murdochmaxwellharris

[murdochmaxwellharris]

Dream Journal: How Murdoch’s Punishment for Jumping into the Bay had him Working with EXID. 2020/09/29

Murdoch’s punishment for jumping in the bay in China  was working as a backup vocalist for a rock band, which he didn't know which rock band it was going to be at the time do to his poor Chinese language comprehension. Luckily the band turned out to be EXID (chockful of kind people willing to help him). Another problem he had due to his poor language capability was not knowing how long he was working for. He didn't know if he was working a day eight days eight hours (which he believed to be most likely) or three hours. It ended up turning out to be an eight hours working period. He took the mic at the back of the stage where he was tasked with saying generic hype man expressions, such "Get ready to ROCK", etcetera. After they finished the performance, EXID & Murdoch were driven to a gondola to go up mountain. Murdoch told EXID his concerns about not being able to find the place where he was staying with the language learning school. I didn't have his phone at the time nor any documents because he jumped into the bay ;and thence, these were his chief concerns aboon that of fanboyism.  EXID understood his concerns and told him they would help him find his place he was staying at. He thanked them.

Was this an anxious dream for Murdoch? Murdoch didn’t seem too stressed whilist dreaming this dream? What do you think Murdoch was thinking?

[murdochmaxwellharris]

Examining A Murdochian Quote on Relationships: An Appeal to Experimentalism in Relationships.

"Considering all sorts of factors such as the divorce rates and the amounts of relationships many of us have prior to marriage. We should be lead to the understanding that statistically we're likely to be in an momentary relationship. Now given such acknowledgement of the unlikeness of matrimonial success.  We should flip our super lovely-dovey relationship brain-mode to experimentalist romantic mode. This experimentalist romantic mode shall be something that will grant us a die-hard acceptance for our evanescent romances. Which in turn will grant us the ability to experiment with our romanticist acts and thus ameliorating either our current relationships and or our future relationships."

Why do you believe Murdoch Maxwell Harris had these thoughts? What caused Murdoch to think this way? Is he highly analytical? Does he have some sort of dissociative issue?  Does he has this sort of “scientism” worship of trial & error, heuristics, and robot dealing with romantic relationship situation going on; due to himself wanting to dissociate with failed romantic attempts he had throughout his life?

[murdochmaxwellharris]

SPOILER WARNING: Murdoch did some Prewriting for an Essay on the Juxtaposition between Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery" & Sophocles' "Antigone".

The Lottery -

The character from The Lottery “Tessie” dies for the supposed greater good. She has her death justified via the repressive societies' cruel traditionalist's dogma. This story may be some sort of propagandistic material for moral rationalism or for figuring out stuff for yourself via your experiences instead of being reliant on your society for your moral & whatnot. My reasoning for such claim is that I believe Shirley Jackson opposed the draft during WWII; at a time when if you opposed such involuntary risk of death, twas social suicide; which, is sort of analogous to what happens in "The Lottery" with Tessie. Sadly, Tessie only comes to the realization that she wants to oppose her societies dogma when she was unlucky enough to be chosen for death.

Antigone -

The characters wanweird in "Antigone" comes from the consequences of the character's actions conflicting with one another. The end of this story was an negative result for all the characters in "Antigone" unlike that of the character in Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery" where the negative result only really applies to her. The notable moral of this story is the idea that one may have a desire to have god’s will, top of mind aboon that of a king or a nation-state if applied to modern times. A desire to hold  pride & or power is explicitly shown by the King wanting to punish the independent-thinking lady (besides the high power influence) who buried the putative traitors body against the will of the king and for god's supposed will that was in opposition of the King's will. The lady dies, but people are actually sad about it in this one. Unlike in "The Lottery" where Tessie's loved ones help with the stoning of Tessie for the supposed heavily influenced by poppycock ""greater good"".

[murdochmaxwellharris]

I Found this List of Media in "Murdoch Maxwell Harris's" Google Drive. He Seems to be Drawn to these Pieces of Media -- Why?

Oldboy (2003)

Was Murdoch's interested in neanimorphic-individuals [folks who appear younger than they actually are] ? Why was he watching this thing called "Oldboy"? Was he interested in relationships with older men?

American Beauty (1999)

Was he an practitioner of geneclexis [one who seeks a mate based on their appearance]; whilst having a preference for Americans? He seems to have liked David Bowie's "I'm Afraid Of Americans" at around the same time. Did Murdoch have some sort of love/hate relationship with these "Americans"?

Midnight Runners (2017)

Was Murdoch search for some sort of mesonoxian [related to midnight] courier job?

Die Hard (1988)

Does he have some sort of suicidal idealization? Why does he like this "Die Hard"? Does he want to Die Hard? What does this hard refer to? Does it refer to something phallic?

Cowboy Bebop (1998)

Why did Murdoch have an interest in Cowboys and Bebop this "style of jazz developed in the early to mid-1940s in the United States, which features compositions characterized by a fast tempo, complex chord progressions with rapid chord changes and numerous changes of key, instrumental virtuosity" [See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bebop ]. I believe he may of had a desire to become a hyper-efficient individual. Maybe doing some cow herding, as a freelance worker, whilst searching for jazz musician gigs in all the towns he had herded cattle to.

Police Story (1985)

Does he have a desire to become a jackboot'ian cop? Hmm, why was he interested in the fuzz?

