mariowil

[mariowil]

Tucker: The American government is at war with its own people

[mariowil]

Today on MindMatters, Harrison and Adam use one of David Ray Griffin's recent books as a jumping-off point to bring together many threads from previous episodes. What is our place in the cosmos? What can the study of nature tell us about ourselves, and about the cosmic mind? From the smallest bits of 'matter' and energy, to animals, minds, and meaning, we tie together our previous discussions with Ken Pedersen, John Buchanan, James Carpenter, along with ideas from Gurdjieff, Ibn Arabi, Stoicism, Jordan Peterson and more, to attempt an initial answer to the question.Along the way we discuss the merits of the anthropic principle and 'fine-tuning', the self-destructing arguments of the new atheists, one of Rupert Sheldrake's coolest ideas, and why importance is perhaps the most important thing for philosophy.

[mariowil]

The virus is just a clever idea to use an invisible enemy for instilling fear, worldwide, by this minuscule, insanely rich and psychotically power-hungry elite to put the entire world population to its knees. FEAR that obliterates the human immune system and may bring about a range of illnesses far worse than covid-19, including cancer, coronary diseases, diabetes - and much more. Imagine the pressure, blackmail, corruption and outright threats that must be used against 193 world governments to act in unison, at the same time with lockdowns and tyranny, destroying their own and the world's socioeconomic system as we knew it.

[mariowil]

You didn't think they were kidding, did you, when they started introducing the Brave New Normal official narrative back in March? They told us, clearly, what was coming. They told us life was going to change ... forever. They locked us down inside our homes. They ordered churches and synagogues closed. They ordered the police to abuse and arrest us if we violated their arbitrary orders. They closed the schools, parks, beaches, restaurants, cafés, theaters, clubs, anywhere that people gather. .. They ripped children out of their mother's arms, beat and arrested other mothers for the crime of "wearing their masks improperly," dragged mask-less passengers off of public buses, gratuitously beat and arrested people for not "social-distancing" on the sidewalk, shackled people with ankle monitors, and intimidated everyone with robots and drones. .. They outlawed protests, then hunted down people attending them and harassed them at their homes. They started tracking everyone's contacts and movements. They drafted new "emergency" laws to allow them to forcibly quarantine people. They did this openly. They publicized it. It's not like they were hiding anything. No, they told us exactly what was coming, and advised us to shut up and follow orders. Tragically, most people have done just that. In the space of four months, GloboCap has successfully imposed totalitarianism — pathologized totalitarianism — on societies all across the world. It isn't traditional totalitarianism, with a dictator and a one-party system, and so on. It is subtler and more insidious than that. But it is totalitarianism nonetheless. .. GloboCap could not have achieved this without the approval (or at least the acquiescence) of the vast majority of the masses. The coronavirus mass hysteria was a masterstroke of propaganda, but propaganda isn't everything. No one is really fooled by propaganda, or not for long, in any event. As Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari noted in the opening of Anti-Oedipus:    The masses were not innocent dupes. At a certain point, under a certain set of conditions, they wanted fascism, and it is this perversion of the desire of the masses that needs to be accounted for." I am not going to try to account for the "perversion of the desire of the masses" here in this essay, but I do want to dig into the new pathologized totalitarianism a little bit.

[mariowil]

