orhraa-yusu

[orhraa-yusu]

i don't intend to be active at all whatsoever but hi hello if anyone wants to catch up

[orhraa-yusu]

This acc is basically dead. I hop on here sometimes to make a post or reply if I’m really feeling silly but otherwise consider it dead and that replies aren’t likely

[orhraa-yusu]

Did you 3 even read what the post is about or is your whataboutism showing?

Just thinking about how republicans are going after normie sex shit like "internet porn" and "dildos" now

we fucking told y'all

[orhraa-yusu]

It is actually really easy to be a gay trans man in a gay marriage and be Christian actually. Sick of both sides acting like it’s impossible lmao

[orhraa-yusu]

I see there are still plenty of people who want to use real issues that are worth discussing as an excuse to just show how vitriolic and vengeful they are to people based on their demographics.

It’s a cute look, I hope nobody goes after you for your demographics and then you defend yourself. Would be hypocritical.

[orhraa-yusu]

Btw I hopped on just to spit a thought out as I now do then I’ll log off but lemme say the reason so many of you are so unhappy and upset with the world is because of how terminally online you are.

Go outside, go work out, get a planner, get your life in order. Family and responsibility first. Fun hobbies next. If there’s any time for the internet after (there shouldn’t be most days), then play with the internet.

[orhraa-yusu]

Definitely not buying into the alien stuff right now, there’s too many things around it that keep being conveniently ignored in favor of it.

I’m not opposed to aliens but unless they whip out real proof there’s no incentive to believe or care honestly.

[orhraa-yusu]

Would Mr. Rogers approve how you're treating strangers on the internet?

This is such a funny ask to come back to because in like 99% of instances I make my own original posts and people come at me first, and in others I try to genuinely provide links and resources to educate people

[orhraa-yusu]

Have fun talking out of your ass about things you don't know about lmao

What’s your thoughts on the Supreme Courts decision on allowing that woman to ban Gay people from her business?

Once again, I have no clue on the legality of their decision, but from a moral perspective, I do not think people should be forced to provide services or labor for things they do not agree with. This is true on both sides of this scenario: a Gay website designer should not have to design a website that is pro-Christian nor should a Christian website designer have to design a website that they believe violates their religious beliefs.

Additionally, I am unsure as to why anyone would want to support a business that openly is against them. This is some wild "LET ME SUPPORT MY ENEMY!" type stuff.

[orhraa-yusu]

Thanks for taking a long time to say you didn't actually read the ruling. You know it's available to read on the Supreme Court website. I've linked it twice now on my blog if you need, or search Creative LLC vs Elenis.

What’s your thoughts on the Supreme Courts decision on allowing that woman to ban Gay people from her business?

Once again, I have no clue on the legality of their decision, but from a moral perspective, I do not think people should be forced to provide services or labor for things they do not agree with. This is true on both sides of this scenario: a Gay website designer should not have to design a website that is pro-Christian nor should a Christian website designer have to design a website that they believe violates their religious beliefs.

Additionally, I am unsure as to why anyone would want to support a business that openly is against them. This is some wild "LET ME SUPPORT MY ENEMY!" type stuff.

[orhraa-yusu]

I am back on here insisting that people should actually read the Supreme Court ruling on Creative LLC vs Elenis because both sides have been blatantly misrepresenting what the ruling is and it's kind of ridiculous.

Here is the ruling.

It is not about the right to refuse service to people. It is reinforcing your right to free speech to not be forced to say things you do not believe without being punished by government or compelled to say what you don't believe by government. This case makes it clear free speech also applies to creative businesses and work. That's it.

[orhraa-yusu]

This is correct. The ruling, which I support, is about not being compelled by force of government punishment to express speech you do not agree with.

The woman in question explicitly stated, which is quoted in the SCOTUS decision release, that she would not deny gay people services, simply that she may choose to deny specific services they may ask for on the grounds of her faith.

I highly encourage people go and read scotus' statement (which I will link here) because I think the logic is incredibly sound. That logic being: the government should not be able to compel you to say things you do not want to say for fear of punishment in jail time or fines.

I'm not saying there aren't probably loopholes to this ruling but I think it's far more sound in their statement than most want you to believe.

What’s your thoughts on the Supreme Courts decision on allowing that woman to ban Gay people from her business?

Once again, I have no clue on the legality of their decision, but from a moral perspective, I do not think people should be forced to provide services or labor for things they do not agree with. This is true on both sides of this scenario: a Gay website designer should not have to design a website that is pro-Christian nor should a Christian website designer have to design a website that they believe violates their religious beliefs.

