#IVC Filter Class Action | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

davidslepkow · 3 years

Link

IVC Filter settlement amounts as a result of an inferior vena cava lawsuit are difficult to determine at this time. Issues with an IVC (inferior vena cava) filter may lead to many unwelcome side effects and IVC filter complications. Physician utilize IVC Filters to strengthen weak or damaged tissue. If you were implanted with a defective IVC filter, contact top IVC filter lawsuit attorneys. These IVC filter complications can drastically alter a patient’s quality of life. Many victims are seeking information about: “Bard IVC filter lawsuit settlements, “ivc filter lawsuit awards”, “blood clot filter lawsuit” and “IVC filter lawsuit settlements” Most importantly, do not miss an ivc filter lawsuit deadline!

Bard IVC lawsuit

In order to determine what ivc filter lawsuit settlements amounts will be, a victim needs to be informed. IVC lawsuits are individual lawsuits and none of the lawsuits constitute an ivc filter class action lawsuit. A patient suffering from serious medical complications due to an inferior IVC filter product and/or placement will be afforded the ability to seek compensation using an ivc filter lawsuit for the following reasons:

IVC FILTER DEFECTS:

The filter has migrated from its original placement position.

The IVC filter did not prevent (or lessen the severity of) a pulmonary embolism.

The filter is not removable due to migration.

The filter has become fractured, broken, or otherwise come apart in some way- whether or not it has migrated from its original position.

The filter perforated, punctured, or otherwise caused damage to the IVC or other blood vessels.

The filter has malfunctioned or broken, causing damage to other organs such as the lungs, liver, heart, kidneys, etc.

The patient has had to undergo further surgery to have a malfunctioning IVC hernias filter removed.

IVC FILTER UPDATE

Update- 11/28/2020- “The guidelines on the use of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters in the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE; ie, deep vein thrombosis [DVT] or pulmonary embolism [PE]) were published in October 2020 by the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR), in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Committee on Trauma, the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS), and the Society for Vascular Medicine (SVM).[1]” medscape

9-25-2020- “Medtech trade group AdvaMed this week debuted a website that tracks law firm TV advertisements aimed at patients who have had certain medical devices implanted. The “Responsible Advertising for Patient Safety” site says that such ads mislead patients into legal action against the manufacturers of devices that are “non-faulty” and may jeopardize patient safety. We are advocates protecting patients from risks associated with deceptive, third-party funded advertisements,” the site says. “We support the doctor-patient relationship and seeking proper medical, not legal, advice for any medical device and health-related concerns.” Medical Design

8-13-2020- “The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday affirmed a $3.6 million award to Sherr-Una Booker, the first bellwether plaintiff in the Bard IVC Filter Multidistrict Litigation and the only one, of five, to win her case at trial. Booker, a Georgia resident represented by Kellogg Hansen Todd Figel & Frederick, still has a fragment of the C.R. Bard G2 filter lodged in a vein leading to her heart, the 9th Circuit said. The MDL jury in Phoenix awarded her $1.6 million in compensation and $2 million in punitive damages in 2018, finding that Bard knew the G2 fractured, migrated and caused perforations at a “significantly higher” rate than competing filters and should have included a warning to physicians on the label.” Reuters

8/6/2020- “The placement of an inferior vena cava filter reduced the rate of pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and cancer, according to study results published in JAMA Network Open….This population-based cohort study included encounter-level data from the (HCUP) databases. The analysis included a total of 88,585 patients (median age, 71.0 years) with malignant neoplasms and a diagnosis of acute lower extremity DVT from state inpatient databases from California (2005-2011) and Florida (2005-2014) who were enrolled in the HCUP. Investigators examined all hospital visits for these patients to determine whether or not an IVC filter was placed. The primary outcome was the development of new PE following the initial DVT diagnosis. Additionally, the rates of new DVT as well as in-hospital mortality were examined. The researchers concluded that “[t]hese data suggest that IVC filter use in patients with cancer is of potential benefit in appropriately selected patients,” but additional studies are needed to determine “the appropriate use of these devices.” Pulmonology Advisor

1/9/2020- The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana has vacated a $3 million judgment against Bloomington-based Cook Medical. The company had been sued by a Georgia woman who claimed an intravenous filter made by Cook deteriorated inside her body, causing medical complications. In the lawsuit, Tonya Brand said she pulled part of her inferior vena cava (IVC) filter out of her thigh in 2011 after it had broken up and deteriorated. She says some pieces of the device are still lodged in her body and cannot be removed. In February 2019, a jury awarded Brand $3 million, however the court has now vacated the judgment and ordered a new trial. In its decision, the court said the “Plaintiff did not have overwhelming evidence to show the filter was defective or that a defect in the filter caused her injuries” and that “a jury could have just as easily found in Cook’s favor.” inside business

1 -8-2020- “On January 8, 2020, the Ontario Court of Appeal certified this proceeding to move forward as a class action on behalf of all residents of Canada who were implanted with an IVC filter product, namely: the Cook Gunther Tulip Vena Cava Filter Set, the Cook Celect Vena Cava Filter Set, and the Cook Celect Platinum Vena Cava Filter Set, at any time on or before January 8, 2020.” Newswire

