#Preventing cybercrime on Substack

[mehmetyildizmelbourne-blog]

Substack Mastery Book: Chapter 6

This chapter is about How to Configure and Maintain Privacy of Substack Publications with Compelling Reasons

How to Configure and Maintain Privacy of Substack Publications with Compelling Reasons Dear beta readers, Thank you for your invaluable feedback, which is helping refine this book and enhance it as a valuable resource for fellow writers. I’ve covered five critical aspects that have already helped many readers jumpstart their Substack journey. Just yesterday, the discussion on editorial…

[provenprecursor]

Why does Tech ‘take over’ America and Americans?

Originally published on SubStack

The Cynical View. They can. Tech has the hubris, pretension, greed, money, and power to do it.

A Tech-First transformation: centers tech over all: Aristechracy, Ameritecha, Ameritechans.

Tech sees people as inferior: everyone, everywhere, needs AI to do everything for them.

The realist view. Tech expects Absolute Autonomy & Impunity from government, entities & people.

Tech conspires ensuring the USG & Americans cannot control tech in any way going forward.

Tech rejects tech controls by government, entities & people, by controlling them first.

Why it matters. Tech’s values are antithetical to, and subversive of, America’s & Americans’ values.

Thirty years ago, TechNet, Tech’s main lobbying power, framed, formed, funded, and advanced Tech’s value system in capturing all three branches of the USG -- legislative, executive, and judicial -- that solidified tech’s no government, regulation or accountability values and priorities going forward.

Tech-loyalist globalists are Anti-America First: Tech’s takeover did this to make the Internet a commercial marketplace not a communications or information network. This then made Tech hyper-scale globalist because Tech could have the whole world as an addressable market not just America’s market to maximize Tech’s growth and profit.

Around the same time, John Perry Barlow wrote the “Declaration of Independence in Cyberspace” that no government had sovereignty over the Internet. Since then, Tech’s supported the declaration that America has no digital Internet sovereignty, digital borders, or digital international rule of law.

Then The Internet Society long claimed the Internet had ‘no controlling authority, which enabled online to have no deterrences, duties, preventions, protections, governance, or accountability.

Tech has embraced Barlow’s utopian, globalist values.

No American Sovereignty or borders online means nonexistent, undefended borders, and no online national or homeland border security.

De-sovereignization means the Internet takes all comers: terrorists, criminals, predators, fraudsters, bad actors, and harmful products/services sans accountability.

Globalist online open borders have allowed China to steal most of America’s trade secrets and Americans’ private data, and Russia to exact ransomware and cybercrime with impunity.

It only gets worse.

No security. The co-father/designer of the Internet, Vint Cerf, described nonreciprocal, Internet peer to peer, technology like this:

"It's every man for himself … In the end, it seems every machine has to defend itself. The internet was designed that way. … you need to be suspicious whether you're inside the trusted cloud or not, and when it fails, the house of cards tends to collapse."

Next, we will expose unchecked-tech’s innovation trickery. Thank you for your interest and support.