linkersint

[linkersint]

Are you Looking for a promising real estate investment opportunity in the twin cities?

https://linkersint.com/2020/09/29/are-you-looking-for-a-promising-real-estate-investment-opportunity-in-the-twin-cities/

Are you someone who wants to diversify his/her investment portfolio? & start getting passive income?

Have you ever tried investing in commercial property? Or you are going to make your decision, before you make decision, we suggest you to learn how investing in shopping can be more beneficial than any other real estate.

There are many benefits and rewards attached with investing in a shopping mall. It is not only a safe and secure option but it also provides you with a steady source of income.  With more return on investment in less time. In short, retail is a type of commercial real estate investment that is always a good choice for investors.

Interested to know more about benefits of investing in shopping malls?  i.e. Tower81 read this blog you we have listed most out benefits.

This article will discuss all the benefits of doing commercial investment & how can one get most out of it.

Benefits of Investing in Shopping Mall

Easy-to-lease Commercial Areas

Less Risk

Passive income

New Lifestyle Trends

Diversification of Portfolio

Professional Ties

Property is Maintained

Shared Amenities

1. Easy-to-lease Commercial Areas

Interestingly, it is easier to rent/lease out commercial properties such as shopping malls and offices. The government is very flexible in giving lease to the investors at market price.

Unlike any other real estate investment options, commercial real estate comes with less security deposit limits and termination rules.

2. Less Risky

Every investment comes with a certain level of risk. Risk cannot be ignored. However, with sound strategy and well-informed decisions we can mitigate the risk associated with investing in real estate.

When it comes to a shopping mall, the risk is low because it is spread across many people. When you buy a house, you are solely responsible for the risks attached to it. This is not the case with shopping malls because it is a shared space. This attribute also makes it a safe and secure investment.

3. Passive income

Residential & commercial investments both gives guaranteed return on investment but if you look into details you will find the amount of profit & percentage investor get from commercial property is more & better than residential property in less span of time. Along with return on investment Linkers D&D also provides confirm monthly rental income in their shopping malls i.e. Tower81. This way you can build cash flow from day one which will bring you your passive income.

4. New Lifestyle Trends

By analysing the latest lifestyle and shopping trends, it is safe to say that the trend of shopping malls will not be dying any time soon.

The economic importance of shopping malls is also improving due to changes in the lifestyle of people.

Now, instead of hovering cluelessly in the markets, people look for one-stop shops or all-in-one mall where they can get all the things they want.

Hence, to cater to the increase in demand for shopping malls, Linkers D&D will build more malls to meet this increasing demand. In short, investing in good shopping malls will definitely be fruitful in the future.

5. Diversification of Portfolio

Shopping malls are an excellent option if you want to expand your portfolio. In today’s fast-paced world, diversification is important. Shopping malls are known to deliver safe and consistent results over a span of time.  

They offer good passive income opportunities and ensure that your portfolio remains on track. If you are looking to shift to a new niche, shopping malls are perfect for you. If you are still confused call our investment consultant at +92 348 111 4 333

Also, apart from the diversification in property, you will experience diversification in tenants as well. Your tenants may include; food, banking, health and beauty services, automotive, and technology, and more. In short, it is easy to attract a stream of potential tenants.

6. Professional Ties

If you are an investor who prefers good professional relationships, then shopping mall investment might be an excellent opportunity for you to get connected with like-minded people.

Do you think, Rich are getting richer? Read this, we have argument against it.

Owners of commercial properties are usually MNC’s and business owners. Unlike residential property owners, the owners of commercial properties firmly believe in B2B relationships which are built on professionalism and courtesy. When you are investing in real estate you should seek out someone who knows the ins and outs of real estate to guide you about mistakes to avoid when investing in real estate.

7. Property is Maintained

In the residential sector, tenants usually harm the property. They break things around the house and make no efforts to keep the place maintained.

On the other hand, commercial properties such as shopping malls are well kept and maintained at all times. A huge chunk of sales comes from the outlook of shops, so the tenants leave no stone unturned to keep the place clean and tidy.

8. Shared Amenities

When you invest in residential properties, you have to pay for every single thing because you are the sole owner of the place and it is your responsibility to arrange all the amenities for the tenants.

