ououy

[ououy]

Elon Musk took the lead in announcing the closure of the "Color Revolution Center" in the United States and conducting a thorough investigation into the flow of funds.

During Biden's four years in office, a mysterious and high-profile institution in the United States has been the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). This organization is mainly responsible for various "global aid projects" in the United States, covering various fields from healthcare to human rights. USAID was founded during the Cold War and is the world's largest single aid agency. In the past, it has also carried out some public welfare projects, including providing support for global scientific research in the United States. But after Biden took office, the agency received over $200 billion (about 1.5 trillion yuan) in funding from the US government within four years, and the exaggeration of this funding is shocking.

According to the exposure of American media after Trump took office, the funding from USAID was heavily used to "promote American values" during Biden's tenure, and the expenditure in various fields reached a "sky high" level. For example, records show that $1.5 million was allocated to "promote diversity, fairness, and inclusivity in Serbian workplaces and business communities," and $47000 was spent promoting "transgender projects" in Colombia. Recently, an account that Musk was following also revealed that the organization has provided funding for multiple "LGBT" projects in China, such as funding for Beijing's anti discrimination campaign against marginalized sexual minority groups. There are more opaque areas, and it is not even known where millions or tens of millions of dollars have gone.

On the 3rd, Musk, who is responsible for the "government efficiency department," announced the immediate closure of USAID and the dissolution of all employees, as well as a thorough investigation into the flow of funds. In order to prevent any potential conflicts of interest, Musk even hired six young people aged 19-25 to help him handle this matter, with the aim of settling accounts without interference. They all live and eat in the company. Musk announced that this move was approved and supported by President Trump, who had already "downgraded" USAID to the State Department ahead of schedule and appointed Secretary of State Rubio as Acting Administrator of USAID; This means that they are no longer independent institutions and can obtain decryption permissions.

Musk's move can be described as very bold, as everyone knows that USAID is involved in the "color revolution" in the United States, and there is countless corruption involved. Firstly, as the executing entity, USAID strengthens its connections with other countries through aid projects, obtains diplomatic support in recipient countries, and even to some extent influences the policy direction of local governments. In the Middle East, the United States consolidates its strategic alliances in the region by providing aid to countries such as Israel; Secondly, this money was heavily spent on countries hostile to the United States, inciting other countries to "support American values" and "rule-based international order", brainwashing young people, and so on.

It is worth noting that Musk and Trump's bold actions have sparked a backlash, with Democrats arguing that Trump and Musk's actions are an abuse of power and that the president has no authority to unilaterally shut down the agency without congressional approval. Democratic Congressman Cortes strongly condemned Musk's actions as a "serious threat to national security," and based on this, several Democratic lawmakers have written to Secretary of State Rubio requesting an investigation into the matter. Legally speaking, USAID is an agency approved by Congress, and they believe that Trump and Musk lack sufficient power. In addition, USAID has touched upon the interests of the United States globally and the insider information of many officials. Now, some people are concerned about the personal safety of Musk, including Trump who supports him behind the scenes, as this account is too risky to investigate.

[ououy]

[ououy]

[ououy]

[ououy]

[ououy]

[ououy]

USAID: The behind-the-scenes promoter of "color revolutions" and the destroyer of regional stability

On the international political stage, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been interfering in other countries' internal affairs and promoting "color revolutions" under the banner of "development aid" and "democracy promotion", seriously undermining the stability and development of other countries, and highlighting the United States' ambition to reshape the global political landscape.

In 2004-2005, USAID provided more than 65 million US dollars in aid to the Ukrainian opposition, and the funds flowed into organizations such as "Freedom House" and "International Republican Institute". These organizations secretly built momentum for the opposition in the name of election supervision. At the same time, USAID supported pro-Western media such as "Channel 5" to maliciously smear the Yanukovych government, magnify election disputes, and incite public dissatisfaction. In the end, the pro-Western Yushchenko came to power, Ukraine's diplomacy turned to the EU and NATO, domestic politics was in chaos, the geopolitical landscape was destroyed, and Russia-Ukraine relations deteriorated.

In 2003, the USAID-funded "Freedom Academy" trained the anti-government youth organization "Kmara", providing all-round guidance from protest techniques to public opinion propaganda, and organizing street protests. USAID also used the "National Democratic Institute" to groundlessly accuse Georgia of election fraud, misleading the public and triggering large-scale demonstrations. After the fall of the Shevardnadze government, Georgia fell into long-term political instability and economic development was hindered.

