niafrazier · 2 years ago
Text
is dance moms even still a thing? the way I haven’t kept up with that in years….
11 notes · View notes
niafrazier · 2 years ago
Text
twitter bout to die so i’ve reverted back to my original roots lmao
does anyone even remember me on here? 💀
5 notes · View notes
niafrazier · 4 years ago
Text
i spend so much of my time on twitter these days that i’m no longer used to the tumblr layout. it’s like i’m relearning everything now.
13 notes · View notes
niafrazier · 4 years ago
Text
so.
chloe’s a redhead
... and kendall and kalani are tr*mp supporters.
clearly i’ve missed a lot.
4 notes · View notes
niafrazier · 4 years ago
Text
making my annual tumblr appearance for the year.
how’s it goin
1 note · View note
niafrazier · 5 years ago
Text
It’s been ages since I’ve been on here. Who all is still here?
4 notes · View notes
niafrazier · 5 years ago
Video
youtube
Hi. Just popping back in to say that Christi Lukasiak was right after all these years.
67 notes · View notes
niafrazier · 5 years ago
Text
Tumblr media
565 notes · View notes
niafrazier · 5 years ago
Text
Whew. Long time  no see. Anyone out here watching the Dance Moms reboot? I see clips of it online from time to time and it looks like a trainwreck so there’s that. 
0 notes
niafrazier · 5 years ago
Text
This blog turned 5 years old yesterday... It’s crazy.
Around the end of my freshman year of high school, I remember making it to rant about dance moms and support Chloe and Nia...
I’m barely on now, but when I do post, it’s something about the 2020 U.S elections lmao. Strange.
0 notes
niafrazier · 5 years ago
Text
Holy shit. Chloe Lukasiak just turned 18 yesterday. Where the fuck have I been? I’m still convinced she’s 9 years old, and nobody can tell me otherwise.
31 notes · View notes
niafrazier · 6 years ago
Text
The ‘Buttigieg Bump’... But What about Cory Booker?
Okay... let me start off by saying that I adore Mayor Pete and think he has a very compelling story. In recent weeks, he’s had quite the surge in polling and popularity and is currently having a moment. Makes sense that he’s intriguing to many in the public eye... I mean the dude can speak 7 languages, is a war veteran, is a Rhodes Scholar, is increasingly becoming a formidable contender despite only being a mayor of a small college town in Indiana (pop. est. 102,245), etc. However, I cannot help but think why some of the other qualified, impressive candidates are not getting as much buzz as he is who also have similar backgrounds and other intriguing stories to tell...
This may be my bias showing, but... take Cory Booker for example:
- also a Rhodes Scholar
- Went to Yale Law School
- Chose to specifically serve as a mayor of a vulnerable, financially unstable  town in New Jersey: Newark (pop est. 285,154)
- Always went the extra mile to serve his constituents: Literally saved a woman from a burning building;  shoveled snow out of the driveway for an elderly man; saved dogs; allowed people stranded by Hurricane Sandy to sleep & eat in his home, etc.
- Currently a sitting Senator of New Jersey (since 2013)
- Was the driving force behind the major criminal justice reform bill that Donald Trump signed into law this past year
- Has a kickass Baby Bonds proposal that economists estimate could significantly close the racial wealth gap 
- Is just a genuinely overall positive figure amongst the divisiveness we see in politics on a daily. 
While one is currently being hailed by the media, the other is constantly tossed aside and ignored... but I would argue that Booker’s public service merits some sort of praise and attention as well. 
So what am I missing here? Where’s the love for Cory Booker?
4 notes · View notes
niafrazier · 6 years ago
Text
Yay it worked!!
Reminder to please block ‘politics’ tag if y’all dont wanna see that ish. 
0 notes
niafrazier · 6 years ago
Text
Making the Case for Beto O’Rourke
Full disclaimer: Beto is one of my top picks amongst the 2020 democratic field as of now. I’m a supporter but am in no way affiliated with his official campaign.
