Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Statistics
We looked inside some of the posts by resurrectionertugrul and here's what we found interesting.
Average Info
Notes Per Post
0
Likes Per Post
0
Reblog Per Post
0
Reply Per Post
0
Time Between Posts
27 days
Number of Posts By Type
Photo
17
Last Seen Tumblr Blogs
Fun Fact
Women make up for the other 50% of Tumblr’s audience.
Photo
Bosnian Merchants Calm and Respectful Sellers
Unlike the French and Italian shopkeepers, who often eagerly encourage people to buy, Bosnian merchants take a different approach. They do not pressure customers or show strong emotion. Instead, they offer their goods with quiet dignity and politeness, often seeming indifferent to whether or not a sale is made.
They never shout, use big gestures, or behave in a pushy way. This calm behavior is influenced by their Turkish neighbors, who follow the teaching of the Prophet Muhammad:
“Be moderate in your steps and lower your voice.”
Pride and Patience in Daily Life
You will also never see a Muslim begging on the streets of Sarajevo. Complaining is rare. One of the most admirable qualities of the local people is how they handle misfortune and disappointment—with calmness and quiet strength Sofia Sightseeing.
Their attitude can be summed up in a simple belief:
“If you have food, eat. If you don’t have food, then die.” While it may sound harsh, it shows their deep faith, self-control, and pride in not asking for help or showing weakness.
Whether in their shops or their places of worship, many Muslim Bosnians stay composed, respectful, and deeply connected to their religion.
Traditional Guilds Organize the Trades
Like medieval Europe, trades in Bosnia are organized by guilds. Each trade or profession has its own guild, which governs many aspects of the business. These guilds:
Choose a patron saint, Elect leaders and officers, Set prices for goods and services, Regulate wages, Appoint apprentices, Settle disputes
Each type of trade also has its own area in the city. For example, blacksmiths, jewelers, or weavers each have their specific streets or districts. Interestingly, even though merchants may be competitors, they usually maintain friendly and respectful relationships with one another.
The Kiraet-Han A Gathering Place for All
At the center of the old city is a famous meeting place: a traditional coffee house called the Kiraet-Han. This is where many skilled workers and merchants gather. It’s a peaceful and lively place where people from all races and backgrounds can be seen relaxing, talking, and sharing ideas.
The Grand Mosque and a Lesson in Cleanliness
Not far from the Kiraet-Han is the Begova Djamia, one of the largest and most beautiful mosques in Europe, second only to Hagia Sophia in Istanbul and the Selimiye Mosque in Edirne (Adrianople).
In its courtyard, there is a fountain where worshippers wash their hands before prayer. In Islam, cleanliness is essential, and the Prophet declared:
“Cleanliness is the key to prayer.”
Also in the courtyard is a stone measuring stick, the official standard of length—just like a yardstick. If a merchant’s measurements are questioned, he must compare his product against this official standard to prove its accuracy. This simple but strict practice ensures honesty and fairness in trade.
0 notes
Photo
Bulgaria Recent History and Politics
From Ancient Thrace to the Roman Empire
In ancient times, the area we now call Bulgaria was known as Thrace. This name was used during the time of Philip of Macedon, the famous military leader and father of Alexander the Great. Thrace was then inhabited by a wild and warlike people. Both Philip and Alexander eventually brought this region under their control and added it to their empire.
Later, during the early Christian era, Roman Emperor Vespasian conquered the region, turning it into a Roman province. It remained under Roman rule for several centuries.
The Arrival of the Bulgars
In the third century, waves of eastern tribes, often called barbarians, began moving through the Danube Valley. Among these groups were the Bulgars, a nomadic clan from Central Asia. They settled in the Balkan Mountains and eventually gave the country its modern name—Bulgaria Local Ephesus Tour Guides.
Over the following centuries, the Bulgars formed a strong and independent state. Their kingdom grew into the Bulgarian Empire, which reached its peak during the rule of Czar Simeon, who reigned from 893 to 927 A.D. However, by the eleventh century, Bulgaria fell under the control of the Byzantine Empire.
Russia’s Role in Bulgarian Affairs
Russia first became involved in Bulgarian history in 967 A.D. when a Russian fleet landed 10,000 soldiers at the mouth of the Danube River. These troops were led by Sviatoslav, a strong and fearless warrior. He lived a rough life—eating horse meat and sleeping on a bearskin.
Since that time, Russia has played an important role in Bulgarian politics. Because of their shared Slavic roots and common Orthodox Christian faith, Russia has long claimed the right to influence events in Bulgaria. Russia has also often supported Bulgarians in their struggles against Turkish (Ottoman) oppression.