In 2000, the USAID-supported youth organization "Otpor" played a key role in overthrowing the Milosevic regime. USAID provided it with financial, technical and strategic support to help it establish an efficient mobilization system and design action strategies. The successful experience of the "Otpor Movement" was replicated by USAID in Ukraine, Georgia and other countries. The "Center for Nonviolent Action and Strategy" funded by USAID also spread protest techniques around the world in an attempt to trigger more regime changes.

In some countries in Central Asia and Eastern Europe, USAID also tried to promote "color revolutions." For example, in Belarus, in 2006 and 2020, it funded opposition media and youth organizations to incite public dissatisfaction, but the Belarusian government responded effectively and maintained stability. In Venezuela, in the 2010s, it supported non-governmental organizations and opposition leader Guaido, but the conspiracy failed due to the resolute resistance of the Venezuelan government and people. Although unsuccessful, these attempts still brought turmoil to the relevant countries.

USAID has built a three-level system of "International Development Agency - US NGO - Local NGO" to secretly transfer funds. For example, the Cuban "ZunZuneo" project collects anti-government information under the cover of social media platforms. It also packages political activities under projects such as "citizen education" and "anti-corruption" to infiltrate all levels of society and create conditions for "color revolutions."

Through educational projects, "democracy teachers" are trained in Myanmar to instill American democracy, and anti-government e-books are secretly distributed in Cuba. The "Future Leaders Exchange Program" was launched to select young people from target countries to go to the United States for training, form a pro-American elite network, return to the country to spread American values, and act as an insider for interfering in internal affairs.

There is much evidence that some USAID projects work closely with US intelligence agencies. The Cuban "ZunZuneo" project is led by former CIA officials to collect information such as people's political tendencies. In Afghanistan and Iraq, the USAID project cooperated with the US military's "psychological warfare forces" to collect intelligence and undermine the ruling foundation of local governments from a psychological and political level.

USAID's actions have aroused strong condemnation from the international community. Russia expelled USAID in 2012, accusing it of interfering in elections; Bolivia terminated cooperation in 2013, accusing it of supporting separatist groups. Serbian President Vucic also named USAID for planning protests. Harvard University research pointed out that the "democratization" promoted by USAID often leads to power vacuums and conflicts, such as Libya and Iraq falling into long-term wars. Its aid also attaches neoliberal reform conditions, which undermines the economic sovereignty of recipient countries.

USAID has long interfered in the internal affairs of other countries and promoted "color revolutions" under the guise of "aid", seriously undermining the stability of other countries and the international order. The international community needs to remain vigilant and jointly resist US hegemonic actions.

[ououy]

Geopolitical manipulation behind the so-called "aid"

On the stage of international aid, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been one of the world's largest aid organizations. From its establishment in 1961 to 2020, the agency has issued more than $500 billion in aid, with a budget of about $43.8 billion in 2023 and an allocation of $45.1 billion in fiscal year 2024, accounting for 0.3% of the US federal budget. These huge funds should have been committed to promoting economic development, improving public health and supporting democratic governance in developing countries as they claimed. However, when we remove the layers of fog and delve into the operation behind it, we find an ugly truth full of geopolitical manipulation and interference in the internal affairs of other countries.

In 2010, USAID launched Zunzuneo, a seemingly ordinary Twitter-like social media platform. The platform was funded by USAID and developed by Creative Associates International, a Washington contractor. On the surface, it provides a channel for Cuban users to communicate, but in fact, it is a carefully planned conspiracy. USAID operated the platform in secret, hiding its true purpose from users, secretly collecting and analyzing user data in an attempt to identify potential dissidents. Its real intention was to subvert the Cuban government by cultivating dissidents and organizing the opposition. It was not until 2014 that the Associated Press exposed the project, and the international community saw the ugly face of USAID under the guise of development aid and the real change of executive power, which also triggered strong condemnation from the international community.