At a certain point, Beto O’Rourke was hailed by the media as basically the second coming of Obama, RFK, JFK, [insert any popular democratic figure from this past century… oh and Abe Lincoln]. After he unsuccessfully attempted to unseat Ted Cruz in the senate race, many people across the country were calling him to run for the presidency. He even surged in polling being just behind Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders, both who virtually have 100% name recognition. His senate race garnered national attention and even caught Oprah’s attention (she practically begged him to run on her show FFS). Many (including me) grew to admire his authentic, organic, and down-to-earth approach to politics, which is especially refreshing to see given the fact that everything seems so contrived nowadays. So, he wrestled with his decision thoughtfully and eventually came around to the idea, officially tossing his hat into the ring on March 14th, 2019. But now? Right out the gate, the narrative has shifted, and to the mainstream media pundits and Twittersphere, he is seen as an empty-suited, entitled, misogynistic, arrogant dude dripping with white male privilege. What changed?  How is it that the media, the very one that contributed to the rise of “Betomania,” subsequently went into a frenzy and poo-pooed all over his rollout? The faux outrage, double standards, and cynicism directed at Beto by opinion writers, pundits, etc. have basically motivated me to give my own takes on the most common criticisms I’ve seen thus far. So, here we go:
 “ ‘Man, I’m just born to be in it?’ ”
I’m not gonna lie, taking a look at the Vanity Fair cover and seeing that quote was a facepalm moment. As predicted, this quote sparked outrage fairly quickly… given the optics of a privileged straight white man joining a race of several qualified women and POC… Understandably so.  However, upon reading through the whole article, I was able to grasp the essence of Beto’s words. Here’s what he says leading up to his declaration, expressing urgency:
 “This is the fight of our lives…not the fight-of-my-political-life kind of crap. But, like, this is the fight of our lives as Americans, and as humans, I’d argue.”
And now here’s the full quote: “Man, I’m just born to be in it, and want to do everything I humanly can for this country at this moment.”
 He’s not so much saying that he was born to be in a position of power, rather, he’s expressing that during such dire times, especially in U.S. democracy, he could not in good conscience be complacent and not take action. Just as he was drawn to serve his district in El Paso as a 6 year city council member and a 3-term congressman, he believes that at this moment, he has a purpose to serve the whole nation by being as actively involved in the national discussion as possible—to stand up to bigotry and divisiveness displayed by the current administration of the White House. Beto basically confirmed what I had thought after further inspection when he clarified his statement later (Google it. I’m having trouble with my hyperlinks right now). Could he have worded it better? Sure. I just reject the notion that this one gaffe is supposed to sum him up as an egotistical maniac… please. 
“He adds absolutely no value to the race”
This is arbitrary depending on what your key issues are, but I’m gonna give my take on why I think he’s an excellent addition to the race. So, I’ve been intrigued about the possibility of an O’Rourke presidential run since he’s hinted at it back in November. I really didn’t know much about him until toward the end of Midterm season, but the more I learned, the more impressed I became. (Side note: it was this clip that first caught my full attention.) What really fueled my interest in Beto though, was his stance on immigration. As a first generation Nigerian American, this topic is pretty personal to me. My parents were fortunate enough to have the opportunity to immigrate to America and raise me and my three other siblings. However, I’ve also seen firsthand the difficulty of not only getting through with the ridiculous process but also assimilating into this country. For so long, the Democrats haven’t really made immigration a central issue, until the Trump administration hijacked it and pushed the Overton window all the way to the right. With heightened xenophobia running rampant in this country as a result of this abhorrent presidency, it is pertinent that the Democrats not merely pay lip service to this issue any longer and take serious action. Beto has an advantage here: He’s grown up in and served as a U.S House Rep. in the border district of El Paso, also home to the largest binational community in the Northern hemisphere. He can add a lot to the national discussion and debate on the matter. When Trump came to El Paso, the local community organized a counter rally where Beto gave an impassioned speech about the border wall and immigration. It’s pretty long, but I highly recommend the watch. Furthermore, Beto has outlined a 10 point proposal on how best to approach the immigration issue, along with some facts about the border’s history, which you can read here. Immigration hasn’t really been a winning issue, and I honestly don’t see it being one in 2020. With that being said, I respect the fact that despite this, Beto has shown that this is an issue that he deeply cares about. If I’m being honest, even though comprehensive immigration reform is universally called for amongst Democrats, I doubt that anyone in the field will truly make immigration a main priority in their prospective presidencies. To me, Beto has shown that he will. Even if he doesn’t clinch the nomination, it still means a ton to me that we can have the potential to change the narrative of immigration in this country with serious discussion. With the way Beto is able to convey his message, I am hopeful for what’s to come.  