European Politics and the Limits of Russian Power
Although Russia wants more control in the Balkan region, Austria and Germany do not allow Russia to take over the Balkan States or expand to the Mediterranean Sea. Still, no country has been able to stop Russia’s political influence in Bulgaria.
Why Bulgaria Still Relies on Russia
Today, Russia remains very influential in Bulgarian politics for several reasons. First, Bulgaria is not strong enough to completely resist Russian pressure. Second, the country sees Russia as its only powerful ally in times of crisis. The Bulgarian government knows that if problems arise, it is to Russia—the “Great White Bear”—that they must turn for help.
0 notes
Photo
The Shape and Size of the Promontory
A Natural Fortress by the Sea
The land on which Constantinople was built is known as a promontory—a piece of land that extends into the water. Although its actual shape is more like a trapezium (a four-sided figure with uneven sides), it is often described as a triangle. This is because the eastern side of the land is shorter than the others, giving it a triangular appearance.
The promontory stretches about four miles in length and varies in width from one to four miles. The ground is not flat. Instead, it is a mix of hills, ridges, valleys, and plains, which gave the ancient city a natural defense and a unique beauty Sofia City Tour.
The Hills of New Rome
A City Built on Seven Hills
The land rises to a height of about 250 feet at its tallest points. The higher parts are grouped into two main areas:
A large, isolated hill located at the southwestern corner of the promontory.
A long ridge that runs along the Golden Horn on the northern side.
This ridge is not continuous but is divided into six smaller hills by five cross-valleys. These valleys cut through the ridge, making each hill seem like a separate piece of high ground.
Because of this landscape, Constantinople, often called New Rome, proudly claimed to be built on seven hills, just like the original Rome beside the Tiber River in Italy. These seven hills became one of the most iconic symbols of the city.
Valleys and Waterways
The Lycus River and Surrounding Plains
Between the two high areas of the city lies a broad meadow, through which the Lycus River flows. This river crosses the promontory and empties into the Sea of Marmara on the southern side. This fertile valley was important for both water supply and city planning.
In addition to this meadow, there are also flat lands along the coastlines of the promontory and in the valleys between the northern hills. These areas were likely used for homes, gardens, and marketplaces in ancient times.
How the Hills Are Named
A Practical Numbering System
Most of the hills in Constantinople do not have individual names. Instead of using traditional names, historians and local guides usually number the hills from one to seven for easy reference. This system helps people understand where important buildings and landmarks were located in the ancient city.
A City Shaped by Nature and History
Constantinople’s natural landscape played a huge role in its strategic power, defensive strength, and architectural beauty. Built on hills, near rivers, and surrounded by water, it became one of the greatest cities of the ancient and medieval world. Its unique geography made it the perfect setting for emperors, armies, and empires to rise and fall.
0 notes
Photo
Bulgaria What You Should Know Before You Go
Alcohol in Bulgaria
The most traditional alcoholic drink in Bulgaria is rakia (also spelled rakiya), a strong fruit brandy. The most common types are grape rakia (grozdova) and plum rakia (slivova). Rakia is usually served in small 50g or 100g shots and is almost always consumed with food—especially a shopska salad or some kind of appetizer.
If you order rakia without food, restaurant staff may find it unusual. In Bulgaria, drinking spirits without at least a small snack is not typical and might get you a few puzzled looks.
When it comes to beer, Bulgaria produces several decent local lagers. Some of the most popular brands are:
Zagorka
Shumensko
Kamenitsa
These are widely available and considered reliable, although not particularly unique Customized Tour Bulgaria.
Bulgarian wine, on the other hand, is gaining international attention—especially the dry red varieties. Here are some standout wines to look for:
Cabernet Sauvignon from Svishtov and Oryahovitsa
Merlot from Stambolovo
Gumza from Novo Selo
Mavrud from Asenovgrad
Melnik from the Melnik region
For white wine lovers, Chardonnay and Traminer from Veliki Preslav are among the best in the country.
Customs and Travel Regulations
If you’re traveling within the European Union (EU), you can legally bring the following from Bulgaria:
10 liters of spirits
90 liters of wine
110 liters of beer
However, many countries limit cigarette imports to just 200 cigarettes from Bulgaria.
You are not allowed to export antiques, artworks, coins, or items of historical value without a special permit from the Ministry of Culture.
Due to concerns about child trafficking, travelers accompanied by young children may be asked to provide documents proving their parental relationship (e.g. birth certificates or legal guardianship papers) before being allowed to leave the country.
