samijami - Tumblr blog

[samijami]

Turning off anon just so I can show you a sample of LOTR fluff. Anything to convince people to stop giving money to JKR. (Also, she may have plagiarized Tolkien.) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPXTVcCaryo

I'm questioning how turning off anon shows people LOTR fluff when you have nothing on your blog?

Also I'm sure nobody on my blog, and I know I, do not give money to JKR.

And if anyone here does, then they're not welcome on my blog.

[samijami]

It's ok if you've haven't read or seen LOTR. I just asked because I think it's better than anything JKR ever wrote.

You can shit on a piece of paper, publish it, and it'd be better than anything JKR ever wrote.

[samijami]

[samijami]

biologist here! why are plants green? well they suck up air from the sky (blue) and mix it with the sunlight (yellow) i fucking love science.

[samijami]

[samijami]

Dogshite website for real

[samijami]

[samijami]

[samijami]

You know, an interesting tumblr transformation that's happened gradually, and which I've seen no one talk about: ask-culture has essentially dropped off to nothing.

By which I mean, asks used to be WAY more of the tumblr economy. They used to be more common to send, and receive, and see. They were integral to the collaborative, forum-like behavior of old tumblr communities, not even to speak on the HUGE number of ask-blogs that used to exist to only be interacted with in ask-form.

I'm not saying this in a vying-for-attention way but instead in an observational way: I used to get way way more asks in like 2015, even with a fraction of my follower count. I wonder if it's due to the homogenization of social media sites? There's a lot more of this divide between "content creator" and "consumer" instead of just a bunch of peer blogs who would talk to each other. "Asks" aren't really a thing on twitter, are they? And as I understand it, the closest thing to an "ask" on instagram or tiktok would be a creator screenshotting some comment and responding to it in a new reel or video or whatever those content mediums are. Are asks just too tumblr-specific? Is that aspect of the site culture dying out as more and more people converge to using all their social media sites in the same way?

[samijami]

Went down two posts and got pissed off bro wtf 💀

Unhinged

They also have a sideblog @/gendiebrainrotreceipts2, block that as well

If you are trans block @/gendiebrainrotreceipts. that account has reblogged multiple of my posts about trans men’s issues and lead to me getting harassed.

And of course everytime they reblog my post they only reblog the radfem additions that have no sources and not my response linking sources proving my point. Because once again TERFs prove that despite them going “we include TIFs in our feminism 🥺” they don’t care about trans men dying bc they care more about cis women’s comfort.

[samijami]

If you are trans block @/gendiebrainrotreceipts. that account has reblogged multiple of my posts about trans men’s issues and lead to me getting harassed.

And of course everytime they reblog my post they only reblog the radfem additions that have no sources and not my response linking sources proving my point. Because once again TERFs prove that despite them going “we include TIFs in our feminism 🥺” they don’t care about trans men dying bc they care more about cis women’s comfort.

[samijami]

[samijami]

It becomes very clear when people only consider trans people who are white, skinny, pass perfectly, and are stealth as ‘real trans people’

People talk about trans men and it becomes clear they aren’t counting non-passing trans men, pregnant trans men, fat trans men, and trans men of color.

I see this from other trans guys so much. So many other trans guys will act like they are better because they pass, they are white, they are skinny, and/or they don’t want to get pregnant. So they leave trans men of color, non-passing trans men, fat trans men, and pregnant trans men out of the conversation.

[samijami]

the idea that restrooms, locker rooms, etc need to be single-sex spaces in order for women to be safe is patriarchy's way of signalling to men & boys that society doesn't expect them to behave themselves around women. it is directly antifeminist. it would be antifeminist even if trans people did not exist. a feminist society would demand that women should be safe in all spaces even when there are men there.

[samijami]

The nazis that you see in movies are as much a historical fantasy as vikings with horned helmets and samurai cutting people in half.

The nazis were not some vague evil that wanted to hurt people for the sake of hurting them. They had specific goals which furthered a far right agenda, and they wanted to do harm to very specific groups, (largely slavs, jews, Romani, queer people, communists/leftists, and disabled people.)

The nazis didn't use soldiers in creepy gas masks as their main imagery that they sold to the german people, they used blond haired blue eyed families. Nor did they stand up on podiums saying that would wage an endless and brutal war, they gave speeches about protecting white Christian society from degenerates just like how conservatives do today.

Nazis weren't atheists or pagans. They were deeply Christian and Christianity was part of their ideology just like it is for modern conservatives. They spoke at lengths about defending their Christian nation from godless leftism. The ones who hated the catholic church hated it for protestant reasons. Nazi occultism was fringe within the party and never expected to become mainstream, and those occultists were still Christian, none of them ever claimed to be Satanists or Asatru.

Nazis were also not queer or disabled. They killed those groups, before they had a chance to kill almost anyone else actually. Despite the amount of disabled nazis or queer/queer coded nazis you'll see in movies and on TV, in reality they were very cishet and very able bodied. There was one high ranking nazi early on who was gay and the other nazis killed him for that. Saying the nazis were gay or disabled makes about as much sense as saying they were Jewish.

The nazis weren't mentally ill. As previously mentioned they hated disabled people, and this unquestionably included anyone neurodivergent. When the surviving nazi war criminals were given psychological tests after the war, they were shown to be some of the most neurotypical people out there.

The nazis weren't socialists. Full stop. They hated socialists. They got elected on hating socialists. They killed socialists. Hating all forms of lefitsm was a big part of their ideology, and especially a big part of how they sold themselves.

The nazis were not the supervillians you see on screen, not because they didn't do horrible things in real life, they most certainly did, but because they weren't that vague apolitical evil that exists for white American action heros to fight. They did horrible things because they had a right wing authoritarian political ideology, an ideology that is fundamentally the same as what most of the modern right wing believes.

[samijami]

A woman whose epilepsy was greatly improved by an experimental brain implant was devastated when, just two years after getting it, she was forced to have it removed due to the company that made it going bankrupt.

[samijami]