#analytica assignment help | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

allhomeworkassignments · 6 years ago

Text

You Have Clashing Assignments? Get our Black Scholes Theory Assignment Help

Black Scholes Theory is a popular area of study under statistics. It's a unique theory that uses mathematical designs of monetary market of acquired financial investment instruments. This topic is built up by daunting topics such as call choices, probability steps, exotic alternative, and many more. Black Scholes Theory demands critical knowledge for you to crack a single question. That's why many learners find it daunting to work a single problem on their own. To cover up their grades from submitting substandard work, they go for Black Scholes Theory assignment help. However, not every service provider has the required expertise to craft your solutions. To evade losing your time and money allhomeworkassignments.com is a recommendable site to go with. Our services are well-established to meet your expectations with no hesitation. Get our Black Scholes Theory Project Help for better exposure than ever before.

You might be wondering how allhomeworkassignments.com is the best solution for online Black Scholes Theory help. Well, availing our services is the best favor you can do to your grades. Here we only offer first-class facilities that are impressive and satisfying. Our prices are affordable you don’t have to blink twice. Our help with black Scholes assignment is associated with unexplored features. Read on to discover them.

· We have outsourced more than 1200+ Ph.D. statisticians. One biggest asset we have in our platform is a pool of qualified writers. They are active and creative to give you an impeccable calculus project help.

· Competitive market rates. This semester we have unbeatable deals. Our quotes are cheaper than our rivals. However, that does not mean our services are of low quality. Send us a request now 'do my Black Scholes Theory homework' and receive the best discounts ever.

· Quality solutions. Quality is our principal goal while composing your solutions. Our academicians are proficient and efficient to give you great answers. Your quality worries are covered now!

· 100% confidentiality. Privacy is a strict policy which we adhere to once you become our client. With us, you can rest assured that your data is safe from a breach.

Avail our incredible services today! Semester dates are against you.

#stata assignment help #jmp assignment help #matlab assignment help #statistics assignment help #analytica assignment help #xl stat assignment help #r programming assignment help #eviews assignment help

0 notes

stuhde · 4 years ago

Text

🔥 to do list (burnout edition) 🔥

so from obvious posts, it’s no surpise that i’m experiencing burnout. thanks to everyone for all the wonderful and helpful suggestions about how i can overcome this v. stressful period rn. to start? making a long to-do list of everything i’m behind in and what i need to finish for next week.

database management:

*get started on HW assignment #1

week 4 readings: pages 53-80 of textbook

week 5 readings: pages 165-178 of textbook

week 5 lecture review (notes)

submit hw #1

gis:

*work on lab #5 (finish on sunday)

review week 2 lecture (notes)

week 3 readings: chapter 2.2

review week 3 lecture (notes)

week 4 readings: chapter 4.2

review week 4 lecture (notes)

review week 5 lecture (notes)

review week 6 lecture (notes)

complete lab #6

review week 7 notes

complete lab 7

cybersecurity (the most behind, but least important):

week 2 readings: cybersecurity basics

review week 2 lecutre (notes)

week 3 readings: NIST framework

review week 3 lecture (notes)

week 4 readings: NIST privacy research stategy

review 4 lecture (notes)

week 5 readings: cambridge analytica case

review week 5 lecture (notes)

*week 6 readings: professor did not respond to email

complete HW #2

business intelligence (most important):

*week 4 readings: capital one bank case

*review week 4 lectutre (notes)

*email professor week 4 reflection (one page)

*week 5 readings: data quality

*review week 5 lecture (notes)

*take week 5 quiz

*week 6 readings: textbook chapter 5-8 (need to order still!)

*week 6 videos: how to spot a misleading graph

complete assignment #1

other:

*apply to one job (tonight)

*draft bp article (tonight)

send me good vibes, viritual hugs, magic, ANYTHING to conquer this list. take care, have a great weekend, and see you all soon!