Electricity in Bulgaria
Bulgaria uses a 220-volt electrical system, the same as most of Europe. The standard plugs are two-round-pin European style.
Visitors from the UK will need an adapter.
Visitors from the US will need both an adapter and a voltage transformer for devices that cannot handle 220 volts (like some hairdryers or chargers).
Smoking in Public Places
By law, cafés, bars, and restaurants must provide non-smoking areas. However, in reality, these areas are often small and not clearly separated. You might find yourself sitting next to smokers, even in the so-called “non-smoking” section.
If you are sensitive to smoke or strongly prefer smoke-free environments, it’s a good idea to check in advance or choose outdoor seating where available.
0 notes
Photo
The British Empire Won Loyalty Without Promises
In the British Empire, no race needed promises of future freedom or religious rights to give their support. Their loyalty came naturally, without needing political deals.
Has Injustice Brought Any Real Gain?
Let’s look at how unfair actions have hurt different countries:
Did Russia truly gain by taking Bessarabia from Romania in 1878?
Did Romania become stronger by taking Dobrudja from Bulgaria—its richest land—at a time when Bulgaria was weak and alone?
Has Greece gained strength by taking land in Macedonia, which was known to be Bulgarian? Greece even carried out massacres against the Bulgarians who didn’t flee Guided Turkey Tours .
That land was promised to Bulgaria in the Treaty of San Stefano and was vital for Bulgaria’s economic growth.
Serbia’s Broken Promise
Is Serbia any stronger now, during its struggles, because it broke its treaty with Bulgaria before the war with Turkey? Serbia took Bulgarian-inhabited land that had been officially recognized as Bulgarian by treaty.
Europe’s Failure to Respect Agreements
Has Europe benefitted by allowing Turkey to take advantage of Romania’s surprise attack on Bulgaria, and use that moment to break the Treaty of London—signed just months earlier with the help of Sir Edward Grey?
The truth is, today’s crisis in Europe is largely the result of ignoring treaties and disrespecting the wishes of local people in the lands being fought over.
Bulgaria Was Treated Unfairly
Where was the justice when Europe stood by silently as Bulgaria lost nearly all the rewards of her hard-won victories?
Even though Bulgaria had made huge sacrifices in blood and resources for the cause of freedom, she was robbed of the benefits she deserved.
0 notes
Photo
Complete State Control Over Banking
On 25 December 1947, the Bulgarian government passed a new law that gave the state complete control over the banking system. As a result of this law, 31 Bulgarian and foreign banks were nationalized—meaning they were taken over by the government.
This marked the end of the market economy in Bulgaria. From this point on, the country moved to a centrally planned system, where all economic activities were controlled by the Communist Party. Private entrepreneurship was no longer allowed, and management of all businesses was handed over to party officials, many of whom had no experience in running businesses.
No Private Businesses Left
After this transformation, not a single private business remained in Bulgaria. There were no privately owned shops, factories, workshops, or even small craft studios. The state owned and controlled everything Istanbul Day Trip.
Even urban homes and apartments were not safe from expropriation. In 1948, special housing committees were formed by local governments to take over homes from wealthier citizens. These homes were often used to house party functionaries, clerks, and newcomers from rural areas who supported the communist regime.
Many homes were also given to the relatives of victims of political purges—people labeled as “enemies of the people,” many of whom had been executed, imprisoned, or sent to forced labor camps.
Law on Urban Property and Personal Confiscation
The Urban House Property Bill, passed in the late 1940s, allowed for the full or partial confiscation of properties such as:
Houses Apartments Villas Offices
Citizens with larger or more valuable properties were targeted. Their wealth was considered “unjust” or “dangerous” to the goals of socialism. They were often forced to share their homes or give up part of their living space to strangers loyal to the regime.
The government used propaganda to justify these actions, claiming it was done for the benefit of the people. However, the real goal was to weaken the influence of the former middle and upper classes and punish opposition.
Economic Burden and Hidden Costs
Although these nationalizations and confiscations were presented as victories for socialism, they came at a huge cost. The government had to spend millions to maintain the newly nationalized businesses and homes. Often, these enterprises became inefficient, poorly managed, and unproductive, as they were now controlled by unqualified party members.
Even Communist Party documents later admitted that only a small percentage of the wealth taken from citizens actually helped the economy. Most of it was lost due to poor planning and corruption.
Religious Persecution
Alongside the economic and political changes, the communist regime also launched a campaign against the church. Following Karl Marx’s belief that “religion is the opium of the people,” the government sought to limit the influence of religious institutions. Churches were closely monitored, many were shut down, and religious leaders were often arrested, harassed, or forced to conform to state-approved teachings.
