spencerhtri718-blog

[spencerhtri718-blog]

Should Fixing Legal Services Take 60 Steps?

SHOULD CONGRESS BE TRUSTED? WHAT HAVE WE LEARNT THROUGH HISTORY? Implications and Expected latest results for a Non-proactive Electorate " inside the fight for Rights"

VOTING RIGHTS BATTLE BACKGROUND IN THE UNITED STATES: The debate for the to Vote dates way back in 1789, a time when the United States Constitution was implemented. The "Slave Owning States" insisted how the to vote should only be granted to "white men" on the same time demanded the black slaves in households be counted and relied on inside determination of congressional representation. Due to disagreements on voting rights, the Federal Government only retained authority to determine USA Citizenship while independent states took on the to set standards on who could vote, when and the way the voting would have been to be conducted. At that time in history, most Southern States were known as as" Slave States" because of wide-spread acceptance of slave ownership. It's not surprising that most states for quite some time granted the right to vote and then "white men" and sometimes setting additional limitations according to property ownership for someone to exercise that right.

It's not surprising how the 1790 Naturalization Act recognized only "free white males" as the only people be subject to naturalized in the United States. Native Americans were excluded from citizenship along with the to certainly vote in the United States. The law presumed "Native Americans were citizens of these sovereign "Indian Nations" and so cannot be citizens from the United States. The women and slaves were the only real nonvoters legally at the time. At the conclusion of the Mexican-American Revolution beneath the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, the Mexicans who had remained inside newly conquered territories were for being USA citizens by law. Although legally recognized as citizens, the 1850 Union of states i.e. Texas and California led for the enactment of laws geared towards denying Mexicans in conquered territories the authority to vote.

The 1861-1865 Civil War led for the death of 360,000 Union antislave supporters "blacks and whites" Thus leading to the end of legalized slavery. The legal death of slavery was enacted in 1863 proclamation and 13th Constitution Amendment of 1865 with the Federal Government. Though the determination of voting rights still lay at the disposal of independent states. In 1867 the 14th amendment extended citizenship to all black men to the first time in History although women coming from all races were denied citizenship.

The directly to choose black men was theoretically legalized in 1867 over the 15th Amendment although almost all Southern States still had very unfavorable voting laws against black men and practically none in support for women's right to vote.

The Republicans and Democratic Party compromises in politics manifesting itself today are deeply rooted in undisclosed agreements between elected leaders with the two political parties purposed for private benefits to the cost in the minorities or underrepresented. In the 1876 disputed presidential elections between Hayes, a Republican candidate and Tilden a Democratic candidate led with a congressional compromise, later known as "Compromise of 1877". In the undisputed facts, the Republicans consented to retain the White House while white racists " in the time mostly democrats" gained political support to oppress and persecute non-whites through very unjust laws adopted during that time.

States completely disregarded with the 15th Amendment, one factor that generated, many working blacks in the time getting expelled from office jobs as a result of exercising their voting right, many were evicted from your own home and crippling laws enacted to deter blacks or any other races from voting. These Laws included, the literacy test laws deterring anyone that couldn't read or write from voting, the grandfather clause limiting voting just to those with grandfathers with eligibility to vote, poll tax laws that limited voting to only individuals who can afford to cover that tax "the rich" along with the separation Laws under "Jim Crow".

Asians inside the 1870 Naturalization Amendment Act were specifically denied citizenship. Citizenship was restricted to white people and individuals of African descent. All women, Asian, Chinese, Mexican and Native - Americans were denied citizenship along with the directly to vote in virtually all Southern States. Between 1890 - 1920, a couple of states granted women the right to vote as well as the consequent adoption in the 19th Amendment generated recognitions of the female's right vote inside the United States.

WHY REVIEW HISTORY: I believe life may be the best teacher for everyone ready to learn. The need to suppress the minority for that selfish desires from the majority "RICH" has persistently manifested itself in USA politics.

On December 4th, 2012 Congress failed to pass the UN Treaty around the Rights of People with Disability. 61 Democrats voted for that agreement (Treaty) while 38 Republicans voted contrary to the agreement thus ratification with a two-third majority failed. Senators who voted against, mostly Republicans alleged they were fighting to the sovereignty from the United States against UN control or broadening of their legal principles. For any person with legal knowledge in the supremacy of laws inside United States, You are aware that International Laws do not automatically become law in the United States always. There exceptions towards the general rule in all principles in Law.

Also, the fact that the United States adopted the "Americans with Disabilities Act as amended" of 1990, a law that's substantially the same because the rejected UN Disability Agreement baffles my head thus far. In addition, the USA enacted laws simply those with disabilities include, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Fair Housing Act, the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the Air Carrier Access Act of 1986, the Voting Accessibility for that Elderly and Handicapped Act of 1984, the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act and the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968.

It's not surprising that old tricks trusted by Congress to sustain selfish interests of "the funders" on the cost of creating the correct decision with the expense from the minority "individuals with disabilities" remains to be at play currently.

Also the applicability and availability within the International Law of principles like "the Non-self-executing treaties" actually make it inconceivable that no congressional representative highlighted the above-mentioned principle for or against ratification. The Senators against the treaty failed to even elaborate or identify specific grounds for voting against ratification. All focus was around the presumptive comes from ratification the UN treaty would attain supremacy against the USA enacted law. To me, explanations provided by congress against ratifying the treaty were all "just a large cry to get more power" against UN governance.

All Lawyers are aware that ratifying countries in international law have a very directly to deliver towards the United Nations committee declarations or reservations held against adopted treaties. This can range from, declaring the ratified treaty won't become self-executing in adopting state automatically to modifying specific provisions from the treaty in regards to declaring country. The legal implications includes, amendment of this treaty through the declaring state as to identified provision or reservation, and limited application from the said treaty against another country. Usually, within the United States, the application of your non-self-executing treaty would require additional consent from congress ahead of the court would apply treaty provisions in the court. The United States has trusted similar declarations before i.e. in the ratification with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, International Covenant for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination and Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.

The public must rise against senators who violate public trust at the worth of self-imposed conditions or pledges for the "RICH FUNDERS " a huge price for the underrepresented "people who have disabilities". Not only does the USA have a very reputation to shield within the International community, but rejection of the UN Agreement also undermines our role as part with the five permanent members inside United Nations.

Congress's breach of trust for United States citizens is undeniable particularly in light of once more did not pass the Aid Relief Package for Sandy victims. The Electorate should require a pro-active role in demanding answers. The elected representative seems clueless in regards to the needs in the people they represented. I think representatives seeking election to congress have to be subjected with a test called "a humanistic co relational experience and exposure to people not as part of your social circles". The test must entail real-life experience and exposure. From recent experience, it's similar to most Republicans have not lost homes, never gone hungry or been helpless and dependant on government for support in any respect within their lives.

The representative have to be made in charge of their actions whilst in congress. The electorate must join hands to halt congress madness and disregard of people's basic needs.