Text
We talk a lot about men invading feminist spaces for their personal gain but not enough about how so many communist women do the exact same thing — leeching off the labour and resources of single, independent and well-off women all under the banner of sisterhood and female solidarity. Honestly, I don’t blame those women who have distanced themselves from feminist activism anymore because y'all have turned feminism into an emotional power grid for miserable and unhealed people like yourselves cause you are still trapped in the belief that women owe kindness, selflessness and emotional labour to everyone by default. Luckily for me, I’m deeply spiritual, and my sixth sense has always been sharp. I can see straight through your manipulative guilt-tripping and professional victimhood so all of that never worked on me. Y'all are just as parasitical as these moids. The only women who are my sisters and I have solidarity with are the ones I’ve intentionally kept close in my inner circle; women who I know are separatists, misandrists and reciprocate the same supportive energy i extend to them. The rest of you clearly don’t want liberation as you’re too busy worshipping moids and then putting the entire responsibility on other women when things go wrong. So no, I don’t give a damn about you anymore. I was on the verge of walking away from feminism too. But after blocking and cutting off a bunch of toxic, miserable wrecks, i remembered I’m a woman too and feminism is for me as well. Nothing is more important to me than my own peace and happiness which i have gained from separating myself from all men and male-centered women (even the ones in my family). And i have zero interest in sacrificing any of it for anybody. Cope and cry!
80 notes
·
View notes
Text
People believe they’re good for being better than the lowest common denominator. Just because the societal identifiers assigned to you lessen your rank on the hierarchal grading scale, doesn’t mean your behavior is automatically moral. “But men do worse.” “But billionaires steal from the working class.” “But people of color can’t be as mediocre.” Others being able to get away with more than you isn’t a free pass to lower your own standards and behavior. Imagine consistently bringing up the existence of criminals and low lives to alleviate your conscience. This is why people walk around confused by the negative circumstances they’ve attracted into their lives. They’re not on the sex offender registry, so they must be good people. It’s very obvious that corruption is about opportunity. Most people’s character only appears correct because they haven’t been given the chance to express their true selves. The law, both judicial and social, are what keep people in check. Not an inner sense of right and wrong, since morality can change on a dime, depending on who has committed the act. It isn’t any surprise that the population continues to act in such a low vibrational manner, since they’re always ready to remind you that someone else is doing worse. Humanity is locked into a consecutive race to the bottom.
49 notes
·
View notes
Note
Is being wealthy inherently a bad thing? Should we strive for a financially humble life?
Economic status isn’t an inherent sign of morality, people are born into a particular income bracket. Creating wealth through exploitation is another story. Like all things, it’s about what resides in an individuals heart. Money can be a doorway to freedom for those seeking it, but that will never require billions. Those who wish to be sovereign should do their best to become financially sound, and having extra would be beneficial. You can live humbly while still having security, as money is currently necessary in our society. Flashing wealth and acquiring capital for ego and greed should be avoided completely.
14 notes
·
View notes
Text




You can’t call the world sick when you’re contributing to it’s symptoms. Another example of people playing into perversion, only to complain about it at a later date. The same women willing to turn a pedophile on for a few extra bucks, cry about feeling unsafe. How do you think children, especially girls, feel when both men and women sexualize them nonstop in collaboration? Some of these women will go onto birth daughters. How will they react when the same degenerates they took chump change from turn their attention onto their new targets? Society is doomed, but men aren’t solely responsible. Women’s willingness to submit to them, even when it means indulging immoral behavior, accelerates humanity’s devolution.
If you’re willing to endanger children for a tip, what the Hell would you do for something really worthwhile? We criticize the mega wealthy, but they have much more on the line. The same individuals accusing those with more than them of being immoral, are just too destitute to act on their shameless impulses. Why would those with millions do “good” when everyone else is selling their souls for much, much less? Some will sexualize kids in order to “get that bag,” while others use them to mine goods. The average person is just as corrupt as those with more advantages or in positions of power. Which is why reality bares such a hideous reflection.
