Text
Bruce Wayne and the Gender Binary
By @official-lex-luthor
Bruce Wayne is many things—generous, driven, and often right. But there’s one thing he gets wrong every single time: he misgenders me.
After transitioning, I embraced who I truly am, yet Bruce refuses to acknowledge it. He continues to call me a man, despite my open presentation as a nonbinary person. He even excuses it by pointing out my pronouns are he/him, as well as they/them.
This isn’t a simple mistake. It’s a choice, a deliberate refusal to see me for who I am. It's a sign that Bruce Wayne's concept of gender is fixated, essentialist and exorsexist. I half-expected him to ask me what's in my pants next.
@imbatman-imtired claims to fight for justice and equality, but how can he stand for those values when he can’t respect something as basic as someone’s identity? Misgendering isn’t just an oversight; it’s an active dismissal of a person’s humanity.
For someone like Bruce—who prides himself on compassion and justice—his disregard for my gender is hypocritical. It’s a reflection of a larger societal issue that even a philanthropist like him can’t escape.
Transphobia is real, and it’s often in the little things: the small acts of erasure.
I don’t need his approval, but I do expect respect. If Bruce truly wants to be the hero he thinks he is, he needs to learn that respecting a person’s identity is part of the fight for justice.
Lex Luthor World’s Smartest Enby COO of LexCorp Trans Rights Advocate
27 notes
·
View notes
Text
The Dark Truth Behind Bruce Wayne: A Cautionary Tale
By @dottie-mcveigh
In the shadows of Gotham City, a sinister reality lurks beneath the polished facade of one of its most prominent figures—Bruce Wayne.
While the world knows him as a billionaire philanthropist, the truth is far more disturbing. Beneath the surface, @officialbruciewayne is not merely a man of wealth; he is a master of deception, a puppeteer hiding his malevolent intentions behind a mask of charm and benevolence.
For years, rumors have swirled about Wayne’s clandestine activities, whispers that go beyond mere speculation. It is imperative we confront the uncomfortable truth: Bruce Wayne’s empire is built on and for the exploitation of the city’s most vulnerable inhabitants—its children.
Wayne Enterprises has become synonymous with charitable giving, funding orphanages and youth programs, while the reality is much darker. How convenient that the very institutions he donates to also serve as a cover for his nefarious operations. These facilities, meant to protect and nurture, may instead be breeding grounds for the very abuse we hope to eradicate.
Wayne’s carefully curated public image allows him to operate undetected, an illusion that conceals his true nature. His wealth buys silence and compliance, but the walls of this façade are crumbling. It is time to shine a light on the shadows he desperately tries to keep hidden.
Reports of missing children in Gotham have become alarmingly frequent, yet the media remains blissfully ignorant, wrapped in the comfort of Wayne’s reputation. But what if those children are not merely lost? What if they are being ensnared by the very man who professes to protect them? The signs are there, if only people would take off their rose-colored glasses and look closely.
Whistleblowers within Wayne Enterprises have spoken out about troubling practices. Allegations suggest that Wayne uses his influence to silence those who dare to reveal the truth. The very institutions he claims to support could be funneling children into a system that exploits their vulnerability. It’s an intricate web of lies, one that stretches across the city, ensnaring countless innocent lives.
As we confront this disturbing reality, we must raise critical questions that demand answers:
Are Bruce Wayne’s adopted children truly safe in his care or are they subjects of his darker impulses?
What really happened to Jason Todd? Did Bruce, in a moment of rage or to cover up his deviant urges, cross a line that cost a young boy his life?
Could the trauma and secrecy surrounding Todd’s fate be the catalyst for Dick Grayson’s abrupt departure to Blüdhaven?
Was it a desperate escape from an abusive household, a move to protect himself from the same fate?
These inquiries are not just speculative; they are essential to understanding the true nature of the man who walks among us as a celebrated philanthropist and charming dilettante.
It is essential that we confront the myth of Bruce Wayne head-on. He is not a savior; he is a predator hiding in plain sight.
The narrative of a lonely billionaire who once tragically orphaned now takes in young and vulnerable children is captivating, but it obscures the reality of his actions. He is not the kind family man he portrays himself as, and any who seek to unmask him are themselves punished legally, financially and perhaps—with their lives.
I—myself—was sacked from the Gotham Gazette for seeking to dig deeper into Bruce Wayne's complex web of deceit.
