22 | marian | he/she | avid reader with a focus on feminist theory this year | afab transmasc & questioning a lot about my current understanding of society, gender, sex, and how these systems of oppression shape the world
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
i think i was just blocked for asking questions about radfeminism & idk why 😭
#like im not even opposed to it bc i see a lot of my frustrations explained/reflected by blogs ive followed on here#she had a cool blog too & said i could message her if i had any questions#& like. we were chatting for a lil bit & then suddenly it said her blog was a ghost blog & it disappeared??#idk if maybe she maybe just went private or something#if u see this. im sorry if i said something that made u uncomfortable 😭
0 notes
Text
Trans men that identify with having been raised as girls aren't your enemy. Just bc I was raised as the eldest daughter/2nd mother of my family & that changed how I view the world, doesn't mean u have to identify with having been a boy or girl or whatever growing up. We are our own people. I as a gay trans man could be seen as at odds with trans men that are lesbians, but they're not my enemy. We're homies. They don't contradict my identity as a gay man bc we're all our own ppl with our own experiences. If another trans/nb person has an identity or experience that u don't like that's not on them. It's on u & all the dumbass transphobes you're trying to please. Fitting trans ppl into neat little categories won't please transphobes, they do not want us to exist. Any of us. Regardless of how neat & presentable ur identity is. They don't give a fuck if your life story lines up with mine. They are your enemy, not me
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
Potentially hot take but I simply think that insisting that transmascs who disagree with you are secretly closeted, transtrending TERFs is misgendering.
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
ok so after some sleuthing bc i was really confused about this influx of weirdly aggressive guys commenting on my vague post about an actual post, turns out the creep that went thru my profile is an e-girl reply guy & the original poster was one of the accounts he follows. pretty sure he was trying to hit on her or something, everyone called him out for not knowing wtf he was talking about, & then he went apeshit & started borderline stalking the comments/profiles of anyone who called him misogynistic. bro was telling a bra fitter that her career didnt mean she knew more than him about bra sizes & was saying that men should be allowed to talk about women's bodies if they care about their "health" 🤢🤢
cis men are pissing me tfo on twt rn. like, how dare i, a meager small chested d cup part-time bra wearer, for lightly poking fun at u insisting all d cups are big-chested, oh great cis man who's supposedly dated women before
1 note
·
View note
Text
something i find mildly frustrating when trying to talk to other trans ppl about gender & the gendered treatment that trans ppl experience from society prior to coming out is a seeming inability to adequately explain how it differs from the treatment of gnc cis ppl. like, i got a ton of shit as a kid that fits w the transandrophobia theory but tbh, i talk to women who were very gnc as kids & they have extremely similar experiences to me. idk i have trouble accepting the idea that trans ppl never experience socialization for their ASAB when i feel like there isnt a good explanation for how gnc ppl are treated that doesnt boil down to they're not actually mistreated that badly, they're secretly trans, or they're just victims of misplaced discrimination
1 note
·
View note
Text
People argue trans men have male privilege and making jokes about them is Fine and Okay because the rest of society is set up to cater to men. And we can get into how society catering to cis men is not the same thing as it doing that for trans men, which should be obvious if you think about it for five seconds and aren'tin denial of the fact that mainstream society will treat you as your AGAB before anything else, but like.
Why do you even want to be aggressive towards men in the first place? Genuinely why is that part of your politics? How is that a good, okay impulse to have? Stop being hostile towards people based on parts of their identity they can't control, oh my God, even if it caused no structural harm that's still not a way to live your life.
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
cis men are pissing me tfo on twt rn. like, how dare i, a meager small chested d cup part-time bra wearer, lightly poke fun at u insisting all d cups are big-chested, oh great cis man who's supposedly dated women before
#like. idk man pretty sure the numerous women in ur comments telling u ur interpretation of the post & bra sizing charts are wrong#might know more about their bodies & clothing items than u#nd then this absolute creep had the audacity to scroll thru my profile to comment on a post i made laughing at the situation#& bring out not one but two alt accounts to comment after i blocked him for being weird
1 note
·
View note
Text
Men get more mad over being called misogynistic than they get mad at other men for raping women
268 notes
·
View notes
Text

Yea, next question.
