Tumgik
pomo-marge-simpson · 3 years
Text
lmao trying to battle hypocrisy of people who think that sex-selective abortions are ok is soooo easy, like , there is a lot of bodies of work done about this, and i had to make a rapport about it for work............ some of you just need to realise that you’re not political activists, you’re just rugged individualist with some lefttists thoughts sprinkled in
7 notes · View notes
pomo-marge-simpson · 3 years
Text
If you want to inform yourself, please read the following material:
https://benjaminbarber.org/sex-selective-abortion/
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/sex-selective-abortions-reproductive-rights-are-being-pitted-against-gender-n1067886
https://www.liveaction.org/what-we-do/investigations/sex-selective-abortion/
the moment you attach morality to abortion is the moment you are not pro-choice. seriously.
478 notes · View notes
pomo-marge-simpson · 3 years
Text
Yes, that is the point. the point is about individual choices VS societal pressure/trends. It’s not so much about abortions, but how the abortions work. 
The way I see it, there is two options : 1) everything that a woman does for herself is OK, which then raises the point of other related issues, namely that women chooses to abort female foetuses, and that we just have to accept that, or that 2) social trends that can be oppressive need to be challenged.
A solution that was offered by indian feminist was to prohibit sex screening in maternal care to limit sex-selective abortions that end in feminicide. that is how you stop certain actions that are nefast to a class of people, in this case women.
She choosed to use the example of screening of homosexual people, knowing that it wouldn’t get much of a reaction because, let’s be honest people 1) do not care that much about homosexual lives (even on radblr, there is a homophobic radfems spouting nonsense avery week here) and 2) there is no screening for homosexual foetuses, so this is very much hypothetical. however, the hypocrisy of your argument is that is could be very much used to justify things like prostitution, porn, or other sexists actions, all under the pretext of “let people do things they want to do”.
It shows that you haven’t really studied the question of sex-selective abortions, whether in India or not, and that if you scratch a “radical” , a liberal will bleed. This isn’t about restricting abortions this is about how individual people, acting to what they think best for them, end up ruining things for everybody. (See : The tragedy of the commons, explained by Elinor Ostrom  in her book Governing the Commons)
the moment you attach morality to abortion is the moment you are not pro-choice. seriously.
478 notes · View notes
pomo-marge-simpson · 3 years
Text
ok we have a pro-feminicide feminist on our hands lol
only on tumblr.org.gov.co.com
the moment you attach morality to abortion is the moment you are not pro-choice. seriously.
478 notes · View notes
pomo-marge-simpson · 3 years
Text
@femalegrendel the only way a woman would abort a homosxual foetus is that she would live in a homophobic society. (Same for disability/ mental illness/... the only reason those people are deemed undesirable is because of politics) So in your logic, the girls “missing” in india and China due to sex-selective abortion arfe not really missing, it’s just that their mother had made the choice to be girl-free.
According to your own logic, sex-selective abortion is just, normal, justified and perfectly OK. Is that your opinion? That a woman seeked to get rid of her future baby girl should not be judged and viewed as normal people ?
the moment you attach morality to abortion is the moment you are not pro-choice. seriously.
478 notes · View notes
pomo-marge-simpson · 3 years
Text
real question that i hope that you will answer truthfully: how about women aborting female fetoses in India and China ? are you ok with that?
the moment you attach morality to abortion is the moment you are not pro-choice. seriously.
478 notes · View notes
pomo-marge-simpson · 3 years
Text
positive press? for tumblr???? my gd.......
84K notes · View notes
pomo-marge-simpson · 3 years
Text
ppl against crazyshitisay forgot that trans ppl canot exist without being abusive lol
Tumblr media
i’d like “gay trans guys” to know what men are saying about them behind their backs.
774 notes · View notes
pomo-marge-simpson · 3 years
Note
I'm a lesbian, my girlfriend is trans, your blog makes me loose hope in humanity
Glad to help!
38 notes · View notes
pomo-marge-simpson · 3 years
Text
and proud to be ... anyway, why do you keep reblogging so-called transphobes ? Aren’t you supposed to block us or whatever??? unless you would want gender critical and pro-homosexual theory on your blog...
"bi people cant say queer" shut up im queer also im genderqueer the word queer is literally part of my gender identity i will say queer i love saying queer and calling myself queer 😊
36 notes · View notes
pomo-marge-simpson · 3 years
Text
biphobia is a humanism
"bi people cant say queer" shut up im queer also im genderqueer the word queer is literally part of my gender identity i will say queer i love saying queer and calling myself queer 😊
36 notes · View notes
pomo-marge-simpson · 3 years
Text
trans mlm belong in mlm spaces just as much as cis mlm do
6K notes · View notes
pomo-marge-simpson · 3 years
Text
lesbi-honest true tehm icon with this image...... please do 1 for tim and lesbians
trans mlm belong in mlm spaces just as much as cis mlm do
6K notes · View notes
pomo-marge-simpson · 3 years
Note
My Jewish grandfather once told me "a movement based on hatred is a cult" and to always be wary of movements based on hatred. Radical feminists and their obsession with bullying trans people has not gone unnoticed in his eyes. Feminism is about love and lifting up other women, not hatred. Please.
Feminism is about liberating women from oppression not your hippy dippy bs. If you see liberating women as hatred then that is a you problem. If you think me not wanting males in my spaces assaulting us and killing us is hatred, that is a you problem. Men have fooled you into thinking taking their power away is hatred.
Also I don't know why you think I would care about your grandfather or his opinion on women but I don't care.
344 notes · View notes
pomo-marge-simpson · 3 years
Text
like when i see straight radfems trying to reason in terms of like... trans narcissism or whatever, i want to say, have you considered that they are straight???
the fact that you can tell most trans people are straight because actual gay kids learn from an early age that most people aren’t attracted to us because they’re exclusively attracted to the opposite sex. like, gay teenagers with crushes on straight people have to figure out eventually that the crush is going to go nowhere. it’s never going to blossom into a full on relationship. it’s impossible.
straight people (especially men i feel) don’t really learn that. chances are that their crush will be reciprocated and if it isn’t then a majority of people are straight so it doesn’t really matter in the long run. this is how you get TIMS/TIFS who don’t understand same sex attraction. 
obviously there’s a sense of entitlement there as well. heterosexual men who call themselves women have been straight their entire life. they’ve probably had their feelings reciprocated by at least one women. so they don’t understand why lesbians reject them because they’re “women” now. they’ve never had to reckon with the fact that people who are actually same sex attracted are a minority of the population.
1K notes · View notes
pomo-marge-simpson · 3 years
Text
folx erasure smh my head
gyns never post your male crushes on here for board approval it is a TRAP
70 notes · View notes
pomo-marge-simpson · 3 years
Text
heterosexuality finally in the dsm-5 !!!!!!!!!!! lobotomize the str8s
15 notes · View notes