Notice how the supposed standard is always placed upon men so that women can excuse their bad behavior? “Men need to stop being pedophiles or else we’ll keep playing into their fantasies for money!” Actually, you don’t ever have to pacify pedo Pete. You do so because it’s profitable, as your values are hidden behind a paywall. I don’t know what’s worse, the women who appear childlike for social validation, or the ones who do it for a check. All of those dollars “earned” come at a price higher than any rent. These women sell their souls for penis and a paycheck.
It’s yet another unfortunate reminder that what’s happening, no matter how disgusting, is due to women and men’s cohesive actions. The heterosexual dynamic is unsympathetic to anyone outside of its realm of self-gratification. No sacrifice is too great, not even that of innocent children. It’s no wonder everyone is so paranoid, they fear encountering others on their same wavelength. People are pointing fingers, when it’s themselves and their peers putting sexual proclivities at the forefront of their lives. Happiness, safety, virtue, and prosperity aren’t capable of manifesting through a putrid population.
A better world is possible, but unreachable for most of mankind and his mistresses.
78 notes
·
View notes
Text
There are plenty of valid reasons to choose to not have children, but the anti-natalists have clung to this idea that you shouldn’t have children because it’s hard. They spout, “Parents are always complaining about how hard it is to/how tired they are!!” as if that’s some sort of gotcha. But like, why do anything rewarding in life if temporary difficulty and unpleasantness happen? Why create art? Why go to therapy? Why write? Why learn an instrument, or a new language? Why take up a new sport, or start working out? Why pursue an advanced degree, or a difficult career? Why adopt a rescue animal? Why make amends in relationships? If your whole reason to not do something is because there is transient unpleasantness involved, then just do nothing. Sit in your apartment and rot away. Everything in life that is truly rewarding is, in some degree, challenging.
261 notes
·
View notes
Text
You've heard of Plato, you know Aristotle, now get ready for..... Women philosophers of ancient greece!
A
Abrotelia
Aedesia
Aesara
Arete of Cyrene
Arignote
Asclepigenia
Aspasia
Axiothea of Phlius
B
Batis of Lampsacus
C
Cleopatra the Alchemist
D
Damo (philosopher)
Diotima of Mantinea
H
Hipparchia of Maroneia
Hypatia
L
Lastheneia of Mantinea
Leontion
M
Melissa (philosopher)
Myia
N
Nicarete of Megara
P
Perictione
Phintys
Ptolemais of Cyrene
S
Sosipatra
T
Theano (philosopher)
Themista of Lampsacus
Themistoclea
Theodora of Emesa
Timycha
5K notes
·
View notes
Text


Women will practice and uphold patriarchal beauty standards they personally conform to. It’s all fun and games when you’re the preferred fetish. Body types, hair colors and textures, lip size, skin tones, etc are all ways in which women are ranked. Egos are bruised when different models go in and out of style. Not because those women want to forgo such ideals altogether, but because they’re unable to embody the latest trend. Let thee without a makeup brush make the first accusation of brainwashing.
A “feminist” former model turned influencer, has dedicated her retirement to preaching about the beauty industry. Writing paragraphs about how her efforts to get dolled up resulted in no dating offers, because men were interested in younger women. This then propelled her into calling out unrealistic beauty standards. The same standards she enjoyed gleefully in youth. Citing she misses “turning heads” and ignoring the hypocrisy of her first marriage to a much older man. Her ultimate goal being a societal shift into including older women into the category of “sexy.”
Women with faces full of filler and glue adhesive on their eyelids will claim it’s ridiculous to rate women based on body shapes. Women who buy undergarments with the purpose of pushing their breast together have something to say about butts being the new thing. Women who sell out Sephoras in college complain about the pressure of maintaining youth with each passing birthday. The body positivity movement is filled with cognitive dissonance. “This standard is bad! Wait, what do you mean my hair dye and eyeliner are included in that? It’s not that deep and I do it for myself anyway!”
When women are “winning” the patriarchal game of penises and empty promises, they will do anything to maintain their status. Social capital is kept through presenting yourself as sexually available to heterosexual males. That is the foundation on which all beauty standards are built, regardless of what women tell themselves. Competitiveness is the sole purpose behind women’s picking and choosing of which aesthetic preference’s should be maintained. Remember, women are hierarchical too, and heterosexual world dominance is perpetuated through pecking order.