A Country Under Total State Control
By the end of the 1940s, Bulgaria had become a fully controlled socialist state, with no private property, no free business activity, and limited personal freedoms. The government owned everything, from banks to homes, and even tried to control people’s beliefs. What was presented as progress was, in reality, a period of hardship, fear, and repression for many Bulgarian citizens.
0 notes
Photo
Women Artists and Architects in Bulgaria
Women artists and architects in Bulgaria had to work hard to be recognized. Like in many other countries, women studying at the Arts Academy were not initially allowed to take certain classes, such as nude-body drawing classes. However, this exclusion did not last as long in Bulgaria as it did in the West. By the late 1890s, after protests from some students, women were allowed to enroll in these classes.
The Women Artists Section
In 1928, the Women Artists Section of the Bulgarian Association of University Women (BAUW) was created. Its goal was to help develop the professional careers of educated Bulgarian women artists. Although women had been allowed to study at the Art School since it opened in 1896, the artistic world in Bulgaria was still not open to them. While there were many female actresses and musicians, female artists were often not given the same recognition. Many women artists rarely exhibited their work in independent or international exhibitions. Some even worked privately at home, becoming parlor artists, creating art just for themselves Travel Bulgaria.
Challenges for Women Artists
After World War I, some Bulgarian women artists went abroad to specialize, participate in exhibitions, and join new artist societies. However, their work was still not recognized in Bulgaria. They were not admitted to art societies’ boards, were not hired as lecturers at the Academy of Fine Arts, and did not have their works bought at exhibitions.
Exhibitions and Criticism
Despite these challenges, the Women Artists Section included nearly all professionally active women artists in Bulgaria. Between 1928 and 1943, three generations of women artists participated in the annual BAUW exhibitions. These exhibitions attracted a lot of visitors and sparked debates about women’s creativity. However, many critics described women’s work as imitative of men’s art and of low quality.
Encouraging Young Artists and International Recognition
Despite the sexist criticism, the Women Artists Section encouraged young women to create art. They helped ill and poor women artists and even took Bulgarian women’s art abroad. In 1937 and 1938, BAUW held an exhibition in Belgrade and Zagreb, which was very successful. The Section also motivated women artists to hold independent exhibitions, both in Bulgaria and abroad, and to participate in general art exhibitions.
0 notes
Photo
Women Artists and Architects in Bulgaria
Women artists and architects in Bulgaria had to work hard to be recognized. Like in many other countries, women studying at the Arts Academy were not initially allowed to take certain classes, such as nude-body drawing classes. However, this exclusion did not last as long in Bulgaria as it did in the West. By the late 1890s, after protests from some students, women were allowed to enroll in these classes.
The Women Artists Section
In 1928, the Women Artists Section of the Bulgarian Association of University Women (BAUW) was created. Its goal was to help develop the professional careers of educated Bulgarian women artists. Although women had been allowed to study at the Art School since it opened in 1896, the artistic world in Bulgaria was still not open to them. While there were many female actresses and musicians, female artists were often not given the same recognition. Many women artists rarely exhibited their work in independent or international exhibitions. Some even worked privately at home, becoming parlor artists, creating art just for themselves Travel Bulgaria.
Challenges for Women Artists
After World War I, some Bulgarian women artists went abroad to specialize, participate in exhibitions, and join new artist societies. However, their work was still not recognized in Bulgaria. They were not admitted to art societies’ boards, were not hired as lecturers at the Academy of Fine Arts, and did not have their works bought at exhibitions.
Exhibitions and Criticism
Despite these challenges, the Women Artists Section included nearly all professionally active women artists in Bulgaria. Between 1928 and 1943, three generations of women artists participated in the annual BAUW exhibitions. These exhibitions attracted a lot of visitors and sparked debates about women’s creativity. However, many critics described women’s work as imitative of men’s art and of low quality.
Encouraging Young Artists and International Recognition
Despite the sexist criticism, the Women Artists Section encouraged young women to create art. They helped ill and poor women artists and even took Bulgarian women’s art abroad. In 1937 and 1938, BAUW held an exhibition in Belgrade and Zagreb, which was very successful. The Section also motivated women artists to hold independent exhibitions, both in Bulgaria and abroad, and to participate in general art exhibitions.
0 notes
Photo
Misconceptions About Bulgaria
Many people in Britain mistakenly believe that Bulgaria is a wild and barbarous land. However, this belief is far from the truth. Bulgaria is just as safe as England, and the Bulgarian people like to think of themselves as trying to follow England’s example in many ways.