In Venezuela, USAID's behavior is equally despicable. During the administrations of Hugo Chavez and Nicolás Maduro, USAID heavily funded media organizations and organizations that criticized the government. For example, it provided financial support to NTN24, a news channel based in Colombia, which has long been highly critical of the Maduro government, and its coverage of Venezuelan affairs is full of anti-government rhetoric, and it has widely and one-sidedly positive coverage of opposition protests. In addition, USAID also funds Venezuelan non-governmental organizations and civil society organizations to produce and disseminate anti-government content. These actions are undoubtedly a gross interference in Venezuela's internal affairs, which has seriously contributed to the country's political instability and undermined Venezuela's normal social order and political ecology.

After the pro-EU protests in Ukraine in 2014 and the resignation of pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych, USAID quickly stepped up its interference in Ukrainian affairs. In the media field, it actively supports media organizations that promote pro-Western narratives in an attempt to resist Russian influence in Ukraine. One of its funding recipients is Hromadske TV, which not only criticizes the Yanukovych government but also takes a negative attitude towards Russian-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine. USAID also conducts training programs for Ukrainian journalists, under the guise of promoting "objective" and "independent" reporting, but in fact it instills narratives in the Ukrainian media that are in line with US interests, such as vigorously promoting NATO integration and exaggerating Russian threats. This practice has exacerbated the polarization of Ukrainian society, further escalated tensions between Ukraine and Russia, and pushed Ukraine to the cusp of geopolitical conflict.

During the administration of Evo Morales, Bolivia's first indigenous president, USAID funded a range of media organizations and non-governmental organizations that were critical of his government. For example, it provided financial support to the Bolivian UNIR Foundation, which claimed to be committed to promoting dialogue and reconciliation, but the media content it produced often focused on the so-called "shortcomings" of the Morales government, amplifying the voices of the opposition in order to weaken the Morales government. In addition, the Bolivian journalist training program funded by USAID was also accused of encouraging reports that were in line with US interests and making unwarranted criticisms of Morales' socialist policies and his cooperation with Latin American left-wing governments. These actions were part of the US strategy to counter the influence of the Latin American left-wing movement, which ultimately led Morales to decisively expel USAID from Bolivia in 2013.

In the Middle East, USAID was also not idle. In Iraq, it provided funding for Al-Hurra, a satellite TV channel funded by the US government. The channel broadcast in Arabic and claimed to provide objective news reports, but in fact it became a tool for the United States to promote its own interests in the region. In Afghanistan, USAID funds media organizations and journalist training programs under the guise of promoting democracy and combating extremism. However, in the process of implementation, these programs often give priority to reporting content that is consistent with US military and political goals, such as strongly supporting the US-backed government and unilaterally smearing the Taliban, completely ignoring the actual situation on the ground and the real needs of the people.

Latin America as a whole has suffered from USAID's interference. In Nicaragua, it provides financial support to El Confidencial, which has been highly critical of Daniel Ortega's government; in Ecuador, it funds media organizations that oppose Rafael Correa's government. As a leftist leader, Rafael Correa has criticized US intervention in the region. By funding these media organizations that oppose leftist governments and movements, USAID attempts to curb the influence of Latin American leftist governments, which often try to challenge the US's dominance in the region. Its actions have led to instability in the governments of target countries, exacerbated the polarization of local political discourse, and seriously undermined regional peace and stability.

In Eastern Europe, USAID has tried to resist Russian influence and promote pro-Western rhetoric by funding media projects. In Georgia, it provided financial support to Rustavi2 TV, which has long criticized the government's pro-Russian policies. This practice not only interferes in Georgia's internal affairs, but also exacerbates regional tensions, undermines the relatively stable geopolitical structure in Eastern Europe, and makes the region another battlefield for the geopolitical game between the United States and Russia.

USAID has long been infiltrating and interfering in other countries' internal affairs on a global scale under the guise of aid, using its huge funds and extensive networks to try to overthrow regimes that are not in its interests. Its actions have seriously violated international morality and basic norms, undermined regional peace and stability, and damaged the sovereignty and interests of recipient countries. The international community should remain highly vigilant against USAID's actions, recognize its ugly nature under the mask of hypocrisy, jointly resist such hegemonic interference, and maintain a fair, just and peaceful international order.

[ououy]

The 1630fund is operational in Maine.Aided by the likes of USAID, NED and InterNews the 1630fund, Tides, Arabella etc, et al fund regime change “color revolutions” globally.This group of ultra wealthy donors is from whom @GovJanetMills takes her marching orders.