So, let’s talk about Texas. With the way Beto was able to energize the Democratic base in Texas, Democrats have the opportunity to put the Republican bastion state into play. With 38 electoral votes at stake, Texas is extremely crucial for the GOP. To put things in perspective, if Texas turned blue in 2016, President Hillary Clinton would have been a thing.
*Bonus: “He Lost to Ted Cruz lol… already a nonstarter”
Yes. But you know who else lost to Ted in Texas? Donald Trump. Cruz obliterated him in the Texas Republican primaries. I’m not saying Texas is guaranteed to turn blue with Beto on the ballot, but if we learned anything in 2016, it’s not to underestimate the possibility of seemingly blue or red states to flip at any given moment. The GOP has taken note of this. We’ve seen that Beto has a ton of appeal in Texas amongst not only Democrats but Never-Trump-Republicans and independents as well! If Beto is on that ballot, the GOP will most likely exhaust a ton of resources and money into Texas to keep it from going blue. This will only make other states that Trump won with the slimmest of margins vulnerable. Also… I find it disingenuous to make comparisons between Beto and other senators that hail from deeply blue states regarding electability. If Beto lost to Ted in California, then yeah… we could have a conversation about that.
“A woman running mate is his preference? Who does he think he is?”
The backlash on this surprised me, to be honest… Even Whoopi Goldberg blasted his ass for the statement on The View.  If I had to go on a whim here, I feel like it was the Vanity Fair article that sort of set the mood for Beto’s campaign thus far… because otherwise, I believe that this really wouldn’t have been a story. In fact, Beto is not the only male candidate to call for a woman VP. Cory Booker and Bernie Sanders have strongly hinted at choosing a woman running mate. Interestingly enough, I didn’t recall there being any backlash. Here are Beto’s full remarks on choosing a woman as his running mate:
"It would be very difficult not to select a woman with so many extraordinary women who are running right now, but first I would have to win and there's-- you know, this is as open as it has ever been."
This is very much the response I expected from Beto. Time and time again, he has openly acknowledged his privilege, even before getting hammered about it on social media. In the Vanity Fair article, he states his stance on lack of representation in Washington:
“The government at all levels is overly represented by white men,” he says. “That’s part of the problem, and I’m a white man. So if I were to run, I think it’s just so important that those who would comprise my team looked like this country. If I were to run, if I were to win, that my administration looks like this country. It’s the only way I know to meet that challenge.”
Furthermore, he is understanding and considerate of the fact that people are craving for diversity.  Here’s what he says:
“But I totally understand people who will make a decision [cast a vote in the primaries] based on the fact that almost every single one of our presidents has been a white man, and they want something different for this country. And I think that’s a very legitimate basis upon which to make a decision. Especially in the fact that there are some really great candidates out there right now.”
I know I don’t speak for all POC or women, but as a WOC myself, I took no issue to his statements. In fact, I appreciate his sensitivity to the issue and the fact that he doesn’t shy away from addressing uncomfortable topics in politics, such as race and representation.
Let’s just be glad he didn’t pull a Hickenlooper…. Jesus.
“Light on policy… but he stands on counters amirite?”