*****

🔥 week update 🔥

feel like i’ve done nothing and yet... more things to add to the list

database management

complete homework #1 (Wednesday)

other

BP article on campus updates (tonight)

work on commencement speech (tonight)

BP article on Texas (Friday)

#to do list #don't reblog #long post

43 notes · View notes

modern-design-master · 4 years ago

Link

Do you feel that even after correcting some math questions? - Join our community StatAnalytica - Statistics & Analytics Assignment Help For more memes like this one. Click on below link for more details about statistics. #stats #stat #analytica #statanalytica #analytics #memes #dankmemes #dankmemesdaily #statisticsassignmenthelp #statisticsarefun #statisticsguru #statisticseducation #mathstudent #homeworkmemes #assignmentmemes #memeoftheday #memesdaily #statisticsexperts #fun #comedy

#Do you feel that even after correcting some math questions? - Join our community StatAnalytica - Statistics & Analytics Assignment Help For

0 notes

glittergummicandypeach · 4 years ago

Text

New Doc, ‘People You May Know,’ Reveals a War on Democracy Being Waged With Big Data | Religion Dispatches

As a journalist taking assignments in war-torn areas, London-based American expat Charles Kriel developed an interest in big data and its use in disinformation campaigns. This eventually led to his appointment as special advisor on fake news to the House of Commons’ DCMS (Digital, Culture, Media, Sport) select committee as it investigated the roles Cambridge Analytica, Facebook, and Russia played in influencing the Brexit referendum.

Disappointment with Britain’s lack of political will to pursue needed regulation of tech companies, Kriel and film director Katharina Gellein Viken, determined to bring what they’d learned about big data manipulation, microtargeting, and tech companies’ undermining of civil society to the broader public.

The result is the new documentary People You May Know (go to trailer), starring Kriel and directed by Viken, which spotlights the role played by churches, many of which use big data for microtargeted outreach, in the information manipulation ecosystem that continues to erode democracy in the US, the UK, and elsewhere. Distributed in the United States by Sundance and available on Prime Video, this must-watch documentary couldn’t be more timely for an election cycle marred by turbulence, uncertainty about such fundamental matters as peaceful transfer of power, and a right-wing Christian power grab.

On October 13, Charles and Katharina sat down (over Zoom) with RD’s Chrissy Stroop for an interview about their creative process, their film’s reception, and the serious threat that big data manipulation represents to democracy.

This interview, which will be presented in two parts, has been edited for length and clarity.

Part 1

CS: So, your film covers a complicated topic with a lot of moving parts that can be tricky to follow. What would be your thirty-second elevator pitch summary of what you want viewers to walk away from People You May Know with?

CK: What’s important to understand is that the Koch brothers commissioned a religious charity, Cofi, and a religious software company, Gloo, to work with Cambridge Analytica to create a platform where churches could specifically target people who are suffering from mental illness or grief in order to recruit them into the churches, and then to weaponize them for the politics of the far Right.

CS: So tell me more about how you came to produce this specific film with this specific focus.

KGV: Well, so, Charles and I are quite recent partners, but we’ve known each other about ten years. And I knew that Charles had done work for civil society and as a journalist in war zones and that kind of thing, and he told me early on that he was interested in Cambridge Analytica, and I watched him do a couple of talks on the subject. And then he wrote a paper for NATO about the potential influence of the Brexit referendum by Cambridge Analytica.

He was then called to the DCMS select committee in the UK, who had been the first to form a committee to really look at the social media companies and what they were doing, and this was back when everyone was at the level of, well isn’t Facebook a nice thing that connects people? And then Charles came into the room and said they should be broken up under antitrust laws, and have you heard about Cambridge Analytica and five-factor personality profiling? Everybody’s jaw dropped, and they invited him to be special advisor the next day. And I said that we have to document this journey and this process.

I’d done a celebrity piece before, and I think initially I just wanted to do something serious; I wanted to look into fake news. And then Carole Cadwalladr’s story [co-written by Emma Graham-Harrison] with whistleblower Chris Wylie broke and the headlines just rolled across the world. I followed the committee for a year. They went to America, the first committee to ever do so, to interview Google, Twitter, Facebook. And as these tech companies lied, and they lied some more, it became a very interesting story. Then it turned out that there was very little will in the UK to pursue any of the regulation that the committee recommended for microtargeting and those issues.