I’ll take claims of unfair beauty standards seriously when I see women rejecting ALL of them in mass. Until then, the same women shaving off their body hair can keep begging the pedo’s they’re appealing to for less judgment on their ass size/shape. Every woman wants to be the exception, the one who accepts patriarchy’s “prizes,” but escapes its eventual expiration date. There’s no having it both ways. Men cannot be both your oppressors and saviors. Perform and play dress up for the penis, then graciously bow and exit the stage when it demands the next act.
68 notes
·
View notes
Text

For this to be true, heterosexuality as a whole would have to be challenged. That includes non heteros who seek to mimic such dynamics. We all know that won’t happen though. An actual feminist would protect children by demanding the porn watching father be removed from the house. Boy children wouldn’t be allowed preferential treatment. Mothers who bought their daughters razors and lipstick could be called out for grooming the next generation. Your desire to have babies with degenerate losers would no longer be enabled. We all know how that would go.
This is another call to extract resources from sovereign women. Who would only be further ostracized and ridiculed by the same women asking for help, if they actually delivered proper treatment. Women insist on cohabiting and procreating with the same half of the population they become paranoid about leaving their children with. Most women will eventually settle with a man and become pregnant. Meaning most men will be chosen by women. Yet, they’d never ask men as a collective to care for kids.
How does that work exactly? Most men have women willing to vouch for them and co-sign their social “safeness” by partnering up, but they’re still not fully trusted. If men are worthy of sleeping with and birthing, there should be no reason to fear their presence so much. These women would never call on men to protect every child they see, as most can barely behave around their own. Women reduce themselves to being incubators for predators, and want those who are free to be even lower than themselves. You’re the predator and groomers babysitter.
Question a mother on anything and watch her reaction. Try and instill actual feminist principles into children, especially daughters, and prepare to be torn a new one. More women will accuse you of malicious intent for letting their daughters know the truth about marriage and procreation, than they would for their beloved husband with “young” in his search history. If protecting children was considered important, majority of the population wouldn’t be here today.
Cat calling typically begins to happen for girls at age 10. 18 and under is when most abuse and assault takes place. Gendered grooming starts when the sonographer accurately reports a baby’s sex, with most women hoping for a son. Boy children are revered, and adult men are worshipped. If women continue to insist on bringing more children here, they shouldn’t require backup, as there’s no higher endorsement of our world than furthering it.
This is a losing game. Women know men are going to continue preying on children, even the ones they help make. Instead of swallowing their cognitive dissonance, they’ll blame unburdened women for their personal failings. In the same way non lesbians employ homophobia the moment their lapdogs won’t defend, or excuse their dealings with men. CPS already exists, and is looked down upon. If child well fare were to be societally acted upon, no more than %2 of the population could parent.
You will do more to protect kids by never birthing them into our Earths low vibrational circumstances, and leading by example through freedom. A million man lovers could pitch into communal nurturing, making the world an even less safe place. While one highly functioning woman with the capacity to reason, discern her environment, and put logic over idealistic thoughts, would make more of a difference. Even if only once. You co create reality with your actions. Helping husband and wife only furthers their misery making. Keep children safe by refusing to succumb to societal guilt tripping by the child endangering masses.
156 notes
·
View notes
Text






They’re shouting it from the rooftops, letting it be known what the truth actually is. This is about sexual fulfillment. Wrapping it up in flowery language such as romance, doesn’t distract from their phallus worship. Women and men are perfect equals, and militant enforcers of heterosexuality. Ready to use homophobia and biological urges to fight against the extreme minority of women who call out their cognitive dissonance. Bonus points because the woman who composed the original message, has other post about men being liars, perverts, and manipulating women into being with them.
I’m once again asking, which one is it? If you’re capable of choosing good men for yourselves, why is feminism necessary? You’re all supposedly finding the exceptions, so why does life continue on this way? The truth is real regardless, women know the only bond created between them and men is through sex. Which is why they’ll insist on lying down with them, but demand you come to their aid when it goes bad. You don’t want other women’s interference when signing up for your fate, then you can take care of yourselves. How is asking the same people you sleep with and birth for safety and rights going?
