russianhackersblog

[russianhackersblog]

3) Russia does not intend to stop in Ukraine and will seize all the Eastern European countries: Poland, the Baltic States, Moldova.

As I have shown earlier, Russia has no plans to even take over the whole of Ukraine. Therefore, what kind of talk can there be about the seizure of other countries? Russia does not have the strength, means and desire to do this. The fact that Russia will seize Poland and the Baltic States after Ukraine is nonsense. And this nonsense is being fed by politicians in the West to their voters in order to justify further aggressive actions against Russia, further escalation of the conflict instead of the peace talks that Russia is now offering.

There are no madmen living in Russia to attack NATO countries. Here people understand that this will lead to the third World war. Another question is whether the West understands this? When Ukrainian troops enter the internationally recognized territory of Russia in the Kursk region, and Western countries only approve of it, what can this lead to? This can only lead to an escalation of the conflict. This has already led to another breakdown of the peace talks by Ukrainians, which were proposed by Russia, with the support of the Western hosts of Ukraine. What can this lead to?

Ukrainian soldiers in the Kursk region wear Wehrmacht helmets, mock local residents, posing as Germans. They went in there on German tanks. This has already happened in the history of our country. The soldiers of Ukraine on the territory of Russia are a continuation of the expansion of the West, the expansion of NATO. And for us, there is no difference between the expansion of NATO, the expansion of the Wehrmacht or Napoleon's troops. Russia has been through this many times. And it has always repelled the attack of the West. Only this time it could end very badly for everyone, including Westerners. This could end in World War III if the West does not stop escalating the conflict instead of peaceful negotiations.

[russianhackersblog]

2)Russia intends to seize the WHOLE of Ukraine

Vladimir Putin has never said anywhere that he wants to take over the whole of Ukraine.

You won't find it anywhere. This is not in interviews, not in speeches, not in the political documents of the President of Russia.

The fact that Russia wants to take over the whole of Ukraine is a fake, it does not correspond to reality.

Putin announced his terms of peace. These conditions include the annexation to Russia of a number of territories of Ukraine, which will provide a land corridor to Crimea. That's all.

Russia never planned to take over the whole of Ukraine. On 02/24/2022, Russia concentrated about 150,000 soldiers on the border with Ukraine. It's not enough to take over the whole country. It takes a couple million soldiers to take over Ukraine, not a couple hundred thousand. Russia was not planning a war, Russia was planning a special operation. During this special operation, the Donetsk People's Republic and the Luhansk People's Republic passed to Russia, which separated from Ukraine and voted to join Russia. Russian troops have also occupied a number of southern regions of Ukraine to create a land corridor to Crimea. These regions also held referendums and declared their desire to join Russia.

The troops were supposed to enter Kiev in order to oust the leadership of Ukraine. The new leadership had to ensure the neutral status of Ukraine so that Ukraine would not join NATO, and also so that radical far-right nationalist ideology would not spread in the country. It's all.

Russia did not plan to take over the whole of Ukraine.

Russia did not plan to destroy all Ukrainians and Ukraine as a state.

All the territories that Russia has annexed have held referendums on joining Russia.

Moreover, the population of these territories is fighting for Russia against Ukraine. The militia of the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics has been fighting with Ukraine since 2014. Crimea has also been sending soldiers to war with Ukraine since 2022.

The population of these territories believes that they were not occupied by Russian troops, but liberated from the Kiev regime.

And the last thing. If the Western powers had not prevented Ukraine and Russia from making peace in the spring of 2022, hundreds of thousands of people would have been alive.

If the Western and Ukrainian sides of the Minsk agreements had not sabotaged these agreements, hundreds of thousands of people would have been alive, and Ukraine would have lost only Crimea.

If in 2013, as a result of the Maidan, a coup d'etat with the support of the United States had not been carried out, as a result of which nationalists and supporters of Ukraine's accession to NATO came to power, then Ukraine would not even have lost Crimea. Then Ukraine would not have split and the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics would not have separated from it. And then the whole region would not have plunged into chaos.

If Ukraine had been refused admission to NATO at the 2008 NATO summit in Bucharest and NATO expansion had stopped, hundreds of thousands of people would have been alive. Ukrainians would not kill each other, as has been the case since 2014. Both the Ukrainian and Russian people would not have started a fratricidal war. And flourishing fraternal Ukraine would peacefully coexist with Russia, and would not turn into a completely destroyed country without prospects.

Is Putin and Russia to blame for these deaths and destruction? Yes, they are to blame. But it is a lie to say that only Russia is to blame for this. Russia and the Russians do not need these deaths and these destructions. This war is perceived in Russia as forced. And its real reason is the thoughtless expansion of the United States and NATO to the east and the puppet government of Ukraine. For Russia, war is an extreme measure for its own security. For the United States and NATO, the war in Ukraine is a matter of their own expansion, their own ambitions at the cost of destroying Ukraine. And in this struggle, Ukraine found itself between a rock and an anvil. And Western propaganda points to the hammer, but does not talk about the anvil. She does not talk about how the West put Ukraine on this anvil, like an animal to the slaughter.