So we kind of wondered, what’s the conclusion of this film? Where does it go? Because Charles had placed himself at the middle of this story, people kept coming to him with evidence. One of them, Brent Allpress, who you’ve seen in the film, just said, listen, I’ve got this connection between Cambridge Analytica and church. When we looked into it, we said, well, we’ve just had a baby, but we have to go on the road and look into this story. So we put our three-month-old baby in the back of a car and drove across America. That’s how it all came about.

CS: What a remarkable story! Charles, what is the origin of your interest in big data and personality profiling?

CK: So, probably about eight or nine years ago, someone asked me if I would go into a conflict zone and work with independent local journalists, and help them try to get digital. In post-Soviet oligarchic, authoritarian states, getting digital was one of the best ways that these journalists could get their message out. So, this offer came up, I was very excited about it, and that’s how I found myself in Nargorno-Karabakh.

I loved doing that work, and I did more and more of that work, in worse and worse places. I’ve worked everywhere from Mongolia and Tajikistan to Iraqi Kurdistan. In situations like that, you find yourself doing lots of work that was almost like counter-radicalization; it was definitely counter-disinformation. That’s what you’re helping the journalists with. So I became really informed on that kind of work, and every dark alley that I went down in these war zones or frozen conflict zones, I would find Twitter, Google, and Facebook.

You’ve signed yourself in [to the church’s app], you’ve signed in your children, you’ve shared your vulnerabilities…but it’s not just mental health, it’s vulnerabilities in general.

CS: Which is fascinating. Troll farms became a big topic in 2016. Were you picking up on anything like that, the organized use of trolls, before 2016?

CK: I was picking up on the methodologies already in place; they just hadn’t been scaled in the way that troll farms scaled things. The methodologies of disinformation and radicalization, and now election manipulation, are all incredibly similar. The difference is to what scale you operate. When the troll farms really kicked in, that was around the time of the annexation of Crimea [in March of 2014].

With social media, what you’re able to do, and what Cambridge Analytica has done, is they do data harvesting, and from those data harvests, they’re able to develop really detailed profiles of individuals, and then they can microtarget those individuals. They can do so to scale. So it’s not just, I need to find somebody in a community who’s vulnerable, and I’m going to target them specifically, and try to flip them and then they’ll be able to influence their friends and so on.

It’s all of that, but I’m going to do a million of them. The power of that is incredible. And then when you dig into what we focus on in the film, that Cambridge Analytica and Gloo were using church networks to identify people who were mentally ill and target them, it’s a really evil system.

CS: So let’s talk more about how churches use microtargeting and the findings you explore in People You May Know.

KGV: When I approached people about this initially in the churches, I talked about the modern outreach programs, and how churches are growing digitally in general. And it’s interesting, because churches have traditionally been slow on the uptake with social media and getting digital. Of course, outreach and evangelism is part of the church’s DNA, and that’s fine. And so you start to use social media for that, you’ve got live broadcasts on Facebook, and it gets started kind of slowly at first.

But then, what we found that really scared me is that a lot of smaller churches have adopted a complete digital interface. And this has happened so fast, because you want sign-in, you want to protect people’s kids, and you want to be able to track people and donations and all these things. And the churches themselves very often tell me, oh no, we don’t do that, we hire this software company, they’re very nice, and they do all of our stuff.

CS: So they’re buying that system from companies like Gloo, is that right?

KGV: Yeah, and there’s plenty of them. There’s Church Community Builder—there’s a lot of them that we ran into. And even if the church itself goes, well our privacy policy is of course we don’t share any data with anybody, the software company doesn’t protect the data at all, or they might be very bad at it. So if you go into the app—and they very often will have downloadable apps—you might find that your data is free to share with anybody. And of course you’ve signed yourself in, you’ve signed in your children, you’ve shared your vulnerabilities. Charles mentioned mental health, but it’s not just mental health, it’s vulnerabilities in general.

