willow // she/him // 20 // quaker pacifist // annoying about film & TV // 18+ // "love is a sacrament that should be taken kneeling"
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
We need to reframe face-painting at parties as an all ages thing. We need a face-painting station in the club
886 notes
·
View notes
Text
Being a flop changed my life. The world is not my oyster, I am glowing. I walked into a pole this morning. There's very little I wouldn't do for $1,000
45K notes
·
View notes
Text
the opposite of that "ogre can't read ulysses" is an elf who smugly delivers a lecture misinterpreting the Very Hungry Caterpillar
90K notes
·
View notes
Text
I'm so glad Eric Bogosian got to come to SDCC this year.
735 notes
·
View notes
Text
*talks about the personal life of someone who is long dead as a depression coping mechanism*
167 notes
·
View notes
Text
my high school used to start at 7:30 and I lowkey think that was child abuse
11K notes
·
View notes
Text

GO HOME THEY"VE MADE THE SICKEST IMAGE EVER
25 notes
·
View notes
Photo

A woman lying down on the floor, smoking cigarette, surrounded by record albums, including “Lonely Girl” by Julie London, released 1956.
5K notes
·
View notes
Text

I hope l have fans cuz l be feeding yall well
More versions !!


Btw l have a lil postpartum depression after a massive piece I smooshed in 3 days so l hope u like this one while l get over it
411 notes
·
View notes
Text
guy who only knows who simon and garfunkel are because of their messy public decades long failed relationship + breakup and not their music
16 notes
·
View notes
Text
Just a note in regards to Jim McCartney's abuse of Paul.
There is something we need to be mindful of when it comes to contextualising behaviour from those in previous generations. There is a tendency to say "well that's how it was then" "parents could hit kids then" "it was acceptable at the time"
Well yes lots of things were acceptable in the 1950s that aren't now, that doesn't make them any less harmful to those who were on the receiving end.
The need to contextualise always favours perpetrators of abuse, racism, misogyny etc It's always about us finding ways to tell ourselves that the people who did these bad things weren't actually bad people. When what we should be focusing on is how their behaviour, no matter how socially accepted at the time, impacted their victims.
Also in regards to Jim McCartney's abusive behaviour, yes the practice of corporal punishment/domestic abuse was viewed as "a man's right" in the 1950s but inspite of this there is no documented evidence that any of the other 3 Beatles suffered it as Paul did. When members of the extended McCartney family were interviewed they adamantly denied that Jim practiced it or laid a hand on either of the boys. Yet both Jim, Mike and Paul testify otherwise. The denial from the family hints at some level of, if not shame, then a desire to "protect" Jim's reputation, but these were interviews conducted during the "socially accepted" days. So why the denial from the family what were they protecting?
160 notes
·
View notes
Text
The beauty of tumblr is that some people here think that cigarettes get you high and drinking once a week makes you an alcoholic, while others here started smoking at 13 and wouldn't even consider ketamine a drug because everyone does it. And both of them are on tumblr blogging about TV shows from 2005.
44K notes
·
View notes