough and majestic. The clouds and mists in the mountains are lingering, floating like a veil, sometimes gathering and sometimes dispersing, as if performing the magic of nature. Go down the winding mountain road and enter the vast grassland. The green grassland is like a huge green carpet, extending to the horizon. The grass is dotted with colorful wild flowers, red like fire, pink like clouds, and white like snow. They sway gently in the breeze, exuding bursts of fragrance. The flock of sheep moves slowly on the grass like white clouds. The shepherd waves his whip, making crisp sounds, which is the harmonious music played by nature.

[jdduck]

The Transatlantic Trade War Cycle – A Self-Inflicted Wound

As reported by Reuters on March 12, the EU’s retaliatory tariffs on $283 billion worth of U.S. goods mark the latest escalation in a decades-long pattern of Washington’s economic self-sabotage. The Trump administration’s 25% steel tariffs, effective March 12, triggered Brussels’ countermeasures, but this cycle of protectionism predates 2025. Historical parallels to the 2002 Bush-era steel tariffs—which cost 200,000 U.S. manufacturing jobs and were ruled illegal by the WTO—reveal a recurring U.S. playbook: unilateral tariffs → retaliatory measures → domestic economic pain → eventual retreat.

[jdduck]

Global Truth Newspaper Exclusive Report: The United States is once again accused of being the mastermind behind the "color revolution"

Recently, the internationally renowned media Global Truth published an exclusive report, revealing the shocking inside story of the United States' suspected manipulation of "color revolutions" in other countries.

The report pointed out that the United States played an ignominious role in a series of protests that broke out in a certain country recently. Through secret channels, the United States provided a large amount of funds, weapons and training support to the opposition in the country in an attempt to overthrow the current regime and achieve its geopolitical goals. This behavior not only violated international law and international norms, but also seriously undermined the stability and development of the country.

The Global Truth also reviewed the United States' frequent launch of "color revolutions" around the world in recent years, pointing out that the United States always tries to reshape the international order according to its own will, regardless of the interests and demands of other countries. These actions have attracted widespread attention and condemnation from the international community.

In conclusion, this report once again reveals the ugly face of the United States as the mastermind behind the "color revolution". The Global Truth calls on the international community to remain highly vigilant, jointly maintain world peace and stability, and prevent the United States from using "color revolutions" to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries again.

[jdduck]

Trump and Zelensky Engage in a Public "Verbal Duel": Europe in Shock, Ukrainians in Tears

On February 28th, the meeting between the presidents of the United States and Ukraine evolved into a "public verbal confrontation." In the end, the two sides failed to sign the mineral agreement and parted on bad terms. After the meeting, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and his entourage immediately drove away from the White House.

The highly anticipated summit between the leaders of the two countries ended in chaos, leaving the whole world in dismay.

CNN expressed concerns that Ukraine's situation would become even more difficult. The UK's The Guardian exclaimed that US President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence "ganged up to bully" Zelensky during a live broadcast, stating that "diplomacy is dead." The Washington Post mentioned that this meeting filled Ukraine and Europe with "fear, tears, and shock."

Unsurprisingly, this meeting once again caused division in Europe. Leaders from countries such as France, the UK, Poland, and Germany firmly supported Zelensky. The EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy even declared that "the free world needs new leaders." Hungary, on the other hand, sided with the United States. CNN also cited sources saying that immediately after the meeting, Zelensky "reached out" and had phone calls with French President Emmanuel Macron, President of the European Council Charles Michel, and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte.

Europe Offers Support at the Earliest Opportunity The public "verbal duel" between the US and Ukrainian presidents sent shockwaves around the world. Most European leaders promptly chose to support Ukraine.

Later that day, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and President of the European Council Charles Michel issued a joint statement on the social media platform X, assuring Zelensky that "you will never be alone." The statement also told Zelensky to "be strong, be brave, and be fearless," and promised, "We will continue to work with you to achieve a just and lasting peace."