11/1/2019- “The lawsuit was filed by a woman from Georgia who was implanted with an Option® blood clot filter in 2016. The filter perforated the wall of her vein, causing her to suffer severe pain and health problems. The jury awarded her over $1 million in future medical expenses, plus more than $2.3 million in future pain and suffering. The jury also awarded an additional $30.3 million in punitive damages. Blood clot filters are wire devices that are implanted in the vena cava, where they are supposed to catch blood clots and prevent deadly pulmonary embolisms. Unfortunately, IVC filters also pose serious risks. The filter can move out of position, fracture into pieces, puncture the vein, and more. Rex Medical was accused of selling a defective IVC filter with an unreasonably dangerous risk of causing complications. The trial began in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas earlier this month. It was the first case to come before a Philadelphia jury in the nationwide IVC filter litigation.” Daily Hornet

IVC FILTER | THE 411

There are over 10,000 ivc filter lawsuits pending in the United States. These IVC Filter lawsuits are pending in both Federal and State Courts. Victims are seeking lucrative awards.

The most IVC Filter lawsuits have been filed against Bard Medical and Cook Medical. Many victims are waiting to get an IVC filter payout.

There are currently two MDL’s: 1.) The Bard MDL located in Arizona Federal Court. 2.) The Cook Medical MDL ( MDL No. 2570 IN RE: Cook Medical, Inc., IVC Filters Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation) which is pending in Federal Court in Indiana. “Southern District of Indiana, assigned to Judge Richard L. Young and Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings.” INSD

“Rex Medical L.P., the designer of the Option and Option Elite IVC Filters as well as the distributor of these products, Argon Medical, face a growing number of lawsuits related to injuries that plaintiffs’ complaints allege were caused by these devices. (See a detailed list of complaints and attorneys below.) We believe the majority, if not all, claims against Rex and Argon have been filed in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. Plaintiffs claim that jurisdiction is proper in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas under Pennsylvania Law partially due to the Pennsylvania citizenship of Rex Medical.” Mass tort

“Boston Scientific faces a product liability lawsuit brought by the family of Ohio woman, which alleges that problems with a Greenfield Vena Cava filter caused severe internal injuries and death. The complaint (PDF) was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio on January 12, by Julia and Raylyn Ratliff, administrators of the estate of Cinthia K. Ratliff.” About lawsuits

“Following a three-week-long trial, a Houston firefighter, Jeff Pavlock, was awarded more than $1.2 million by a Texas jury for the lawsuit filed against Cook Medical LLC involving an IVC filter. The plaintiff was implanted with Cook Celect IVC filter in March 2015 to avert blood clots from reaching his heart, but the filter tilted and pierced into his tissues causing an internal injury, requiring a revision surgery. The allegations include failure to warn the performing surgeon about the possible adverse effects of the defectively designed filter. Cynthia Kretz, vice president and general counsel for Cook Medical and Cook Group, expressed her disappointment saying, “we are disappointed in this outcome and do not believe this verdict is supported by the facts or the law. This one case does not change our position on continually defending this important, life-saving technology.” Cook officials stated that they plan to appeal the court’s decision on the allegations laid on them over its IVC filter.” Neuralit

BARD IVC FILTER LAWSUIT MDL:

“The U.S. District Judge presiding over all federal Bard IVC filter lawsuits indicates that the Court will consider whether to establish a separate track for cases likely to be resolved in settlement, or whether to simply begin remanding all cases after an upcoming bellwether trial. There are currently more than 5,700 product liability cases pending in a federal multidistrict litigation, each involving allegations that plaintiffs experienced complications with IVC filters manufactured by C.R. Bard, including reports that the retrievable blood clot filters moved out of position, punctured internal organs or fractured, causing small pieces to travel throughout the body.” About Lawsuits

IVC FILTER PAYOUTS

“Given similar questions of fact and law presented in the cases, the litigation has been centralized before U.S. District Judge David G. Campbell in the District of Arizona since August 2015, for coordinated discovery and a group of “bellwether” trials designed to help gauge how juries are likely to respond to certain evidence and testimony that is likely to be repeated throughout the litigation.” Id.

BLOOD CLOT FILTER

Bard medical MDL bellwether trial

1st Bard MDL bellwether trial in 2018- Verdict for 3.6 million in favor of victim.

2nd bellwether trial- Defense verdict a couple of months after the first bellwether.

3rd bellwether trial- Schedule for May 2019. This trial is about the Bard Recovery Filter.