Additionally, I am unsure as to why anyone would want to support a business that openly is against them. This is some wild "LET ME SUPPORT MY ENEMY!" type stuff.

[orhraa-yusu]

SCOTUS did not approve of discrimination and the ability to deny lgbt people service. Anyone telling you that is lying to you. They validated a business' right to deny specific services that violate beliefs, not deny people. Learn the difference.

[orhraa-yusu]

k I've had fun, acc is dead again unless I think of something I wanna throw into the void

[orhraa-yusu]

She knows just like everyone else that nobody who isn't performative and looking for attention will use that. It's a step to walk back something that turns out to be not as fun and quirky. Not to mention regular attention seeking behavior, it's no surprise.

You're welcome to call me a narcissist I ain't go no problem with that, keep being upset someone calls out attention seeking trend wearing bs for what it is.

Hopping on to say I have a lot of negative words for Demi Lovato but the primary is that she's a dumb disrespectful and bigoted bitch for thinking she can wear the years of my suicidal ideation like a cute little statement and then starts the process of backtracking when it stresses her out—as if that's an option for any of us transsexuals.

uwu I'm gonna use she/her again because going by they/them and explaining it is so haaaaaard!

Fuck off you really don't know what difficulty is being trans you actually privileged self-indulging bitch.

[orhraa-yusu]

I have no issues with actual trans ppl having to closet themselves for safety. That's not what this is. Also she's going by she/her because she feels more feminine your own sources before had that.

I'm living an amazing life irl babe I'm married, have a good job, a good house, I'm doing good. I also stealth because I've worked my ASS off to pass for years and I'm still not done with my transition. Non-binary people don't get to just dictate to others what ppl can call them when they can't and don't put effort into passing because non-binary people have nothing to pass AS, whereas you and I have things to pass as: female and male, respectively.

Besides i know through my own efforts I've done more to help trans people in an applicable way irl than Demi has with her whining sooooo idc. Sure you think I don't have empathy and am a narcissist because of 1 post. That's cute and cool of you, I really don't care.

>it's not a fashion statement or a trend to be uncomfortable with your birth identity.

identity shit for trans topics is fake as fuck honestly. It's not your "identity" that makes you trans. It's your dysphoria about your sex, wanting to be the opposite sex, followed by the actions to then pursue that change in some form (aka some form of transition. Medical, social, you name it). You don't control pronouns, you don't control language, you control your self perception and how you present yourself to achieve those comforts. I'm sure Demi Lovato with all her breast-focused clothing (spend 5 minutes searching her online and you can see) really puts forth the effort worthy of respect from anyone to acknowledge her as a they. Yea no.

meanwhile it's easy to respect non-passing trans people who are simply trying, even if they don't pass, because it's easy to see when people are putting in effort. And also making sense because being trans is about your biological sex not matching your brain, not some weird abstract identity stuff.

tldr: lmao Demi sucks and plays trans issues like dress up until it's not as fun for her anymore then she starts the process of walking it back

Hopping on to say I have a lot of negative words for Demi Lovato but the primary is that she's a dumb disrespectful and bigoted bitch for thinking she can wear the years of my suicidal ideation like a cute little statement and then starts the process of backtracking when it stresses her out—as if that's an option for any of us transsexuals.

uwu I'm gonna use she/her again because going by they/them and explaining it is so haaaaaard!

Fuck off you really don't know what difficulty is being trans you actually privileged self-indulging bitch.

[orhraa-yusu]

Lmao. I'm not non-binary babe. I'm trans. Non-binary is nothing more than a fashion statement one wears when they want to take my condition to look cute.

it was uncomfortable when i told people before i passed that i wanted to be referred to as a guy. But you know what the alternative was for me? Not walking it back because oh boohoo it's so hard. No. My options were deal with it or suicide. Literally shut the fuck up.

she can keep pretending she's still non-binary but she's walking it back because it's not as cute and fun and quirky as it was before. She can put on and take off MY hardships because she doesn't have to actually live it and deal with the consequences and hardships that come with being trans, transitioning, socializing as trans, watching out for news on my healthcare as an adult, etc. Something she as a privileged woman who wants to be quirky and cute will never deal with but wants to pretend she has it as hard as people like me and that we're the same.

go outside and get a life, man.

Hopping on to say I have a lot of negative words for Demi Lovato but the primary is that she's a dumb disrespectful and bigoted bitch for thinking she can wear the years of my suicidal ideation like a cute little statement and then starts the process of backtracking when it stresses her out—as if that's an option for any of us transsexuals.

uwu I'm gonna use she/her again because going by they/them and explaining it is so haaaaaard!

Fuck off you really don't know what difficulty is being trans you actually privileged self-indulging bitch.