#i dont even like the 'all men r bad' message but bfr. u know that's not what they r implying at all#a LOT of ppl dont even acknowledge how disabled men engage in misogyny against their disabled women peers#like. yes they are oppressed & victimized by society on the basis of disability & whatever other axes of oppression they fall under#but they are still capable of weaponizing their status as men against the women of their class/community#it's not fair to disabled women that they're seen or treated as acceptable targets of misogyny bc their attacker is also disabled#and disabled women. being both disabled and women. r not granted the same grace disabled men are at all#if they 'retaliate'. there is less consideration about whether or not they're capable of comprehending why they're being mistreated#or justifications for them or space for them to feel angry & upset#many disabled men are allowed to get away with behaviors that would never be acceptable from disabled women in similar situations#i dont think able bodied women should be making fun of them for their disability & they absolutely need 2 be mindful of those power dynamic#but all men means all men#bc of the power dynamic that allows men to oppress the women of their class & community#the able bodied & healthy oppress the disabled & ill and men oppress women#which absolutely leads to a lot of complex#messy power structures & interactions#but the core of it is that disabled men oppress disabled women & they utilize misogyny against them bc of their position of power
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
been thinking about my opinions on surrogacy & adoption lately (both of which i am deeply against). the idea that ppl need to reproduce to be complete or that they are entitled to having a child is so fucked up. the nuclear family was a mistake
0 notes
Text
Genuinely the #1 thing you can do to make sure trans people around you get gendered correctly is to just lead by example. Saying "hi this is [x] she'll be joining us today, could you show her [y]" is 100000x more effective and less scrutinizing pressure than a pronoun circle.
42K notes
·
View notes
Text
Celibacy is so powerful. Liberal feminism doesn't want you to know this because it's men pulling the strings behind the curtain, but it's so powerful.
Having EXTREMELY high standards and being a perfectionist when it comes to partners is one of the most self empowering things you can do. Our bodily autonomy is threatened on a daily basis, you can take control back by not allowing anyone who is not up to your extreme standards to touch you.
#every single woman in my direct matrilineal line for as far back as i am aware had their first child by 21#thats like 7 generations and im the first in that line to be in college earning my degree with no kids at 22 w no plans to start any time#soon and i am so psyched about it!!#there have been a couple times where im like damn it'd be nice to have a bf#but then i start talking to guys & am immediately like lol nope#not risking messing up my streak for some dumbass i probably wont be w in 5 years#idk who im willing to break the streak for but it's a pretty high bar#its save me so much bs & when i talk to my girl friends who r my age & dating guys. i feel like i dodged a bullet
13K notes
·
View notes
Text
i remember watching oppenheimer & while i do like the movie & nolan's films, i was really annoyed they didnt show any of kitty oppenheimer's scientific contributions to the manhattan project. a lot of the women there were scientists & mathematicians in their own right & it isnt shown at all.
okay but if you ever see a male creative who had a string of great work and then everything else he did was dogshit, go to the "personal life" part of his wikipedia and look at his relationships. you'll either find a major tragedy he didn't recover from (completely understandable) or, more likely, there was a woman in his life doing uncredited shit editing his stuff or contributing generally and she's not there anymore.
I told a friend about this phenomenon in literature and he called me weeks later like, I remembered what you said about women doing uncredited work when tim burton came up. he made a string of bangers then everything else just was nowhere near as good. the timeline matches perfectly to when he was with this german visual artist (lena gieseke). he's done some good work in collaboration, but if things were dug into I suspect we would find she did a lot more than people realise.
so yeah whenever you look around like wow women didn't work in history, or, women aren't auteurs, or, there just aren't as many great female writers - societal reasons for that aside, half the time they absolutely did.