COOK MEDICAL IVC FILTER MDL UPDATE

There are more than 5000 Cook medical IVC Filter lawsuits consolidated in to the MDL in the Southern District of Indiana. Many victims are seeking information abou cook ivc filter lawsuit. “Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 , the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) has transferred a number of actions to the Southern District of Indiana, assigned to Judge Richard L. Young and Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. The Plaintiffs allege defect in Cook Medical’s IVC filter, a medical device placed in the inferior vena cava to catch blood clots and stop them from traveling to the heart or lungs. The cases generally allege defective design, misrepresentation in marketing, and failure to warn doctors and patients. The Southern District of Indiana’s Master Case is: 1:14-ml-2570-RLY-TAB (PACER access required)” https://www.insd.uscourts.gov/mdl-case-information

SETTLEMENTS

“According to recent court filings, Cook Medical and plaintiffs lawyers are continuing settlement negotiations in an attempt to resolve IVC filter lawsuits pending throughout the federal court system, as additional “bellwether” claims are being prepared for early trial dates. There are currently more than 4,700 product liability cases filed against Cook Medical in U.S. District Courts nationwide, each involving similar allegations that Cook Celect, Cook Gunther Tulip or other inferior vena cava (IVC) filters were defectively designed and prone to migrate out of position, puncture internal organs, fracture or cause other serious health complications.” https://www.aboutlawsuits.com/cook-ivc-filter-settlement-negotiations-151304/

Important Orders in MDL 2570

THE COOK MEDICAL IVC FILTER BELLWETHER TRIALS

1st Cook Medical lawsuit bellwether trial- Defense verdict.

2nd Cook Medical IVC Filter lawsuit bellwether trial- Case dismissed on summary judgement because the victim missed a statute of limitations / IVC Filter deadline.

3rd Cook Medical IVC lawsuit-bellwether: Jury determines that the IVC filter is defective and awards IVC filter victim 3 million in damages. This trial went on for over a month. The IVC Filter lawsuit jury refused to award punitive damages to the victim

GREENFIELD IVC FILTER LAWSUIT AGAINST BOSTON SCIENTIFIC

If you are a victim of the Greenfield IVC , you should seriously consider filing a greenfield filter lawsuit. What are the greenfield filter lawsuits? “Boston Scientific produces the Greenfield™ Stainless Steel Vena Cava Filter. (It is named after Dr. Lazar Greenfield, who originally designed it.) The Greenfield™ filter is implanted in patients’ veins to stop current blood clots from traveling while maintaining as normal a blood flow as possible. According to the manufacturer website, more than one million of these devices have been implanted in the last three decades.” Shouse Law

HEART FILTER

The heart filter lawsuits, which are often know as a blood clot filter lawsuit, pertain to allegations that the manufacturer of the medical device did not properly warn medical doctors and victims of the heightened risk of the heart filter breaking causing metal fragments to travel in the blood, possibly causing organ damage. Many heart filter victims are wondering:

What are the ivc filter lawsuit settlements amounts?

How long until there will be ivc filter lawsuit settlements?

How do I get an ivc filter payout

WHAT IS AN INFERIOR VENA CAVA FILTER PLACEMENT?

“An inferior vena cava (IVC) filter is a small device that can stop blood clots from going up into the lungs. The inferior vena cava is a large vein in the middle of your body. The device is put in during a short surgery. Veins are the blood vessels that bring oxygen-poor blood and waste products back to the heart. Arteries are the blood vessels that bring oxygen-rich blood and nutrients to the body. A deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a blood clot that forms in a vein deep inside the body. A clot occurs when blood thickens and clumps together. In most cases, this clot forms inside one of the deep veins of the thigh or lower leg.” Hopkins Medicine

FIRST BELLWETHER TRIALS

“Inferior vena cava filters are commonly used to prevent pulmonary embolism in patients who manifest deep vein thrombosis and recurrent pulmonary embolism despite anticoagulation, or in patients with contraindications to anticoagulation.” NCBI

“The first bellwether trials over medical devices that are designed to prevent blood clots during surgery have failed to carve out a clear winner, with another trial set to begin next week. About 9,000 lawsuits allege that various types of inferior vena cava filters, or IVC filters, which doctors implant in patients, have perforated or fractured in their bodies, causing pain and leading to removal surgeries. Among the several device manufacturers listed in the lawsuits, C.R. Bard Inc. and Cook Medical Inc. face the largest number of cases, clocking in over 4,000 each. law.com

DO I QUALIFY FOR A LAWSUIT?

The victim “had an IVC Filter (Inferior Vena Cav) implanted after January 2003 and suffered any of the following injuries after receiving this implant:

“Device Became Non- Removable, Device Tilted, Filter Fracture, Device Migration, Filter Perforation, Device Embolization (Deatched Components), Filter Punctured Blood Vessels or Organs, Death.” (Source Consumer Awareness Group Full Service Marketing and Intake Support Center)

Implanted with: Bard IVC filter, Cook IVC, Johnson and Johnson IVC.

IVC FILTER LAWSUIT DEADLINE

IVC Filter victims who do not meet the above IVC lawsuit criteria should still reach out to an IVC Filter lawsuit lawyer to see whether he or she can still file an IVC filter lawsuit.

1.2 MILLION VERDICT IN TEXAS

“So far, trials have failed to identify a clear victor. Cook won the first IVC filter trial last year, but it lost a $1.2 million verdict in Texas state court on May 24. Bard lost a $3.6 million verdict on March 30, but followed up with a defense win on June 1. Judges also have granted summary judgment motions in at least two key cases slated for trials. For these reasons and more, a patient can and should seek legal representation. IVC filters have had numerous warnings and recalls over the years. It comes as little to no surprise many patients are now facing the ramifications of faulty products and/or poor placement procedures. Though the pain and suffering can not be reversed with monetary compensation, the outcome of a lawsuit against the manufacturers of the IVC and possibly against the medical professionals in charge of the patients’ care will deliver peace of mind in a most difficult time.” Law

IVC FILTER LAWSUITS AND IVC FILTER LAW FIRMS

Considering all this and more will greatly reduce the chances of a patient having a negative experience. Of course, complications will arise regardless of either the doctor’s or patient’s frugality in understanding the potential outcomes. If and when that happens, finding the best legal representation is imperative. Those who are left without legal recourse to obtain compensation for time lost from work and/or other major lifestyle alterations due to the procedure or complications therefrom will find themselves less able to function in their everyday lives and see an inevitable decline in their quality of life.