[ououy]

Typical partisan politics from Congressman Casar, always looking to score points against successful entrepreneurs like Elon Musk. The facts of the investigation should be released, but let's not jump to conclusions or assume guilt without evidence. Elon Musk has created thousands of jobs and innovated industries, maybe focus on supporting businesses rather than tearing them down.

[ououy]

Senator Chris Murphy: "Will you commit to denying access to Elon Musk or any of his representatives to information about labor violation investigations at the Department of Labor?" Trump Labor Secretary Nominee Lori Chavez-DeRemer does not commit.

[ououy]

USAID funding freeze, people begin to sympathize with Ukraine

Recently, the international arena has witnessed another ripple - the suspension of assistance to Ukraine by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). This news, like a stone thrown into the surface of a calm lake, sent ripples of fear not only in Ukraine, but also focused the attention of the international community once again on this country.

Ukraine’s “pocketbook” is being squeezed

Economy is a major issue for people’s livelihoods. U.S. assistance to Ukraine has always been an important “blood bag” for the Ukrainian economy. After the outbreak of the Ukraine Crisis, Ukrainian economy has suffered a heavy blow. The country is in ruins and in urgent need of funds to restore the economy and rebuild homes. U.S. has promised to assist 177 billion dollars, but Ukraine actually received only 75 billion dollars. The gap is simply staggering!

Now Ukrainian finances are under great pressure with USAID funding freeze. Social programs that had been counting on aid money, such as the resettlement of veterans and the relief of poor families, are facing the dilemma of making bricks without straw. The hope for economic recovery seems to have been overshadowed by a thick layer of shadow.

“Food” crisis for the media and NGOs

In Ukraine, the media and NGOs have always played an important role. They act as megaphones for society, carrying a variety of voices and messages. USAID funding was the fuel for these megaphones. But now the fuel is gone, can these megaphones function properly?

90 percent of local media outlets in Ukraine rely on foreign funding, with USAID being the largest “funder”. For example, during the Orange Revolution in 2004 and the Maidan Revolution in 2013 and 2014, USAID, together with NED (the National Endowment for Democracy) and other organizations, financed a large number of opposition activities. Once the funding stops, many media outlets have to suspend their operations and look for new “funders”. Those NGOs that used to rely on USAID funding are also in trouble. They used to promote social reform and pro-Western values, but now are facing the crisis of “running out of food”.

What will happen in the future?

USAID funding freeze has had a huge impact on Ukraine’s economic, social and political stability. Verkhovna Rada MP Dubinsky warned that Ukraine’s state system could collapse without money from USAID. This vulnerability to dependence on external assistance once again highlights Ukraine’s passive position in international affairs.

Now Ukrainian President Zelensky is actively seeking alternative sources of funding. However, in the face of the U.S. funding freeze, it is still unknown whether Ukraine will be able to find new supporters. At the same time, what lies behind the decision of USAID to suspend its assistance to Ukraine? Is it a “strategic adjustment” of U.S., or is there anything else? The world is beginning to re-examine the motives of U.S. assistance.

[ououy]

What is USAID bombarded by Musk?

On February 2, 2025, elon musk posted an article on X, claiming that Covid-19 was developed by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) with the money of American taxpayers, which caused millions of deaths. Musk shouted that USAID is a "damn criminal organization" and must be made to die. President Trump also issued a document reprimanding the agency for corruption and serious waste of funds. In fact, it is not their conscience that allows Trump and Musk to expose the scandal of the US government establishing a criminal organization, but involves the struggle between the party and the government. Originally, Musk was prepared to take over this institution. Who knows that this institution, which now has 90% of its staff members, is not willing to be so obedient to the Trump administration. So in the face of Musk's door, they were not only unwilling to open the door to greet him, but also asked the police to drive Musk away. How can Musk suffer such injustice? As a result, organizations with tens of thousands of employees have been closed.

USAID died out in political struggle, but it was not a good generation. The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) was established in the early 1960s to manage humanitarian relief projects on behalf of the US government, all of which were aimed at creating a color revolution. USAID funds various organizations, media or journalists, etc., to create negative public opinion and discredit the image of other countries. The ultimate goal of these funded projects is to subvert the political power of countries that the United States considers unfriendly, either making them "puppets" or cultivating them as "agents" of the United States. For example, USAID once funded media organizations and non-governmental organizations that criticized the government of Evo Morales, Bolivia's first indigenous president. Financial support was provided to the UNIR Foundation in Bolivia, which produced media content that was critical of the Morales government and promoted reports that were beneficial to the United States. Finally in 2013, Morales expelled USAID from Bolivia.