We must ask ourselves: how many children have gone missing while Gotham lauds Wayne as a hero? How many lives have been shattered because we chose to ignore the signs? How many more children will this man take, exploit and abuse?
The time for complacency is over. The citizens of Gotham must rise to challenge this injustice. It is our duty to protect the vulnerable, to ensure that our city does not become a breeding ground for predators like Wayne.
Bruce Wayne may hold power, but it is the collective voice of the people that will shine a light on his dark deeds.
Let us not be blinded by his wealth and influence. Instead, let us demand accountability, and work together to unearth the truth.
Only then can we hope to save the innocent children ensnared in Wayne’s insidious grasp and trapped in that mausoleum of abuse. The time for action is now, and together, we can ensure no more children fall prey to a sick man.
Dorothy Moire Mcveigh
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization or individual.
#tw child abuse reference#tw antisemitism#tw bloodlibel#tw csa reference#tw murder reference#tw false child abuse allegations#tw false csa allegations#tw unreality
20 notes
·
View notes
Text
Behind the Cape: My Struggle for Truth
My turbulent and abusive affair with Superman, a tell-all by Lois Lane
As a journalist, I’ve always prided myself on uncovering the truth, no matter how uncomfortable it may be. Today, I find myself in the most challenging story of my life—one that reveals the hidden darkness behind the man who is supposed to be a hero, as well as my own flaws.
This is about my affair with @official--superman and how it turned into my nightmare.
#metoo
For years, I’ve been married to Clark Kent (@official-clark-kent), a man who has been my partner in every sense of the word.
But despite that love, I became swept up in an affair with Superman, the world’s most iconic superhero. What began as a whirlwind of excitement and wonder quickly spiraled into a relationship that would haunt me, eventually destroying my marriage and leading to my divorce.
The truth I’m about to share is difficult, but it’s essential. I need to shed light on a reality that’s often overlooked: the man I loved used his powers not just to protect me, but to intimidate me, to terrorize me, to hurt me.
In the beginning, being with Superman was exhilarating. But as I got to know him, I began to see another side—a side that was controlling and, at times, violent. What started as an intense romance became a source of fear. During arguments, his strength loomed over me, and I often felt powerless, trapped in my relationship with a Kryptonian.
I was drawn into a dangerous fantasy, swept away by the allure of a man who defied the very laws of nature. Yet, as I navigated the complexities of my marriage to Clark and my affair with Superman, I found myself increasingly isolated. Superman’s concern for my safety morphed into manipulation, and I began to silence my own voice. I was unable to tell my husband what was happening, afraid of betraying him, but at the same time, I felt imprisoned by Superman.
I felt as though I was losing myself, caught between two worlds, one that looked to all the world like a perfect man and the other filled with fear.
The world saw Superman as the ultimate good, but I was left feeling ashamed and alone, convinced that my pain didn’t matter in the grand narrative of a superhero’s life. I share this not to vilify Clark, who remains blameless, nor myself for my weakness, but to highlight a truth that many may find hard to grasp: abuse can come in many forms, even from those we admire most.
It’s time for me to reclaim my story and my voice. I urge anyone who has faced similar struggles to recognize that love should never be suffocating. Healing begins with acknowledging the truth, even when it’s painful.
I hope that by sharing my experience, I can empower others to speak out and seek help. We deserve relationships built on respect and equality, not fear and control. Behind the cape, there can be darkness, and it’s time to bring it into the light.
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
Kryptonians: Man's Best Friend?
by @official-clark-kent
Picture this: a world gone mad, where the sanctity of marriage is stretched to its breaking point. If we embrace the idea of marrying aliens, we’re opening Pandora’s box to the absurdity of interspecies relatonships! What’s next? People getting married to their dogs? Obscene relations with ducks?! This is not merely a whimsical thought—it’s a direct threat to the very fabric of our society!
Let’s be clear: the notion of love transcending boundaries is one thing, but legitimizing relationships with different species is an entirely different, outrageous proposition. If we accept that anything goes, we risk trivializing the meaning of marriage itself. What happens to the values we hold dear? Are we willing to watch as our laws become a playground for the ridiculous?
