silvyavan

[silvyavan]

Keepin' this train going babyyyyy

[silvyavan]

KEI_URANA

[silvyavan]

We are now two weeks away from the GACHIAKUTA anime, everyone!!

[silvyavan]

[silvyavan]

Gosh I hate grind culture. My little sister just started medical school and all of her orientation leaders are like “you absolutely cannot have a life WHATsoever you WILL have to give up EVERYTHING besides this program say GOODBYE to your hobbies and relationships” and now she’s calling me feeling guilty for running and going to the grocery store and that’s just WRONG! And that is exactly what I was told starting law school as well, and rejecting that mentality was the best thing I ever did but it was so hard not to buy into. Anyway if any of you are in an intense academic program PLEASE take time to sleep and eat and exercise and maintain your relationships and keep up your hobbies! you are not a robot who exists solely to study and I promise that living a life and staying physically and mentally healthy is not going to make you fail

[silvyavan]

GACHIAKUTA inside cover illustrations for volumes 2 to 15, by Kei Urana-sensei

[silvyavan]

GACHIAKUTA PREMIERE COMING OUT SOON YES GODDDDDDD

[silvyavan]

Headcanon/overanalysis about significance of hair in Sileian culture

Hair by itself doesn't seem to be sacred or very meaningful for Sileia. Young and elder women are allowed to cut it short. And Noerde was less offended by the comment than by a possibility of Zodyl thinking of her as "airheaded damsel"

Despite this, post Sileia destruction both known characters from there have very long hair

Noerde keeps it long because of her jinki, it's a part of her power. Pair it with strange loyalty to Zodyl— who gifted her the comb—and one might argue she grew it out for him specifically. I disagree with this point for a few reasons, but will explain why on some other day

Mildretta, however, is not a giver. She doesn't have to keep it long, but still does. It's a cool design choice in isolation and a coincidence when standing side by side with Noerde, but I thought there might be more to it

Some real life cultures cut their hair to grieve, because it serves as a physical reminder of the loss. Maybe Sileia instead grow out hair to show grievance. By keeping it long they symbolically keep the memories from before the loss. For both Noerde and Mildretta it means holding on to memories of their tribe, their home

And this play on the concept of hair holding memories ties well with Noerde's arc. One loses everything dear to them to cross the border. She already burned off most of her hair and all that was left were memories and her pride of being a Sileia warrior. Border most likely stole that from her. Now she's left with nothing

[silvyavan]

I am praying for this series to give us some nice and heartwarming shot of Rudo's proper smile at the end of the story. I need it for my mental health

[silvyavan]

Headcanon/overanalysis about significance of hair in Sileian culture

Hair by itself doesn't seem to be sacred or very meaningful for Sileia. Young and elder women are allowed to cut it short. And Noerde was less offended by the comment than by a possibility of Zodyl thinking of her as "airheaded damsel"

Despite this, post Sileia destruction both known characters from there have very long hair

Noerde keeps it long because of her jinki, it's a part of her power. Pair it with strange loyalty to Zodyl— who gifted her the comb—and one might argue she grew it out for him specifically. I disagree with this point for a few reasons, but will explain why on some other day

Mildretta, however, is not a giver. She doesn't have to keep it long, but still does. It's a cool design choice in isolation and a coincidence when standing side by side with Noerde, but I thought there might be more to it

Some real life cultures cut their hair to grieve, because it serves as a physical reminder of the loss. Maybe Sileia instead grow out hair to show grievance. By keeping it long they symbolically keep the memories from before the loss. For both Noerde and Mildretta it means holding on to memories of their tribe, their home

And this play on the concept of hair holding memories ties well with Noerde's arc. One loses everything dear to them to cross the border. She already burned off most of her hair and all that was left were memories and her pride of being a Sileia warrior. Border most likely stole that from her. Now she's left with nothing

[silvyavan]

anyway you should always remember that all those foreigners you see dying on the news are just as real people as you are who have just as much interiority as you do. there is nothing about you that makes you more important and it is by pure chance that you are not in their position. in fact, this holds for all of history. every person, no matter the horror of the fate that befell them, had just as much interiority as you do. i feel like some people haven't fully internalized this.

[silvyavan]

GACHIAKUTA anime is scheduled to air on July 6, 2025, at 23:30 (JST)

[silvyavan]

All colored pages in GACHIAKUTA chapters

[silvyavan]

All colored pages in GACHIAKUTA chapters

[silvyavan]

A good rule of thumb for AI is "would you trust a trained pigeon to do this?"

"We trained a pigeon to recognise cancerous cell clusters and somehow they're really good at it" okay great, that's something that could plausibly be a thing.

"We trained a pigeon to recognise good CV:s and left it in charge of sorting through all our job applications" uh perhaps consider not doing that.

[silvyavan]

what i’ve failed to understand since i was a kid is why these ghouls want war with iran so badly. is it resources? do they have money in defense contracting? is it just that iran is too strong an opponent to us hegemony? why specifically do they want to see iran destroyed?

There is not one singular motivation behind the drive to send the US to war with Iran. There are multiple motivations which often overlap, but which are held in different orders of prioritization by different advocates of war. Most of these motivations are irrational and/or immoral, while others are legitimate complaints that could be addressed through diplomacy far more easily than they could through militarism.