After all, as a European, it’s interesting to watch how churches in the States, they fill every need. You have preschool, you have a couple’s night, you have childcare, you have all this stuff that’s free and really hard to say ‘no’ to.

CS: Sure. I like the way you emphasized that in the film, because I think it’s a really important American reality that many Europeans probably don’t grasp. Just, the extent to which it’s difficult to get yourself plugged into a socially supportive community, which you need all the more because we hardly have a social safety net in America for those who aren’t religious.

KGV: Absolutely. Down here in Alabama, church daycare is the thing to do.

CS: And of course there’s also Vacation Bible School every summer. From where I sit now, as a kid who grew up in right-wing culture-warring churches, I do consider the evangelism aspect of these programs predatory. But I also see that there aren’t a lot of alternatives for most people.

CK: You can see that this happens in other functions of life too. Joining a church in a new town is the way to get quickly integrated into the community. It’s comparable to the role of the village pub in the UK. There’s a story that just broke in the past week. We have a track-and-trace system—it’s not working very well, but a track-and-trace system in Britain for COVID. And you go into a pub, and you have to download an app. You put your details in.

And that’s fine, but the pub didn’t build the app, a third party built the app. And we’re now hearing people say that pubs and restaurants have been selling this data to data brokers. But I’ll bet you it’s not the pubs and restaurants selling the data. What the pub and restaurant owners are doing is scrambling for a quick solution, thinking, we’re not coders. What the hell do we do? So they find an app, and they download the app, made by a company similar to Gloo, and they’re just harvesting data.

KGV: And it’s easy, and also in terms of churches of course, social media is cheap. Traditional outreach might have been much more time-consuming and expensive, whereas now using data you can easily find people who might be open to an invitation.

Look for Part 2 tomorrow, in which Kriel and Viken will discuss issues related to the coming election, including the Council for National Policy, a secretive conservative Christian organization leveraging these powerful tools to change the country. — eds

PYMK Trailer:

This content was originally published here.

0 notes

dylan-stableford-blog · 7 years ago

Text

Zuckerberg says Facebook staffers have been interviewed by Mueller’s team

yahoo

Facebook founder and chief executive Mark Zuckerberg told lawmakers on Capitol Hill on Tuesday that staffers at the social media giant have been interviewed by members of Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller’s office investigating Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

When asked by Sen. Patrick Leahy whether anyone at Facebook had been interviewed by Mueller’s team, Zuckerberg said, “Yes,” adding: “I have not.”

“I want to be careful here because our work with the special counsel is confidential,” Zuckerberg said. “And I want to make sure that in an open session I’m not revealing something that is confidential.”

The 33-year-old initially said the company had been served subpoenas by Mueller’s office before clarifying that he was not aware of whether it had been subpoenaed or was voluntarily cooperating with the probe.

“I actually am not aware of a subpoena — I believe that there may be,” Zuckerberg said. “But I know we are working with them.”

Earlier this year, Mueller’s charged 13 Russian individuals and three Russian companies with interfering in the U.S. election process in a broad plot that involved the proliferation of so-called fake news and disinformation on Facebook and other social media platforms.

In January, Wired magazine reported that Mueller’s office interviewed at least one Facebook employee who was assigned to Trump’s presidential campaign to help shape his ad messaging on the platform.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg takes his seat to testify before a joint hearing of the Senate Judiciary and Commerce Committees on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

Zuckerberg’s appearance before members of the Senate Judiciary & Commerce Committees comes in the wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal that left personal information from up to 87 million users exposed. Cambridge Analytica, a data mining firm used by Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, was able to access user data on Facebook through a third-party quiz app.

A whistleblower, Christopher Wylie, said the company used the information to build psychological profiles in order to target voters with political ads on Facebook.

In written testimony released Monday, Zuckerberg apologized for the Cambridge Analytica breach and a host of other issues related to election interference.

