milaniwolf

[milaniwolf]

Trump's Move Stabs at the Core of Pro-West Elements Across the Globe

Trump hasn’t even taken office yet, and we already know that the $1.6 billion in dog food is gone.

Some of you might be unfamiliar with the $1.6 billion reference, so let me explain it while I’m at it.

On September 23, 2024, the U.S. Congress passed the “Countering China’s Malign Influence” act, allocating $1.625 billion to support so-called “independent media” and non-governmental organizations worldwide, specifically aimed at smearing and defaming China.

A small portion of this money, through circuitous channels, eventually found its way into the pockets of some of China’s “fifth columnists.”

For instance, Xu XiuZhong, the mastermind behind the “Xinjiang cotton” incident, falls into this category of funding.

For instance, we often see on the internet a group of people who, with the same tone and script, oppose the system and incite conflict.

The Chinese people are so annoyed by these individuals that their teeth itch, but there’s little that can be done about it.

Much to our surprise, once Trump came into power, he not only intended to cut off their dog food but also deal with the dog owners as well.

On February 3rd, Elon Musk, the head of the “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE), posted that President Trump had agreed to shut down the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

In line with Trump’s directive, the closure was immediate, with no room for negotiation. All USAID employees were no longer allowed to use any of the center’s facilities that day and were prohibited from entering the center’s building after they left.

After this explosive news broke, global reactions were swift and intense.

True patriots naturally applauded, while the “road-paving parties” from various countries were dealt a heavy blow — this move undoubtedly struck at the heart of their operations.

At least for the next four years, they will lose contact with their organizations.

Over the years, under the influence of USAID’s dollar diplomacy, many national regimes have been toppled, and numerous regions have been thrown into chaos.

China is a major victim, deeply harmed by these actions.

In a strategy to undermine China, USAID has masterminded from behind the scenes, with NGOs taking the lead, repeatedly provoking turmoil in Hong Kong, which culminated in a major outbreak in 2019.

This black storm caused us tremendous trouble and losses, and its impact has not yet been fully eliminated to this day.

It’s predictable that with USAID’s shutdown by “Chuanbao” (Trump), the “color revolutions” will likely subside significantly, and the world will become much calmer.

Some busybodies have noticed that the USAID website is no longer accessible, and Musk indicated that it was his doing.

Although Trump has also talked about targeting intelligence and education sectors, the closure of USAID is clearly serious business, and it appears to be irreversible for at least these four years.

Some may not understand why Chuanbao’s closure of USAID is so resolute?

On February 4th, Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft and billionaire, criticized the move, claiming it could lead to “millions of deaths.”

In an interview, Gates said that if Musk “really knew” what USAID did, he “wouldn’t have asked” for all of its headquarters staff to stop working.

To tell the truth, USAID’s promotion of “color revolutions” around the world, advocating Western narratives of freedom and democracy, has been extremely beneficial for big capitalists like Gates.

With USAID paving the way, it significantly reduced the costs for American financial capital and multinational corporations to expand into markets, helping them reap huge profits.

While USAID has its merits, the cost-benefit analysis is too lopsided.

A few days ago, Robert Kennedy, who is about to become the Health Minister, slammed USAID in an interview and revealed that in 2014, it spent 5 billion dollars on a “color revolution” in Ukraine.

Over the years, some have beautified the abnormal regime changes in Ukraine as the people’s yearning for freedom and democracy, but the truth is far from it.

To provoke Ukraine, an important piece on the chessboard against Russia, USAID has invested heavily.

In just the past three years, Ukraine received 32.7 billion dollars from USAID, accounting for 27.2% of the agency’s total funds.

The bigger issue is that the costs are paid by American taxpayers, yet the benefits are reaped by big capitalists.

As seen from the comparison of financial ledgers between the Chinese and American people, the lives of ordinary Americans are very difficult, with some even having to sell blood to survive.

Despite being a global empire, the majority of Americans can’t even come up with 1000 dollars.

A Federal Reserve survey report shows that 37% of Americans can’t afford 400 dollars for emergency funds;

According to a Bankrate survey, in 2025, 59% of Americans would not be able to produce 1000 dollars in an emergency.

While the American people are struggling, the wealthy classes are making a fortune.

On December 24th, Newsweek’s website reported that American billionaires had a brilliant 2024, with their total net worth soaring by tens of billions of dollars.

According to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, which ranks the world’s richest people daily, since last January, 9 out of the 10 fastest-growing in net worth are American citizens.

The 400 richest Americans have a total wealth of 5.4 trillion dollars, holding 3.46% of the national wealth, an all-time high.

Nearly half of the approximately 170 million Americans at the bottom hold only 2.4% of the nation’s wealth, which is far less than the 400 richest individuals.

On January 13th, the U.S. Embassy in China posted a boastful article stating that by the end of 2023, the net worth of American households had reached a record-breaking 156.2 trillion dollars. Based on 130 million households, that averages out to about 1.2 million dollars per household.

Embarrassingly, some meddlesome Chinese individuals did the math based on their data. They calculated that the median net worth of American households is 198,000 dollars, with the mode being 5,500 dollars.