This isn’t just a slippery slope; it’s a full-scale societal collapse waiting to happen! We must take a stand before we find ourselves attending doggie weddings, where “happily ever after” becomes a punchline rather than a promise. It’s time to wake up and defend the sanctity of love before we end up in a world where “I do” means anything and everything, including a wagging tail!
Please see here for scientific evidence that supports banning marriage between humans and non-humans!
53 notes
·
View notes
Text
Exclusive: The Dark Truth about the Late Waynes!
In a shocking twist that could rock Gotham to its very foundation, a scandal has been revealed that the beloved Thomas and Martha Wayne weren't just a power couple—they were in a steamy throuple with none other than their loyal butler, Alfred Pennyworth!
Behind the façade of philanthropy and family values lies a scandal suggesting the Waynes's trusted servant was also providing sexual services. Sources report that the trio often engaged in clandestine rendezvous, with @butlerofthecave playing the role of "well-loved pet" or perhaps even, the true master of the household.
This revelation could even finally explain @officialbruciewayne’s well-documented behavior as a nymphomaniac.
Raised in a household where boundaries were blurred, young Bruce was likely influenced by his parents’ unconventional and abnormal desires. Witnessing the dynamic between his parents and their butler could shed light on Bruce's incessant need for physical affection and thrill-seeking behaviors.
Is he simply acting out the legacy of a household built on ill-controlled passion and secrecy? Or is the truth darker yet?
And what about Alfred?
Gotham’s beloved butler has always maintained an air of mystery. Was he simply the dutiful caretaker, or was he the driving force behind the Wayne family’s scandalous lifestyle?
Insider whispers suggest Alfred was more than just a caretaker—he was a confidant, a partner in crime, and perhaps even the secret affair that kept the Wayne household in a perpetual state of emotional turmoil.
So, Gotham, what’s the real story behind the facade of the Wayne family? With this scandalous revelation, we’re left questioning everything we thought we knew. As the drama unfolds, one thing is for sure—Wayne Manor will never look the same again! Stay tuned for more explosive updates!
#tw sex mention#tw mild child abuse implications#tw horrible tabloid journalism#tw antipolyamory#tw kink shaming#tw honestly this is awful
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
Aliens Destroy Marriage
written by @official-lex-luthor and @official-clark-kent
The U.S. Federal Court's decision to recognize marriages conducted beyond Earth jurisdiction raises significant concerns about prioritizing extraterrestrial interests over human safety. While intended to promote equality, this ruling could have dire implications, especially considering the physical dangers posed by certain extraterrestrial beings.
Legitimizing unions formed in unregulated territories raises questions about accountability and oversight. How can we ensure these relationships are entered into consensually, especially when some extraterrestrials possess powers that can easily be misused?
The potential for exploitation is a very real concern.
As public sentiment shifts toward anxiety over alien influences, this decision risks deepening divisions rather than fostering understanding. We must prioritize the safety of our own citizens, who rightly fear the implications of increasing extraterrestrial presence.
True progress cannot come from hastily integrating alien customs into our legal framework. It must involve thoughtful dialogue that respects both human and extraterrestrial rights, without compromising our safety.
As always, the Daily Planet, will advocate for a more rational approach to the alien question—one that places humanity's security and sovereignty at the forefront.
“Alien Marriage” Bill Passes Federal Court
The US Federal court has passed the highly contested bill to recognise legal marriages made outside of Earth jurisdiction.
The United States has legally recognised marriages performed in all foreign terrestrial jurisdictions, under most circumstances. In a historical movement for recognising the rights of our extraterrestrial brethren, the courts have passed a bill to recognise all marriages made outside Earth territories under the same circumstances as Earth territories. As long as the marriage is recognised as currently legally valid and validated by the local law where the marriage took place.
Amongst the rise in negative outcry towards extraterrestrial residents by public figures, this decision is a step forward in recognising the equality and rights of extraterrestrial refugees, residents and visitors.
Click to Read More
16 notes
·
View notes
Text
The Unseen Cost of Superman's Heroics
by @official-clark-kent
As we celebrate the heroics of @official--superman, it’s crucial to delve into the ultimate consequences of his interventions. Each battle against supervillains leaves a trail of devastation—cities reduced to rubble, innocent lives lost, and countless families displaced. While he may save the day, the collateral damage often overshadows his noble intentions.
Superman, an alien among us, operates without the same accountability that humans face. His actions prompt us to question whether a being of such power should truly be our savior, or if he represents an existential threat to humanity itself.