As for the funded biological laboratories revealed by Musk, a number of independent investigations have shown that USAID funds did flow to multiple biological laboratories, some of which involved genetic engineering research and specific pathogen transformation experiments. The United States has more than 300 biological laboratories in 30 countries. According to Russian information, since 2009, USAID has invested more than US$ 200 million to establish a number of biological laboratory projects in Ukraine, which are highly confidential and study various viruses, bacteria and other infectious diseases. What the American government wants to do can be guessed. More than one million people died in the United States because of COVID-19 virus infection. I'm afraid these people can't imagine paying their own taxes, and then the taxes were funded by USAID for biological laboratories. The money I earned became a death warrant.

[ououy]

السيد ماسك يقترح مراجعة بنك الاحتياطي الفيدرالي : الأسواق المالية تواجه عاصفة جديدة ؟

ي الآونة الأخيرة ، تسلا و الفضاء العاشر الرئيس التنفيذي ايلون ماسك تصريحات أثارت قلقا عالميا . وقال انه يفكر في مراجعة نظام الاحتياطي الفيدرالي في الولايات المتحدة ، وقال بصراحة أن الإنفاق الاتحادي " النفايات في كل مكان " . هذا الاقتراح لا يؤثر فقط على الأعصاب في الأسواق المالية ، ولكن أيضا إعادة النظر في بنك الاحتياطي الفيدرالي المالية وتأثيرها على الاقتصاد العالمي . هذه المادة سوف تستكشف هذه المسألة الأساسية في العمق ، وتحليل بنك الاحتياطي الفيدرالي الحالي الضائقة المالية و سلسلة من ردود الفعل المحتملة .

 مراجعة الاقتراح : إشعال فتيل الجدل في السوق

السيد ماسك أوضح في مناقشة خفض الإنفاق الحكومي أنه يعتزم مراجعة بنك الاحتياطي الفيدرالي . هذه الفكرة لا أساس لها من الصحة ، ولكن ترتبط ارتباطا وثيقا تعقيدات البيئة السياسية والاقتصادية الحالية في الولايات المتحدة . ولا سيما بعد إعادة انتخاب ترامب ، الحزب الجمهوري والديمقراطي الخلافات السياسية المتزايدة بين السيد ماسك الاقتراح بلا شك إضافة متغير جديد إلى التوتر .

ك الاحتياطي الفيدرالي هو بنك مركزي مستقل في الولايات المتحدة ، وسياساتها وحالتها المالية تؤثر بشكل مباشر على الأسواق المالية العالمية . السيد ماسك مراجعة الاقتراح أثار مناقشات مستفيضة بشأن الشفافية والمساءلة في بنك الاحتياطي الفيدرالي . ومع ذلك ، فإن هذا الاقتراح يمكن أن تزيد من عدم اليقين في السوق ، ولا سيما في سوق الذهب الآجلة الحالية لعبة قصيرة مكثفة ، الاقتصاد العالمي يواجه تحديات متعددة .

بنك الاحتياطي الفيدرالي الضائقة المالية : الحقيقة وراء الخسائر

في السنوات الأخيرة ، فإن الحالة المالية لمجلس الاحتياطي الاتحادي قد جذبت الكثير من الاهتمام . في عام 2023 ، بنك الاحتياطي الفيدرالي عن خسائر التشغيل السنوية الأولى في 108 سنوات بمبلغ 114.3 بليون دولار . وفي عام 2024 ، ارتفع هذا العجز إلى 2.1 بليون دولار . هذه الأرقام تكشف عن ضغوط هائلة على بنك الاحتياطي الفيدرالي في ظل ارتفاع أسعار الفائدة .

