sobbani

[sobbani]

Alfred Hui ??? - If Only I Can Weep ?????? (Yuan Lai Wo Ke Yi Ku) Lyrics ?? with Pinyin Singer: Alfred Hui ??? Album: Miraculous Journey ???? Title: ?????? (Yuan Lai Wo Ke Yi Ku) English Title: If Only I Can Weep ?????? W�i mai d�o de ji�zhi ?????? x�ngh�o bici hu� b�i ?????????? y�b�ile ji ni�n yi kouq� fanhui ????? ??? w�duan jiang z�i hu� r�h� jiang ???????????? h�yi hu�n b� ken gei wo

[sobbani]

Ariel Tsai ??? - The Vow ?? (Xuan Yan) Lyrics ?? with Pinyin Singer: Ariel Tsai ??? Album: The Vow ?? Title: ?? (Xuan Yan) English Title: The Vow ?? ?? ?? ??? Mei sh� mei k� mei miao dou xiang ni ?????? ????? ???? zhi xiang y�o ni kaixin zhi xiang y�o r�ng ni yong r� hu�i li ????????? shou zhong jin jin w� zh� de zh�opi�n ????????? ??????? ni de tianli�ng sh� wo de heiy� xiang k�n d�o ni de

[sobbani]

Best 5 resume cv template word

cv template word

There are lots of free resume templates offered on the web, however generally it are often extremely tough to decide on the correct one that's most suited to you. Most websites resume guides will typically over complicate things by having clever titles for the various types of template on offer, and generally the descriptions are often therefore confusing they'll leave you along with your head spinning!

In today’s extremely competitive job market, your resume has to stand out. Our fashionable resume choice is crafted to supply trendy, crisp and contemporary themes that square measure designed to be simply legible and highlight specific data that you simply wish to induce across to your prospective leader after their 1st skim over your resume.

Women cv template word:

cv template word

If you lik this template please click in this link below for download:

Click here for download

Creative cv template word:

cv template word

You can download this template in this link:

Click here for download.

Sample cv template word:

cv template word

Click in this url for get template:

Click here for download.

Clean cv template word:

cv template word

Clic here for download.

Pro resume template word:

cv template word

Click her for download.

How to edite template resume for platforme word:

This topic will help you:

Top 5 Templates Create Resumes

How To Make A Resume?

Cv template word When you are applying for employment that depends on the strengths of the individual, you wish a resume example that you just will inject a little additional temperament into to form it ‘pop’.

many roles that involve building matched business relationships, an inventive drive or aptitude for art and style ought to attract individuals with a robust best resume template word temperament.

Our artistic templates permit you to face out from the gang. The sleek styling and layouts we tend to gift here can get your resume detected cv template word.

Best resume template word.

Adding some distinctive vogue to your resume can build your temperament shine through and can simply separate you from your competitors that have submitted bland or harsh wanting resumes cv template word.

Cv template word.

Each one of our artistic vogue templates provides a wonderfully balanced mixture of temperament cv template world, expertness and slightly of fashion best resume template word.

You'll be able to distinguish your resume from others by victimization our punchy styles, cv template word however best resume template word, keep in mind that these work best for the creative cv template word United Nations agency wish to induce themselves detected.

These templates are nice for a printmaker or designer, for instance, however, if you're applying to become an Associate in Nursing comptroller, you will wish to travel for a sublime or classic style instead cv template word.

[sobbani]

Top 5 templates create resumes

Create resumes

In this publication you can download templates to create a professional resume in a manner appropriate to your work, these templates are the best templates on the web, you can use them for free enough to write create resumes on the search engines followed by the name of the site to find the relevant topics also from our site.

Create resumes provides you with the possibility of direct download with information in the folders is information that helps you modify the create resumes templates.We hope that these templates helped you create resumes.

Top 5 templates create resumes:

1.Template create resumes:

Create resumes

Please download this template create resumes in this link for free:

Click here for download

2.Template create resumes (PROFESSIONAL):

Create resumes

if you want download this template, please click in this link below:

Click here for download

3.Create resumes "creative template":

Create resumes

Download this template in this link below:

Click Here For download

4.Template create resumes (Clean resume):

Create resumes

If You want this template for create resumes, download in this link below:

Click Here for download

5.Template create resumes (Sample resume and sample letter):

Create resumes

If you like this template and you want download for make and create resumes click in this link:

Click Here for download

You don't understand how to edit resume in this software (photoshop and microsoft word), this video will can help you to edit any resumes templates, create resumes.