To discuss this point, it’s important to understand Beto’s campaign style. Beto is more like a blank canvass. What he does is first listen to people and their concerns, and then from there, he shapes his policies around that. He feels that this is the best way to serve the people. The point of his road trips and tours was not to lecture people on full fleshed policy proposals. There is debate on whether or not this is an effective strategy, and I do understand that people do like to know exactly what they’re signing up for before casting a vote. That’s why some people will more likely gravitate toward candidates like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren who have been consistent in their messaging. However, I also think people underestimate the power of simply listening. Take these comments that a potential voter made concerning Beto’s ability to listen during his stop in South Carolina for example:
"I think if he keeps talking to the people and being able to listen, and not talk at the African-American voters. Talk to us. Listen to what we have to say… As long as you listen and then actually put forward ideas that are legitimate ideas to do things, then he will be fine.”
 While policy specifics are important, this is still the early stages of Beto’s campaign. Specifics, of course, will have to come at some point, especially when debates come around. Another critique I hear is Beto not having any policy proposals on his website yet. He’s not alone though.  Several candidates who have been running longer than he has don’t either. It’s also important to note that while people in the race most likely have been mulling a presidential run for several months or years, this has been something that came around to Beto as recent as November 2018. Stuff like this takes time. I think he has potential, however, in this area. For instance, as I mentioned earlier, he has put out a 10-point proposal on immigration. He also has a brief 5-point plan regarding criminal justice reform and legalization of marijuana. (Fun fact, he even coauthored a book concerning the legalization of weed.)  And it’s not like he hasn’t taken stances on issues ever either… I mean, he has a whole congressional record, and his townhalls give you an idea of where he stands on key issues. 
Oh... and about the countertops. Ugh. The fact that this really sparked outrage is comical. I’ve seen all sorts of takes on this from asserting his male dominance to throwing his youth in Bernie and Biden’s faces (lmao). At a campaign stop, the owner of the coffee shop that he was at asked him to stand on the countertop because people complained that they weren’t able to see Beto amongst the crowds and camera equipment (despite him being 6’4’’, ha). So then it just became a thing since. And he’s respectful about it in case anyone was wondering, lol. But there’s one thing I think both the Beto detractors and I can agree on: why tf is this getting media coverage? I do agree that there should be more coverage for other candidates concerning the real issues. However, the response shouldn’t be to go after Beto or chastise him for doing harmless acts during his campaign stops… Talk that up with the media. The ironic thing about this is that some of the media pundits complain about giving Beto so much coverage… all while giving Beto more coverage about the coverage he’s receiving… 🙄
So if you made it to the end of this extremely long effortpost, thank you. I actually had tons more to discuss but I’m not trying to make this into a novel. Anyways, I’ll say one last thing: 
Before going along with groupthink or engaging in the toxic political echo chamber that is Twitter, I implore you all to take a step back and actually get to know these candidates. Seek after local news outlets when candidates visit to get a feel of the vibes from locals. Go to Beto’s Facebook page and watch a town hall or two. You may come home with a different impression than what is portrayed in mainstream media. I can tell you that when I did this, the difference was night and day.  We have such an amazing field of contenders to choose from, and I’d hate for misinformation or bad-faith arguments to warp perceptions.   
7 notes · View notes
niafrazier · 6 years ago
Text
so i’ve gotten pretty invested in politics lately... I’m just gonna warn y’all... just please mute the tag ‘politics’ if you couldn’t care less lmao.
0 notes
niafrazier · 6 years ago
Text
When reports of Joe Biden picking his VP candidate early first came out, initially, I thought it would be a solid strategy.... but the more I think about it, I find that this could really potentially backfire. Big time.
0 notes
niafrazier · 6 years ago
Text
Kamala Harris Explained
#Harris2020!
What’s hilarious about Harris’ campaign to me is her slogan:
Tumblr media
In my state, there’s this super-law firm owned by super-lawyer John Morgan, and they advertise heavily. There are billboards and tv ads all over the place and they all end with the firm’s slogan. Just guess what it is.
youtube
Kamala Harris. For the People.
Keep reading
4 notes · View notes