Here's ten common motivations and arguments for a US war with Iran which you might encounter:

Independence from the US: The Iranian government is among the world's least-willing governments to obey US demands and subjugate themselves to the US-led order. For certain US primacists, this independence means that their very existence poses an existential threat to US dominance (similar to North Korea, Cuba, etc.) To a particular type of US militarist, it is necessary for the Iranian government to fall in order for the US to remain the unquestioned leader of the world.

Real Fear of their Nukes: There is a substantial contingent who really does believe that Iran is close to developing a nuclear weapon and that they could well use it if they were to develop it. Logically, the best way to address this concern would be through a diplomatic deal similar to the 2015 JCPOA, which Iran complied with! But the intensity of anti-Iranian sentiment among US hawks tends to convince them that direct military confrontation is somehow a better option, thus explaining why Trump decided to break this deal.

Desire for Revenge: Many older foreign policy hawks in the US have never forgiven Iran for 1) the 1979 US Embassy hostage crisis, and 2) the 1983 bombing of the US Embassy in Lebanon, which was orchestrated by a terror organization with ties to the Iranian government. In their minds, both of these incidents were embarrassments to the US' military prestige which we have never properly gotten revenge for. (These people tend to ignore the massive wrongdoings which the US has carried out against Iran during this same time period, like the US destruction of Iran Air Flight 655). There are people in and around the Pentagon who have wanted to bomb Iran over a grudge for more than 40 years now.

Iran's Regional Proxies: Over the last several decades, Iran has engaged in an aggressive campaign to expand their influence throughout the region by supporting proxy paramilitary forces in Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, etc. Many of these proxies have undeniably engaged in acts of terrorism. This strategy is both opportunistic (taking advantage of the power vacuum caused by the US overthrow of Saddam Hussein) and defensive (countering the regional influence campaigns of Saudi Arabia and Turkey). This is probably the most legitimate cause of US anger towards the Iranian government, but it is a grievance which will only be worsened by backing Iran into a corner militarily.

Israel (and Saudi Arabia) Hates Them: Iran is unfriendly with two of the US' closest partners in the region: Israel and Saudi Arabia. The Israeli government, in particular, has long been laser-focused on the overthrow of the Iranian government, and they are fully committed to dragging the US into such a regime change operation. For the most fervent defenders of Israel in the US, overthrowing the Iranian government is near the top of their wishlist.

They Got Oil: Oil is a factor which is often overstated in these discussions, but it definitely is one of the factors. Iran currently produces 5% of the world's oil and has the potential to produce far more were the current sanction regime against it to be removed. They also have the ability to shut down the Straight of Hormuz, an important chokepoint through which 25% of the world's oil flows. Regime change in Iran would significantly increase the leverage that the US and its allies hold over global oil markets and further weaken the strength of OPEC.

And Other Commodities Too!: Though the separation between the US and Iranian economies hurts the US economy as a whole, there are certain sectors of US industry who benefit enormously from having Iran so heavily sanctioned. Some of the big names in the US pistachio industry have lobbied heavily to keep US-Iranian relations unfriendly, because the elimination of US sanctions on Iran would allow the massive Iranian pistachio industry to compete with the US industry. As long as these two governments hate each other, a few politically-connected US businessmen make way more money.

Diaspora Pressure Campaigns: Most Iranian-Americans hold the following two opinions at the same time: 1) they hate the current Iranian government and want to see it replaced, but 2) they strongly oppose US efforts at regime change in Iran. However, there is a vocal minority of Iranian-Americans that do support regime change efforts, and they tend to cluster into two well-organized groups that wage pressure campaigns against the Iranian government. The first are the monarchists, who want to see the son of the former US-backed Iranian dictator restored to power. The others are those who are loyal to the MEK, a cult and former terrorist organization which has been extremely effective at building relationships with US politicians. Both of these groups work full-time to push the US towards overthrowing the Iranian government so that they can step in and take over; it's fairly easy to find both of these groups in online social media threads about US-Iranian relations.

Who Cares, We Want War: As I have written about many times before, the US military-industrial complex encourages the US government to engage in militarist behavior in order to boost their profits. Iran is one of their favorite boogeymen to justify increased levels of US military spending, second only to China. These companies fund think tanks and other policy initiatives to argue that Iran is an immediate threat to us, and then they fund political candidates who want to spend more money preparing for this "threat."

They're Crazy! You Can't Trust Them!: We are led to believe that the Iranian government cannot be negotiated with because they are irrational, they're anti-Western religious zealots incapable of reasoned decision-making. This is a convenient excuse for war, but it's entirely incompatible with the restraint that the Iranian government shows in responding to Israeli aggression, their continued willingness to sit down for diplomatic talks with their aggressors, the way that they helped the US government deal with al Qaeda and the Taliban after 9/11, and a million other indications that the Iranian government is just as rational as any other government in its geopolitical decision-marking.

Add all of that together, and you get a deranged political ecosystem obsessed with inflating the scale of foreign threats, finding excuses for maintaining the trajectory of our militarist status quo, increasing regional tensions, and rejecting obvious opportunities for diplomacy and a peaceful resolution of our differences.

[silvyavan]