not-a-motobug

[not-a-motobug]

GOODBYE.

[not-a-motobug]

MARIO HAS A MESSAGE FOR YOU

[not-a-motobug]

inb4 one of them is revealed as gay

Blizzard Entertainment astounds the world with their incredible variety of facial options, making every facial choice look entirely unique

(I want to clarify that these are not repeat screenshots, these are literally ALL OF THE FACE OPTIONS FOR MALE KUL’TIRAN HUMANS)

[not-a-motobug]

yes but

THAT FLUTE

[not-a-motobug]

oof ahh it happened again!

[not-a-motobug]

That one outfit Mina has that a combination of a black dress and thigh/knee(?) high boots is such a look and y'all never draw her in it

[not-a-motobug]

Japanese designer Haruki Nakamura creates interactive paper toys.

[not-a-motobug]

wicked

reblog by only using one word to describe what country/state you’re from

cheese

[not-a-motobug]

unmute this now

[not-a-motobug]

Clearly you still don't get it, even after the PPG reboot fizzled out of the public conciousness because everyone simply stopped giving a shit. Keep fueling the hate circlejerk. Dump your unjustified rage on a fucking kids cartoon to fuel your petty little ego. Keep weeping your sad little save season six tears. CN doesn't give a shit. Any publicity for this show is good publicity. The TTGO writers shamelessly mock you just solely to get under your skin, yet you keep taking the bait. You're beyond help.

Yo but some things are objectively bad; low quality animation, cliche and lazy writing, ageing super poorly, etc. Isn't shit over-rated if it has those bad elements but people still defend it? Like, their liking of it is fine if it isn't actively promoting the KKK or whatever, but stuff can definitely be over-rated. Gen 1 of Pokemon is that. People love it and will say it's the best, but objectively it's got messy art and buggy code that Later titles fixed. That's over-rated

I don’t feel you can review something objectively, especially with art.

What exactly is the correct amount people should should enjoy a highly influential game like Gen 1 Pokemon? How many of these would people notice glitches in an interactive medium? I don’t remember crashing my game from my experience. Objectively I’d say it’s not glitchy since I didn’t notice any. How is the art messy if there’s tons of people who appreciate 8 bit art? Is art only good if it’s done without the restrictions of screen resolution rather than the artist working within their limitations? Would that mean paintings done on smaller canvases or limited colors inferior?  Who decides if 8 bit art is objectively good or bad? Who decides how to objectively review a game from the 90s? Do you compare it to what we have now or do you go into it pretending you’re a person not spoiled by modern innovations?

Is their a council to decide what is objective? Powerpuff Girls, Hannah Barbera Shows and Tons of anime have limited animation. But they work well within their limitations. Should I deduct points for the Powerpuff Girls for not having fingers or not looking like a Disney Film? When does it objectively become a lazily drawn? Iron Giant is derivative of ET and other similar stories. Is that objectively a bad movie? Is execution no longer valid when we have a black and white check list telling us if a movies good or bad.

Who decides what’s objective?

If reviews objectively review things why don’t we just have only 1 person on Metacritic who is certified objective? Objectivly how many points should you deduct for a flaw? Do regular people not review things objectivly? Do they accept the flaws of a product and still love it? 

How does Cypher in the Matrix consult with Agent Smith over steak? You can’t enter and exit the matrix without someone else at the control panel. If they could, the rest of the conflict in the action falls apart. Objectivly the Matrix is broken but it’s objectivly reviewed before as a classic

SEREROUSLY HWO THE FUCK DID CYBER DO THAT

[not-a-motobug]

A dullahan bunny girl

[not-a-motobug]

Holy fuck that's a show I completely forgot about.

Yeah Get Ed had the most hyped theme song. Never actually watched the show.

[not-a-motobug]

Thanks for the recommendation, FireFox

[not-a-motobug]

This guy is worse than the Pokemon fans screeching in unison about how Let's Go is not "muh Gen 8" when all you have to do is just not fucking buy the game. If you think a show is awful and needs to die, then just shut the fuck up about it and don't give it constant publicity. TTGO has literally only survived this long out of spite for the hate train, and they make that so blatantly obvious yet you STILL keep feeding into it like the ego-fueled hivemind that you are. The people riding the Shit on TTGO Train are the real problem here and they're too oblivious to their own retardation to realize it.

Yo but some things are objectively bad; low quality animation, cliche and lazy writing, ageing super poorly, etc. Isn't shit over-rated if it has those bad elements but people still defend it? Like, their liking of it is fine if it isn't actively promoting the KKK or whatever, but stuff can definitely be over-rated. Gen 1 of Pokemon is that. People love it and will say it's the best, but objectively it's got messy art and buggy code that Later titles fixed. That's over-rated

I don’t feel you can review something objectively, especially with art.

What exactly is the correct amount people should should enjoy a highly influential game like Gen 1 Pokemon? How many of these would people notice glitches in an interactive medium? I don’t remember crashing my game from my experience. Objectively I’d say it’s not glitchy since I didn’t notice any. How is the art messy if there’s tons of people who appreciate 8 bit art? Is art only good if it’s done without the restrictions of screen resolution rather than the artist working within their limitations? Would that mean paintings done on smaller canvases or limited colors inferior?  Who decides if 8 bit art is objectively good or bad? Who decides how to objectively review a game from the 90s? Do you compare it to what we have now or do you go into it pretending you’re a person not spoiled by modern innovations?

Is their a council to decide what is objective? Powerpuff Girls, Hannah Barbera Shows and Tons of anime have limited animation. But they work well within their limitations. Should I deduct points for the Powerpuff Girls for not having fingers or not looking like a Disney Film? When does it objectively become a lazily drawn? Iron Giant is derivative of ET and other similar stories. Is that objectively a bad movie? Is execution no longer valid when we have a black and white check list telling us if a movies good or bad.

Who decides what’s objective?

If reviews objectively review things why don’t we just have only 1 person on Metacritic who is certified objective? Objectivly how many points should you deduct for a flaw? Do regular people not review things objectivly? Do they accept the flaws of a product and still love it? 

How does Cypher in the Matrix consult with Agent Smith over steak? You can’t enter and exit the matrix without someone else at the control panel. If they could, the rest of the conflict in the action falls apart. Objectivly the Matrix is broken but it’s objectivly reviewed before as a classic

SEREROUSLY HWO THE FUCK DID CYBER DO THAT

[not-a-motobug]

Friendly reminder that the Playstation Classic is releasing the same week as Super Smash Bros. Ultimate, a game that costs less, has more content AND Classic PlayStation representation, supports analog sticks, and doesn’t require an AC adaptor that’s sold seperately.