libraryangymrat

[libraryangymrat]

Opening a restaurant called "the Puffy Pussy" and the mascot is an obese tomcat and the entrees all revolve around duck/turkey/chicken (with turducken being an obvious option) and a dessert dish called "the litterbox" and it's a chocolate cheesecake with puppy chow covered in brown sugar so it looks like a litter box with some poops in it

There's also a food challenge called the ecosystem annihilator special and you have to eat like 5lbs of various meats (of all sorts) and you can only drink milk with it. If you win you get a Tshirt and your name on the wall but you can never come back because bro why are you living like this

[libraryangymrat]

Love love love characters that present themselves as emotionally open social butterflies but the more you see of them the more obvious it is that they’re the most closed off fuckers in the story. Sure, they want to help you with your personal problems and messy emotions, but if you turn that shit back on them, they’ll shut down or deflect every time. Why are you sticking your nose in their business anyway? It’s not like it matters. They’re not a person, they’re just a role being played. They’re the guy who fixes things and saves people. Please ignore the man behind the mask, he’s fine. Everything’s fine.

[libraryangymrat]

Book cover for a prayer book, a gift for a woman, 1400s, Italy.

[libraryangymrat]

Pill Bug 🥰

[libraryangymrat]

Difference between Aristotle and Plato

[libraryangymrat]

Eyes Without a Face: On the paradoxical presuppositional axiomatic claims at the interstice of materialism and the empiricism of qualia.

I do not believe in Atheists anymore. This is not to lend any particular credence or affinity for denominations with which modern man has become quite accustomed to, whether with ire or with fondness; no- I mean in an even more aggressive criticism than Georges Bataille affords to the faux opposition to Idealism afforded by the "Dead Matter" of Materialism, that the modern self-designated Materialist no longer believes in the presupposition of dead matter. The field of Psychology, and to a greater extent even Sociology, has ushered in not the death of God but rather the death of belief in physical or chemical determinism via the language of essentialism and the compartmentalization of this premise into the realm of the Taboo.

What does this mean? With the full sequencing of the human genome and the ability to systematize the engineering of procedurally generated outcomes at scale, the blank slate should have gone from a premise of a black box of unobservable informative principles and causative drives that fashion a person into form with a minor degree of predictability into a fully mapped out terrain of phenotypical and socially engineered layers of compositional partitions that make a person who they are. Of course there is the epistemic crisis innate to self-observation innate to the experiential flaws of qualia insofar as one cannot readily make distinctions between the perception of a thing and the thing in itself.

What does this mean? It means that we have empirically reached the boundaries of all observable human behavior and empirically mapped out what causes what. The human condition is no longer a mystery, all that really remains is documenting what has readily become apparent... Of course, that isn't how things played out, is it? The term "Essentialism" is a pure and moralistic refutation of a material reality, of a theory of dead matter, and a return to the metaphysics of idealism that has been associated with schizophrenics and those "redneck Christians" whom have been thoroughly relegated to the lowest echelons of status and agency within society, a people to be ignored and regarded with a general apathy.

What emerged in the place of Materialism? Experiential reality has now, as a result of certain psychological trends, been pushed into a sort of "super-empiricism" that epistemologically supplants any and all scientific research on the matter of neurology and biology that has been developed throughout history. Yes, we have arrived at a point in civilization in which the Qualia has been abstracted and released from the confines of dead matter, and into the categorical ontology we would normally assign to the Soul. To attempt to constrain the experiential phenomenon of "Gender" to scientific consensus of biology is rebuked in favor of the obvious super-empirical (as the self-referential narrative cannot possibly fail to interpret the difference between the thing in itself and the thing as it is perceived) truth that a person's cognition exists irrespective of their material composition and that the empirically observable material composition is less prudent to understanding what a thing in and of itself is than the metabolics of ego manifesting itself as the consumption of dimorphic products as an attempt of ritualistically engendering the psyche.

This is all to say that consensus has holistically abandoned the attempted hyper rationalism of the Atheistic materialists. We're not even just at a generic Idealism, but somewhere between the Platonic and Gnostic realms of Idealism. The premise of material composition that fails to embody the essence of the thing in itself because the qualia's spiritual relationship with the abstraction of Gender (it is an abstraction as it has zero relationship to the material elements of sex) would register to a true materialist as schizobabble, and yet...