remingtonidsf934-blog - Tumblr blog

[remingtonidsf934-blog]

Cracking The Legal Services Code

As I've researched this story in the tangled, deceitful, web-like lines of entrapment, which appear to have entangled the lives of many Bakersfield and Fresno area residents; I think I have found the spider in the center of this web. There has been much talk inside the news lately of "liberal judges," "Activist Judges," "Extremist Judges" and "Partisan Judges." Yet wedding party judge, which is not being discussed, may be the old-fashioned "Corrupt Judge." To me it could be the corrupt judge, the individual that works well with bribes, for favors, or who hands out bribes and favors to others, which is in the rotten core of what is wrong using this type of country's legal system. Judge Lawrence J. O'Neil, I think, qualifies of a single with the great corrupt judges of our lives!

Why do I think that? The IRS case against Dr. Steven V. Booth alone has demonstrated how corrupt this judge Lawrence J. O'Neil is. He started by signing a vague and suspect search warrant for your IRS. The warrant would have been to search the premises of Dr. Booth and another defendant; it was so vague that it was an excuse to simply ransack the citizen's homes. The homes were ransacked, money and the personal property went missing along with the co-defendants' lawyers called them into it. Judge Lawrence J. O'Neil was just a magistrate. You see magistrate judges just have statutory authority if someone challenges their business, which someone did, they've no authority to make a decision their case, instead, it needs to be heard by an Article Three Federal Judge. Lawrence J. O'Neil had not been legally designed to rule on whether his or her own signed warrant was valid after it absolutely was questioned. He must have rescued himself. Instead, he buried the truth until he was catapulted from as being a magistrate to like a fully-fledged Federal Judge after being nominated by President G.W. Bush in 2007. Oddly, the situation involving his signing of a disputed search warrant being a magistrate now was the target of his jurisdiction! O'Neil needs to have recused himself therefore at the same time. This is what he did wrong, he ruled on his search warrant whether it was valid or invalid just as the IRS was making their criminal case against Dr. Booth with his fantastic co-defendant. Evidence was then submit through the IRS that will do not have been allowed. Talk about letting the fox guard the henhouse!

Judge Lawrence J. O'Neil then took to get one from the most arrogant, heartless and cruel judges for the Federal Court dais. He continually inherited severe, almost medieval sentences. He quashed bills about cutting California carbon emissions in favor of the Big Oil companies. He was said by his colleagues being an extremist judge. Yet, what he was quoted saying and did to Dr. Booth's co-defendant was indeed an offence bred beyond corruption. Judge Lawrence was washing the backs of the IRS as they definitely washed his. The co-defendant was made aware by a few friends and attorneys that there would be a cabal of judges and lawyers in Fresno which had basically staked an incident on the Federal Courts. Anyone crossing this gang of corrupt personages was bound to feel their wrath. In his case, whenever the co-defendant attempted to make a motion to save himself, Lawrence O'Neil quashed it. He would not reverse his decision around the search warrant, allowing evidence to be taken to the truth which was just circumstantial. "Right to some speedy trial" to the co-defendant? Denied! Then, mixing the trial of Booth while using co-defendant like that they been some form of criminal cohorts, O'Neil allowed Booth's perjured testimony to get seen as "proof" that this co-defendant had bilked the us government beyond huge amount of money! Calling Booth's trust manager a "slick, cagey, wily con-man who only agreed to be upset over getting caught, rather than having committed a criminal offence" he sentenced him to 9 long years in Federal prison, while using the IRS "$4,000,000.00 estimate" products Booth owed them, as being a basis to the harsh sentencing! Even though he knew full-well that Booth only owed $207,000, understanding that his tax burden had nothing to do with his co-defendant's case.

However, it gets worse. For the co-defendant, himself reported if you ask me that an attorney for your court was ushered into his cell, (not into an anteroom or meeting room or some other area where most such conversations take place in prison, but in the actual defendant's cell, as though he were some kind of Death Row inmate). There he was offered an arrangement. It seems that Judge Lawrence J. O'Neil did not think he was guilty of conning government entities. Instead, he was angry as hell he wouldn't normally deed over the properties as part of his portfolio time for Booth. So now, O'Neil was cutting a deal on the part of Booth and also the IRS! If the co-defendant would simply revenues his 5% portion in the properties, and convince the corporation he worked for to offer over their 95%, he would be released. Case closed. Records expunged.

Now this man faced an actual dilemma. Either take action patently wrong since IRS had convinced a jury that most the different trusts involved were "shams," however be signing documents having said that this became correct and true, that they was a criminal and his life's work a sham. He could be relinquishing properties, which were legally bought and taken care of and mostly in the hands of the corporation he worked for, which may also be seen being disreputable if he did as Judge Lawrence J. O'Neil demanded. He would then must try to convince his partners to perform likewise. Then he'd be freed. Or, he could decline and spend nine years in prison. He was put relating to the veritable rock plus a hard place. His wife needed him out and. His associates needed him to become out, and not only that, his reputation re-established. His kids needed him. His community needed him. He had been in jail and in need of freedom. Yet if he did what Lawrence J. O'Neil asked, however be denying every principle he ever stood for or believed in.

After a good nights prayer, he gave his reply to his wife and the attorney and Lawrence J. O'Neil. "No deal." This man had chosen prison over lying and wrongdoing. He wouldn't normally give on the properties on the IRS. Instead, he'd fight all of them. Now you tell me, what con-man, with an offer prefer that, that may free him of going about his daily confidence games, would NOT have taken the deal? Only a good man would say "I'm keeping jail!" In the finish, Judge Lawrence O'Neil's evil plan did not work. This is only because he was facing down a significant man; somebody that would not flip and play his games.