This topic will help you for make a resumes:

How To Make A Resume?

[sobbani]

Cincinnati Reds the original red socks via www.google.com Do you know that the original team of Cincinnati Reds socks was called? The fully professional team started in 1863 and was considered a professional team in 1868. The Red Socks won 125 consecutive games before Brooklyn Atlantics defeat them recognized. Key players at the time were Asa Brainard, Fred Waterman and George Wright. Red

[sobbani]

What is happening in France might be a harbinger of good things to come.

Some Gallic good looks there!

The recent elections in France are quite interesting.   Even though the press gave a lot of coverage to far-Left and especially far-Right politicians, the French elected, with a huge majority, a centrist candidate and a centrist legislature.   The practical French rejected radical politics in favor of getting things done, along with consensus and compromise.   Despite all the hoopla over Le Pen, the French decided that radical politics were not the future.

Meanwhile in Virginia, a governor's race is brewing.   "Red State" Virginia, which went for Obama, twice and also for Hillary, has a pragmatic centrist Democratic governor.   And in the recent primary, people rejected the "progressive" Democratic candidate (read: Comrade Sanders) in favor of a more centrist politician.

In the UK, Prime Minister Theresa May beat out Elmo and Lord Buckethead to win re-election, albeit without a clear majority.  Clearly, far-right politics have lost some momentum in the UK.   Maybe they can re-think this Brexit thing while they are at it?

Could it be that people are tired of extremist politics and want a return to normalcy?   And were does the media fit into this picture?

Like its brother, the financial media, the political media loves controversy and heat.  Sound and fury signifying nothing.   They love candidates who say outrageous things or get into outrageous controversies, as it sells newspapers or in today's lingo, generates clicks.  Marie Le Pen was popular in the press because she was controversial and people wanted to hear "what outrageous thing she said today" - the same reason people listened to Howard Stern.   People who hated Howard Stern listened to him more than people who liked him.

And of course, this is the reason the New York Times and The Washington Post are in hand-wringing Trump meltdown mode.  The more they can convince people that Trump is a threat to our national sovereignty, the more newspapers (or clicks) they sell.   And this was true before the election and doubly true today.  I am not a fan of Trump, but the republic will survive his Presidency.   Why?  Because our founding fathers were smart enough to create three branches of government, and the two other branches have already shown a propensity to keep the Executive branch in check.

Maybe a lot of bad things will happen in the next four years - and already are.  People are being deported and families are being torn apart.   Marijuana users who voted for Trump are going to have a pleasant surprise when the DEA busts down their door.   A lot of regulations in the banking industry will be repealed and people will be allowed to borrow more money than they should, and go broke.   And cronies of the President will profit.

But in four years there will be another election.   And if people decide these changes in our society are swell, Trump will be re-elected.   But maybe something else will happen.   Sadly, the media loves to tout "progressive" candidates with their wacky theories of government (give more money away, raise taxes, increase the deficit, etc.) which likely will insure a second Trump victory.  The only thing Americans fear more than fascism is communism, which really are both the same thing.

What 90% of Americans really want is a centrist candidate - someone who can appeal, at least in a limited amount, to both parties and work across the aisle.   But since our primary system favors extreme candidates, this is what we get.   And sadly, the parties cow-tow and cater to the extremes, convinced that their "base" is in the radicals and that they will not win office unless they pay homage to the tea-partiers and progressives.

But is this really true?  Or are we seeing movement in a different direction?   Sure, the Washington Post and the New York Times both hype the progressive movement as the wave of the future, even as this same movement derailed Hillary's campaign.    Like the Republicans before them, when they lost a major election, the consensus seems to be, "Let's become even more extreme!   Moderation is what cost us the election!"

