rcttenprince

[rcttenprince]

SICKENING. ABSOLUTELY SICKENING.

[rcttenprince]

[rcttenprince]

𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘂𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝘂𝗴𝘂𝗿𝘂 𝗱𝗶𝗲𝗱

[rcttenprince]

I'll carry that sin with you

[rcttenprince]

redraw

[rcttenprince]

[rcttenprince]

Anne Carson, from "Glass, Irony and God," originally published in 1995

[rcttenprince]

Ph. Elizaveta Porodina

[rcttenprince]

[rcttenprince]

Saw a panel with gojo's bloody face and then this little sketch happened.

[rcttenprince]

in a moment of desperation, as an act of love, geto suguru…..

edit: @phontao wrote a fic inspired by this piece!! go read it!!!!

-

geto suguru’s ct is consuming curses. the original idea with him was to interpret his ct literally and have him eat a curse piece by piece in order to keep it.

here the idea is gojo dies in his fight with toji and geto stumbles across his corpse and - as a way to keep him with him, keep him “alive” - he consumes him, in a literal sense.

this isn’t an AU, it’s more of an idea/concept

closeup:

[rcttenprince]

forgive me lord for I have imagined a life far more soft and tender than the one you created for me

[rcttenprince]

the night before he left

[rcttenprince]

Rem the Shinigami🦴

[rcttenprince]

that boy is mine

[rcttenprince]

gojo loves getting compliments from geto

[rcttenprince]

i wanna talk about this thing gege said

i’ve seen a lot of people saying that this is a bad way to write a story, and i couldnt disagree more. from a writer’s perspective, there is no reason to kill off a character if it’s not going to have impact.

in any case, i think this reaction points out two things i’ve noticed about the jjk fandom.

i. jjk fans prioritize enjoyment of characters over the plot

which is fine, i guess. i’m not gonna begrudge any readers the space to enjoy their fav characters. however, what i disagree with is the constant trashing of gege and jjk as a story because the narrative doesnt treat the characters as you want it to.

i mostly talk about these things from the perspective of someone who has been writing for a while, so i will take a second to acknowledge from the reader perspective. it’s easy to get attached to characters and see them as real people in your life.

but they arent real people. they only exist for the author’s intentions. every time i see someone complain that “x character only died because plot” i just think “yes?” characters exist for the plot. they exist to serve the narrative. they live and die for the plot, and that isn’t a bad thing. this is a story. that is how stories work.

with characters like gojo or choso, it’s easy to look back and see their character arcs and how their ends fit their purpose in the story, but i think people get so caught up in wanting to fuck the character, or fanon, that they forget their original purpose is to do what gege wants them to do.

this is a war against the most powerful, most evil sorcerer in history. of course characters are going to die, and of course it’s going to be characters we love. it’s honestly unrealistic to expect anything else.

and i think it’s really disrespectful to say so many rude things to gege because he is thinking about the story he wants to tell, and not the story that best suits your favorite character.

ii. few people want to feel anything from what they’re reading anymore

which again, is totally fine, but maybe read something else?

tragic stories have existed and enjoyed immense popularity for millennia. and theres nothing wrong with that. there’s nothing wrong with authors intentionally stirring up their readers’ emotions.

i wanna bring attention to the origins of the words “tragedy” and “catharsis”

“tragedy” is a genre that stems from greek drama based on human suffering and the terrible or sorrowful events that befall the main character. the intention of of tragedy is to invoke “catharsis”

“catharsis” is commonly used to refer to the purification of thoughts and emotions by way of expressing them. in terms of tragedy, this refers to arousing a negative emotion with the intention of expelling it so the audience can walk away feeling relieved.

for all intents and purposes, jjk is a tragedy. it’s meant to make you feel sad. that’s gege’s intention. yet every time people feel upset by a specific event, they call “bad writing.” if anything, according to what jjk is, it’s good writing if you feel sad.

i have seen some people say that jjk wasn’t set up this way, and i disagree so strongly that it’s hard to comprehend.

jjk0 ends with gojo having to kill his best friend, his one and only. tragedy. yuuta’s story is tragic too, having cursed rika and accidentally isolated himself just because he didn’t want her to die.

jjk starts with yuuji faced with execution just because because he wanted to honor his grandfather’s dying wishes. within a handful of chapters, there’s yuuji’s “death” and junpei, and there’s a clear set up of tragedy and repeated loss, despite characters giving their best effort.

i could get into how this relates to my interpretation of the themes of jjk, and sharing burden/responsibility to be stronger together, but that’s another point.

tldr; the point of this post is to say that gege killing characters and making readers feel sad is not bad writing or a bad narrative choice. it’s true to his intentions and the essence of jjk. if you don’t like that, then don’t read. but there’s no reason to disrespect gege and his hard work just because it’s not your cup of tea