nagetiere

[nagetiere]

I think anti-radqueers that claim to be accepting of recovering radqueers need to be nicer to paraphiles.

No matter how many "even if you're a paraphile, radqueers aren't the only ones who'll accept you!" posts you make, you're still effectively anti-para if you say that being anything other than ashamed of one's paraphilias is bad and that having pride flags for paraphilias is suspicious, and are thus unsafe for radqueer paraphiles looking to leave the community.

[nagetiere]

I forgot this account existed

[nagetiere]

Bit confused because all these terms get extremely mixed up for me: What’s TransID and hows it sperate from RadQueer?

TransID is just any trans identity that isn't transgender. The most well known ones are trace and transabled, but there's also ones that would be considered harmless such as transhaircolor and transartstyle.

Radqueer is an entire ideology, not just one belief. Radqueer supports transid, yes, but it's also inherently pro-contact/pro-abuse as well (which I am against)

[nagetiere]

The thing is, radqueers don't seem to realize that we don't dislike them because they're "vulnerable minorities" (sure) like they claim, we dislike them because they literally defend child abuse and blackface

[nagetiere]

ok i (formerly einhornsocken) am moving to @astriodent

fritz can have his blog back

[nagetiere]

dawg it is literally one of the first things you see on your blog. I looked at a post on your Public Tumblr Blog so i'm obviously an obsessed stalker. how privileged are you

this userbox is so funny to me because transid users aren't the ones being told "Aww you're actually transid but the evil antis groomed you into being anti-transition uwu" like arrisomei users

[nagetiere]

Don't you have better things to do than argue with children on the internet

haiii i used to be einhornsocken !! (the anti that has THANKFULLY deactivated) i'm not really into discourse anymore (hence why i don't have my own blog anymore and am posting this on a headmate's blog lol) but this post made me mad so i had to say something

for context devilradz was an "undercover" anti "pretending" (for lack of better words) to be a radqueer. their intentions didn't seem to be bad, though. they weren't intentionally trying to hurt anybody as far as we know (and i'd bet no radqueer is even actually as affected by this as they claim to be)

the person in the screenshot had a fairly popular anti blog at one point (burningradqueers) and then right before new years deactivated and made a rq blog. they were never actually an anti though. i will call them O because they seem to throw tantrums if you even dare mention their name

afaik the anti behind devilradz themselves didn't have anything to do with people finding out about O's radqueer blog. i don't remember them being involved in whatever was going down at all. personally disliking antis in general doesn't make it okay to be an ass to one specific anti that didn't even do anything wrong

i am the anti they are talking about when they say they were named publicly by an anti. you wanna know what actually happened? shortly after O had deactivated their anti blog, i got an anon saying that O was actually radqueer despite saying they were still an anti. i didn't believe this at first, and then whaddaya know? i get sent O's radqueer blog.

this is where me "publicly naming" O comes in. i wanted to let the other antis know that O was, infact, a radqueer, and that the anon wasn't lying. so i made a post along the lines of "burningradqueers is actually a radqueer, anon wasn't lying" but did not post the name of their radqueer blog anywhere.

at this time, i was still using O's deadname (unknowingly) and so i get told "hey this is O's current name please don't deadname them" by an anon. i guess because i started referring to O as their current name, that caused other antis to be able to find O's radqueer blog easier. not once did i tell ANYONE their rq blog's name. i literally just stopped using their deadname. i'm such a horrible person for using O's name /sar

"antis were fine with that" haha. multiple antis were saying things like "don't jump to conclusions!!" about O despite knowing that O was/is dating a pro c transn@z1 (censored so this actually shows up in tags). if anything, the other antis were overly kind to O.

"you only deserve privacy if you're an anti /sar" lol. there have been several anti blocklists/report lists made by radqueers. love it when radqueers say our community sucks and then do the exact same things they're criticizing us for /s

crosstagging because you guys (radqueers) will accept any and all information you're spoonfed as long as it comes from another radqueer

[nagetiere]

this userbox is so funny to me because transid users aren't the ones being told "Aww you're actually transid but the evil antis groomed you into being anti-transition uwu" like arrisomei users

[nagetiere]

"Trace transitioning" includes skin painting and racefishing you dumb fuck. "Trace transitioning" literally means you support blackface and asianfishing and the such.