“It’s clear now that we didn’t do enough to prevent these tools from being used for harm as well,” Zuckerberg wrote. “That goes for fake news, foreign interference in elections, and hate speech, as well as developers and data privacy. We didn’t take a broad enough view of our responsibility, and that was a big mistake. It was my mistake, and I’m sorry. I started Facebook, I run it, and I’m responsible for what happens here.”

Read more from Yahoo News:

Trump rages after FBI raids his lawyer’s office

‘It would be suicide’ to fire Mueller, GOP senator warns Trump

Mueller probe outgrows its ‘witch hunt’ phase

Trump says ‘DACA is dead’ in post-Easter tweetstorm

Trump resurrects conspiracy theory that millions vote illegally

#_uuid:17657d43-d95b-3a2c-9b7d-dd036478bb4c #mark zuckerberg #russia #_author:Dylan Stableford #_revsp:Yahoo! News #senate #testimony #facebook #robert mueller #_lmsid:a077000000CFoGyAAL #capitol hill

1 note · View note

khalilhumam · 5 years ago

Text

Social media in Latin America: Caught between a rock and a hard place

New Post has been published on http://khalilhumam.com/social-media-in-latin-america-caught-between-a-rock-and-a-hard-place/

Social media in Latin America: Caught between a rock and a hard place

Latin America has a long history of State censorship

Protesters at Plaza Baquedano, in the Chilean capital Santiago, on November 8, 2019. Credit: Wikimedia user B1mbo (CC BY-SA 4.0)

This article was written by Agustina Del Campo, Director at the Center for Studies on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information (CELE) at Universidad de Palermo, Buenos Aires, and a professor of internet and human rights and international human rights law. In January 2020, following informal reports of issues with protest-related content on social media, three Chilean organizations, Fundacion Datos Protegidos, the University of Chile and the Observatorio del Derecho a la Comunicación carried out a study investigating social media censorship between October 18 and November 22, 2019. The study documented 283 censorship incidents where protest-related content was deleted or blocked on social media. In some cases, users active in the country’s protest movement had their accounts closed or suspended, with no timely recourse available. According to the authors, as well as other civil society organizations tracking the phenomenon, automation, lack of context, and lack of clarity as to the platforms’ rules were among the main stated causes. Understanding what the Latin American content rules are and how they are enforced is a constant challenge. Although companies claim to have adopted global policies, approaches differ from country to country and from region to region. The last couple of months have been very telling about these practices, for example, in the different treatment that misleading content received among major platforms. For example, while in March, Twitter deleted misleading tweets about COVID-19 cures posted by Brazilian President Jair Brazilian President, Jair Bolsonaro, they appear to have been more tolerant of similar tweets from US President Donald Trump. Likewise, in dealing with misleading tweets from Trump on election fraud, they kept them up, but assigned them a false claim warning. In 2017, the Center for Studies on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information (CELE) conducted its own research into measures by Facebook, YouTube and Twitter to combat fake news and disinformation. Our intention was to track disinformation related announcements that companies had made globally, particularly in the aftermath of well-known events like the Brexit vote, the Cambridge Analytica scandal and the Colombian referendum, and contrast measures announced and implemented in light of these events with what had been implemented in Latin America. We found that policies were being announced, in some cases on a daily basis, and that new tools, policies and programs often overlapped or contradicted one another, making it difficult to assess what was actually being done and where. Disaggregated information about local implementation was difficult to find, and procedures or policies were not always translated into local languages, making it difficult for users to understand how their content was being assessed and what remedies might be available to them. Sometimes initiatives were deployed to different countries in the world with varying levels of resources behind them, leading to disparities in enforcement. As researchers, it is very difficult to know how, or even if, high profile global announcements are actually impacting users in Latin America. CELE is finalizing a new study to update its 2017 research on platform responses to disinformation and of the 61 most relevant actions identified and analyzed in the document—in at least 28 of them, researchers could not verify their implementation in Latin America. This all speaks to a broader challenge around transparency, accountability, and access to information regarding the operations of the biggest internet platforms. Although we recognize that efforts have been made to improve transparency reporting over the past couple of years, it is still difficult to find disaggregated data for our region. This includes even basic information about what policies are being applied where, as well as data about the regional and local impacts of content moderation, and how the local context differs from the global picture. Facebook and Twitter, for example, have recently started providing more information about their content moderation practices but it’s still not geographically disaggregated. This severely undermines state and non-state actors’ ability to assess the social implications of private content moderation locally. Together, the lack of understanding of how content moderation is carried out in Latin America, along with failures to account for local context, has led to increasing calls for regulation against major platforms, coming from both governments and civil society. While intentions may be well placed, governments in this region are less concerned with the narrowing space for freedom of expression than on developing new restrictions on speech, owing to their perception that the online space remains under-regulated. The propagation of laws or legal proposals from Europe and the United States which are similarly hostile to freedom of expression certainly does not help, nor do campaigns by many of the world’s oldest democracies, including in Europe and the UK, to pressure platforms into using their terms of service more aggressively to attack harmful but legal content. Although well intended, these initiatives promote vague and overbroad restrictions to freedom of expression in online platforms. Indeed, in the context of a region with a long history of State censorship, these proposals can provide political cover for governments to take a similarly aggressive approach to cracking down on online speech. Latin American internet users, particularly those involved in advocacy or social movements, are caught between a rock and a hard place. In this context, the need for Latin American civil society and activists to raise their voices in global debates vis-á-vis content moderation practices and free speech appears more necessary than ever.