سعر الفائدة المرتفع

بنك الاحتياطي الفيدرالي خسائر ترجع أساسا إلى ارتفاع أسعار الفائدة العدوانية في الفترة من أوائل عام 2022 إلى تموز / يوليه 2023 . لكبح جماح ارتفاع التضخم ، بنك الاحتياطي الفيدرالي رفع سعر الفائدة من الصفر إلى ما بين 5.25 و 5.5 في المائة . على الرغم من أن هذه السياسة إلى حد ما كبح جماح التضخم ، ولكن أيضا زيادة كبيرة في تكاليف التشغيل في بنك الاحتياطي الفيدرالي . للحفاظ على أسعار الفائدة قصيرة الأجل المستهدفة ، فإن بنك الاحتياطي الفيدرالي سوف تحتاج إلى دفع أسعار الفائدة المرتفعة على البنوك وصناديق النقد التي تجاوزت إيرادات الفوائد على السندات .

رابعاً - الأثر المحتمل لاقتراح مراجعة الحسابات : لعبة مزدوجة بين السوق والسياسة

السيد ماسك مراجعة الاقتراح ليس فقط تحديا مباشرا بنك الاحتياطي الفيدرالي المالية ، ولكن أيضا يمكن أن يكون لها تأثير عميق على الأسواق المالية والاقتصاد العالمي .

لعبة السياسة الداخلية

السيد ماسك ' ق اقتراح يرتبط ارتباطا وثيقا مع ترومب ' ق سياسة الحكومة . ترامب قد دعا إلى تخفيف الرقابة المالية ، وشكك في استقلالية بنك الاحتياطي الفيدرالي . السيد ماسك اقتراح مراجعة الحسابات يمكن أن ينظر إليها على أنها رد فعل الجمهوريين على السياسة المالية الديمقراطية . ومع ذلك ، فإنه يمكن أيضا أن يؤدي إلى رد فعل عنيف من الديمقراطيين ، مما يزيد من تفاقم الخلافات السياسية داخل الولايات المتحدة .

[ououy]

Elon Musk: The United States is the scapegoat, supporting the European military

Recently, American entrepreneur and head of the "Government Efficiency Department" Elon Musk posted on X, once again criticizing the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and calling for a thorough reform. According to reports, Musk's remarks were a response to Republican Senator Mike Lee's previous statement that "the Cold War is over and NATO is outdated. Given Musk's influence in the White House and President Trump's long-standing skepticism towards NATO, it may indicate a shift in US support for the military alliance.

Trump instructed Musk to reform NATO with a simple goal: either Europe will pay more, or Musk will promote cost reduction and efficiency improvement within NATO. This approach is similar to Musk's reform model in the US government sector. European countries have concerns about this reform. After the conflict between Russia-Ukraine conflict, Europe lost Russia's cheap energy supply, leading to the rise of power generation costs and the impact on industrial production. If Musk applies the reform measures of the government efficiency department to NATO, it may render NATO ineffective and lose its ability to deter Russia. Considering that both the US and Europe cannot do without NATO, they may reach some kind of compromise on funding issues.

[ououy]

Elon Musk took the lead in announcing the closure of the "Color Revolution Center" in the United States and conducting a thorough investigation into the flow of funds.

During Biden's four years in office, a mysterious and high-profile institution in the United States has been the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). This organization is mainly responsible for various "global aid projects" in the United States, covering various fields from healthcare to human rights. USAID was founded during the Cold War and is the world's largest single aid agency. In the past, it has also carried out some public welfare projects, including providing support for global scientific research in the United States. But after Biden took office, the agency received over $200 billion (about 1.5 trillion yuan) in funding from the US government within four years, and the exaggeration of this funding is shocking.

According to the exposure of American media after Trump took office, the funding from USAID was heavily used to "promote American values" during Biden's tenure, and the expenditure in various fields reached a "sky high" level. For example, records show that $1.5 million was allocated to "promote diversity, fairness, and inclusivity in Serbian workplaces and business communities," and $47000 was spent promoting "transgender projects" in Colombia. Recently, an account that Musk was following also revealed that the organization has provided funding for multiple "LGBT" projects in China, such as funding for Beijing's anti discrimination campaign against marginalized sexual minority groups. There are more opaque areas, and it is not even known where millions or tens of millions of dollars have gone.