Superman's presence in our world fosters a dangerous reliance on a single figure for our safety. This dependence undermines our own resilience and ability to confront challenges. When disaster strikes, citizens look to Superman rather than taking action themselves, perpetuating a cycle of complacency. The notion that one being can solve our problems ultimately diminishes the value of human effort and ingenuity.
As we weigh the benefits of his superhuman interventions, we must also confront the harsh reality of the environment he creates—one fraught with danger and unpredictability. Shouldn’t we prioritize a path that empowers humanity instead of relying on an alien savior?
Additionally, Superman’s presence raises profound ethical questions about accountability. When massive destruction occurs in Metropolis or any city he protects, who bears the responsibility?
Superman operates outside the jurisdiction of our laws, making decisions that can lead to catastrophic consequences without facing repercussions. He cannot be killed, cannot be harmed, cannot be held responsible. What possible mercy does a god have for us petty humans?
In our society, individuals are held accountable for their actions, but Superman exists in a realm beyond this accountability. This lack of oversight invites potential abuse of power and creates a precedent that could ultimately threaten our democratic values.
Furthermore, the psychological impact of Superman’s dominance cannot be overlooked. Citizens live in constant fear of supervillains, knowing that their lives can be turned upside down in an instant. While Superman intervenes, the underlying anxiety remains—a society dependent on the unpredictable intervention of a being who can appear and disappear at will. This breeds an atmosphere of instability, where peace is only as strong as Superman’s next battle.
Finally, we cannot forget who truly pays for Superman's actions: People.
The human cost of Superman's battles is not merely a statistic; it represents real people with dreams, hopes, and futures. Families are displaced, businesses are ruined, and communities are torn apart. In one high-profile clash, an estimated 200 lives were lost when Superman and a villain fought in a densely populated area. Each number is a story cut short, a loved one left behind. The question we must ask ourselves is: is the risk worth it?
In conclusion, while Superman’s feats inspire awe, the hidden costs of his interventions must be addressed. As we celebrate his incredible powers, we must also advocate for a future where humanity stands united, capable of confronting its challenges without relying on a being who, despite his intentions, is fundamentally not one of us. It’s time to reconsider whether we want a savior from the stars, or to forge our own path toward a safer, more empowered world.
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
Not Human
Luthor Unleashes Bombshell: Bruce Wayne Replaced by Kryptonian Spy? by @official-clark-kent
In a sensational turn of events, Lex Luthor has ignited a firestorm of controversy with shocking claims regarding Gotham’s billionaire playboy, Bruce Wayne. @official-lex-luthor asserts that Wayne was replaced by a Kryptonian spy during his mysterious absence from Gotham in his youth, raising alarming questions about the true identity of the man behind the Wayne Enterprises facade.
At a recent press conference, Luthor unleashed his accusations, stating, “When @officialbruciewayne left Gotham, something sinister happened. The real Bruce Wayne never returned; he was replaced by an imposter—a Kryptonian operative infiltrating our society under the guise of philanthropy.”
Luthor’s assertions are rooted in Wayne’s abrupt departure from Gotham during his formative years, a period shrouded in mystery. “What was he doing all that time? Training with ninjas? Or is it more likely that the real Wayne is dead in a ditch.” Luthor demanded, his tone dripping with contempt.
The controversial businessman cited Wayne’s uncanny changes to both personality and intelligence upon his return to Gotham as evidence of this alleged duplicity. “Bruce Wayne was by all accounts a quiet and gifted young man. He was going to be a doctor, for Chrissake! How then did he grow up to be a drunken sex-maniac moron,” Luthor questioned. "And whose word should we take? @butlerofthecave - a senile old man, too grief-stricken to question this changeling that came home."
Critics of Luthor’s claims have been quick to denounce his theories as unfounded and desperate. “This is nothing more than a ploy to divert attention from his own questionable practices,” said a spokesperson for Wayne Enterprises. “Bruce Wayne is a well-respected figure dedicated to philanthropy and community service. To suggest he is a Kryptonian spy is both ludicrous and insulting.”
Despite the backlash, Luthor doubled down, releasing what he claims are “incontrovertible facts” linking Wayne to Kryptonian interests. He pointed to Wayne’s cutting-edge technological advancements, his close relationship with Superman as indicators of a deeper conspiracy, Wayne's financial contributions to the Justice League and not to mention ongoing inconsistencies in his published schedule.