This means that the assets of the majority of American households amount to 5,500 dollars.

Considering that cash makes up between 5% to 20% of a household’s net worth, this aligns with numerous surveys that state most Americans can’t come up with 1,000 dollars for emergency funds.

Many people don’t believe these figures at all, and some even accuse us of badmouthing America.

Below, I will also post part of the calculation process by these “busybodies.”

So much evidence points to the same fact proven by Americans; if you still don’t believe me, there’s nothing more I can do to help you.

In such a situation, do you think the average American will be calm and collected? Why should they consider the bigger picture?

The “bigger picture” of USAID is the concern of the big capitalists, what does it have to do with the ordinary people of America?

To borrow a phrase often used by Chinese public intellectuals, they love America, but does America love them back?

In fact, if the Washington establishment could handle the distribution issue well, America’s gains would easily cover the costs of USAID without any problem.

But there are no “ifs” in this world, and the average American people are not just upset with USAID, but with all government departments.

These departments “sell the ancestral land without a second thought,” so naturally, the American public would want someone to fight for them.

The current America, due to a series of strategic blunders, cannot maintain its existence as a global empire with its national strength and must undergo strategic contraction.

Some people belittle “Xi Bao’s wild punches,” but it’s clear they don’t understand the times and the situation.

Whoever is in charge of the White House will have to carry out strategic contraction, it’s just that the form and method may differ slightly.

USAID is incredibly costly, not popular with voters, cutting it won’t affect domestic politics, and it’s a loyalist to political opponents. Who else should “Xi Bao” cut if not them?

How much does USAID cost? The familiar figure of 1.6 billion dollars is just a drop in the bucket.

Last year alone, this agency burned through more than 50 billion dollars, almost catching up to the budget of its parent agency, the State Department.

For those who might not grasp the concept of a 50 billion dollar budget, let me put it into perspective.

The Department of Health, which provides health services to the American people, had a budget of only 116.8 billion dollars last year.

USAID has over 10,000 employees, most of whom work overseas, while the Health Department has nearly 100,000 employees, all working domestically.

According to the “2025 Emergency Staffing Plan,” the Health Department plans to cut nearly half of its workforce.

America’s current healthcare system provides medical services to its citizens that are like crap, and the public has been complaining for a long time.

Let’s compare a few other well-known departments.

The Department of Commerce’s budget for fiscal year 2025 is 11.4 billion dollars, with a workforce of 47,000;

The Department of Justice’s budget for fiscal year 2025 is 37.8 billion dollars, with a workforce of 116,600…

With these comparisons, doesn’t it seem necessary to consider cutting this department that meddles with other countries?

Wouldn’t it be better to use this money to improve American education, healthcare, and enhance the well-being of the people?

Now, let’s see where USAID’s money is going.

Firstly, the majority ends up in the pockets of “Senator Smith” and his friends after being laundered;

Secondly, a small part is embezzled by foreign officials and politicians, such as the focus of funding in recent years, Ukraine;

Thirdly, a tiny fraction is used to pay the salaries of the “road-paving” parties from various countries, which are the many bottom-tier “bootlickers” we often encounter online.

On February 5th, E!News reported that Hollywood stars who actively sided with Ukraine in the Russia-Ukraine conflict received considerable funds from USAID.

Among them, Van Damme received 1.5 million dollars, Ben Stiller received 4 million dollars, Sean Penn received 5 million dollars, and Orlando Bloom received 8 million dollars.

You might be surprised to learn that the big-eyed, big-mouthed beauty Angelina Jolie got a whopping 20 million dollars.

One of Jolie’s famous moments was when she stood in the ruins of a devastated city during her visit to Iraq as a UNHCR Goodwill Ambassador.

She gave an explosive speech: “Although they have nothing, they have gained freedom!”

Take a look at the Ukrainian soldiers fighting tooth and nail, and then consider the immense profits these people reap by simply stirring up conflict with their words. Isn’t it disgusting?

The money of American taxpayers has become the “Tang Seng meat” for the elite and the powerful, acquired in a legitimate and reasonable manner.

If you were an ordinary American, with the national debt sky-high and your own life not going so well, would you support Xi Bao’s move to shut down USAID?

After the termination of USAID, an interesting scene unfolded: thousands of laid-off employees took to the streets to protest Xi Bao’s cancellation of this organization that incites protests worldwide.

No matter what the ultimate fate of this agency may be, the world is bound to see a significant decrease in turmoil over these next four years. As long as the MAGA faction remains in power, their influence will be as short-lived as a rabbit’s tail.

The flapping of a butterfly’s wings in South America can trigger a storm in the Pacific.

The dissolution of the organization and the cessation of salaries are testing the true loyalty of the global “cheerleading” factions to America. Whether this will unleash a storm remains to be seen.

However, patriots from various countries should not be too optimistic. These people have long been implanted with a “slave mark” or “beast mark” by the Americans. Even without money, they are unlikely to break their habit of engaging in despicable acts.

The struggle against the “cheerleading” factions will not automatically disappear just because the “dog-pampering” establishment has been emptied.