The co-defendant within the Booth criminal case was finally released on appeal. He remains under house arrest, can not work, to produce a living, to visit and even to walk towards the local store. He wears a Federally mandated ankle alarm bracelet, that this Feds want him to fund even though they have disallowed him the right to work! They still work their evil machinations using this man who stood around them and on the vile Judge Lawrence J. O'Neil, who sentences men to 750 years in prison and doesn't care if his children choke for the noxious polluted air of California, so long as his Big Oil bedfellows are pleased.

Having heard pretty much everything I realized, Judge Lawrence J. O'Neil will be the wily, cagey con-artist here. He's body fat spider spinning the web to entrap and entangle innocent people. He does it for power and favor and funds. He's the ringleader of the Fresno/IRS gang, pursuing chiropractors and business managers instead of drug lords and crime king-pins. This man needs to become exposed. He's not fit to become a judge. And he needs to become in the cell somewhere contemplating his failings, instead of lording it over others.

[remingtonidsf934-blog]

World Class Tools Make Legal Services Push Button Easy

This short article examines the down sides concerning the business lawsuit inside the little business world. Simply because they have a suitable dpt large corporations have been excluded by me therefore. that somehow will be the main business. This short article also makes all the proposal that most of the time, small enterprises are best using alternatives to litigation in resolving business disputes.

Their owners and firms normally end up in litigation because of this of hard jobs in the company challenge. Frequently the parties need a view that their situation is 100% right and another side does not have any advantage whatsoever inside their discussion. This case carries a fair chance of ending with the solicitors as well as a great probability of learning to be a situation of protracted litigation. While the merits of each one case will unquestionably differ, we find many common elements for this situation; the chances of the expenses of litigation being significantly larger than any difference one of many roles is pretty likely; the likelihood of the functions positions hardening with the length in the litigation may be large also. Even though attorneys usually are energetic in protecting their client's jobs, and settlement will likely be also suggested by attorneys as a possible excellent choice, the type of the actions isn't favorable to settlement. Even though negotiation is within the back of each litigant's head, the thought is always to check it out eventually "later on". The parties end up "later on" even as we realize in the future implies that a great deal of resources and money are consumed once. This means the motivation to remain decreases during the entire only spikes and procedure following your parties recognize their folly and recognize that they're with a runaway train called "protracted litigation".

Let's attempt to measure the process: the average argument comes from a small enterprise provide different kinds that gets documented on the incorrect foot, sometimes because with the vagaries from the transaction; bargains performed in haste without obviously spelling information from it are wonderful candidates to finish up in litigation. As well, bargains made between friends often get the complicated litigation that arises and friendship blended.

There's generally a change of bluster between parties, when the conflict occurs. No more next the parties have appointed attorneys as well as a volley of legal risks are traded. During this period the marketplace gets involved as well as any real potential for achieving a negotiated settlement decreases dramatically. When one sides provide lawsuits for their competitors these phase is. The discovery process has become entered by us and during this time period that expenditures commence to support. Often you'll find depositions to be used, conditions or maybe the creation of countless a lot of papers. And that means you commence to get my drift all this have to be replicated at ludicrous costs. At this time usually, there's an effort to choose, however, emotions are running high since depositions as and as unpleasant as they definitely usually give you in number mood to take into consideration agreements strenuous. Money was earned with the next stage will be the preparation for trial using the attorneys spending your hard at full throttle. From then on it's test time, a long matter, frequently from the two and week with prices running unabated. Following an uncertain end comes article test displays and activities. If you're fortunate to know it you ultimately have wisdom that pays nobody. Did you think it's over? Believe again; an appeal is inside the wings using the price and process starting once more. At this time you begin your metaphysical issues like "What is life all about". The challenge is significantly more impersonal; the events are scarcely involved, to make sure the attorneys; a normal denominator the costs, remain the same.

I guarantee that I've not offered a nightmarish scenario; to you personally what I've described is exactly what I experienced returning four years of my entire life. The procedure was an economic disaster and though I was vindicated there were no silver lining after it; no feel well, no feeling of justice, merely an unavoidable experience of waste, waste of time, money, sources, etc. Lots of people including judges, lawyers, paralegals, courtroom reporters and others doing use no benefits of others. Several trees being cut, a good amount of gas been used without obvious benefits of the whole planet and town above all.

I've pointed out that the correct business industry isn't for smaller businesses or entrepreneurs. In my opinion that this elements in position to achieve a young termination in the cases are ineffective. Mandatory arbitration purchased from the judge is by in large ineffective. A lawyer must be used by the court to try to persuade the parties to stay in after a half every day of overwhelming, cajoling and threatening. The parties contain the activities however, there is no real motivation to stay in. Arrangement discussions between your parties, without discouraged from the solicitors will often be saturated in bluster and allows face the facts; industry doesn't really benefit from early settlements. Ultimately, the insufficient familiarity while using individuals about the true character of the method make them simple targets for the system; if they are in, the hurdles to depart a variety of.

I believe only a few in the conflicts must enter the legal process, and in many cases less could offer an improved result than an early on and appropriate decision. In my opinion, a potential answer lies not in the business. Someone that's number vested interests in extending the method, and contains a payment structure that would gain in the event the parties can resolve their problems with out a lawsuit must interject himself and cajole the parties in order to complete their argument preventing the legal process. Demonstrably they will have to possess the skills needed, nevertheless I stress again the need for a celebration outside the range of the Industry.