IVC FILTER LAWYER

A licensed physician is not one typically one who is out to take advantage of unhealthy patients. Though invasive surgeries may be more commonplace today than they were even twenty or thirty years ago, and our technologies and understanding of the issues have grown exponentially, there will still be those instances where something doesn’t go according to plan. Rarer, though still a prevalent issue, the doctor or surgeon made the wrong call or bungled the procedure. In those cases, seeking immediate legal representation will greatly benefit the patient in the end.Whether you or a loved one has experienced pain and issues with their IVC hernia filter or are taking preventative measures before undergoing such a procedure, it will behoove the individual to keep in mind the serious risks and potential medical complications which can, and very well may, arise in the aftermath of the surgery.

WHAT IS A DENALI IVC FILTER?

A Denali Ivc filter is described here: “The DENALI® Vena Cava Filter is a venous interruption device designed to prevent pulmonary embolism. TheDENALI® Filter can be delivered via the femoral and jugular/subclavian approaches. A separate delivery system isavailable for each approach. The DENALI® Filter is designed to act as a permanent filter. When clinically indicated,the DENALI® Filter may be percutaneously removed after implantation according to the instructions provided under the “Optional Procedure for Filter Removal” section.”

BARD IVC FILTER LAWSUIT SETTLEMENTS

“The DENALI® Filter consists of twelve shape-memory laser-cut nickel-titanium appendages. These twelve appendages form two levels of filtration with the legs providing the lower level of filtration and the arms providing the upper level of filtration. The DENALI® Filter is intended to be used in the inferior vena cava (IVC) with a diameter less than or equal to 28mm.” Bard/ Davol

IVC FILTER LAWSUIT ATTORNEYS

For those patients who are suffering, there is hope for a return to your previous standard of living. Though the physical problems may never fully disappear, having the right legal team fighting for your patient rights can deliver one from a state of utter despair and hopelessness to one of seeing a brighter future on the horizon! Victims are looking for IVC filter attorneys to file IVC filter lawsuits or a blood clot filter lawsuit on their behalf. As of this date there has been no global ivc filter lawsuit settlements. Victims are hoping for an ivc filter lawsuit settlement in order to get an IVC Filter payout as soon as possible. An IVC filter lawsuit using a blood clot filter lawsuit lawyer will help the victim get justice and compensation in the form of an IVC filter payout for his or her complications. If you are seeking an ivc filter payout, you need to speak to an IVC lawsuit lawyer as soon as possible. If you do not have a lawsuit filed because you missed an ivc filter lawsuit deadline, then it makes no difference what the IVC settlement amounts end up amounting to. It cannot be repeated enough that the greenfield filter lawsuits are not an ivc filter class action lawsuit.

#ivc filter lawsuit

0 notes

abuselawyerca · 4 years

Link

IVC Filter lawsuit for side effects. Free attorney review, class action lawsuit may take place with substantial cash claims awards from settlements.

#SexualAbuseLawsuitsNY #SexualAbuseSettlementsNY #ClergyAbuseLawyersAZ

0 notes

tortlawteam-blog · 7 years

Text

#ivcfilter #sideeffects @tortlawteam.com @drugslawsuitusa

[vc_row][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_custom_heading text=”Free Consultation” font_container=”tag:h2|text_align:left|color:%234873ff” use_theme_fonts=”yes”][contact-form-7 id=”281″][/vc_column][vc_column width=”3/4″][vc_column_text]It’s worthwhile to inquire pro help to doctors or expert if you are at the moment bothered by hyperhidrosis or generally known as excessive sweating. Sweating is a normal…

View On WordPress

0 notes

averagesettlementlawsuitclaims · 7 years

Text

Understanding the lawsuit on optease ivc filter https://www.averagesettlementlawsuitclaims.com/optease-ivc-filter/ eric Average Settlement Lawsuit Claims

Understanding the lawsuit on optease ivc filter https://www.averagesettlementlawsuitclaims.com/optease-ivc-filter/ eric

With medical research and technology advancing at an amazing rate many are falling victim to failing devices. Hundreds have documented the device’s shortcomings. As for the Optease IVC filter, some have even filed a lawsuit against the manufacturer.

To explain in short an Inferior Vena Cava filter is a device implanted by surgeons used to stop a blood clot from traveling through your body causing a Pulmonary Embolism, a situation that is commonly known to be life-threatening. While the filter sounds great in theory many are reporting the device it self-collapsing, perforating or migrating and causing complications all on its own.

Common side effects from these occurrences include internal bleeding, lower limb deep vein thrombosis, constant or severe pain in the heart, chest and difficulty breathing and unfortunately death is a major concern. These side effects can be life changing or simply minor on their own but combined with the constant aggravation of body movement and implant site/perforation causing internal infection looming the after effects can be debilitating.