A Glimpse of Old Bulgaria
Tirnova: The Ancient Capital Tirnova, the ancient capital of Bulgaria, is a city with a unique charm. The name “Tirnova” means “the thorn,” and the city is shaped like a thorn, sitting on a rock above the Yantra River. It has long been a symbol of Bulgaria’s strength and history, causing both admiration and challenges for Europe.
A City Away From the Tourist Path
Tirnova is not a place visited by many tourists. It hasn’t been influenced by the modern, stucco-style buildings found in Sofia. Instead, it represents old Bulgaria—picturesque, romantic, and peaceful. The city is located to the north of the Balkan Mountains, surrounded by natural beauty. The landscape around it is rugged, with hills and the Yantra River making a curved path at the city’s base Holiday Bulgaria.
A City Like Edinburgh
If you can imagine Edinburgh Castle, but ten times bigger, built on a giant rock, with parts of the town hanging off the rock’s edge, you would have an idea of what Tirnova looks like.
First Impressions of Tirnova
I first saw Tirnova in the early morning, surrounded by mist and the glow of a beautiful sunrise. The view looked like a scene from an old medieval play, with misty trails along the river and tall pine trees growing on steep slopes. Above, the town seemed to spill over the rocks, a mix of white buildings with bright yellow shutters and vines climbing up the walls. The sky above was a pure, clear blue, with no clouds to interrupt the view.
0 notes
Photo
Boats on Lake Ochrida
There are many boats on Lake Ochrida. They are shaped like gondolas and are moved with large, shovel-like oars. Surprisingly, no boats on the lake use sails. Even when the wind is strong and the journey is long—sometimes taking a full day—the boats are still powered only by oars. This is not because the people don’t know how to use sails, but because the mountain winds are so sudden and strong that a boat with a sail could easily tip over.
Water Wheels for Irrigation
The old-fashioned water wheels are often seen in the area. These wheels are connected to a treadmill, and several tin cans are attached to the wheel. As a man walks on the treadmill, it turns the wheel and raises water. The water is then poured into a trough and carried off to irrigate nearby fields. This method is a simple way to combine exercise with useful work. A man can take a pleasant walk for four or five hours before breakfast without ever leaving home Istanbul Tour Guides.
The People of Struga
In Struga, there are very few Bulgarians or Greeks. The majority of the people are Turkish. However, the most noticeable group are the Albanians. Albanian men are tall, dark, and have attractive, regular features. I also noticed that the Albanian man takes pride in his appearance and is a bit of a dandy. His jacket is often decorated with silver or gold, and his kilt is always very clean. His shoes, usually made of red leather, have a large puff-ball on the toe. While I didn’t find this style particularly attractive, the Albanians think it looks “swagger.” They also carry revolvers with carvings and inlays on their waist. If they prefer a gun, it’s long and thin, often decorated with precious stones and a gold inscription along the barrel.
0 notes
Photo
The Governor’s Decision
The Governor finally gave in. A representative of the British Government, who had been pretending to be just a tourist, could not be allowed to walk while his escort was on horseback. He quickly arranged for a man who owned horses, and within ten minutes, a deal was made. The horse owner was very nervous and afraid. He worried about the brigands capturing him and his horses, especially the Bulgarian revolutionaries.
Journey Across the Land
We traveled through a rough, barren landscape, with small, twisted oak trees everywhere. The ground dipped and rose, and although the view changed, it always looked the same. It was as though a powerful heat had burned everything away, leaving nothing behind. We crossed dry riverbeds, with no water in sight. The only signs of life were large tortoises moving slowly along the ground. We crossed a wide, dry river, the Koyundara Natural History Museum.
Different Villages
We came across peasants wearing black fezzes. These were Turks of Bulgarian origin, and they spoke a mix of Greek—a leftover from the time of Byzantine rule. All the Bulgarians in this area spoke Greek. Some villages in the region were Bulgarian and Christian, while others were Turkish and Muslim. The Christian villages were generally cleaner than the Muslim ones.
0 notes
Photo
The Border Cooperation Between Bulgaria and East Germany
Agreement on Cooperation
In 1988, a new agreement was signed between the Bulgarian Ministry of the Interior and the Ministry of State Security of the German Democratic Republic (GDR). This was based on a previous Cooperation Agreement established on November 26, 1974. Bulgarian Interior Minister Stoyanov and GDR Minister Erich Fritz Emil Mielke formalized this new agreement for cooperation and collaboration between their respective security agencies for the period of 1988 to 1993.
