#HowardSchneider

[doomonfilm]

Thoughts : Three Identical Strangers (2018)

Back in 2018, it seemed as if there was going to be another surge in popularity for the documentary genre.  Won’t You Be My Neighbor?, RBG and Whitney gave us insight into iconic figures within the popular culture, Demon House put paranormal investigator Zak Bagans on a much bigger map, and a host of other documentaries on a wide range of topics found moderate box office success.  Out of this rush of releases, however, one documentary in particular piqued my interest more so than the rest : Three Identical Strangers. 

19-year old Bobby Shafran arrives at New York Community College for his first semester, but much to his surprise and confusion, a large portion of the student body seems familiar with him, with a few students even welcoming him back.  A chance encounter with a fellow student unveiled that Bobby was a dead ringer for former student Eddy Galland, and after a quick phone conversation, the two have a strong belief that they may have been twins separated at birth.  After meeting one another face to face, the story is reported by the New York Post, which brings knowledge of the twins to David Kellman, a third adopted individual which a striking resemblance to the now famous reunited twins.  Shockingly, it turns out that Bobby, Eddy and David are triplets born to an unexpectant young mother who puts them up for adoption via the Louise Wise adoption agency.  The trio forms an inseparable bond, but their unlikely reunion is quickly darkened when the history of their separation leads to revelations of an extremely dark and far reaching conspiracy.

When it comes to documentaries, the subject matter is of the utmost importance, and the nature of the tale that unfolds in Three Identical Strangers is one of those one in a million sets of reveals that is stranger than fiction.  Tales of lost twins separated at birth already stand out, but to factor in a set of triplets, the discovery of how many more sets of twins were impacted, and the overall diabolical nature of the reason for these splits is almost too much for the average individual to comprehend without an extreme emotional reaction.  Dr. Natasha Josefowitz attributes the inhumanity of the study to “a different time”, but even with the curiosity and blind devotion that was present in the 1950′s (which in itself opened the door for the counter-cultural revolution of the 1960′s), it’s still hard to fathom how a group of medical professionals and scientific minds could justify splitting up scores of twin brothers and sisters... while probably not the intention of their actions, it’s hard not to look at those who propagated the study as having a God complex of sorts.

As inhumane as the study was, the unofficial results that we are presented with obliterate any sense of grey area in the long-standing “nature versus nurture” debate.  While it was true that the brothers developed slightly unique sets of values from the different social classes that the families they were assigned to fell in, the genetic makeup of the triplets was strong enough to confuse peers who were only aware of one-third of the triplets... indicators like their mannerisms, vocal characteristics and distinct hands overrode their varied builds.  As the triplets learned about one another, elements of similarity were so obscure, yet so numerous, that it almost felt like their genetic roadmaps overrode their separation : each triplet wrestled in high school, smoked the same cigarettes, had interest in the same type of women and more, which was echoed in Elyse Schein and Paula Bernstein’s independent attendance of film school.

While fascinating, the ethical implications of what the Louise Wise agency did are damning, to say the least.  To take advantage of mothers in harrowing positions or with mental illnesses is one thing, but it becomes an entirely different can of worms when you consider that the adoptive parents were kept in the dark about both the familial history of their adopted children and the true intentions of the follow-up researchers sent by the Wise agency.  The irresponsibility of taking children from parents with health and mental risks, exposing those children to a cloak and dagger approach of research, and all the while, hoping the truth stays buried feels like a recipe for disaster, and while not directly attributed to the case of Eddy Galland’s passing, it’s hard to ignore those elements as key factors.  The fact that the results of the study are locked away from the public until 2066, which will be many years after all those impacted are dead and gone, feels grossly irresponsible as well, if not outright cruel and inhumane.

It’s been quite a while since a documentary took me on an emotional rollercoaster anywhere comparable to that of Three Identical Strangers.  You’re hooked by fascination, but you’re left questioning humanity at large while you attempt to comprehend what the triplets’ experience was in all of the madness that surrounded them.

[omanxl1]

Ray Barretto ‎– Confrontation

Sunday Jazz err I mean Digital Crate Digging Continues, this is the Saturday Night Fever edition…

Well, Sunday will be here in an hour or two as I post this, so what it do? O-Zone will school a non- believer..

Dropping Sunday morning type of knowledge!!  it’s rough out here my constituents will acknowledge, word from the old deacon in the amen corner?

Can I get an amen, and another amen again?…

[tanroboot]

HowardSchneider［ワシントン１１日ロイター］ - 米連邦準備理事会（ＦＲＢ）が経済成長を妨げ、自身の利下げ要請を聞き入れないと不満を募らせていたトランプ大統領は、同中銀理事に保守系経済評論家のスティーブン・ムーア氏と元ピザチェーン経���者ハーマン・ケイン氏を指名する意向を示している。トランプ氏はＦＲＢの政策判断に対して特に批判的であり、ムーア、ケイン両氏は、これまでの指名候補と比べても党派色が非常に強い。以下は、トランプ大統領がＦＲＢ及び自身が指 全文 ロイター 04月15日 16時54分

[tanroboot]

HowardSchneider［ワシントン６日ロイター］ - ノーベル経済学賞受賞者のポール・クルーグマン氏とローレンス・サマーズ元米財務長官は過去３週間、ツイッターやテレビ、新聞のコラム欄を活用して、ニューヨーク州立大学のステファニー・ケルトン教授に反論を重ねてきた。ケルトン教授は、政府予算や財政赤字は完全雇用やインフレを実現するために積極利用すべしという「現代金融理論（ＭＭＴ）」の強固な提唱者で、２０１６年の前回大統領選ではバーニー・サンダース上院議員の 全文 ロイター 03月11日 15時00分

[tanroboot]

HowardSchneider［ワシントン１９日ロイター］ - 米連邦準備理事会（ＦＲＢ）は利上げ打ち止めがそう遠い先ではないことを示唆し始め、形だけでも金融政策を正常化する取り組みを終えようとしている。それにしても正常化の歩みは遅々とした足取りで、過去３年で９回の利上げを何とか実施し、あと数回できるかどうかにとどまる。今までを振り返ってみると、ＦＲＢはいくつかの成果を挙げた半面、失ったものもある。以下に「収支計算」をまとめた。◎成果＜失業率＞３．７％と４９ 全文 ロイター 12月21日 07時53分