To date, there are a small group of individuals looking to hold the manufacturer accountable for the faulty equipment unknowingly provided to the trusted Doctors. Some are claiming that some Doctors were not to be trusted to begin with and this is another example of insurance fraud. With medical insurance awareness at its peak the speculations that these overpriced microdevices are inadequately made by the cheapest developer leaving the patients to endure the process of removal and replacement.

To add to the stress of the blood clot they were originally concerned about, patients’ quality of life begins to deteriorate when you factor in not only the physical side effects the emotional roller coaster is exhausting. An estimated 33,00 Optease IVC filters were recalled in March 2013 by the FDA for a labeling error used to show Doctors how to implant the device, apparently, the instructions were placing the implant in backward.

Class action lawsuits look to be promising with the manufacturer themselves not only providing sub-par devices but also failing to demonstrate correct use of the equipment after tens of thousands had been distributed for use in patients. Highly recognized and awarded Doctors are also standing with the lawsuit.

To think of the hours of the paper trail it would take to contact all patients is staggering, so people are beginning to speak out and call attention to the problem themselves. Contacting a trusted and knowledgeable Law Firm is proved to be the best action when dealing with the pharmaceutical companies.

As they have the legal advice of their own individual cases are pushed to the side or settled for substantially less money than those involved in a class action lawsuit. The Optease IVC filter lawsuit has been growing in number through the years as much more come forward to report their injury, pains, and damages.

Some have lost loved ones due to the device failing. Some have simply lost their time dealing with additional appointments with specialists. All those combined have lost faith in the Optease IVC filter.

…

https://www.averagesettlementlawsuitclaims.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/IVC-Filter-300x200.jpg November 30, 2017 at 11:57AM Average Settlement Lawsuit Claims https://www.averagesettlementlawsuitclaims.com

#https://www.averagesettlementlawsuitclaims.com/optease-ivc-filter/IFTTT #Average Settlement Lawsuit

0 notes

injurylawyerpost · 7 years

Text

Find IVC Filter Lawyer in Round Rock Texas 78665

Find IVC Filter Lawyer in Round Rock Texas 78665. Hurt or become ill due to an IVC Filter? Call for a FREE consultation to talk about your accident claim.

Big pharma has failed to warn people of side effects of many medications that are causing medical complications in people throughout the world. And billions of dollars are set aside in”class action” lawsuit settlements for people hurt by those specific medications due to greed and negligence.

IVC Filter Lawyer Discusses Class Action Lawsuit

Pharma drugs and medical device injury claims or lawsuits involve a specialized area of the law known as product liability.

A court is not required to approve a settlement or certify a class. Not even if if the plaintiffs and defendants are in agreement, the court can turn down a settlement if it doesn’t adequately resolve or compensate class members’ claims.

If the parties reach an agreement, their attorneys will come up with a plan for notifying potential class members and settling claims. Once the court approves the settlement, lawyers notify potential class members of their chances to submit a claim for a percentage of the settlement if they meet eligibility requirements.

Plaintiffs are not required to participate in class action lawsuits even if they meet all of the criteria. Those who do participate will lose their right to file an individual lawsuit about the tort in the future, no matter the outcome of the accident lawsuit against IVC filters. Individuals who choose not to participate will keep their right to file a injury claim and may have more input into a possible settlement.

IVC filter lawyers in Round Rock don’t recommend “Class Actions” because the one’s most hurt won’t have access to bigger settlements because all participants get the same award regardless of personal condition.

Pharma manufacturers, distributors and sellers have a civic responsibility to to protect patients from potential health risks and produce products that are free of medical effects. Plaintiffs can file injury lawsuits caused by product defects.

Dangerous pharma drugs and faulty medical devices account for most claims.

IVC Filter Class Action Lawsuit: Understand What You’re Up Against?

Product liability is a unique legal category, there are lawyers that specialize in drug and device lawsuits. Product liability lawyers can help with your lawsuit in a number of ways. They can explain your legal rights and possible decisions I would have to make in the event of drug or device recalls.

They can evaluate the chances of liability lawsuit and file the injury claim on behalf of the plaintiff. After filing a lawsuit, the IVC filter lawyer can discuss about a possible a compensation agreement in the case or take it to court.

Tip: Hurt by a Drug or Device? You may be able to file an IVC filter lawsuit.

Product liability laws may vary depending on Texas laws and the medication, and there is a limited time to file called a “statute of limitations” (SOL). This all depends Texas laws where the client lives the SOL may vary. The time limit may also begin from the date of surgery, injury or when the plaintiff realized the product caused their injury.

Questions to Ask a IVC filter lawyer

Medications and device litigation, there is typically “No FEE” for a consultation. These types of injury lawsuits are on a “If we don’t win your case…you pay nothing!” basis. This means the lawyers will not charge a client unless they win a injury lawsuit or jury verdict.

A IVC filter class-action lawsuit involves similar claims of illness by a group of people injured by one or more common defendants. Rather than go it alone, the plaintiffs choose to join others in what is called a “Class Action” lawsuit.