I never insulted anyone but you and your dumbass community please learn reading comprehension🙏

haiii i used to be einhornsocken !! (the anti that has THANKFULLY deactivated) i'm not really into discourse anymore (hence why i don't have my own blog anymore and am posting this on a headmate's blog lol) but this post made me mad so i had to say something

for context devilradz was an "undercover" anti "pretending" (for lack of better words) to be a radqueer. their intentions didn't seem to be bad, though. they weren't intentionally trying to hurt anybody as far as we know (and i'd bet no radqueer is even actually as affected by this as they claim to be)

the person in the screenshot had a fairly popular anti blog at one point (burningradqueers) and then right before new years deactivated and made a rq blog. they were never actually an anti though. i will call them O because they seem to throw tantrums if you even dare mention their name

afaik the anti behind devilradz themselves didn't have anything to do with people finding out about O's radqueer blog. i don't remember them being involved in whatever was going down at all. personally disliking antis in general doesn't make it okay to be an ass to one specific anti that didn't even do anything wrong

i am the anti they are talking about when they say they were named publicly by an anti. you wanna know what actually happened? shortly after O had deactivated their anti blog, i got an anon saying that O was actually radqueer despite saying they were still an anti. i didn't believe this at first, and then whaddaya know? i get sent O's radqueer blog.

this is where me "publicly naming" O comes in. i wanted to let the other antis know that O was, infact, a radqueer, and that the anon wasn't lying. so i made a post along the lines of "burningradqueers is actually a radqueer, anon wasn't lying" but did not post the name of their radqueer blog anywhere.

at this time, i was still using O's deadname (unknowingly) and so i get told "hey this is O's current name please don't deadname them" by an anon. i guess because i started referring to O as their current name, that caused other antis to be able to find O's radqueer blog easier. not once did i tell ANYONE their rq blog's name. i literally just stopped using their deadname. i'm such a horrible person for using O's name /sar

"antis were fine with that" haha. multiple antis were saying things like "don't jump to conclusions!!" about O despite knowing that O was/is dating a pro c transn@z1 (censored so this actually shows up in tags). if anything, the other antis were overly kind to O.

"you only deserve privacy if you're an anti /sar" lol. there have been several anti blocklists/report lists made by radqueers. love it when radqueers say our community sucks and then do the exact same things they're criticizing us for /s

crosstagging because you guys (radqueers) will accept any and all information you're spoonfed as long as it comes from another radqueer

[nagetiere]

I'm not gonna send you death threats or whatever but I am gonna let you know that this is incredibly annoying. If you don't want antis tagging anti shit with radqueer tags, don't tag your shit with anti tags.

give me attention give me attention send me trauma dumps send me death threats tell me im being groomed plsplspls antis ^_^

[nagetiere]

The fact that radqueers made an "anti blocklist" is honestly hilarious, considering they've been saying "But!!! Public blocklists encourage harassment!!!" for ages

[nagetiere]

???

[nagetiere]

you mfs cry and throw up when someone tags some shit like "kids can't consent" with radqueer and then do this shit

If you’re an anti or neutral person who genuinely wants to learn about radqueers, I love you. It’s perfectly normal to be afraid of something you don’t understand and my DMs are always open to anyone with questions, even if I don’t have the exact answer.

