pulseminus

[pulseminus]

“He would not fucking say that” except its the badly written source material so he did, in fact, say that

[pulseminus]

Done.

Seph in Kuja’s gear from FF7EC, wielding the Genji Blade.

[pulseminus]

jeepeon (based on this image from Let's Find Pokemon)

[pulseminus]

[pulseminus]

[pulseminus]

Whilst entirely useless as a Wikipedia article, this version of the one on If on a winter's night a traveler remains one of the funniest things I've read

[pulseminus]

help meeeeee

get him away from me

[pulseminus]

get him away from me

[pulseminus]

I say shit like "If my memory serves me" knowing damn well it serves the dark lord

[pulseminus]

N's Klinklang -- matazo

[pulseminus]

[pulseminus]

[pulseminus]

reaching the point of hyperfixation where I can no longer engage with it due to the nausea that I experience at the mere thought of seeing it on my screen is the closest I’ve ever been to being diagnosed with female hysteria

[pulseminus]

You can survive almost anything through the right combination of:

Bitching and moaning

Hater-ology

Doing a goofy little bit about it

Having a buddy say "that's so fucked up" at intermittent points (you can also be your own buddy)

Destroying the cursed amulet you carry everywhere, why do you even have that thing

[pulseminus]

Why don’t we let the guy whose every plan could be reasonably construed as an abstract suicide attempt take a crack it

[pulseminus]

[pulseminus]

There’s a scientific journal called “Get me off Your Fucking Mailing List”.

In 2005, computer scientists David Mazières and Eddie Kohler created this highly profane ten-page paper as a joke, to send in replying to unwanted conference invitations. It literally just contains that seven-word phrase over and over, along with a nice flow chart and scatter-plot graph.

An Australian computer scientist named Peter Vamplew sent it to the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology in response to spam from the journal. Apparently, he thought the editors might simply open and read it.

Instead, they automatically accepted the paper — with an anonymous reviewer rating it as “excellent” — and requested a fee of $150. While this incident is pretty hilarious, it’s a sign of a bigger problem in science publishing. This journal is one of many online-only, for-profit operations that take advantage of inexperienced researchers under pressure to publish their work in any outlet that seems superficially legitimate.