#she was a biologist and worked as a lab technician on figuring out the effects radiation has on the body#like. do ppl seriously think these scientists were looking for life partners who didnt have similar interests or knowledge
82K notes
·
View notes
Text
it's the same with a lot of the scientific greats as well. aside from the domestic labor allowing them to focus on research, for many of them, their wives, mothers, and sisters literally helped them with their calculations, experiments, and theories as well with none of the recognition they were entitled to
okay but if you ever see a male creative who had a string of great work and then everything else he did was dogshit, go to the "personal life" part of his wikipedia and look at his relationships. you'll either find a major tragedy he didn't recover from (completely understandable) or, more likely, there was a woman in his life doing uncredited shit editing his stuff or contributing generally and she's not there anymore.
I told a friend about this phenomenon in literature and he called me weeks later like, I remembered what you said about women doing uncredited work when tim burton came up. he made a string of bangers then everything else just was nowhere near as good. the timeline matches perfectly to when he was with this german visual artist (lena gieseke). he's done some good work in collaboration, but if things were dug into I suspect we would find she did a lot more than people realise.
so yeah whenever you look around like wow women didn't work in history, or, women aren't auteurs, or, there just aren't as many great female writers - societal reasons for that aside, half the time they absolutely did.
82K notes
·
View notes
Text

I hate them more every single day. how does someone even think this way???? and 2. this poor woman oh my god. how does it get to the point where you make yourself so useless your poor wife feels like she has to bribe you this way? this is so beyond disgusting for so many reasons it’s insane. AND TO CALL HER A NARCISSIST?
#why is he not already doing those jfc???#she shouldnt have to be making a stupid sticker chart but for grown ups jsut so he'll do his share of the housework#maam plz just stop cleaning and dont have sex with him#let him figure it out
627 notes
·
View notes
Text
very interested to read some of dworkin's work later this year bc at face value, i dont agree w the notion that erotica and kink is inherently harmful or dangerous & i very much believe that ppl should be able to create & read whatever fictional content they like so long as real, living ppl are not being exploited. however, based on my own observations without reading any official literature or discourse on porn & bdsm, i do think the porn *industry* and bdsm as a formalized social setting/community have major issues that reflect & exacerbate the misogyny of society at large
#im also very in favor of critiquing basically everything#and love spending time really combing thru my life & social experiences & beliefs to analyze why exactly i have the kinks i do#or why i engage in certain behaviors#and likewise why other ppl do#& i find it a little concerning when ppl who are pro those communities arent willing or able to entertain other perspectives on it#gonna probably make a post with my stances pre and post dworkin lmao
1 note
·
View note
Text
I hate living in a baby daddy epidemic because WHY ARE Y'ALL NOT MARRYING YOUR BOYFRIENDS BEFORE HAVING KIDS WITH THEM😭
And I don't mean this in a religious "pre-martial sex is bad" way, but what makes you think a man who's hesitant to just MARRY you isn't gonna hesitate even more to raise kids with you??
Although I do think that the social norm and idea of marriage in general can be critiqued, it's ridiculous to think that someone who has an issue with just legally binding themselves to you (which they can undo) is gonna be perfectly fine raising ACTUAL living breathing children with you
#see i dont actually have an issue with the them being single thing#i have an issue with the men in their lives wanting all of the benefits of a wife (domestic labor. extra income#childcare. emotional support. the literal children) with none of the social or legal obligations#they dont wanna pay for her housing. they dont wanna pay for her medical care. they dont wanna pay for her car or her food#but they want her to birth & raise their kids#and she doesnt even get the tax or income benefits that come with marriage#if he were to die or get injured. his retirement & life insurance will go to his family#maybe it'll go to her or her kids but it's not a guarantee#and that is a very precarious position to be in#they want her to do the economic. physical. & emotional labor all without their guaranteed support or legal oath/tie to care* for her#that's not to say married women are safe. just that there are more legal protections for them than for the single mom#at the end of the day. marriage is a business contract & id be very careful of giving the contract benefits without any of the assurance#*by care i mean split his assets & resources#tbh tho my own aunts & grandmothers who never pressed for a legal marriage also did not press for legal custody arrangements#& have been getting viciously exploited by their parasitic loser exes#make sure you have these arrangements in paper somewhere if ur gonna list him on the birth certificate or tell him the kid even exists
616 notes
·
View notes