[nagetiere]

there was another poll asking radqueers if they support skinpainting and at least half the votes were yes however i can't find the screenshot

"Expected since you're you" dawg you don't even know who i am you've literally only ever interacted with me to insult me and one of my headmates shut your bitch ass up

haiii i used to be einhornsocken !! (the anti that has THANKFULLY deactivated) i'm not really into discourse anymore (hence why i don't have my own blog anymore and am posting this on a headmate's blog lol) but this post made me mad so i had to say something

for context devilradz was an "undercover" anti "pretending" (for lack of better words) to be a radqueer. their intentions didn't seem to be bad, though. they weren't intentionally trying to hurt anybody as far as we know (and i'd bet no radqueer is even actually as affected by this as they claim to be)

the person in the screenshot had a fairly popular anti blog at one point (burningradqueers) and then right before new years deactivated and made a rq blog. they were never actually an anti though. i will call them O because they seem to throw tantrums if you even dare mention their name

afaik the anti behind devilradz themselves didn't have anything to do with people finding out about O's radqueer blog. i don't remember them being involved in whatever was going down at all. personally disliking antis in general doesn't make it okay to be an ass to one specific anti that didn't even do anything wrong

i am the anti they are talking about when they say they were named publicly by an anti. you wanna know what actually happened? shortly after O had deactivated their anti blog, i got an anon saying that O was actually radqueer despite saying they were still an anti. i didn't believe this at first, and then whaddaya know? i get sent O's radqueer blog.

this is where me "publicly naming" O comes in. i wanted to let the other antis know that O was, infact, a radqueer, and that the anon wasn't lying. so i made a post along the lines of "burningradqueers is actually a radqueer, anon wasn't lying" but did not post the name of their radqueer blog anywhere.

at this time, i was still using O's deadname (unknowingly) and so i get told "hey this is O's current name please don't deadname them" by an anon. i guess because i started referring to O as their current name, that caused other antis to be able to find O's radqueer blog easier. not once did i tell ANYONE their rq blog's name. i literally just stopped using their deadname. i'm such a horrible person for using O's name /sar

"antis were fine with that" haha. multiple antis were saying things like "don't jump to conclusions!!" about O despite knowing that O was/is dating a pro c transn@z1 (censored so this actually shows up in tags). if anything, the other antis were overly kind to O.

"you only deserve privacy if you're an anti /sar" lol. there have been several anti blocklists/report lists made by radqueers. love it when radqueers say our community sucks and then do the exact same things they're criticizing us for /s

crosstagging because you guys (radqueers) will accept any and all information you're spoonfed as long as it comes from another radqueer

[nagetiere]

I'm bringing up racism as an example because ~70% of radqueers support blackface and racefishing.

Pro-contact has ALWAYS meant supporting contact for things like pedophilia and zoophilia. Anti-contact has NEVER meant being anti-c for every single paraphilia. If you ask literally ANY pro-c radqueer what they mean by being pro-c they will tell you they don't think minor/adult and human/non-human relationships are inherently abusive.

You literally have said multiple times that being anti-radqueer is inherently bigoted (false). You have, in fact, insulted me for being anti-radqueer.

Just 2 minutes in the radqueer tags shows me at least 3 pro-c radqueers. That's an incredibly large amount for such a small community.

Again, NOBODY means they're anti-contact for every single paraphilia when they call themselves anti-c. Pro-contact means pro-contact for EVERY paraphilia and it always has. I never said pro-c was a term made specifically for radqueers, either. I hate pro-c non-radqueers just as much as I hate pro-c radqueers.

You know the different between POC and radqueers? POC are actually oppressed and being against them is actually harmful.

Also, you don't know SHIT about my system or my relationship with my headmates. I'm not just "tolerated" by the headmate that owns this blog. We are friends because I don't give a shit that he's pro-transid and he doesn't give a shit that I'm anti-transid.. Stop making assumptions about people you have never met in your life.

haiii i used to be einhornsocken !! (the anti that has THANKFULLY deactivated) i'm not really into discourse anymore (hence why i don't have my own blog anymore and am posting this on a headmate's blog lol) but this post made me mad so i had to say something

for context devilradz was an "undercover" anti "pretending" (for lack of better words) to be a radqueer. their intentions didn't seem to be bad, though. they weren't intentionally trying to hurt anybody as far as we know (and i'd bet no radqueer is even actually as affected by this as they claim to be)

the person in the screenshot had a fairly popular anti blog at one point (burningradqueers) and then right before new years deactivated and made a rq blog. they were never actually an anti though. i will call them O because they seem to throw tantrums if you even dare mention their name

afaik the anti behind devilradz themselves didn't have anything to do with people finding out about O's radqueer blog. i don't remember them being involved in whatever was going down at all. personally disliking antis in general doesn't make it okay to be an ass to one specific anti that didn't even do anything wrong

i am the anti they are talking about when they say they were named publicly by an anti. you wanna know what actually happened? shortly after O had deactivated their anti blog, i got an anon saying that O was actually radqueer despite saying they were still an anti. i didn't believe this at first, and then whaddaya know? i get sent O's radqueer blog.