Joint Activities and Surveillance
As part of their ongoing partnership, a plan was created for joint activities between the Bulgarian State Security’s Department Six and the GDR’s Chief Directorate Two for the years 1984 to 1986. This plan aimed to strengthen efforts against Bulgarian citizens who had escaped to the West, as well as to monitor their relatives still in Bulgaria.
One significant report from February 24, 1953, highlighted the harsh measures to be taken against families of those who fled. It stated that:
Relatives of traitors who were not involved in legal proceedings and were able to work would be sent to the labor camp at Belene Private Balkan Tours.
All property owned by these relatives would be confiscated.
They would be held responsible for their remaining possessions, including livestock. Children aged 14 to 18 would be sent to Labor Schools operated by the Ministry of the Interior, with some reformatories designated for this purpose.
Younger children, aged 7 to 14, would be placed in special schools under the Ministry of Education.
Military and Intelligence Operations
The collaboration also involved military and intelligence operations along the Bulgarian borders. Both nations worked together to gather information about political emigration, monitoring citizens who attempted to leave. This joint effort was aimed at suppressing dissent and preventing any opposition to the communist regimes in both countries.
The Role of Stasi
The Stasi, East Germany’s secret police, provided valuable information to the Bulgarian State Security. This included intelligence about political émigrés and their activities abroad. Such collaboration ensured that both nations could effectively control their citizens and maintain the authoritarian status quo.
The partnership between Bulgarian State Security and the Stasi exemplified the extensive measures taken by Eastern Bloc countries to enforce their borders and suppress dissent. By sharing intelligence and coordinating efforts, these regimes sought to eliminate any potential threats to their power. The policies regarding the families of defectors demonstrate the harsh realities faced by those who dared to oppose the regime. Ultimately, these actions reflect a broader strategy of fear and control that characterized life under communist rule in Eastern Europe.
0 notes
Photo
The Border Cooperation Between Bulgaria and East Germany
Agreement on Cooperation
In 1988, a new agreement was signed between the Bulgarian Ministry of the Interior and the Ministry of State Security of the German Democratic Republic (GDR). This was based on a previous Cooperation Agreement established on November 26, 1974. Bulgarian Interior Minister Stoyanov and GDR Minister Erich Fritz Emil Mielke formalized this new agreement for cooperation and collaboration between their respective security agencies for the period of 1988 to 1993.
Joint Activities and Surveillance
As part of their ongoing partnership, a plan was created for joint activities between the Bulgarian State Security’s Department Six and the GDR’s Chief Directorate Two for the years 1984 to 1986. This plan aimed to strengthen efforts against Bulgarian citizens who had escaped to the West, as well as to monitor their relatives still in Bulgaria.
One significant report from February 24, 1953, highlighted the harsh measures to be taken against families of those who fled. It stated that:
Relatives of traitors who were not involved in legal proceedings and were able to work would be sent to the labor camp at Belene Private Balkan Tours.
All property owned by these relatives would be confiscated.
They would be held responsible for their remaining possessions, including livestock. Children aged 14 to 18 would be sent to Labor Schools operated by the Ministry of the Interior, with some reformatories designated for this purpose.
Younger children, aged 7 to 14, would be placed in special schools under the Ministry of Education.
Military and Intelligence Operations
The collaboration also involved military and intelligence operations along the Bulgarian borders. Both nations worked together to gather information about political emigration, monitoring citizens who attempted to leave. This joint effort was aimed at suppressing dissent and preventing any opposition to the communist regimes in both countries.
The Role of Stasi
The Stasi, East Germany’s secret police, provided valuable information to the Bulgarian State Security. This included intelligence about political émigrés and their activities abroad. Such collaboration ensured that both nations could effectively control their citizens and maintain the authoritarian status quo.
The partnership between Bulgarian State Security and the Stasi exemplified the extensive measures taken by Eastern Bloc countries to enforce their borders and suppress dissent. By sharing intelligence and coordinating efforts, these regimes sought to eliminate any potential threats to their power. The policies regarding the families of defectors demonstrate the harsh realities faced by those who dared to oppose the regime. Ultimately, these actions reflect a broader strategy of fear and control that characterized life under communist rule in Eastern Europe.
0 notes
Photo
The Persecution of Kulaks in Yablanitsa
Introduction to the Ordinance
On November 27, 1950, the Bulgarian Communist Party Committee in the village of Yablanitsa, located in the Teteven district, declared certain individuals as kulaks, labeling them as enemies of the people. The names listed included Dimiter Mikov Markov and his sons, Dako Neikov Jakimov, and Dako Vutkov and his sons. This decision meant that these individuals would face severe restrictions.