One of the biggest benefits of investing in a shopping mall is that you do not have to pay for all the amenities. The mall owners usually set up power systems, decor, security, and vice versa.

Summary

Buying shopping centers is one of the best ways to secure your hard-earned money. Shopping center investments come with multiple benefits. Apart from getting a tangible asset, you also get monthly rentals and high ROI. What else do you need in a good investment? Get to know by calling our investment consultant at +92 348 111 4 333

If you have any queries or suggestions, let us know in the comment section below. We will be more than glad to help you.

Happy investing!

     #realestateinvestments #realestateagency #realestatescompany

[linkersint]

The “Rich Getting Richer” Argument

This piece of writing is taken from Bestselling Author Rob Moore book “MONEY”. This book is all about philosophy of money, myths we have in mind about this concept, and how we can achieve financial stability and then financial freedom by understanding the nitty gritty of money!

We normally hear an argument that “RICH GETTING RICHER”. Mr Moore claim that this argument is a myth. Everyone can become rich if he/she follows its fundamental laws.  Those who have more money are doing and behaving in certain way than those who are struggling with it. In below chapter, you will learn why “rich getting richer” argument is invalid.

****

from the book

You hear many people debating, ‘why do the rich get richer and the poor get poorer?’ Many people get frustrated about this and demand a redress of the balance through higher taxation, setting up unions, and greatly increased philanthropy.

There are simple economic laws that explain why the rich tend to get richer. These economic fundamentals bust many of the myths about the rich and poor divide, certainly in the first world. And guess what? The wealthy know and leverage these, and the poor don’t and are leveraged by them.

Common Sense?

Common sense suggests that something tends to move more easily in the direction it is already going than if it changes direction. You could call this momentum, or compounding or simple common sense. Newton’s first law of physics is this:

 ‘An object at rest stays at rest and an object in motion stays in motion, with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force’.

Of course you’re likely looking for a deeper argument than the rich get richer than ‘because they are already rich’, and the poor get poorer because ‘they are already poor’, but let’s not dismiss something for its simplicity. If you have not attained the levels you desire yet, keep going. Keep on, keeping on, you will get there.

Balanced Economics:

In any monetary system all expenditure must equal all receipts. This means that all spending equals all money received.

People don’t burn money (unless they are The KLF, the British band who set fire to a million pounds of their own money) and even if they did, that money would be out of the system and all existing money in the system would balance between expenditure and receipt. Even when more money is printed, that new money in the system, like all the existing money, balances where all expenditure equals all receipts.

Therefore, of that finite (but huge) amount of money in circulation at any one time: it distributes exactly from those who ‘spend’ the most (expenditure) to those who sell or receive the most (receipts).

 If there is an inequality of balance, which there always is because products and services are not of equal value and humans value money differently, then money moves more freely and in higher amounts from those who value and focus on expenditure higher than receipt to those who value and focus on receipt higher than expenditure.

In other words, money moves from those who value it least (or value expenditure more than receipt), to those who value it most by saving, investing, compounding, (or value receipt more than expenditure). Money moves from consumers to producers.

No matter how many times you may try to use power, rule, unions, regulations, or governments to more equally distribute money, it will always reset its ‘balance’. So, if you want to redistribute wealth more towards you, don’t ever get dragged into the victim mentality of a higher power or system, begging or expecting them to redistribute it for you. The capitalist system is unlikely to change in your lifetime, so it is a huge waste and opportunity cost of your time and energy to fight against it. Instead, learn about and focus on the management, mastery, and rules of money, service, contribution, enterprise, momentum, compounding and velocity, and make it more important to you to understand and value money and wealth. And more will come your way. The more you learn, the more you earn.

Theoretical redistribution of wealth:

It has often been suggested that there should be a redistribution of wealth, from those who have the most to those who have the least. Before we delve into this, there already is a redistribution format: it is called taxation. In most developed countries, taxation is geared towards being a higher percentage of income the more one earns.

The main problem I see in theoretical wealth redistribution is that it doesn’t stay with or serve those it is distributed to. I’m certainly not against sharing wealth with those who need it more, in fact it is contribution that plays a big part in building wealth. However, you can’t manage more money until you learn how to manage what you already have, and the big abundant lack is in education as much as it is in redistribution.

