They/them. Not a woman. A blog run by "pro-choice murder brigade scumbags" who are part of “the classic left”.
Last active 60 minutes ago
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
Full offense to those who swallowed “rainbow capitalism bad” but rainbow capitalism has always been a neutral barometer for social acceptance of LGBT people. When rainbow capitalism is big, a corporation sees marketing to LGBT people and projecting at least an image of acceptance as potentially worth losing homophobic customers over. And when they scale back, the opposite.
So yeah to the gays celebrating the death of rainbow capitalism, you are a useful idiot.
959 notes
·
View notes
Text
The crux of the anti trans movement is a war on bodily autonomy. They don't want you to have any agency over what you look like, how you dress, who you date, whether to have kids, etc.
They want total control over you. Not just trans people. Not just queer people. You. Everyone.
Trans people are just a scapegoat. They want total control over everyone's self expression. They want the right to mold you into their perfect little cog in their dehumanizing machine.
Happy Trans Day of Visibility. Our rights are your rights. Our destruction is your destruction.
47K notes
·
View notes
Text
I feel like whenever you get too doomer about the idea that the entire population harbors some deep undeprogrammable homophobia you have to remember that in the 2010s hearts & minds were being changed by shit like Glee
14K notes
·
View notes
Text
Having experienced a lot of it in my 20s, I think some of the worst, pettiest, most straight up this-is-just-bullying-you're-passing-off-as-praxis incidences of Queer Infighting endemic to young people can be best understood as attempts to exercise power by people with very little power.
Like you're 22, you're queer, you've just become a Marxist, the scope of World Suck is overwhelming and you have $30 in your bank account. What can you do to feel like you have any power? Well, you can try to get your frenemy cancelled for cosplaying a character from a problematic show. You can write a public callout post over someone's obviously friendly use of a slur you don't think they technically have the right to reclaim. Doing this stuff can make you feel like you have power and your actions have an impact. Unfortunately the impact in question is a negative impact on other marginalized people. But that often takes some maturity and self-reflection to notice.
17K notes
·
View notes
Text
reminder that "allies welcome" was once secret code for "those not out yet can still participate without putting themselves at risk", and for those who aren't out yet to comfortably exist in these spaces you have to let allies exist in those spaces too.
50K notes
·
View notes
Text
I know most people don't care about anything unless it has to do with the U.S. but can we please start talking about the Canadian election.
Please don't vote for Poilievre. He's basically the Canadian Trump and plans to put in place laws that harm trans youth, and lots of other shit.
Please vote istg this is the only way anything will get better. Poilievre has been kissing millionaires and billionaires asses. He'll make life even harder, and he loves Trump.
Reblogs are appreciated, especially if you aren't Canadian.
This post is about Canada, do not derail or say that "it's worse in America." Canadians are very scared, we deserve to talk about our issues without Americans talking over us.
32K notes
·
View notes
Text







We have always existed, and we always will.
81K notes
·
View notes
Text
I know most people don't care about anything unless it has to do with the U.S. but can we please start talking about the Canadian election.
Please don't vote for Poilievre. He's basically the Canadian Trump and plans to put in place laws that harm trans youth, and lots of other shit.
Please vote istg this is the only way anything will get better. Poilievre has been kissing millionaires and billionaires asses. He'll make life even harder, and he loves Trump.
Reblogs are appreciated, especially if you aren't Canadian.
32K notes
·
View notes
Text
crazy that in the 1970s they were like, "fine, women can play sports. but because they're innately less athletic than men, only in a special ghettoized League For The Frail And Delicate where they get paid less 😊". And not only is that still the system in 2023, but viciously lashing out at the smallest challenges to that system gets framed as Feminist Praxis
139K notes
·
View notes
Text
Dehumanizing bigots is bad, not because I want to be nice to them, but because they are human beings and they serve as a reminder that anyone is capable of evil ideation and action. Violent bigots are not fundamentally different beings from you. They are human beings, who have developed a reactionary and destructive belief system due to their circumstances combined with their biases. In a different timeline, that could've been you. Anyone can be radicalized. Nobody is immune to propaganda, not even the person reading this.
45K notes
·
View notes
Text
I love when people act like the "right wing pipeline" is a fucking mind virus and not shit that sounds completely stupid if you have a developed worldview and a single principle
6K notes
·
View notes
Text
disability advocacy went wrong when it became about inspiration porn and “differently abled” and savants. its incredible that that guy with no legs did a triathlon but your sister with no legs will not and she doesnt need prosthetics or five hour training days to deserve respect and compassion and accommodations. its incredible that that autistic guy can look at a city from a helicopter for an hour and then draw the entire detailed skyline from memory when he lands but your autistic friend cannot and they dont need to have a special Autism Power to deserve respect and compassion and accommodations.
activism framed around “we are just as CAPABLE” means that when people genuinely are less capable they are left behind. activism framed around “we are just as WORTHY” is fundamental to radical compassion.
148K notes
·
View notes
Text
A core feature of anti-fatness is the "you did this to yourself"-view. People are very invested in the idea that size is within everyone's control. It's soothing to believe that all fat people are a small series of good choices away from becoming thin and staying that way, and that thin people are success stories by virtue of existing.
Any time we speak up about discrimination and fatphobia, someone inevitably plays that card. Trolls will say "eat a salad, pig" and well-meaning health nuts will gently explain what calories are. In either case, we're met with a "you know, you can stop this at any time." Why, if nobody was fat, thin people wouldn't need to examine their biases! It sure would be an easier time for everyone if we weren't so Around and Bulliable!
9K notes
·
View notes
Text
I’m glad second wave feminism helped make it possible for fathers to accompany their partners into the delivery room but I wish this fantastic progress hadn’t slowly warped into people thinking they’re entitled to being in the delivery room and thinking cultures where birthing individuals are traditionally accompanied by female relatives are somehow barbaric and misogynistic. It was about choice and consent. The person giving birth should be able to decide, not peer pressure and not unstated “father’s rights”.
4K notes
·
View notes
Text
I am also just... so baffled when people say "dO yOu BeLiEvE nAzIs" as if it's some kind of "gotcha" when I say that I take TERFs' hatred of cis men at face value.
Like, do I believe Nazis?
Yes. Yes I do.
Because they are quite explicit about what they believe! ESPECIALLY in their own spaces where they think no one else is listening.
It would be LAUGHABLE to say "fascists only hate [socially acceptable target that they publicly vilify]; they don't ACTUALLY mean it when they say that they want to eradicate [historically marginalized group that is no longer an acceptable target for explicitly genocidal campaigns]." Why do you think fascists have stopped publicly advocating for legally mandated racial segregation in the mainstream press? Do you think it's because they ONLY hate undocumented immigrants and trans people? Or do you think it's because they care about optics and know that revealing the full scope of their objectives wouldn't be politically expedient?
The real question is: why do you believe TERFs' public statements over their private correspondences? Is it so inconceivable to you that a reactionary movement would conceal its true intentions? OR could it actually be that your worldview axiomatically requires a reality in which TERFs don't hate men? Are you afraid of recognizing TERFs' hatred of men because acknowledging the similarity in your beliefs would let everyone know that your entire political philosophy is indistinguishable from theirs once you scrape off trans-inclusive veneer?
500 notes
·
View notes