A plaintiff acts as a leader for a much larger group of people involved in the lawsuit. After filing a accident claim in Texas or federal court, the lead plaintiffs — also called class representatives ask the court to certify the personal injury lawsuits.

In deciding the courts determine whether it is a class action based on these factors

There are enough claims to warrant resolving them in a single lawsuit.

There are common facts or legal questions.

The lead plaintiffs’ claims are typical for the class.

Represent the interests of the class.

Product Liability Claims Goes into Three Main Categories:

False Advertising – Lawsuits where the big pharma give bad instructions or warnings or simply fail to warn people about a product’s foreseeable risks.

Design Defects – These are injury cases where it is possible to foresee that a product will cause an injury due to its design. The pharma company may be able to avoid or reduce the injury by changing the way the product is made.

Manufacturing Defects – These are cases where marketing and design were done right, but a mistake occurs during the process of making the drug that leads to a defective product.

Compensation Amount Against IVC Filters:

Injury claims for defective products may fall into one of these cases. If a defective product, the drug maker may be financially liable for any injuries or illnesses that you might get.

Hire an experienced IVC filter lawyer to represent your case. They are the legal pros that can get you the compensation that you deserve.

U.S. and Canada Top Medication Lawsuits

Xeralto, Topamax, IVC filter, Depuy hip replacement, Fosamax,Taxotere, Effexor, Lipitor, Topamax, Yaz, Byetta, Celebrex, Celexa, Topamax, Fen Phen, Accutane, Lexapro, Pradaxa, Prozac, Resperdal, Vioxx, Zoloft , Ambien, Aredia, Baycol, Benicar, Stryker Hip Replacement, Taxotere

IVC Filter Lawyer Explains Injury Lawsuits

youtube

References:

IVC filter lawyer in Round Rock Texas 78665

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inferior_vena_cava_filter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_injury_lawyer

Cordis IVC Filter Lawyer Round Rock

at yahoo

from Injury Lawyer 360 http://injurylawyer360.com/ivc-filter-lawyer-in-round-rock-texas-78665/ from Injury Lawyer 360 https://injurylawyergazette.tumblr.com/post/166289263527

0 notes

injurylawyergazette · 7 years

Text

Find IVC Filter Lawyer in Georgetown Texas 78633

Find IVC Filter Lawyer in Georgetown Texas 78633. Hurt or ill because of an IVC Filter? Call for a FREE consultation to discuss your illness claim.

IVC Filter Lawyer Talks About Product Liability Claims

Medical drugs and device lawsuits involve a specialized kind of law known as product liability.

A court is not required to certify a class or approve a settlement. Even if the plaintiffs and defendants agree, the court can turn down a injury settlement if it doesn’t resolve the class members’ illness claims.

If parties reach an agreement, their attorneys will come up with a plan for notifying potential class members and settling claims. Once the court approves the settlement, lawyers notify potential class members of their opportunity to file for a claim for a percentage of the court settlement if they meet eligibility requirements.

Plaintiffs are not required to participate in class action lawsuits even if they meet all of the criteria. Those who do participate lose their right to file an individual lawsuit about the tort in the future, regardless of the outcome of the case against IVC filters. Those who don’t want to participate can keep their right to file an individual lawsuit and may have more input into a settlement.

IVC filter lawyers in Georgetown do not typically recommend “Class Actions” because the one’s most hurt may not have access to bigger court settlements because plaintiffs get the same award regardless of each individuals damages.

Pharma manufacturers, distributors and sellers have a civic duty to protect people from potential risks to health and give products that are free of problems. Plaintiffs can file for liability caused by defective products.

Dangerous pharma drugs and faulty medical devices account for many product liability class action claims.

IVC Filter Product Liability Claim: Understand What You’re Up Against?

While product liability is a big category, there are lawyers that specialize in drug and device lawsuits. Product liability lawyers can help with your case in a lot of instances. They can explain legal rights and options in case of a drug recall.

They can evaluate the strength of liability lawsuit and file the injury claim on behalf of the plaintiff. After filing a lawsuit, the IVC filter lawyer can help negotiate a out of court in the injury claim or take it to court.

Tip: Injured by a Device or Medication? You may be able to file an IVC filter lawsuit.

Product liability laws may vary depending on Texas laws and the product, and there may be a limited amount of time to file called a “Statute of Limitations” (SOL). Depending on Texas laws where the plaintiff resides the SOL differs. The time limit may also begin from the date of surgery, injury or when the plaintiff realized the product caused their injury.

These are all questions to ask a IVC filter lawyer

In drug and device injury litigation, there is typically “No FEE” for a consultation. These types of injury claims are on a “If we don’t win your case…you pay nothing!” basis. This means no charge to you unless they are awarded a injury claim or jury verdict.

A IVC filter class-action lawsuit involves similar claims by a group of people injured by one or more common defendants. Rather than go it alone, the plaintiffs choose to join others in a class action.

An individual or small group of plaintiffs acts as a leader for a larger group of people involved in the lawsuit. After filing a accident complaint in Texas or federal court, the lead plaintiffs — also called class representatives request from the court to register and certify the ivc filter lawsuits.

The courts take into consideration whether it is a “class action” based on these factors

Having enough claims warranting putting them in a single lawsuit.

Common facts between plaintiffs.