Innovation has never come from the top. Let alone from a small group at the top. Innovation has always come from mavericks outside the system. But an interest group can only dominate by repressing the majority -- especially the mavericks and individualists, and the awkward, introverted sods who don't wear masks and have no social distancing skills and don't even hear the orders because they don't watch TV. ..Here's the evidence: Look at the proposals at the World Economic Forum and the World Wildlife Fund revealed this past month. No! Not the cozy panda or the claims that it's to 'save the climate'. That is all a front, like Covid, like vaccines, like the offer of a techtronic future where your fridge tells your car to go collect groceries. Read the proposals from WEF and WWF: you won't have a car and you will be content with your ration...Look the Commodity Traders, Industrial Chemicals, GM seeds and fertilizers, Amazon and UN2030 and Agenda 21... DNA-altering Big Pharma working together with Big Tech to map your DNA, trace contacts and work with the Banks to determine your social credit and digital wallet... Now interpret: what does those elements working together mean for the world you are going to live in?Look at the narrow strata of interests behind them. Who owns them? Then look at the tax-exempt foundations and the future they are discussing. What do they use their philanthropy to promote?By the way, if you're not yet convinced that the International Monetary Fund and World Bank have always been a Trojan horse for banks and corporations and the vested interests behind them, watch the documentary Princes of the Yen.They will Map the Future but it will not work. The best analogy is from plants. Back in the 1930s the dust bowl was largely man made. So was the Irish famine of the 1840s. In both cases farmers had abandoned diversity and planted the same few high-yielding varieties of corn and potatoes. When the blight came it spread rapidly through identical varieties and the bulk of the crop got wiped out. Managed outcomes have a habit of backfiring...Innovation does not happen in totalitarian economies because by definition the outcomes must benefit a specific interest group. That is why the fascists and the Bolsheviks both worshiped Ford! He's right there in Brave New World: Our Ford. They loved his ideas but they could not make them work. They had to import innovation from the USA. They bought whole production lines, entire factories from Ford. The same thing will happen with the glorious Globalist, One-World, Carbon Neutral, Climate Friendly, Soylent Paradise. Except we won't have the USA.We are being sold a lie: That we'll get our digital comforts in a controlled society - yet wealth is rationed... ... ... Equity for all: everybody gets what they deserve - yet everyone gets the same... ... ... Surveillance and social control - yet with the freedom to innovate...These goals are not compatible. Technocracy = corporatism = fascism = reactionary. We are being sold a lie in the guise of the need to "save the planet" or "save the environment" or "rebel against extinction" or "fight the carbon" or "fight the virus" but the answer is always the same: give up your liberties, close down the market, centralize control.

[mariowil]

That said, one thing I'm fairly sure of is that someone, somewhere, really wanted to stop the spread of this virus among the wider population to the greatest extent possible. The other thing I am very sure of is that their reason for doing so had nothing to do with the welfare of the ordinary people of this world.

[mariowil]

Bill Gates Paid W.H.O. To Declare Corona a Pandemic,  Cheryl Chumley  Bill Gates has tremendous influence at WHO to push 'anti American policies'

[mariowil]

    "They did it because we let them do it. We believed them, so we obeyed them. If there is anything good that comes out of this disaster, it is that none of us will ever make that mistake again." .. We sense that this pandemic is far, far less than advertised. While the numbers of cases continue to grow worldwide, the fatality rate is very low, more analogous to a bad flu year but only in some locales. As of June 11th, 2020 the John Hopkins COVID tracking site gives these selected statistics: ..    USA: 2,000,464 cases; 112,924 fatalities; Fatality rate 5.64%    Brazil: 772.,416 cases; 39,680 fatalities; Fatality rate 5.13%    Russia: 493,023 cases; 6,350 fatalities; Fatality rate 1.28%    United Kingdom: 291,588 cases; 41,213 fatalities; Fatality rate 14.13%    India: 276,583 cases; 7,745 fatalities; Fatality rate 2.80%    France: 192068 cases; 29,322 fatalities; Fatality rate 15.267% .. The aggregate of coronavirus cases worldwide gives us: ..    7,360,239 cases; 416,201 fatalities; Fatality rate 5.65% .. For comparison, the seasonal flu kills between 290,000 and 650,000 people per year.

[mariowil]

Dr Rashid Buttar THEY WILL BAN THIS IMMEDIATELY! (URGENT) PLEASE SHARE NOW

[mariowil]

Owens notes that Floyd was high on fentanyl and methamphetamine at the time of his death, according to the autopsy report, and goes on to cite his record which includes jail sentences in 1998, 2002, 2004, 2005, and 2007. His 2007 arrest, she continues, was for participating in an armed home invasion against a pregnant African-American woman, where Floyd held a gun to the pregnant mother's stomach. Owens challenges the idea of lifting Floyd up as a hero. ..    "We are the only people that fight and scream and demand support and justice for the people in our community that are up to no good. We are being sold a lot of lies and at the detriment of the black and the white community and at the detriment to America as a whole." Owens also questioned the narrative of police brutality. ..    "A police officer is 18 and a half times more likely to be killed by a black person than the other way around. Do some police officers do the wrong thing? Yes. They're always going to exist because they're human beings. And sometimes human beings suck...society is not perfectible. It is no excuse to paint society with a broad brush and it is certainly no excuse to accept a Democratic narrative." Rather than celebrate George Floyd as a role model, Owens cites some of her own African-American heroes, including Kobe Bryant, Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, and Shelby Steele. "George Floyd is not my martyr...he can be yours," she says. "And that's all I have to say to Black America." Comment: Candace Owens is on a tear in her video, highlighting 'flaws' in the way we perceive and react to both black and white cultures, including acquired perceptions that misrepresent truths. She makes some interesting and dramatic points. However, regarding George Floyd and the circumstances of his death, she risks conflating the human right to live with how the human lived. The reality? Floyd was not a hero - not even close. He was the 'nexus' point that unleashed pent-up human anger. It could have been anyone