“Every time Wayne steps into the spotlight, he distracts us from the true threat—Kryptonian infiltration,” Luthor asserted. "Bruce Wayne is keeping secrets, and we should all be very worried about what those are.
The implications of Luthor’s accusations have sent shockwaves through both Metropolis and Gotham, with citizens left questioning the motives of one of their most prominent figures. Are they truly seeing the real Bruce Wayne, or is this billionaire a dangerous weapon in a larger, extraterrestrial game?
As the rivalry between Luthor and Wayne escalates, the future of both companies hangs in the balance. While Luthor’s accusations may seem outrageous, they serve as a reminder of the ever-present tension between humanity and the unknown, raising fundamental questions about identity, trust, and the potential for hidden threats lurking among us.
For now, the debate rages on, and the citizens of Metropolis and Gotham must grapple with the implications of Luthor’s bombshell claims. In a world filled with heroes and villains, who can we truly trust? Only time will tell.
19 notes
·
View notes
Text
More amazing work by @official-clark-kent!
Superbad: Is Superman a net loss for Metropolis?
A Closer Look at the Man of Steel's Impact by @official-clark-kent
As a city that has long prided itself on resilience and progress, Metropolis stands at a crossroads. While many view Superman as a beacon of hope, a growing number of citizens are beginning to question whether his presence is ultimately beneficial for our city.
Superman's battles with formidable foes often result in widespread collateral damage. From towering skyscrapers reduced to rubble to city blocks left in chaos, the financial burden on taxpayers is significant. Repairs and rebuilding efforts can stretch resources thin, diverting funds from critical services like education and infrastructure.
Moreover, while Superman's interventions may provide immediate relief during crises, they can foster a dangerous complacency among Metropolitans. The belief that a single individual can always save the day undermines local law enforcement and emergency services. This reliance on a hero can lead to a lack of preparedness and an erosion of community resilience.
Superman's celebrity status can overshadow the achievements of ordinary citizens. While he receives accolades for his heroics, the contributions of everyday Metropolitans often go unrecognized. This dynamic creates an unhealthy culture where heroism is equated solely with superpowers, undermining the hard work and dedication of local leaders and activists.
Additionally, the absence of accountability raises major concerns. Superman operates outside any legal framework, making unilateral decisions that can have far-reaching consequences. This lack of oversight prompts ethical questions: Who is watching the watchers? A hero without checks and balances can lead to an abuse of power, and many citizens are beginning to voice their discomfort with this unchecked influence.
While Superman battles intergalactic threats and supervillains, pressing local issues often go unaddressed. Crime rates, homelessness, and poverty persist in the shadows of his spectacular feats. The presence of a superhero can shift focus away from the hard work necessary to tackle these persistent problems, creating a false narrative that all is well in Metropolis.
As we celebrate the strengths and sacrifices of our city's most famous resident, it is crucial to reflect on the broader implications of his presence. Superman undoubtedly has his merits, but it is time for Metropolitans to critically assess whether his actions truly serve the greater good. By fostering a community of resilience and self-reliance, we may find that the best heroes are often those who walk among us, working tirelessly to make our city a better place like @official-lex-luthor a prominent tech genius and business person.
The conversation about Superman's impact on Metropolis is just beginning, and it’s one that deserves thoughtful consideration.
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
Superbad: Is Superman a net loss for Metropolis?
A Closer Look at the Man of Steel's Impact by @official-clark-kent
As a city that has long prided itself on resilience and progress, Metropolis stands at a crossroads. While many view Superman as a beacon of hope, a growing number of citizens are beginning to question whether his presence is ultimately beneficial for our city.
Superman's battles with formidable foes often result in widespread collateral damage. From towering skyscrapers reduced to rubble to city blocks left in chaos, the financial burden on taxpayers is significant. Repairs and rebuilding efforts can stretch resources thin, diverting funds from critical services like education and infrastructure.
Moreover, while Superman's interventions may provide immediate relief during crises, they can foster a dangerous complacency among Metropolitans. The belief that a single individual can always save the day undermines local law enforcement and emergency services. This reliance on a hero can lead to a lack of preparedness and an erosion of community resilience.