this is where me "publicly naming" O comes in. i wanted to let the other antis know that O was, infact, a radqueer, and that the anon wasn't lying. so i made a post along the lines of "burningradqueers is actually a radqueer, anon wasn't lying" but did not post the name of their radqueer blog anywhere.

at this time, i was still using O's deadname (unknowingly) and so i get told "hey this is O's current name please don't deadname them" by an anon. i guess because i started referring to O as their current name, that caused other antis to be able to find O's radqueer blog easier. not once did i tell ANYONE their rq blog's name. i literally just stopped using their deadname. i'm such a horrible person for using O's name /sar

"antis were fine with that" haha. multiple antis were saying things like "don't jump to conclusions!!" about O despite knowing that O was/is dating a pro c transn@z1 (censored so this actually shows up in tags). if anything, the other antis were overly kind to O.

"you only deserve privacy if you're an anti /sar" lol. there have been several anti blocklists/report lists made by radqueers. love it when radqueers say our community sucks and then do the exact same things they're criticizing us for /s

crosstagging because you guys (radqueers) will accept any and all information you're spoonfed as long as it comes from another radqueer

[nagetiere]

If a racist tells me "racism isn't bad" I'm not gonna fucking believe them. I'm going to observe the behaviors of racists and decide that they are indeed pieces of shit. If a radqueer tells me "Radqueer isn't (defining belief of radqueer) I'm not going to believe them, I'm going to look at what radqueers believe. And 90% of radqueers are pro-c blackface supporters.

Tell me where I lied? Highlight every single part of my posts where I lied.

You are genuinely stupid as fuck. My 9 year old sibling has more reading comprehension than you. Do you want me to go on every single radqueer blog and screenshot where they say they're pro-c? That wouldn't help anyways, because you're so goddamn stupid that you don't even know the DEFINITION of pro-c.

I'm not 'invalidating my headmate'. I don't care that the headmate in question is transid + the headmate in question knows I'm anti-transid and is fine with that because he's tolerant of beliefs other than his own (unlike you)

haiii i used to be einhornsocken !! (the anti that has THANKFULLY deactivated) i'm not really into discourse anymore (hence why i don't have my own blog anymore and am posting this on a headmate's blog lol) but this post made me mad so i had to say something

for context devilradz was an "undercover" anti "pretending" (for lack of better words) to be a radqueer. their intentions didn't seem to be bad, though. they weren't intentionally trying to hurt anybody as far as we know (and i'd bet no radqueer is even actually as affected by this as they claim to be)

the person in the screenshot had a fairly popular anti blog at one point (burningradqueers) and then right before new years deactivated and made a rq blog. they were never actually an anti though. i will call them O because they seem to throw tantrums if you even dare mention their name

afaik the anti behind devilradz themselves didn't have anything to do with people finding out about O's radqueer blog. i don't remember them being involved in whatever was going down at all. personally disliking antis in general doesn't make it okay to be an ass to one specific anti that didn't even do anything wrong

i am the anti they are talking about when they say they were named publicly by an anti. you wanna know what actually happened? shortly after O had deactivated their anti blog, i got an anon saying that O was actually radqueer despite saying they were still an anti. i didn't believe this at first, and then whaddaya know? i get sent O's radqueer blog.

this is where me "publicly naming" O comes in. i wanted to let the other antis know that O was, infact, a radqueer, and that the anon wasn't lying. so i made a post along the lines of "burningradqueers is actually a radqueer, anon wasn't lying" but did not post the name of their radqueer blog anywhere.

at this time, i was still using O's deadname (unknowingly) and so i get told "hey this is O's current name please don't deadname them" by an anon. i guess because i started referring to O as their current name, that caused other antis to be able to find O's radqueer blog easier. not once did i tell ANYONE their rq blog's name. i literally just stopped using their deadname. i'm such a horrible person for using O's name /sar

"antis were fine with that" haha. multiple antis were saying things like "don't jump to conclusions!!" about O despite knowing that O was/is dating a pro c transn@z1 (censored so this actually shows up in tags). if anything, the other antis were overly kind to O.