Restrictions Imposed
The ordinance stated that the village council and other state services would no longer provide assistance to the named individuals. They were prohibited from visiting local restaurants or pubs and could only purchase salt from village shops. Any failure to follow these rules would result in harsh punishment. Copies of the ordinance were to be displayed in public areas and given to restaurant and shop staff, ensuring everyone was aware of the restrictions.
Impact on Bulgarian Peasants
For centuries, Bulgarian peasants owned land and livestock, but this system changed dramatically with the rise of collective farming. Peasants were transformed into landless laborers working on collective farms controlled by local party officials. This shift from private ownership to collective management marked a significant change in the lives of many Bulgarians.
History of Cooperative Farming
Cooperative farming in Bulgaria has its roots in the 1920s. By 1935, there were already 1,239 cooperative farms. However, after the communist regime took power on September 9, 1944, these cooperatives were dismantled. The government imposed the kolkhoz model, which was a type of collective farming typical in the Soviet Union. By the end of the 1950s, Bulgaria, a country with strong farming traditions and a predominantly rural population before World War II, had no private farms left Customized Daily Istanbul Tours.
The Demographic and Economic Impact
This transformation caused serious demographic, economic, and social harm to Bulgarian society. The loss of private farms disrupted the livelihoods of many families and changed the rural landscape forever. The collective farms were often inefficient and poorly managed, leading to decreased agricultural productivity.
Growth of Collective Farms
The number of collective farms and households involved in them grew rapidly from 1944 to 1957. Here are some key statistics:
Year Number of Collective Farms Number of Households 1944 17 649 1945 382 34,000 1946 480 41,000 1947 549 46,000 1948 1,100 124,000 1949 1,601 156,000 1950 2,501 502,000 1951 2,739 582,000 1952 2,747 553,000 1953 2,744 569,000 1954 2,723 569,000 1955 2,735 591,000 1956 3,100 911,000 1957 3,202 1,017,000 1959 3,972 1,290,000
The persecution of kulaks and the push towards collectivization had a profound impact on Bulgaria’s agricultural landscape. The transformation from private farms to collective farms altered the fabric of rural society, leading to widespread hardship and loss of traditional ways of life. This period remains a significant chapter in Bulgaria’s history, illustrating the struggles faced by the rural population under communist rule.
0 notes
Photo
The Persecution of Kulaks in Yablanitsa
Introduction to the Ordinance
On November 27, 1950, the Bulgarian Communist Party Committee in the village of Yablanitsa, located in the Teteven district, declared certain individuals as kulaks, labeling them as enemies of the people. The names listed included Dimiter Mikov Markov and his sons, Dako Neikov Jakimov, and Dako Vutkov and his sons. This decision meant that these individuals would face severe restrictions.
Restrictions Imposed
The ordinance stated that the village council and other state services would no longer provide assistance to the named individuals. They were prohibited from visiting local restaurants or pubs and could only purchase salt from village shops. Any failure to follow these rules would result in harsh punishment. Copies of the ordinance were to be displayed in public areas and given to restaurant and shop staff, ensuring everyone was aware of the restrictions.
Impact on Bulgarian Peasants
For centuries, Bulgarian peasants owned land and livestock, but this system changed dramatically with the rise of collective farming. Peasants were transformed into landless laborers working on collective farms controlled by local party officials. This shift from private ownership to collective management marked a significant change in the lives of many Bulgarians.
History of Cooperative Farming
Cooperative farming in Bulgaria has its roots in the 1920s. By 1935, there were already 1,239 cooperative farms. However, after the communist regime took power on September 9, 1944, these cooperatives were dismantled. The government imposed the kolkhoz model, which was a type of collective farming typical in the Soviet Union. By the end of the 1950s, Bulgaria, a country with strong farming traditions and a predominantly rural population before World War II, had no private farms left Customized Daily Istanbul Tours.
The Demographic and Economic Impact
This transformation caused serious demographic, economic, and social harm to Bulgarian society. The loss of private farms disrupted the livelihoods of many families and changed the rural landscape forever. The collective farms were often inefficient and poorly managed, leading to decreased agricultural productivity.