Lesbians especially need to leave the feminist movement alone. You’ve historically done all of the work, heavy lifting for heteros, only to be insulted at every turn. Accountability doesn’t exist for the majority. They’ll blame lesbians, “brainwashing,” and the laughable concept of mainstream straight hate to deflect. Just as men only value women for one thing, osa’s also see singular use for their fellow gender. You’re their buffer to facing relationship reality. A free therapist, punching bag, and yes woman. When not performing as told in their delusional play, they attack.
These women want to be with men, there is no reason to “save” them. How many of them would show up for lesbians and male attracted women who choose to abstain? They’d be right alongside their males hurling insults and claiming there’s something wrong with you for suppressing the urge to mate with spiritual apes. Or if their XY doesn’t avert his gaze enough, view you as a potential threat. It’s all about sex at the end of the day. That’s what they’re marching for. Concede from the competition that is the politics of opposite sex living. Women and men can settle their issues individually from here on out.
132 notes
·
View notes
Text
If I were to poll the world’s women, particularly feminist, they’d almost all answer that the men they know personally are exceptions. Especially their husbands and sons. So what exactly is the problem? Why is feminism necessary and how is misogyny being perpetuated when you’re all empowered girl bosses with one of the good ones with a son raised to respect women? Do you know a single woman who would admit to being related to, married to, or a mother to a misogynist, let alone pedophile or rapist? I don’t. Somehow they still exist in the billions though. Who is oppressing you?
149 notes
·
View notes
Text
Stop feigning ignorance about men’s sexual preferences. Yes, men objectify corpses and will still wolf whistle you in a potato sack, but there’s still obvious beauty practices that peek their interest. You know whether or not something is self care by its genderless nature, and benefits regardless of age. A 4, 14, or 40 year old brushing their teeth, washing their face, or applying sunscreen are examples. A 4 year old in a face full of makeup is horrifying, because of its implications. So why does it suddenly change at 14 or 40? Is it because sexed expectations regarding our appearances ramp up at the age of puberty? The age in which it becomes widely socially acceptable to serve girls up on a silver platter. If clothes aren’t made with men in mind, why not put your 3rd grader in a bodycon dress? Sensory issues are present at young ages, and in boys as well, but they’re not the ones shaving their underarms and legs. Why is so much of women’s “self expression” and “preferences” aligned with what gets men off?
78 notes
·
View notes
Text

To survive in this world, you must face reality. Life is not a Marvel movie, people with bad intentions aren’t obvious villains. They’re not going to be sporting an eye patch, twirling their mustache, jumping out of bushes, or spewing a monologue of their nefarious intentions. You are first taught this as a child, when warned about strangers approaching you with promises of puppies and candy. People put on acts, especially when seeking to harm and use others. This is unremarkable human behavior, that shouldn’t surprise or frighten anyone who’s reached adulthood.
Everyone is interested in coming across as normal, as it’s the path to social acceptance. There are consequences for those who don’t, ranging from isolation, and imprisonment when taken to an extreme end. You only know what another person wants you to see, and men know you’re resistant to seeing the truth. They intentionally seek out social status, especially through marriage and fatherhood, in order to further tighten the masks of normalcy around their heads. The world is a circus and the clowns wearing the biggest noses and wigs win, but remember, there’s a person behind that painted on smile.
Do you behave exactly as you would while alone, as you do outside? Would you share your search history with a stranger? Someone being momentarily nice to you, or even for a prolonged period of time, is only showing one aspect of their personality. Women focus on finding media made “clues” such as spotting “disheveled cross eyed men hiding in alleyways,” rather than using common sense. Which proves that men are predatory regardless of their clothes, occupation, and social standing.
Women will become upset and distressed upon seeing studies which show men’s attraction towards underage girls, or willingness to commit crimes if assumed there’d be no punishment. BUT that’s the standard that they’ve created, because reality can’t be accounted for. There’s a refusal to accept what maleness really is, so instead, everyone plays pretend in polite society. Fathers, husbands, and sons reveal their true selves behind closed doors.