Snatch (2000)

As a psychoanalyst, I see Murdoch had harpaxophobia [the fear of thieves or of becoming a thief]. This must have been an ever-present fear throughout his life.

[murdochmaxwellharris]

I Found this Grammarless Mortifying Essay I Wrote In High School about this Book called "Ishmael" by Daniel Quinn. (This seems to be a draft to it)

Essay Question -

   The world was made for man, & he was meant to rule & conquer it.” Why does Ishmael find this problematic? Where does this Taker story come from? is there another story that might be helpful in healing humans' relationship with the Earth (themselves)?

The Mortifying Ishmael Probably Without A Thesis -

   The taker story is about the development of a portion of the human race becoming speciesist and becoming more & more damaging as it achieves its accolades. These accolades such as irrigation, mass production of goods, or protections from our (as in us humans') limiting factors such as disease, extreme weather, or predation. These achievements give the takers a seemingly unfair edge where we can seemingly play like the gods. An edge where we the takers pursue theomorphism at the putative expense of the other species on the planet(s). I believe that people should assist all the species, their environment, and give succor to the folks in their shared biomass. All of this would aid their attempts to become god-like creatures especially in becoming a divine altruistic David Bowie-like god..

   There’s no possible way currently to find out if the universe was made for the peoplekind species or any other species. Because in the search of evidence for such we can point out several reasons why & not for any species. Instead we find various species working in harmony; we observe the species' limiting factors and their niches all within their ecosystems. Heck even us takers (i.e. humans) compete in the state of nature. So tis (really) best to drop the question entirely unless you desire to be a pochemuchka about it. Or if you have some weird fascistic desire to justify your species being number 1 or something. Daniel Quinn (a human/taker) attacks the thought of his species claiming the throne. Something I may refute saying that maybe we human-folk could be like sweetie-pants dictators helping all the other species get smart. In Daniel Quin's book, he posits the hypothetical of another species from our earthly biomass achieving an equal level of consciousness & intelligence that we do. I find this a lame hypothetical because we probs have to power right now; to help these other species evolve. We don't need to leave them to their own devices. To maybe see these other species evolve to our level in about a few million million years or so. We could herald their abilities & bring them to our level. But, NO apparently we need a beat down (Daniel Quin says) -- cause humans are bad. Daniel then brings up situations where we were inappropriately conducting ourselves (us takers) to the annoyance of other species. But, as I see it we're still developing. So of course we're going to muck up -- at times. That's not specifically human nature that's just straight-up nature -- everybody's a screw-up. Things muck up -- we muck up. Yes, we participate in excessive farming, or we farm in ways in which damage the soil. We humans see these negative practices/effects, we feel bad about them, & we act to fix them. Daniel Quin plays it off as though we all perceive the past as wholly detestable. Which to me is a bit maddening. Yes, I know it's true -- we have done some lame things in the past. But heck it's thanks to the past that we learn. In regards to the overproduction whatnot, I rather have tons of stuff rather than a paucity of stuffs. So I surmise most people would probably choose tons of stuffs. I mean it’s only natural, for people to seek luxuries -- luxuries are quite luxurious.

   In relating to, conquering the world. I’d say as of now it is our niche. It's the human thing to do. Many of us like Schumpeter's gale & welcome change. The world isn't perfect and we recognize that. We will surely work to maintain the biomass' homeostasis because us selfish takers have of own homeostasis-es tied to such health of the biomass'/environment's homeostasis. Yes, our humanly interventions may not sustain itself forever, as shown in Ishmael, but, if our interventions are continuous & are ever-adapting, the biomass will be sustained as long as we assist or if we had set in motion an automotive system that does such for us.

   Ishmael finds this problematic because he finds that nothing humanity has done in the past has been successful for the earth as a whole & if humanity would continue their efforts it would be insane. But, hey I don’t find ourselves being in this perpetual state of adolescence. I don’t believe we're following the path of insanity expecting a different result from the same experiment. I believe we are adapting like the evolution does with all the species on our planet. Just in a different way. Instead of the traditional mutations in DNA. Were evolving through an explosion of ideas & connect-ted-ness. See our internet, the waning powers of nation-states, and the large gatherings of people apart of what-have-you avowed interests. Our species becoming a melting pot for awesome multiculturalism & not just some human-centric niche loving species. We humans now have biocentrists, cynocentrists [doggys first folk], ecocentrists, and yes we still have a few anthropocentrists. Even if our excess production temporarily affects the environment. We will learn how to fix the environment. We people love all the niches, all the cultures, and mega-nerds. When we become aware of the issue we attempt to solve it. Because that's how we do.

   The taker story comes from the assumption that a portion of humanity is significantly separated from another. That’s simply not true. We simply may have different motives. But, heck we're always are supporting one another as we support the other animals as they often help us. Albeit I do concede that a lot of the other animals haven't developed their brains much. Like the Hippos, but if we could genetically engineer the hippos to be (really) smart. So they wouldn't have to be such liability smashing into Walmarts and whatnot.

[murdochmaxwellharris]

[murdochmaxwellharris]

[murdochmaxwellharris]

[murdochmaxwellharris]

[murdochmaxwellharris]

[murdochmaxwellharris]

[murdochmaxwellharris]

♡☯ more like this ☯♡

[murdochmaxwellharris]

[murdochmaxwellharris]

[murdochmaxwellharris]

[murdochmaxwellharris]

[murdochmaxwellharris]