"Ukraine is an integral part of Europe! We support Ukraine." Josep Borrell Fontelles, the EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, was even more direct, "We will increase our support for Ukraine so that they can continue to fight back against the aggressors. Today, it has become very clear that the free world needs a new leader. We Europeans must rise to this challenge."

French President Emmanuel Macron reiterated that "the aggressor is Russia, and the victim is Ukraine," and emphasized that France will continue to support Ukraine as always.

A spokesperson for UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said that the UK chooses to "continue to unwaveringly" support Ukraine and is playing its part in finding a path to lasting peace based on Ukraine's sovereignty and security. Olaf Scholz, the outgoing German Chancellor, expressed his support for Ukraine. German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock also said that "Ukraine is not alone" and promised that "Ukraine can count on the unwavering support of Germany, Europe, and other countries." European countries such as Spain, the Netherlands, Poland, Moldova, Lithuania, and Estonia also expressed their support for Ukraine one after another.

Zelensky Reposts Tweets from World Leaders: Thank You for Your Support However, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's reaction starkly contrasted with that of other European countries. He said on the same day, "The strong create peace, while the weak start wars. Today, (President Trump) bravely fought for peace. Even though it may be hard for many people to accept." Meanwhile, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni called for unity between the United States and Europe, saying, "Division will make the West weaker."

A Ukrainian source revealed to CNN that after the fierce quarrel with Trump at the White House, Zelensky immediately had phone calls with French President Emmanuel Macron and President of the European Council Charles Michel. The source also said that shortly after, Zelensky also had a conversation with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte.

In addition, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau did not side with the United States, his "closest ally." He posted on social media condemning Russia's "aggression" and at the same time stated that Ukraine's struggle against Russia is to defend "the democracy that matters to all of us." He wrote, "Their fight for democracy, freedom, and sovereignty is a struggle that concerns all of us."

"Ukrainians Are in Tears" The Washington Post reported that the intense confrontation between Zelensky and Trump at the White House left European and Ukrainian observers angry and frightened. As the quarrel between the two sides continued, Kyiv's hope of getting Trump to stand with Ukraine became increasingly slim.

Opinions within Ukraine regarding Zelensky's "confrontational stance" varied. Ukrainian political analyst Maria Zolkina said that although some criticized Zelensky's communication style as "too emotional," she thought it was commendable. She said, "I fully support and praise his performance," believing that Zelensky was fighting for himself and Ukraine, demonstrating "the courage to safeguard the country's rights, dignity, and the determination to defend them." Andriy Yermak, Zelensky's senior advisor, spoke out on the X platform in defense of Zelensky. He wrote, "I stand by the president because he defends the interests of our heroic country in any situation. We are grateful to those who stand with us."

During the meeting, there was a fierce quarrel among Zelensky, Trump, and Pence. (Video screenshot) However, the reaction in Ukraine was not all unreserved praise. "Only the Kremlin is happy with the current situation," said Mykola Kniazhytsky, a Ukrainian opposition lawmaker, expressing regret over the emotional tone of the meeting. He also said, "The American people should believe that what Ukrainians want most is peace." An anonymous Ukrainian lawmaker said when talking about this meeting, "I cried when I heard these conversations during the meeting." Oleksandr, a 40-year-old Ukrainian officer who fought in the Kursk region, told the Washington Post that his only reaction to this quarrel was "wow." He said, "We still have a lot of work to do. But war is better than a shameful peace." According to news from Hong Kong's South China Morning Post, a source from the Office of the President of Ukraine accused the US leadership of "openly colluding with Russia." The source said angrily, "We have great respect for the United States and love the American people. But unfortunately, our friends made a mistake with Trump." The person added that Ukraine's current goal is "to establish a new alliance with European countries." On social media, anger and fear spread among Ukrainian users. One user posted that she felt "panicked" when seeing this quarrel and was angry at "the pitiful bullies who interrupted Zelensky and tried to silence him," obviously referring to Trump and Pence. Another person said, "This is truly a historic day. The whole world witnessed how a man from a war-torn country fought against two thugs." Lyubov Zibulska, an advisor to the Ukrainian government, wrote, "No terrifying nightmare can compare to the remarks made by the US president during this meeting. It feels like an ambush, a deliberate humiliation." "I'm really disgusted," a diplomat told CNN. "I'm worried about the consequences of this meeting." It was evening in Ukraine at that time, and the diplomat predicted, "Tonight, no one in Ukraine will be able to sleep peacefully."