Growth of Collective Farms
The number of collective farms and households involved in them grew rapidly from 1944 to 1957. Here are some key statistics:
Year Number of Collective Farms Number of Households 1944 17 649 1945 382 34,000 1946 480 41,000 1947 549 46,000 1948 1,100 124,000 1949 1,601 156,000 1950 2,501 502,000 1951 2,739 582,000 1952 2,747 553,000 1953 2,744 569,000 1954 2,723 569,000 1955 2,735 591,000 1956 3,100 911,000 1957 3,202 1,017,000 1959 3,972 1,290,000
The persecution of kulaks and the push towards collectivization had a profound impact on Bulgaria’s agricultural landscape. The transformation from private farms to collective farms altered the fabric of rural society, leading to widespread hardship and loss of traditional ways of life. This period remains a significant chapter in Bulgaria’s history, illustrating the struggles faced by the rural population under communist rule.
0 notes
Photo
Bulgarian "Bands" in Macedonia
Methods of Operation
The Bulgarian “bands” had a clear strategy in their fight against the Turks. They visited Bulgarian villages, collected contributions, and stored arms, preparing for a future uprising to free Bulgarian Macedonians from Turkish rule. These bands were often seen as heroes, and villagers willingly provided them with food. Many industrious peasants, living under Turkish surveillance, knew where the weapons were hidden and were sworn to join the revolution when the time came Bulgaria Tours.
Mixed Reactions in Villages
However, not all Bulgarian villages were eager to support the bands. Some villages, perhaps out of ignorance or contentment with their current situation, coexisted peacefully with their Turkish neighbors. These villagers had no desire for nationalistic uprisings and feared the severe reprisals that would follow any interaction with the bands.
Turkish Reprisals
The Turkish response to these revolutionary activities was often heavy-handed and poorly executed. Turkish spies would inform them about villages serving as headquarters for the bands. The Turks would then set out to capture the revolutionists, but more often than not, the bands would be warned by their own spies and escape to the hills before the soldiers arrived.
Unable to capture the bands, the Turkish soldiers would then take out their frustrations on the village itself, following their usual punitive methods. They would shoot villagers, burn houses, and commit atrocities, punishing the innocent and those least involved. If the punishment was severe, news of it would eventually reach Constantinople, often in an exaggerated form, leading to international outrage over what was perceived as unprovoked attacks on peaceful Bulgarian villages simply for being Christian.
A Misleading Narrative
This cycle of violence created a misleading narrative. While the Turkish reprisals were indeed brutal and often targeted innocent people, the reality of the situation was more complex. The Bulgarian bands, while fighting for freedom, were also putting these villages at risk. The villagers who supported the bands did so out of a mix of nationalistic fervor and coercion, knowing the terrible price they might pay if the bands were discovered.
The actions of the Bulgarian bands and the Turkish reprisals created a vicious cycle of violence and suffering in Macedonia. The bands, seen as heroes by some, brought hope of liberation but also the threat of brutal Turkish retaliation. Meanwhile, the Turkish soldiers, unable to capture the elusive bands, took out their frustrations on the villagers, perpetuating a narrative of innocent Christians being attacked by a barbaric regime. This situation highlights the complexities and tragedies of revolutionary movements and the harsh realities faced by those caught in the crossfire.
0 notes
Photo
Unveiling Contradictions The Governor of Philippopolis
Turmoil in Philippopolis
The Multiserv of Philippopolis, known for his favorable stance towards Bulgarians, faced strong opposition from the Turks during our visit, who vocally called for his removal. Despite this, he appeared as an honest and conscientious individual, genuinely striving to do what was right.
A Concern for Suffering
In discussions with Mr. Schuyler and Mr. Baring, the Multiserv addressed the plight of the fire-ravaged people with earnestness and sincerity. He expressed a commitment to providing financial aid, restoring lost cattle, rebuilding homes, and offering all possible assistance to alleviate their suffering. His dedication was palpable, leaving no doubt about his genuine intentions City Tours Istanbul.
A Disappointing Reality
However, despite these assurances, the promises remained unfulfilled. Mr. Schuyler discovered that the same governor who made pledges of support was simultaneously enforcing strict orders for the people of Batak and other affected villages to pay their taxes as usual, disregarding their recent hardships.
A Dilemma of Good Intentions
This contradiction raises questions about the governor’s true allegiance. Despite his apparent sympathy towards Bulgarians, his actions cast doubt on his sincerity. The demand for his recall by the Turks underscores the complexity of his position and the challenges faced in navigating conflicting interests.
Navigating Contradictions
The case of the Philippopolis governor highlights the intricate dynamics of governance in a region torn by ethnic tensions. While his intentions may be noble, the reality of political pressures and conflicting allegiances complicates efforts to address the needs of all communities fairly.
0 notes