But I think the opposite is true.   Sure, extremists can win elections.   A Tea-Partier can win in a Red State only because a Democrat doesn't have a chance.   But the moderate Republicans don't necessarily vote for extremists - they just stay home, instead.    Winners of such elections - on both sides - claim to have a "mandate" even when, in many cases, less than 50% of the eligible voters even showed up to vote, or if they did, the winning candidate had less then 50% of the population of eligible voters vote for him or her.

Sadly, it seems extremists on both sides of the aisle have captured the fancy of the press, and the rank-and-file Republicans and Democrats are getting a short shrift.   We hear a lot from the loudmouths on both sides of the aisle, as well as the erratic tweets of our Commander-in-Chief.   But we never hear from more moderate, sensible minds, on either side of the debate.

Maybe it is time to change, and maybe people worldwide are ready for such a change.   After all, we've seen where radical politics get us - nowhere.

[sobbani]

Why has the three-wheeled car been so popular in history and yet never succeeded?

The year is 1980, and we are sitting in the elaborate three-story "tree house" behind the Sigma Chi fraternity at General Motors Institute in Flint, Michigan, smoking an awful lot of pot.   The topic is cars, of course, and given than the economy is in the toilet, gas is available only on even and odd days, and the 1980 Corvette 305 "California" is maybe cranking out a pitiful 180 HP on a good day, it seems that the days of high-performance cars are behind us.   The Chevette is one of GM's best-selling cars at the time.

"What about a three-wheeled car?" someone says, exhaling marijuana smoke.  And no, his name wasn't Elio, but maybe he had the same conversation in the same tree-house, a decade later, when he also went to GMI.   The speaker passes the bong, and a marijuana-fueled discussion ensues. The appeal of the three-wheeled car is very simple.   Emissions controls and safety standards meant that cars of that era got shitty gas mileage, had poor performance, and cost a lot of money to build and buy.   A three-wheeled car would sell like hotcakes in the recession era of 1980!

A three-wheeled car, which could be registered as a motorcycle, would avoid emissions and safety standards, and thus be very cheap to make, have good performance, and get fantastic gas mileage.   For simple commuting and going to the grocery store, it would make a good second car.   A few more bong hits, and it starts to sound like a viable idea.  The bong hits being the key.

The Reliant Robin was made in the UK until 2001, as severe taxes on cars made three-wheelers far less expensive to own.   However changing economic conditions and regulations put an end to the three-wheelers for the most part.  As the UK slides into depression following Brexit, perhaps the new Nissan plant there can crank out these poverty-mobiles once again.

And it is an idea whose time has come and gone, time and time again.   Whenever a recession hits - or a depression - or government regulations make building an ordinary car too expensive, people start thinking about three-wheeled cars.   And a lot of them have been made over the years.   Probably the largest market was in England, where three-wheeled cars were taxed far less than ordinary cars, and thus a lot were made and sold for many years.  They also had three-wheeled "motorized wheelchairs" which were leased to handicapped people for a minimal cost, so they could get around.   For an island that is so small you can walk  drive across it in a day, such vehicles might make sense on low-speed secondary roads.

The Queen next to an "invalid car" which were leased to handicapped people in the UK to help them get around.   Few exist today, and likely many handicapped people ended up dead or further handicapped if they got into an accident in one of these deathtraps.

In other markets, not so much.   After World War II, shattered economies in Germany, Japan, and Italy turned to three-wheeled cars (or tiny four-wheeled microcars) as their solution to the problem of no work, no money, and no gas.  In Italy, the Vespa scooter was born.  These cars are poverty-mobiles that become popular when an economy crashes.  They were even briefly popular (in concept if not in execution) in postwar America, when new cars were in high demand and factories couldn't make them fast enough.   The Davis Divan, (shown at the top of the page) sat four across and was developed during the post-war car shortage - but quickly faded from the scene.   The Tucker was also born during this era. As you can see, transitional economic conditions often result the development of oddball cars.   The problem is, of course, that recessions end.   People make more money and they no longer want poverty-cars.   In the 1970's, maybe such a "car" would have sold, in limited numbers.  And yes, people tried back then to build three-wheeled cars - it turned out to be a scam.   But by the mid 1980's, when the economy started to recover, sales would taper off to nothing.   In a way, it is like the recession of 1958, which spawned the Chevy II, the Falcon, and the Valiant (and put VW on the map in the USA).  Small, cheap cars started to sell well in America, then, but by the mid-1960's, everyone wanted a big-block "Muscle Car".   When the oil crises hit in 1973, we got the Vega and the Pinto.  The car business is cyclical this way.  Remember how many Honda Fits were sold in 2009 - and how many monster SUVs have been sold since then? By the way, if you want to see a collection of three-wheeled cars and microcars, check out the Lane Museum in Nashville, Tennessee (yet another good reason to go there!).   Sadly, the Bruce Weiner Microcar Museum here in Georgia closed a few years ago and the collection was auctioned off.   You can still "virtually" visit that museum online, though.   As you can see, the idea of a simple basic mico-car or a three-wheeled car is one that has been popular many, many times in the past, usually in response to harsh economic conditions.  And in nearly all instances, such poverty-mobiles had a brief heyday in the sun, or were utter failures in the marketplace.   They never really took off for the long haul.