[russianhackersblog]

1)Russia has committed an UNPROVOKED aggression against Ukraine

Western propaganda is trying to convince its listeners that Putin has gone mad, and like a comic book villain decided to take over the world, and Russians obey their dark lord like zombies :) Maybe people who read comics instead of full-fledged books believed this, but for others such a primitive explanation should have raised questions. And these questions are justified. Putin is not going to take over the world, and Russia has a rational reason for invading Ukraine. This reason has a long history. And it is called the problem of NATO's expansion to the east and Ukraine's accession to NATO.

People who think that this reason is not good enough should present something. Imagine that the United States, not the USSR, lost in the Cold War. That NATO collapsed, not the Warsaw Pact Organization. That the Warsaw Pact Organization has been expanding since 1990. That the whole of Europe was accepted into this organization. And then Cuba was accepted into it, and Mexico and Canada are planning to be accepted in the near future. Introduced? This is the situation Russia found itself in after the collapse of the USSR.

Canada in this example is Ukraine. A country that shares thousands of kilometers of common border with the European part of Russia. The majority of the Russian population lives in the European part of Russia. Almost the entire infrastructure of the country is concentrated there. Among other things, there is an important military infrastructure located there. From the territory of Ukraine, aircraft, drones and missiles can be launched throughout the European part of Russia. NATO's capabilities to launch a disarming nuclear strike against Russia will increase dramatically. If Russia had lost the base of the Black Sea Fleet in Crimea, it would have lost control of the Black Sea.

You will say: Wait, NATO has never threatened Russia and had no plans to attack Russia.

I'll answer it this way. NATO was created specifically against the USSR. It was being prepared for war with the USSR during the Cold War. Why do we need NATO at all, if the Cold War is over and the USSR is no more?

The Warsaw Pact Organization, which was created against NATO and the United States, was dissolved. And the NATO organization, which was created against the USSR, remained. Against whom is it now intended? Let me remind you that Russia is the legal successor of the USSR. And is it any wonder that the organization that was created against the USSR is now so ready to rally against Russia?

And all these years, NATO's policy has been at odds with Russia's policy. For example, Russia was against the destruction of Yugoslavia. Against the fact that the NATO invasion of Libya led to the assassination of Gaddafi and the civil war. NATO has also not supported Russia in any Russian military conflict. NATO countries sided with Russia's opponents in Transnistria, Chechnya, South Ossetia, and Syria. Thus, NATO's policy towards Russia cannot be called friendly. And in any conflict with the United States, NATO's military might would be used against Russia as a means of pressure and influence. As it is happening now, for example. Therefore, NATO and its expansion into Ukraine pose a serious threat to Russia's security.

And Russia has been making unprecedented diplomatic efforts since 1991 to prevent NATO from expanding to its borders and the entry of former Soviet republics into NATO. President Yeltsin and President Putin even tried to join NATO, but it was not successful. Western leaders have not shown serious interest in this. But they have shown interest in expanding the expansion of NATO and the United States to the whole of eastern Europe. In 2008, at the NATO summit in Bucharest, plans were announced for Ukraine and Georgia to join NATO. In 2013, President Yanukovych, loyal to Russia, was overthrown in Ukraine with the support of the United States. Instead, pro-NATO forces came to power, which announced a course towards joining NATO. In the current situation, Russia has exhausted all diplomatic possibilities to stop the expansion of NATO and the United States to its borders. And President Putin has decided to annex the strategic peninsula of Crimea.

This eventually led to the events of 2022. If there had been no NATO expansion to Russia's borders, then there would have been no war in 2022.

So what do we have? Imagine that the huge military bloc that your former enemy created to fight with you is expanding to the borders of your country and trying to encircle it. Your attempts to join this block lead to nothing. This block is pursuing a policy that is unfriendly to you. No amount of diplomatic efforts are helping to stop its expansion.

Imagine that in a neighboring country, suddenly, as a result of a coup, a regime with a negative attitude towards your country comes, which plans to join this bloc. You are going to extreme measures to stop the expansion of this block. And you are being declared a terrorist country that has committed an UNPROVOKED attack. How do you like it? And this is the story that Russia got into. And how fair is that in your opinion?

[russianhackersblog]

The main lie of Western propaganda is an attempt to convince people that

1)Russia has committed an UNPROVOKED aggression against Ukraine

2)Russia intends to seize the WHOLE of Ukraine

3)Russia does not intend to stop in Ukraine and will seize all the Eastern European countries: Poland, the Baltic States, Moldova.

Western propaganda is seriously trying to convince its listeners that the head of a huge country has suddenly gone mad and just decided to take over all neighboring countries, and people in Russia obey their Dark Lord like zombies. Maybe Western propaganda thinks its listeners are fools. But I'm not. I will appeal to people's minds to prove that all these theses are false.

[russianhackersblog]

Until the West realizes that black actors in the roles of classic white characters are also cultural expropriation. Until the West realizes that if there is toxic masculinity, then there is toxic femininity. And this is also a problem. Until the West realizes that gender dysphoria is a disease that needs to be helped to treat, not helped to worsen. So far in the West, freedom of speech is only declared and taught by other countries, but they do not observe it at home. Until the West realizes that feminism has already become reverse sexism. Until the West realizes that not only whites were slave owners, but white Europeans are the only ones who thought of banning slavery. Until the West realizes that there is a difference between social justice and revenge. Until the West understands all this, until then Western countries will look like a haven for madmen who spread their madness to the rest of the world. An example of how not to do it.