"you only deserve privacy if you're an anti /sar" lol. there have been several anti blocklists/report lists made by radqueers. love it when radqueers say our community sucks and then do the exact same things they're criticizing us for /s

crosstagging because you guys (radqueers) will accept any and all information you're spoonfed as long as it comes from another radqueer

[nagetiere]

Oh my god You make me rethink giving radqueers basic respect

Pro-contact IS a fucking paraphile contact stance!!! Pro-contact means your support contact for paraphilias!!! I thought this would be obvious but you don't know the history of your Own Fucking Community

I never fucking said any radqueer broke the law!!!! Not ONCE!!! You don't have to break the law for something to be morally wrong!!!

I listen to radqueers!!! I have argued with multiple radqueers!!! And I am STILL anti-radqueer!!! I have talked to radqueers, I have observed their interactions with each other!!! And you are all racist ableist transphobic child abusers hiding under the label of "queer"!!!

I am anti-radqueer!!!! That is a singular belief that includes being anti-contact and (sometimes) anti-transid because being pro-transid and pro-contact is the entire basis of radqueer!!! Anti-radqueer literally cannot be an ideology because every single anti-radqueer believes vastly different shit!!! The only thing most anti-radqueers have in common is that they're anti-radqueer!!!

haiii i used to be einhornsocken !! (the anti that has THANKFULLY deactivated) i'm not really into discourse anymore (hence why i don't have my own blog anymore and am posting this on a headmate's blog lol) but this post made me mad so i had to say something

for context devilradz was an "undercover" anti "pretending" (for lack of better words) to be a radqueer. their intentions didn't seem to be bad, though. they weren't intentionally trying to hurt anybody as far as we know (and i'd bet no radqueer is even actually as affected by this as they claim to be)

the person in the screenshot had a fairly popular anti blog at one point (burningradqueers) and then right before new years deactivated and made a rq blog. they were never actually an anti though. i will call them O because they seem to throw tantrums if you even dare mention their name

afaik the anti behind devilradz themselves didn't have anything to do with people finding out about O's radqueer blog. i don't remember them being involved in whatever was going down at all. personally disliking antis in general doesn't make it okay to be an ass to one specific anti that didn't even do anything wrong

i am the anti they are talking about when they say they were named publicly by an anti. you wanna know what actually happened? shortly after O had deactivated their anti blog, i got an anon saying that O was actually radqueer despite saying they were still an anti. i didn't believe this at first, and then whaddaya know? i get sent O's radqueer blog.

this is where me "publicly naming" O comes in. i wanted to let the other antis know that O was, infact, a radqueer, and that the anon wasn't lying. so i made a post along the lines of "burningradqueers is actually a radqueer, anon wasn't lying" but did not post the name of their radqueer blog anywhere.

at this time, i was still using O's deadname (unknowingly) and so i get told "hey this is O's current name please don't deadname them" by an anon. i guess because i started referring to O as their current name, that caused other antis to be able to find O's radqueer blog easier. not once did i tell ANYONE their rq blog's name. i literally just stopped using their deadname. i'm such a horrible person for using O's name /sar

"antis were fine with that" haha. multiple antis were saying things like "don't jump to conclusions!!" about O despite knowing that O was/is dating a pro c transn@z1 (censored so this actually shows up in tags). if anything, the other antis were overly kind to O.

"you only deserve privacy if you're an anti /sar" lol. there have been several anti blocklists/report lists made by radqueers. love it when radqueers say our community sucks and then do the exact same things they're criticizing us for /s

crosstagging because you guys (radqueers) will accept any and all information you're spoonfed as long as it comes from another radqueer