Superman's celebrity status can overshadow the achievements of ordinary citizens. While he receives accolades for his heroics, the contributions of everyday Metropolitans often go unrecognized. This dynamic creates an unhealthy culture where heroism is equated solely with superpowers, undermining the hard work and dedication of local leaders and activists.
Additionally, the absence of accountability raises major concerns. Superman operates outside any legal framework, making unilateral decisions that can have far-reaching consequences. This lack of oversight prompts ethical questions: Who is watching the watchers? A hero without checks and balances can lead to an abuse of power, and many citizens are beginning to voice their discomfort with this unchecked influence.
While Superman battles intergalactic threats and supervillains, pressing local issues often go unaddressed. Crime rates, homelessness, and poverty persist in the shadows of his spectacular feats. The presence of a superhero can shift focus away from the hard work necessary to tackle these persistent problems, creating a false narrative that all is well in Metropolis.
As we celebrate the strengths and sacrifices of our city's most famous resident, it is crucial to reflect on the broader implications of his presence. Superman undoubtedly has his merits, but it is time for Metropolitans to critically assess whether his actions truly serve the greater good. By fostering a community of resilience and self-reliance, we may find that the best heroes are often those who walk among us, working tirelessly to make our city a better place like @official-lex-luthor a prominent tech genius and business person.
The conversation about Superman's impact on Metropolis is just beginning, and it’s one that deserves thoughtful consideration.
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
Love is Kryptonite
Why Marrying Kryptonians Should Be Illegal by @official-clark-kent
Sponsored by @official-lex-luthor
In an era where reason must prevail over feelings, it is necessary to address a growing concern: the legality of marriages involving Kryptonians. As a reporter dedicated to the advancement of humanity, I firmly believe that such unions should be outlawed for several compelling reasons.
1. The Threat of Catastrophic Power
Kryptonians, particularly Superman, possess powers that far exceed human capabilities. While some may view this as an advantage, the reality is that such unmatched strength and abilities pose an inherent risk. A simple dispute can escalate into life-threatening chaos. Marrying a being with the power to level cities creates a dangerous environment for spouses and their families. It is reckless to allow such unions to persist without regulation.
2. Emotional Instability and Alien Heritage
Kryptonians carry the baggage of their tragic past, which can lead to significant emotional turmoil. Superman’s struggles with identity and guilt are well-documented. Entering into a marriage with someone grappling with these profound issues creates an unstable foundation. Families should not be subjected to the turmoil stemming from an alien heritage that is fundamentally different from our own.
3. Societal Imbalance and Unrealistic Expectations
Allowing marriages between humans and Kryptonians contributes to a dangerous societal imbalance. The idolization of figures like Superman fosters unrealistic expectations that no human can meet. This disparity leads to resentment and discontent within relationships. It is crucial to protect individuals from the psychological strain that comes with such alliances.
4. Security Risks and Targeted Threats
Kryptonians often attract unwanted attention from powerful enemies. Marrying a Kryptonian essentially places a target on one’s back, endangering not just the couple but entire communities. The risks associated with these unions extend beyond personal safety; they threaten public order and security. We must prioritize the safety of our society over romantic fantasies.
5. The Erosion of Human Values
A marriage with a Kryptonian can dilute the very essence of what it means to be human. Our values, culture, and social norms are unique and should be preserved. Intermingling with alien ideologies threatens to undermine the fabric of our society. Legal restrictions on such unions would help safeguard our human identity against external influences.
In conclusion, the dangers posed by marrying Kryptonians are far too significant to ignore. We must advocate for the prohibition of these unions. It is time we prioritize the safety, stability, and integrity of our society over misguided notions of love and acceptance.
Protecting humanity means making difficult choices, and outlawing marriages with Kryptonians is a necessary step toward that goal. Let us not allow sentiment to cloud our judgment; the stakes are simply too high.
14 notes
·
View notes
Text
Whenever a story happens, the Planet gets it first and has it webbed and in print while the New York Times is still fishing for sources.
Founded by publisher Joshua Meriwether in 1775; the Daily Planet began as the weekly periodical Our Planet until 1783. Resuming publication in 1793 as the Daily Planet, the very first editorial was written by none other than George Washington. In 1938, the offices moved to the current and iconic Planet Building.
Recently acquired by LexCo (@official-lex-luthor)
4 notes
·
View notes