nkooookkk

[nkooookkk]

forcemasc but it's me pushing that cis friend I'm about to lose yo incel propaganda to man up and own his masculinity without being a little bitch about it

[nkooookkk]

KEEP IN MIND ‼️‼️‼️

[nkooookkk]

You do know you can keep her sexually satisfied even if you're not in the mood, right? Dude, you don't even have to do anything at all. Just hold her as she makes herself cum. That's it. That's all you have to do. If you're not in the mood for sex, you still need to make her feel wanted and desired. If you don't touch her, she's going to start staring at herself in the mirror and wonder what's wrong with her

Hold her. Kiss her. That's it. That's literally it. She'll do the rest. It's so easy

[nkooookkk]

Wild to look back at the Hunger Games trilogy now and know that at any given moment there's like a 70% chance that Haymitch is reciting "The Raven" in his head.

[nkooookkk]

Yes, I am a straight man. Yes, getting the shit beat out of me in an all-male mosh pit is an erotic experience for me. We exist

[nkooookkk]

Struggling to explain that my ideal relationship dynamic is basically evil god x devoted dog.

[nkooookkk]

if you’re a transmac person who DOES NOT have a misgendering kink / detrans kink, pls reblog this

[nkooookkk]

one of my opinions (that seems niche and trivial to cis people, and maybe even a lot of trans people, but I genuinely take pretty seriously) is that we need to stop comparing penises to vaginas as "complementary" structures.

there's this thing where most kids are taught "boys have penises and girls have vaginas" (if they're taught terms for their body parts at all), and even the sort of progressive "trans inclusive" version is like "some people have penises and some people have vaginas."

and I just find it such a rhetorical slight of hand to imply a greater difference between bodies than is actually there.

the penis is not an analogous structure to the vagina. the penis is an analogous structure to the clitoris. if we compared the two, we can much more easily understand this is the same structure that may form in a diversity of ways (e.g. the length, whether the urethra is routed through it, whether or not it is set in a downward position by the surrounding tissue or whether it is only connected at the base, etc.).

similarly, a vagina is not analogous to the penis. the vagina seems much more analogous to the areas of the inguinal canals and perineum, the space in the body that external genitalia can be "tucked" inside of. if we compare the two, we can more easily understand these structures (e.g. not articulating the vagina as an "open hole" but as an area that can accommodate something within it, without being permanently changed).

the way that we constantly pair vaginas with penises in order to make sexed bodies seem more differentiated than they actually are is ideological. it's like saying "men have hands and women have breasts." like sure, that's true in many cases... but women also have hands and men also have breast tissue. why are these traits becoming emblematic of legal/economic categories? what does the exclusion of women's hands and men's breast tissue do to our understanding of the body in general?

(side tangent--and sure, you can say "but penises fit into vaginas" "but hands can fit around breasts" absolutely! those realities don't change by acknowledging they are different parts of the body. penises also fit into anuses and hands also fit around butt cheeks. you can use body parts in many ways. it doesn't mean they need to be used that way, can only be used that way, or is more "natural" to use them in that way than in any other way.)

there are many people who don't even realize they have a clitoris, and I feel like it's pretty much exclusively trans women and their lovers who are aware enough of their bodies to engage in muffing and such. we are denied information on using our own bodies by what parts are erased as "irrelevant" to procreation.

in my opinion, this constant pairing of vaginas with penises as "complementary opposites" creates the impression of a more dramatic difference between "sexes" than exists, and privileges a procreative heterosexual understanding of sexuality over all others.

[nkooookkk]

“what if kids identify with something and it ends up just being a phase-?” good. stop teaching and expecting kids (and adults honestly) to formulate permanent traits and ideas of themselves. everything in life is a phase. that doesn’t make it any less legitimate while you experience it. let people explore themselves and know it’s okay if what you think about yourself changes.

[nkooookkk]

Quote by Julian K. Jarboe.

[nkooookkk]

If you do it with enough devotion and no fear it will come back to you as hotness

sacrifice your beauty on the altar of your manhood

[nkooookkk]

fucking her on my car, with one hand between her legs and the other one alternating between her neck and her ass slapping her angrily for no reason other than to feel her pussy clenching around my fingers and hearing her moan and whimper

[nkooookkk]

this line delivery has lived in my head for 10 years

[nkooookkk]

Making a desperate, slutty boy say "I'm your dog" over and over again while hopelessly humping a pillow and whimpering. You agree, reblog.

[nkooookkk]

Me liking a bunch of your posts is the equivalent to a puppy nudging your hand for pets. (Also I'd probably want you to fuck me stupid but pets is cool too)