So why, other than in the heavily regulated UK, did three-wheeled cars not succeed in the marketplace?   There are a number of reasons, used cars being one of them.   No matter how cheaply you think a three-wheeled car can be made (and they are more expensive than you think), they are not competing with conventional brand-new four-wheeled cars, but inexpensive used four-wheeled cars.   Why would you buy an Elio for $8000 when for the same money you could buy a pretty lightly used Toyota Corolla?   And let's face it, the Elio is never going to be made, and if it was, it would cost more than $8000 to make, particularly as presently envisioned.

The vaunted advantage of the three-wheeler is that it avoids nasty environmental and safety regulations (which actually protect you and the environment).   As a motorcycle, you'd have to wear a helmet and obtain a motorcycle driver's license - a barrier to customers who might not want to have to take a motorcycle driver's test (and might not be able to pass it) in some States.   But if you could avoid airbags and pollution controls?   That would be sweet!  You could make one of these cars for cheap, right?

The problem is, you are one government regulator away from going out of business.  If you made a car with three-wheels, the government might argue it is a car and thus has to meet all the appropriate safety standards.   There goes your cost-savings right there. More puzzling still, the vaunted Elio car is said to be equipped (in theory, anyway, none have been built, other than rough prototypes) with airbags, pollution controls, etc., negating the cost advantages of the three-wheeler.   If you equip such a car with all of that stuff, you might as well cut to the chase and add the fourth wheel and just make a regular car.   Airbags aren't cheap, and neither are emissions controls. Will we see three-wheeled cars in our future?   Probably not.   The Elio seems to be slowly fading from view, as each date for production or other goals comes and goes with no activity in their used Hummer plant happening (other than, apparently, selling off the machinery!).  And economic conditions worldwide are getting better, overall, not worse, even if it seems that a recession is on the horizon.  Even in India (especially in India), Tata motors  is trying to wean the public of the "tuk-tuk" type three wheelers in favor of their new four-wheel nano car.  When people have a choice and they can afford to do so, they favor a more traditional four-wheeled car.   Three-wheeled cars are usually not a choice but something people are forced into buying. Sadly, like with the Tucker, or the Bricklin, or whatever, there are always a few rabid "true believers" who are willing to suspend disbelief to put a religious-like fervor into a vehicle or other product, for no apparent valid reason.  And often these sort of folks lose their shirts as a result.   Never make a consumer good into a religion or believe it will change the world.   Don't invest - or put down payments on - wild-eyed dreams.   Sadly, the people who are losing money on these sorts of deals are people who can least afford to lose what little money they have.   But then again, they have no one but themselves to blame for being so blind to the obvious. I realized, even back in 1980, that the three-wheeled car was little more than a marijuana-fueled fantasy.   It made a lot of sense after a number of bong-hits, but then you sober up and realize that it really makes no sense, economically or environmentally or from a safety standard.   And maybe right there is a good reason to give up on pot and pot-fueled fantasies.

The Bricklin car was going to revolutionize the car business and provide much-needed jobs for New Brunswick.  Sadly, not only was the car a piece of crap (the few that were made, anyway) but a lot of people lost a lot of money in the deal and the politicians who backed it lost their jobs.   A lot of elected officials in Shreveport, Louisiana are no doubt sweating right now.