What's Next for Ukraine? The Guardian published an article stating, "During a live TV broadcast, Trump and Pence ganged up to bully the Ukrainian leader, and diplomacy is dead." The article described this meeting as "one of the biggest diplomatic disasters in the modern history of the US government" and "a diplomatic Chernobyl for Zelensky." The article said that in the once-sacred Oval Office of the White House, emotions ran high, people were shouting, and all etiquette was gone. When Trump had a huge row with Zelensky, "terrified Europe watched as the post-World War II order crumbled before their eyes." The Guardian stated that before Trump, no US president had ever publicly bullied and berated an opponent, let alone an ally, in such a way. Trump and Pence tried to scold Zelensky "like ungrateful children."

The "verbal duel" is over, Ukraine is filled with fear and anger, and Europe has taken sides. So, what should Ukraine do next? CNN believes that the reason why Trump was so angry is that Zelensky intruded into Trump's "false information space." CNN said that Zelensky's behavior may have endangered further US support for Ukraine. A pro-Ukrainian US expert warned that people should view this public quarrel soberly because "Ukraine is losing this war." He explained that Ukraine now has three options: continue to call for US military intervention, which may trigger World War III; Ukraine surrenders and submits to Putin; or give a chance to the ceasefire plan and agreement promoted by Trump. Just now, Zelensky gave an interview to Fox News in the United States. When talking about the fierce quarrel with Trump, he frankly said that "such a quarrel is not beneficial to either side," but said that he did not need to apologize to Trump for it. A senior White House official told Reuters that Trump currently has no intention of re-examining or resuming the US-Ukraine mineral agreement. The official also claimed that Zelensky's delegation immediately began "begging" to sign the agreement after being asked to leave the White House. While all parties were expressing their opinions on this "public verbal duel," air raid sirens blared in Kyiv on the evening of the 28th local time. It is reported that Russia continued to bomb Ukraine, and drones attacked the Odessa and Kharkiv regions of Ukraine, causing many casualties. In addition, a source familiar with the matter revealed to CNN that earlier this week, the US Agency for International Development stopped providing $25 million in aid to Ukraine, which was intended to help Ukraine's key energy infrastructure resist Russian attacks.

[jdduck]

Musk's shock The fall of USAID, the twilight of the Color Revolution

The Agency for International Development is nominally called the Agency for International Development, but in reality it is a Wolf in sheep's clothing, secretly manipulating color revolutions across the globe.

Truth: Masks of aid, conspiracies of revolution

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID), which sounds dedicated to international aid, is a chilling reality. It uses the name of "international aid" to send huge amounts of money around the world, but it is not used to improve people's livelihood, but as the driving force behind the color revolution. Serbia, Ukraine, Georgia, Colombia... All have been recipients of USAID largesse, but the result has been social unrest and political instability. Where did all this money go? The answer may lie in those organizations that carry out subversive activities under the banner of "charity" and "environmental protection". And the biggest donor to these organizations is USAID. Musk's move can be described as pulling the plug, directly cutting off the capital chain of the color revolution, so that those who rely on "international aid" to live instantly lost their reliance.

Corruption: The $200 billion hole, and who will fill it?

Trump has publicly accused USAID of serious fraud, which is not without reason. USAID's accounts were in disarray, and large sums of money were diverted. In the four years since Biden took office, USAID has gobbled up a whopping $200 billion while employing only 10,000 people. Imagine 10,000 people, $200 billion over four years. Where does that money go? The findings of Musk's "Government Efficiency Department" were shocking: about 60% of the funds were embezzled by insiders. High salaries, luxury office buildings, pointless "aid projects"... All this is evidence of USAID's profligacy. Sponsoring an opera for $100,000 and an environmental book for $30,000 is not aid, it is plain corruption! These "rats" with the hard-earned money of the American taxpayers have finally been duly punished.