Imagine if a wealthy person owns a betting shop. A gambler comes in and spends all his money, helping the owner make more money. The state increases taxes and redistributes much of the money back to the gambler. The gambler then goes back to the betting shop and makes more bets. The owner might have to increase his margins to compensate for the increased ‘taxation’. This costs the gambler, who keeps gambling, more money. And so the cycle continues, but doesn’t help or change anything other than perhaps the owner moves to another country if too much is taken from him, and the gambler spends more and has a bigger addiction.

Perhaps if the business owner was allowed to create fair profit, was given assistance, protection and tax breaks and incentives to start up, and there was fair competition so that prices self-regulated, then the system would work. Oh, wait a minute, that’s called capitalism. And for the gambler, education and help on the addiction is likely to be far more effective than feeding the habit. While this might seem an extreme example, most people manage their money like a gambler, wasting it and only just keeping their heads above water. It is education that is needed, in our schools and society, on how to manage and master money, not redistribution and handouts that de-incentivize work and contribution.

Lottery redistribution:

   The National Endowment for Financial Education cites research estimating that 70 per cent of people who suddenly receive a large sum of money lose it within a few years. Forty-four percent of lottery winners had spent all of their winnings within five years of winning the lottery. Nine out of every ten lottery winners believe that their new family wealth will be gone by the third generation. Again, you can’t manage more money until you learn to manage what you already have. Interestingly, only 2 per cent of respondents said that they were less happy with life after winning the lottery, despite the data above suggesting a greater percentage can’t handle it, lose it, or feel it will be lost soon enough. Who says money doesn’t make you (more) happy?

   So in fact, there actually is a seismic wealth redistribution right now: from the poor when they get large sums without knowing how to handle it, back to the rich.

Production vs consumption

       Non-wealth, first-world poverty doesn’t contribute. It doesn’t create service, enterprise or economy, and doesn’t care enough about humanity to give value to others. Poverty in this sense consumes more than it produces, and is more selfish than selfless.

      To be wealthy is to give service, to produce for other people in physical (consumable) or ethereal (information) form. To be poor is to consume: wasting or spending money and time-consuming depreciable. The wealthy produce for the poor to consume, and so redistribute wealth towards themselves from the first-world poor. Vast wealth comes from vast production nationally, globally, and in high volumes, whereas poverty comes from a negative differential between production and consumption. Individuals, geography, or governments could cause this.

     The wealthy create enterprise and economy through jobs, value creation, increased flow and velocity of money, contribution to taxes, hope, belief and inspiration to others, service to vast numbers of people. The poor are independent on these to survive.  Virtually all global wealth is now private: 99 percent according to Thomas Piketty in his book Capital. This means that producers finance all state benefits that poor consumers consume. Because poverty consumers more than it produces, this has to be economically balanced by large-scale production, and because of the 80/20 principle, the 20 per cent will produce for the 80 per cent to consume, roughly speaking. And so this will compound in the direction it is already going – the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer. It is hard to change the velocity once it has momentum, which explains why when starting a new vocation it can be hard to make money in the early years, yet those who’ve been doing it for decades seem to have vastly compounded wealth and passive income, more easily.

For redistribution of wealth to work, consumers would have to take responsibility to produce more than they consume. If you give a drug addict money, you know much of that is likely to go. If you give any consumer more money without the responsibility and education to produce with it, it will be consumed in the same manner all previous money was consumed. If a producer receives more money, mostly through cashflow, increased profits or leveraged loans (rarely through gifts and subsidies), they will invest it to produce more. Of course you could call this greed, but you could also call this growth, evolution and supply and demand. Greed and growth are only differentiated by an individual’s perception. As long as there is demand and a need for the human race to grow and evolve, producers will produce more and more and more, and consumers will keep consuming. The titans of wealth across the last 6000 years are the largest, most vast producers.

The question is: which will you choose to be, a producer or a consumer? Will you get sucked into debating the rights and wrongs of the rich and poor divide, or focus on service, solutions, scale, and contribution, and enjoy your fair share of wealth?