The lead plaintiffs’ claims are typical for the class.

The named plaintiffs fairly represent the interests of the class.

Drug and Device Liability Injury Lawsuits Goes into 3 Main Categories:

Marketing Defects – Lawsuits where the drug maker give poor instructions or warnings or simply fail to warn patients about a medicines foreseeable hazards.

Defective Design – These are class action where the manufacturer knew of the liability prior to making it. The pharma company may be able to avoid or reduce the injury by changing the way the product is made.

Manufacturing Defects – These type of cases where marketing and design are proper, but a mistake occurs during the manufacturing process that leads to a faulty medicine.

Injury Damages Against IVC Filters:

Device liability claims may fall under any of these categories. If a product has any of these defects, the drug maker could and should liable for any injuries or illnesses that you might get.

Hire an experienced IVC filter lawyer to represent your case. They are the legal pros that can get you the compensation that you deserve.

Canada and U.S. Big Medicine Lawsuits

IVC Filter Lawyer Discusses Injury Lawsuits

youtube

References:

IVC filter lawyer in Georgetown Texas 78633

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inferior_vena_cava_filter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_injury_lawyer

IVC Filter Settlement Lawyer Georgetown

at yahoo

from Injury Lawyer 360 http://injurylawyer360.com/ivc-filter-lawyer-in-georgetown-texas-78633/

0 notes

attorneygroup · 7 years

Photo

DePuy Attune Lawsuit

A DePuy Attune lawsuit may be an option for patients who have experienced early failure of their ATTUNE Primary Total Knee System.

If you have question about your DePuy Attune knee replacement or a DePuy Attune lawsuit, contact the Attorney Group today.

We provide free, confidential, no-obligation consultations, and if you have a case, we can connect you with an affiliated DePuy Attune lawsuit attorney who can assist you throughout the legal process.

Get a Free Case Review

Jump to Section

Have You Seen a DePuy Attune Lawsuit Commercial?

What is the DePuy Attune Knee Implant?

What are the Risks of the DePuy Attune Synthes Attune Knee Implant?

Has There Been a DePuy Attune Recall?

Arthrex Knee Replacement Recall

Exactech Knee Implant Failure

Is There DePuy Attune Class Action?

Have There Been DePuy Attune Settlements?

DePuy Attune Lawsuit News

How a DePuy Attune Lawsuit Attorney Can Help

The Time to Pursue a Claim is Limited. Contact Us Today.

A DePuy Attune lawsuit may be an option for patients who have experienced early failure of their ATTUNE Primary Total Knee System. Reports indicate that the Attune knee implant, as well as knee implants manufactured by device makers Arthrex and Exactech, may cause patients to undergo revision surgeries and experience pain and other losses. Affected patients may be eligible to seek compensation with the help of a medical device attorney.

If you have question about your DePuy Attune knee replacement or a DePuy Attune lawsuit, contact the Attorney Group today. We provide free, confidential, no-obligation consultations, and if you have a case, we can connect you with an affiliated DePuy Attune lawsuit attorney who can assist you throughout the legal process.

The time you have to pursue a claim is limited.

Contact UsCall for a Free Case Review

Have You Seen a DePuy Attune Lawsuit Commercial?

You may have seen a DePuy Attune lawsuit commercial or a commercial about lawsuits involving another knee replacement system. Numerous knee replacement lawsuits have been filed in recent years, alleging injuries to patients. The purpose of this article is to provide you with information about the issues to help you determine whether you might be eligible to file a DePuy Attune lawsuit.

What is the DePuy Attune Knee Implant?

The DePuy Synthes ATTUNE Primary Total Knee System is intended for cemented use as a total knee replacement system, for use in patients with a severely painful and/or severely disabled knee joint resulting from:

Osteoarthritis

Post-traumatic arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis, or

A failed previous implant

According to the manufacturer, the device was designed with the goal of addressing the clinical needs of patients who require a knee replacement procedure, incorporating extensive research and science in the design to help improve functional outcomes for patients. DePuy Synthes claims that the ATTUNE Knee is an innovative, comprehensive, integrated knee system. The company also claims it is one of the largest research and development projects in the history of DePuy Synthes Joint Reconstruction combining “the latest in design, kinematics, engineering and materials to deliver stability and motion.”

What are the Risks of the DePuy Attune Synthes Attune Knee Implant?

Risks of the ATTUNE Primary Total Knee System based on reports by patients include:

Loosening or instability of the implant

Heat in the knee

Swelling around the replaced knee joint

Joint pain

Nerve damage

Infection

Fracture of the implant components

Fracture of the femur or tibia

Device dislocation

Independent studies report the ATTUNE Primary Total Knee System has experienced failures requiring revision surgeries and documented cases of death.

Has There Been a DePuy Attune Recall?

August 2017

There is not an ATTUNE® Primary Total Knee System recall. However, problems reportedly associated with the ATTUNE® Primary Total Knee System may lead to a DePuy Synthes Attune lawsuit even though no recall has been initiated. A recall of a product is not necessary for claims alleging that a product or medical device is defective and unreasonably dangerous, nor is a recall necessary for patients to recover damages for injuries allegedly caused by a defective medical device.

