Tumgik
lilyaquarius · 10 hours
Text
No in between. Reblog if you vote pleas
22K notes · View notes
lilyaquarius · 14 hours
Note
People can forgive and understand why Mary burned so many people but will call Anne the devil and all these horrible things because she was mean a couple of times. Gotta love the logic.
I think the idea is more that burning for heresy was the standard for the time, and that being cruel to your stepdaughter like...wasn't.
I actually find it funnier from a fandom/'fanon' perspective particularly when it comes to The Tudors. Natalie Dormer and Sarah Bolger were both actresses whose performances were really compelling, but as their characters are written there's actually more similarities than differences. You know I sometimes wish all Spaniards were drowned in the sea / if God wills it, hopefully she [Anne of Cleves] will drown at sea / careful, Cromwell, or I will see you cropped at the neck / if I could, I would strip him [Cromwell] from the King's side and burn him.
Granted, all of Anne's above scenes are taken from contemporary reports (although, from a decidedly hostile source), whereas Mary's above scenes are purely speculative fiction. Still, it's amusing that so many Marians watching the show adored Mary's characterization (I've spoken before about how despite how compelling SB's acting was to watch at turns, the writers' character work for Mary was actually remarkably inconsistent...I actually think an interpretation wherein Mary's 'affection and gratitude' towards her second stepmother was gradually revealed to have been affected and mainly strategic self-fashioning would have been compelling, especially considering that she passed an Act during her reign which held Jane and Edward as Henry's 'concubine' and 'bastard', just as much as Elizabeth & AB...but they did not take that route) and absolutely loathed, or loved-to-hate, AB. I'm sure it's to some extent an amalgam of their experience watching the show balanced with like biographies they've read and such, but still...funny af.
11 notes · View notes
lilyaquarius · 14 hours
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
CINDERELLA (1950) dir. clyde geronimi, wilfred jackson + hamilton luske
1K notes · View notes
lilyaquarius · 14 hours
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
it's may, it's may, the month of yes, you may HAPPY MAY!
2K notes · View notes
lilyaquarius · 14 hours
Text
I love you "boring" female characters. I love you ingenues. I love you female characters who aren't "modern" enough. I love you female characters who aren't "badass" enough. iI love you female characters who aren't "empowering" enough. I love you quiet female characters. I love you unappreciated female characters. I love you polite female characters. I love you female characters who "can't appeal to modern audiences." I love you frightened female characters. I love you female characters labeled as not complex just for being nice. I love you female characters who get criticism just for not being their tomboy or femme fatale counterpart. I love you silk hiding steel trope.
11K notes · View notes
lilyaquarius · 18 hours
Text
"Maybe it’s because our political discourse swings between deranged and abhorrent on a daily basis and we would like to combat our feelings of powerlessness by insisting on moral simplicity in the stories we tell and receive. Or maybe it’s because many of the transgressions that flew under the radar in previous generations — acts of misogyny, racism and homophobia; abuses of power both macro and micro — are now being called out directly. We’re so intoxicated by openly naming these ills that we have begun operating under the misconception that to acknowledge each other’s complexity, in our communities as well as in our art, is to condone each other’s cruelties."
3K notes · View notes
lilyaquarius · 18 hours
Text
No in between. Reblog if you vote pleas
22K notes · View notes
lilyaquarius · 18 hours
Note
There's something that pisses me off in the latest released chapter of LO and that's when Hades says he "forgives" Kronos and says he's doing it so he can heal himself. It's same rhetoric you hear from people who victim blame, telling you that you need to forgive your abuser for your own sake... but the hell would it be for your own sake when you didn't do anything wrong?? Even if you blame yourself for things your abuser did, that still doesn't mean you have to forgive your abuser!!
Someone (in the UnpopularLoreOlympus subreddit, I believe) made a great comparison that Hades forgiving his abusive father is more so just a way for him to forgive himself. Because let's face it, a lot of what Kronos has been responsible for, Hades has also perpetuated in his own cycle of abuse towards others, like Minthe, Alex, nymphs and satyrs in general... and Thanatos, his own adopted son who he still barely acknowledges despite the narrative wanting us to believe that they've "recovered". So by forgiving Kronos, it's more so just him forgiving himself and saying "yeah it's fine that I'm an abusive sack of shit teehee"
This complete lack of self-awareness is to the point that you could replace the Episode 217 dialogue between Hades and Thanatos with the dialogue between Kronos and Hades from 275 and virtually nothing would change.
And if you don't believe me, well...
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
And considering the current FP literally has Persephone say to Apollo "I've done terrible things but it doesn't matter because you have to be punished", I think it's safe to say that, at least in her writing (because I obviously can't speak on behalf of whatever she may or may not have gone through in life) Rachel has zero awareness of what it really means to be a recovering victim of abuse.
She definitely loves writing characters who are unironically abusive and think they're not, though.
160 notes · View notes
lilyaquarius · 18 hours
Audio
Tumblr media
137K notes · View notes
lilyaquarius · 18 hours
Text
Tumblr media
9K notes · View notes
lilyaquarius · 19 hours
Text
Tumblr media
4K notes · View notes
lilyaquarius · 19 hours
Text
Tumblr media
Umberto Eco, who owned 50,000 books, had this to say about home libraries:
"It is foolish to think that you have to read all the books you buy, as it is foolish to criticize those who buy more books than they will ever be able to read. It would be like saying that you should use all the cutlery or glasses or screwdrivers or drill bits you bought before buying new ones.
"There are things in life that we need to always have plenty of supplies, even if we will only use a small portion.
"If, for example, we consider books as medicine, we understand that it is good to have many at home rather than a few: when you want to feel better, then you go to the 'medicine closet' and choose a book. Not a random one, but the right book for that moment. That's why you should always have a nutrition choice!
"Those who buy only one book, read only that one and then get rid of it. They simply apply the consumer mentality to books, that is, they consider them a consumer product, a good. Those who love books know that a book is anything but a commodity."
4K notes · View notes
lilyaquarius · 19 hours
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
I love baseball
70K notes · View notes
lilyaquarius · 19 hours
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media
121K notes · View notes
lilyaquarius · 19 hours
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
What If…
12K notes · View notes
lilyaquarius · 1 day
Photo
Tumblr media
My first time participating in the Character Design Challenge! I’m sad I didn’t know about the mermaid challenge until it was too late, but it’s okay, I love Sailor Moon!
Princess Serenity and Luna always reminded me of the Chinese Moon Fairy, Chang E, so I kept that in mind as I designed. I tried to evoke her iconic hair style, but also inspired by more traditional Chinese hairstyles. Not too hard at all! I also put the planetary symbols of her main five sailor scouts on the “brocade” since I wanted to tie their relationship in somehow!
3K notes · View notes
lilyaquarius · 1 day
Text
"Maybe it’s because our political discourse swings between deranged and abhorrent on a daily basis and we would like to combat our feelings of powerlessness by insisting on moral simplicity in the stories we tell and receive. Or maybe it’s because many of the transgressions that flew under the radar in previous generations — acts of misogyny, racism and homophobia; abuses of power both macro and micro — are now being called out directly. We’re so intoxicated by openly naming these ills that we have begun operating under the misconception that to acknowledge each other’s complexity, in our communities as well as in our art, is to condone each other’s cruelties."
3K notes · View notes