As long as men never spell out their true intentions completely, and do most of their sexual gratification in private, life goes on as normal. Leading to women being “tricked,” because all it takes is a man publicly presenting as normal to be given good man status. Monsters don’t look like Michael Meyers. Law and Order SVU doesn’t exist outside of the writers room. You are never going to spot danger by believing it comes in particular packaging. Men aren’t smart, their deceptions are reliant on women’s naivety. They’re all degenerates, respond accordingly.
49 notes
·
View notes
Text

For women, personal emotional attachments they develop towards males trump all else. It’s statistically impossible for women to be partnering with, and mothering such upstanding men. The results are in, at least 88% of men are sexually aroused by children. There’s no way all of the tumblrinas are finding exceptions. Especially since the minority of men who aren’t pedophiles, are just as likely to have other perversions. Imagine believing that your man is trustworthy because he does the bare minimum of cleaning up after himself and the house he also occupies.
Most women never surpass their “not like other girls phase.” Which makes it even more embarrassing when they attempt to minimize critiques of women more adept than them by claiming they’re all just “teens.” It’s underage girls who are most preyed upon by males, if anything, they’re more clued into reality. Older women are enforcers of patriarchy, and downplay its effects when girls are harassed. Your husband is attracted to that teenager, why don’t you talk about that, and your willingness to accept such behavior?
I can’t ask it enough, if all of these women are happily married and outstanding boy moms, where are feminist concerns coming from? If coupling up with men isn’t patriarchal, why are OSA’s relationship problems relevant? Why are we being told that mothers should be centered and reminded that married women are burdened by emotional labor? The only issues worth discussing would be those of public safety concerns, such as pedophilia and assault. Inherent or not, men’s behavior is easily observable, and women are complaining about it on a universal scale.
“I don’t care about your approval, my males love me, and I love them.” Thank you for finally admitting what women who see past the veil have been saying nonstop. We know that women who adore men only care about the validation they receive from those bonds. As long as a woman feels good about someone or something, it’s alright. All of the women who stand by their defunct and degenerate husbands and sons agree. Behind every man is at least one woman waiting to back him up.
If your freedom depends on collaboration amongst women, you’ll be in chains for life. They’re never going to give up on men and their fantasies of domestic life. Women will continue to create the same people they cry oppression from. As long as the possibility of finding Prince Charming remains in their minds, they’ll never prioritize the female collective. Women who are burdened by the world and its believers MUST separate. Don’t allow yourself to become cannon fodder for the heterosexual paradigm.
71 notes
·
View notes
Text
The fear mongering women project onto us as a collective is an attempt to keep you in a fear based mindset. It’s low vibrational and serves no real purpose for sovereign women. When a libfem in a “peg the patriarchy” hat tries to tell me that I should be worried because my rights are being taken away, I tell her that I don’t fuck, so my bodily autonomy is safe.
They’ll try to scare you, “radical” spaces were filled with women telling us that even separatist aren’t safe because men will come rape us. Sure, that’s a possibility, but so is getting struck by lightning. There are plenty of statistically proven ways to keep yourself safe as a woman. The biggest being limiting your exposure to men, and the women who love them, so %99 of the population.
I have always been stingy with my presence, even before knowing the true purpose of this reality. Being closed off to most people you encounter is important and will keep you healthy. Even outside of the sex dynamic, people are constantly on the look out for resources, their favorite one being people. If you aren’t an emotional retard and show self preservation by accurately assessing the world around you, others will be desperate to latch on. Don’t let them, our world truly operates in a “crabs in a bucket” mentality and will drag you down.
Depression and anxiety aren’t normal despite what this heavily medicated society will tell you. Look how eager others are to let you know that self improvement won’t help. Libtards especially seethe at the mouth to remind you that you’ll fail because “there’s no cure for depression.” Ask anyone telling you that the last time they watched filth on their computer or touched a penis..starting to get it?
The mind is a terrible thing to waste, and being able to see through the illusion is the ultimate gift. Don’t waste your time collecting titles and status symbols. The makeup will wash off at the end of the day, and your wedding ring represents nothing when your partner is out scouting new prey. The biggest regret of those on their deathbeds is that they didn’t live a life true to themselves. Break free from this reality and you’ll have lived a life more meaningful than most of those who came before you. What a gift it is to know, even more so to act upon it.
80 notes
·
View notes