Cryptid (they/them) | 18+ {Personal} Things I find aesthetically pleasing | entertaining | relatable May contain: spoilers | gore | mental health issues | shipping #TooTiredToTag
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
cup of tea no breakfast: nothing remarkable
cup of coffee no breakfast:

29K notes
·
View notes
Text
"it's all in your head" correct! unfortunately I am also in there
243K notes
·
View notes
Text
beta server stress test going on so we are now the beatles
51K notes
·
View notes
Text
Today I saw a leaf that looked like a frog and I was like haha nice and then it hopped because it WAS a frog and I started crying bc life is really full of everyday miracles including but not limited to experiencing frogs
166K notes
·
View notes
Text
31K notes
·
View notes
Text
Diversity win! The horniest person you know is on the asexual spectrum
41K notes
·
View notes
Text
do y'all remember when they found all that tf art in Osamu Tezuka's drawer post-mortem because I think about it often
anyway keep chasing your bliss and draw weird shit, god knows we need that right now
86K notes
·
View notes
Text
38K notes
·
View notes
Note
hii, i found you from youtube!! are you thinking of posting any of the individual sprites from your art in the Meganeko Judgment video? :D
Hello! Unfortunately the sprites won't be posted anywhere publicly, but I might post some animation clips to my instagram monday.
Also I suppose this is the perfect bridge to bring this up for those unaware lol, but I made the art/visualizer for meganeko's latest release, and you can watch it here! (flashing lights warning, esp for the 2nd drop.)
youtube
The character(s) are also drawn in the As the World Ends style; it's not canon to the song, but I'd like to think our floaty friend here comes from the same universe as the AtWE pantheon :)
179 notes
·
View notes
Text
(an ask from my retrsopring)
Apologies in advance, this is going to sound harsh.
'What is different then?' It's not complicated. A computer is not a human. A computer can't think. A computer can't feel. A computer can't experience. A computer can't learn. To equate a computer's ability to copy and regurgitate data to a human's ability to communicate through art is so existentially offensive as a premise that it's inherently bad faith, even if you yourself aren't asking it in bad faith. You may as well be asking me what's the difference between a plagiarist and a writer, because if that difference between those two things is even entertained as a debate, then either you're being made an idiot or you are indulging idiots. At worst, both.
No one seems to debate this when it comes to the idea of, say, athletes. A machine can ostensibly produce the same results as a basketball player, throw a ball in the hoop and score points against other machines. But that's patently ridiculous, isn't it? People don't watch sports for the concept of throwing balls in hoops, people watch sports for human spectacle and physical ability.
It's a mistake to think art is only about the results, that's capitalist thinking in that only the end conclusion of the process has any value (fiscally or otherwise). Propaganda made by mediocre people who think being an 'idea guy' is the only important part of any project. Art is about ability, it's about expression, it's about making history. It's about human labor and craftsmanship. It's about being alive.
That a creator who is too lazy to respect their own art doesn't have the imagination to be good at it, and also they hate the planet and want humanity to die, ostensibly.
1K notes
·
View notes