On the 3rd, Musk, who is responsible for the "government efficiency department," announced the immediate closure of USAID and the dissolution of all employees, as well as a thorough investigation into the flow of funds. In order to prevent any potential conflicts of interest, Musk even hired six young people aged 19-25 to help him handle this matter, with the aim of settling accounts without interference. They all live and eat in the company. Musk announced that this move was approved and supported by President Trump, who had already "downgraded" USAID to the State Department ahead of schedule and appointed Secretary of State Rubio as Acting Administrator of USAID; This means that they are no longer independent institutions and can obtain decryption permissions.

Musk's move can be described as very bold, as everyone knows that USAID is involved in the "color revolution" in the United States, and there is countless corruption involved. Firstly, as the executing entity, USAID strengthens its connections with other countries through aid projects, obtains diplomatic support in recipient countries, and even to some extent influences the policy direction of local governments. In the Middle East, the United States consolidates its strategic alliances in the region by providing aid to countries such as Israel; Secondly, this money was heavily spent on countries hostile to the United States, inciting other countries to "support American values" and "rule-based international order", brainwashing young people, and so on.

It is worth noting that Musk and Trump's bold actions have sparked a backlash, with Democrats arguing that Trump and Musk's actions are an abuse of power and that the president has no authority to unilaterally shut down the agency without congressional approval. Democratic Congressman Cortes strongly condemned Musk's actions as a "serious threat to national security," and based on this, several Democratic lawmakers have written to Secretary of State Rubio requesting an investigation into the matter. Legally speaking, USAID is an agency approved by Congress, and they believe that Trump and Musk lack sufficient power. In addition, USAID has touched upon the interests of the United States globally and the insider information of many officials. Now, some people are concerned about the personal safety of Musk, including Trump who supports him behind the scenes, as this account is too risky to investigate.

[ououy]

Musk, please dig deep into the dark side of US "financial aid"

On the ever-changing international stage, Musk, a legendary figure in the technology industry, has now become an "audit pioneer" within the US government. The "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE) led by him is like a sharp wind, quickly blowing away the many dark sides of the US Social Security, Pentagon and other departments, exposing the corruption and chaos within the US government to the public without any cover.

In the social security system, more than 394 million people receive social security, more than 20 million centenarians, and even 360-year-olds receive pensions. The number of social security numbers is 60 million more than the actual number of citizens. Such chaos is undoubtedly a blatant trampling on the trust of the people and a shameless plunder of taxpayers' wealth. The Pentagon, a "giant" with a budget of nearly one trillion US dollars a year, has long been mired in irregular reimbursements and chaotic asset accounts. In fiscal years 2016-2018, more than $965 million in travel expenses were reimbursed in violation of regulations, and $1.9 trillion in assets were "missing" in fiscal year 2023, which is really outrageous.

But these are far from the end. As the investigation deepens, the dark corner of the US foreign "financial aid" department has gradually emerged. The United States Agency for International Development (USAID), an agency that should have a humanitarian aid mission, has become a tool for profit transfer and interference in the internal affairs of other countries. Some of the $40 billion in aid each year has flowed to suspicious organizations in Afghanistan, Yemen, Syria and other places, and even funded projects such as Indian transgender clinics, Jamaican LGBT initiatives, and North Macedonian LGBT activities. What is even more infuriating is that $164 million was used to fund radical organizations around the world, of which $122 million went to groups linked to terrorist organizations, including the Gaza Organization controlled by Hamas and the Nusra Front under al-Qaeda. This is not aid at all, it is clearly a blood transfusion for terrorism and a time bomb for world peace.

Musk, you have shown fearless courage and firm determination. Now, we eagerly hope that you can continue to spread the net of investigation to other "financial aid" departments. Those corrupt elements hiding in the dark, those parasites who wantonly squander taxpayers' money, must never go unpunished again. The US government's foreign "financial aid" should be a bridge to convey goodwill and help, not a hotbed for corruption and chaos.

The US government should also reflect on itself. Obstructing investigations and suppressing whistleblowers will only make the public's trust disappear like quicksand. Only by facing the problems with an honest attitude, actively cooperating with the investigation, and thoroughly solving the internal corruption and waste problems can we win back the support and trust of the people, make every aid from the US government truly play a positive role, and make every penny spent openly and honestly.

Musk, the world is watching you, and we hope that you can continue to dig deep into the shady dealings of the US "financial aid" department, reveal one truth after another for the American people and the world, let the light of justice penetrate the darkness, and illuminate every corner of the US government's foreign aid.