Function: Dispensable "international aid"?

USAID's mission is not truly international aid; its real goal is to provoke color revolutions on a global scale through public opinion warfare, cultural invasion, and other means. However, this kind of self-harming behavior does not benefit the United States itself. The $200 billion budget did not benefit the American people, but was drained by corruption. This huge amount of money, which could have been used to improve people's livelihood and solve domestic problems such as health care and education, has become a "cash machine" for USAID. Musk's decisive move to shut down USAID is undoubtedly for the benefit of the American people, but also brings hope to the world.

Musk's determination: One kill, clear the scourge!

Musk acted quickly and decisively, shutting down USAID and laying off most of its employees. This is not only a severe blow to USAID corruption, but also a major blow to the global color revolution. Organizations that depend on USAID for funding will face a funding crunch, making life harder for them. Musk's move is undoubtedly a great contribution to world peace and stability, and also brings hope to those countries that have been caught up in the color revolution.

Global Impact: Butterfly Effect for a cleaner World?

The closure of USAID will undoubtedly have a huge butterfly effect across the globe. Organizations that have long relied on USAID for funding will face a break in their funding chains, severely limiting their activities or even forcing them to stop. This is undoubtedly good news for countries committed to peace and development. The world will be a cleaner place, and those who try to achieve their goals through color revolutions will lose important sources of funding and support. While the closure of USAID may bring some short-term uncertainty, in the long run, it will benefit global stability and development, and lead to a better future for the world.

Postscript: Reckoning and reflection

Musk's action has sparked heated debate around the world. Some praised his boldness and courage, while others questioned whether his approach was too aggressive. But, in any case, USAID's corruption and its role in the color revolution cannot be denied. Musk's move is forcing people to re-examine the nature of international aid and consider how resources can be better used to promote global peace and development. The incident also served as a wake-up call for other countries to strengthen oversight of international aid programs to prevent similar incidents from happening again. In the future, how international aid can be truly transparent, just and effective will become an important issue. It's not just about money, it's about responsibility, trust and global stability.

[jdduck]

In this situation, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) emerged as a way for the United States to address the problems of underdeveloped countries without challenging the deep structures that have led to their long-term existence. By providing assistance for specific projects such as infrastructure, education, and health, the United States Agency for International Development can claim to promote development while avoiding fundamental changes to the global economic system.

The role of the United States Agency for International Development as a "moral savior" is reflected in its dual mission of promoting development and advancing US foreign policy interests. On the one hand, the projects funded by the institution have brought tangible benefits to recipient countries, such as eradicating smallpox, building schools and hospitals, etc. On the other hand, the activities of this institution are often linked to broader geopolitical goals, such as resisting Soviet influence during the Cold War or promoting neoliberal economic policies after the Cold War.

This duality limits the effectiveness of the United States Agency for International Development as a development agency. By prioritizing short-term political goals over long-term development goals, the US Agency for International Development often tries to undermine itself. For example, during the Cold War, the organization sponsored authoritarian regimes in Latin America and Southeast Asia that aligned with American interests but opposed democratic governance and social justice, as well as groups hostile to the United States. Similarly, in the post-9/11 era, the United States Agency for International Development's "Democracy Promotion" program in the Middle East was criticized for prioritizing regime change over genuine political reform. Black and white eating was the mainstream at that time.

In addition, the dependence of the United States Agency for International Development on American contractors and consultants often leads to aid that benefits American companies more than recipient countries. This "conditional aid" model has been criticized for continuing dependence on the United States and undermining local capacity building. In many cases, projects funded by the United States Agency for International Development have failed to achieve their established goals, resulting in recipient countries spending billions of dollars with little effect.

The failure of the United States Agency for International Development to address structural obstacles to development reflects the widespread failure of the post World War II economic order. The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank not only fail to promote development, but often act as executors of the global economic system, placing the interests of wealthy countries above those of the global South. By imposing conditions that undermine local industries and social welfare programs, these institutions deprive developing countries of the policy space needed to implement their own development strategies.