June 2015

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration did recall one of the instruments of the ATTUNE knee system – the Tibial Articulation Surface Trial which snaps together with the Shim component to function as the Insert Trial during the total knee replacement surgery. A Balseal, a small wire spring coil located on the post feature of the ATTUNE Knee Tibial Articulation Surface Instruments, is attached to each of the two post features on the Articulation Surface to provide a connection force between the Tibial Articulation Surface and Shim to ensure secure engagement between the components.

November 2015

The Attune FDA recall was terminated in November 2015. The FDA recall was issued after it was discovered that the small wire spring coil used in the range of motion testing to assist in tibial location prior to drilling peg holes, could become damaged and detach. This may have allowed the coil to enter the surgical site during the knee replacement surgery and remain in the patient if the surgeon was unaware that it detached.

In April 2017, the National Joint Registry of England, Wales and Northern Ireland reported that between 2012 and 2016 there were 93 deaths and 46 revisions related to the with the ATTUNE knee replacement device.

Other knee replacement devices have been recalled or experienced issues in recent years.

Arthrex Knee Replacement Recall

Arthrex, a Naples, Fla., based medical device company, issued a recall of its Arthrex iBalance TKA Tibial Tray in December 2015. The recall came after patients suffered from complications requiring revision surgeries. Arthrex recalled the product after finding a smooth texture on the outer part of the knee implant. The texture made the iBalance incompatible with previous product models that had a rough texture.

Call to Get Help Today: (888) 888-0612

Exactech Knee Implant Failure

The FDA received reports that the Exactech Optetrak knee replacement components were failing prematurely. A study by Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, showed the performance of the Exactech Optetrak in 110 prostheses in 106 patients 25 months after the knee replacement surgery.

The studies results were poor in a number of patients after receiving the implant. The knee replacement patients who were part of the study reported the following:

• 15% said they were disappointed or dissatisfied • 22% reported pain and the need for painkillers on a regular basis • 22% were beginning to suffer from tibial implant loosening • 21% had signs of patellofemoral conflict • 13 implants needed revision surgery for tibial loosening, patellofemoral instability or patellofemoral pain

The researchers noted that the tibial loosening was taking place at the cement-tibial-implant interface.

Fragmentation and wear of the polyethylene (plastic) insert were among the problems cited by researchers regarding the Exactech Optetrak knee implant.

Is There DePuy Attune Class Action?

There is no DePuy Synthes ATTUNE Primary Total Knee System class action pending as of August 2017. DePuy Attune lawsuit attorneys are doubtful that a class action will be certified for patients who are adversely affected by these knee replacements. Instead, if multiple lawsuits are filed against DePuy alleging injuries and other damages caused by the DePuy Attune, it is anticipated that these lawsuits will be consolidated for discovery and other pretrial proceedings.

When cases are consolidated in this way in federal court it is called a multi-district litigation (MDL), and on a state level it is known as a state court consolidated proceeding. MDLs are distinct from class actions, and it is generally agreed that consolidating cases instead of proceeding in a class action is a more efficient and effective way of handling claims arising from injuries causes by medical devices.

Have There Been DePuy Attune Settlements?

Some cases settle early in the claims process, but it is not expected that there will be early DePuy Attune lawsuit settlements. In most cases that proceed in an MDL or state court consolidated proceedings, after a certain period of time initial trials, also known as bellwether trials, take place. The purpose of these trials is for the parties to get an idea of the types of evidence and arguments that will made, as well as to see how juries will respond to the evidence and arguments. After a certain number of cases have been tried, the parties are in a better position to determine whether a case can be settled.

It is expected that DePuy Attune lawsuit settlements will follow this pattern, although the outcome of any case is never guaranteed and past results are not necessarily predictive of future outcomes.

Call to Get Help Today: (888) 888-0612

DePuy Attune Lawsuit News

March 2011

The DePuy Synthes Total Knee System was approved for marketing under the FDA’s 510(k) approval process.

June 2015

A recall of the Tibial Articulation Surface Trial was initiated, and later terminated in November 2015.

April 2017

The National Joint Registry of England, Wales and Northern Ireland reported that between 2012 and 2016 there were 93 deaths and 46 revisions related to the with the ATTUNE knee replacement device.

How a DePuy Attune Lawsuit Attorney Can Help

Medical device makers have a duty to provide safe products. If there are risks of harm associated with their devices, they also must provide adequate warnings. If a device maker fails to fulfill this duty, it could be held liable in lawsuits for injuries that may result.

People injured by a defective IVC filter may be eligible to recover money for:

Medical Expenses

Lost Wages Pain and Suffering

The families of those killed may be eligible to recover money for funeral expenses and the pain that comes with losing a loved one.

The Time to Pursue a Claim is Limited. Contact Us Today.

If you or a loved one received a DePuy Attune knee replacement, or if you have questions about a possible DePuy Attune lawsuit, contact the Attorney Group for more information. We can answer your questions in a free and confidential consultation, and there is no obligation on your part to speak with us. If you have a case, we can connect you with an affiliated DePuy Attune lawsuit attorney who can assist you through the legal process. State laws limit the time you have to pursue a claim, so contact us today.

New Post https://attorneygroup.com/lawsuits/defective-medical-devices/depuy-attune-lawsuit/

#Array

0 notes