[mariowil]

The origins of the Democrats and their KKK bastard child... Wake up Guys.

GEORGE FLOYD, RIOTS, & ANNONYMOUS EXPOSED AS DEEP STATE PSYOP FOR NWO!

[mariowil]

Despite all the efforts of equalization, women in high-ranking corporate positions are still exceedingly rare. But they are almost as rare in the dredges of society - and the reasons for both run deeper than sexism. It is more than passing curious that at a time when women constitute roughly half the workforce, and are in the actual majority in terms of earning college degrees, there are still so few female CEOs. The distaff side accounts for CEOs in only 167 out of 3,000 large companies, which translates into a rather modest 5.5 percent of the total. Various explanations have been put forth to account for this fact. Women do a disproportionate share of household tasks, such as cooking, cleaning, childcare, shopping. This accounts for some of the gap, but not all of it. Females are less ambitious; they do not as readily seek promotions as do males. Why not? They are more attached to home and hearth, and realize that the higher up you go in the work hierarchy, the more on the job responsibility there is, which will detract from their family obligations. This, too accounts for their greater reluctance to seek greener pastures in more lucrative employment elsewhere; the wife is more likely to be the trailing spouse, who has to accept whatever is available in another city or state, than her husband. Recently, a new elucidation has been added to these more traditional accounts. It is that men are more likely to occupy positions that feed into CEO jobs than women. For example, more males than females take on line roles which are directly responsible for profits and losses, such as heading up a division of a large firm. In contrast, women specialize in areas that do not as readily account for the bottom line, such as heading up human resources, the legal team, or administration.            This phenomenon, too, could possibly explain part of the divergence in CEO representation, but is unlikely, even along with the other accounts, to do the entire job. One difficulty with it is that one can easily push back, and ask why this divergence occurs in the first place?

[mariowil]

Who is Bill Gates? A software developer? A businessman? A philanthropist? A global health expert? This question, once merely academic, is becoming a very real question for those who are beginning to realize that Gates' unimaginable wealth has been used to gain control over every corner of the fields of public health, medical research and vaccine development. And now that we are presented with the very problem that Gates has been talking about for years, we will soon find that this software developer with no medical training is going to leverage that wealth into control over the fates of billions of people.

[mariowil]

In January of 2010, Bill and Melinda Gates announced a $10 billion pledge to usher in a decade of vaccines. But far from an unalloyed good, the truth is that this attempt to reorient the global health economy was part of a much bigger agenda. An agenda that would ultimately lead to greater profits for big pharma companies, greater control for the Gates Foundation over the field of global health, and greater power for Bill Gates to shape the course of the future for billions of people around the planet.

[mariowil]

The takeover of public health that we have documented in How Bill Gates Monopolized Global Health and the remarkably brazen push to vaccinate everyone on the planet that we have documented in Bill Gates' Plan to Vaccinate the World was not, at base, about money. The unimaginable wealth that Gates has accrued is now being used to purchase something much more useful: control. Control not just of the global health bodies that can coordinate a worldwide vaccination program, or the governments that will mandate such an unprecedented campaign, but control over the global population itself.

[mariowil]

There can be no doubt that Bill Gates has worn many hats on his remarkable journey from his early life as the privileged son of a Seattle-area power couple to his current status as one of the richest and most influential people on the planet. But, as we have seen in our exploration of Gates' rise as unelected global health czar and population control advocate, the question of who Bill Gates really is is no mere philosophical pursuit. Today we will attempt to answer that question as we examine the motives, the ideology, and the connections of this man who has been so instrumental in shaping the post-coronavirus world.