This article was developed as part of a series of papers by the Wikimedia/Yale Law School Initiative on Intermediaries and Information to capture perspectives on the global impacts of online platforms’ content moderation decisions. You can read all of the articles in the series on their blog, or on their Twitter feed @YaleISP_WIII.

Written by Guest Contributor

0 notes

qualityhomeworkanswers · 5 years ago

Text

Computer Science homework help

Question 1:

Do a bit of research on CWE, Common Weakness Enumeration.

Write a brief overview of their scoring system.

Pick one of common weaknesses identified on their site and describe it.

Your assignment should be 200-300 of your own words.

Question 2:

Read this article (https://www.wired.com/story/cambridge-analytica-facebook-privacy-awakening/) about Cambridge Analytica in Wired Magazine.…

View On WordPress

0 notes

uwamanda-blog · 5 years ago

Text

Unit 12: Personality on the Internet

Assignment 1:

I have never been one to believe in personality tests. The new uprising of interest in the enneagram is concerning to me because I think that it gives people an excuse to not change or treat people better. In the opposite, people take it too literally and don’t like what they got and suddenly think poorly of themselves. In either case, it is not beneficial.

Where I see room for benefit in a personality test would be in understanding what you got and how you can use that information to better yourself as well as treat others better. If you find out you are truly an introvert, you can take this information and apply it to your life to increase your productivity by giving yourself some alone time. You also could find out that you are an extrovert and realize that being with people isn’t just fun for you, but is a necessity.

Personality tests are great, when used appropriately and covered by sound science. This is why I like the Big Five Personality Traits. According to Koreth-Baker, these tests are backed by real science and bring together information on the five big clusters or focuses of a personality. I think going this route is important because it doesn’t tell you, “you are group x and here is why.” Instead, it describes whether you are considered low or high in a trait compared to the large sample that has already taken the test. It doesn’t put you into a box and tell you who you are, but it explains to you some of your tendencies.

I also believe there is no right answer in any one of these traits. Being high on any one of these says you are “above average” but what does that really mean? Is that a good thing or a bad thing? I think to some degree that is up to you, and that is the beauty of this test. There is no right answer, but you decide what you want to be and you aren’t put into a box.

Assignment 2:

In assignment 2 we had the chance to learn about the proportion of variance. This helps us to understand how likely it is that one variable will help to predict the next through the difference of scores. These scores helped us to pull apart what really happened with Cambridge Analytica.

After some realization that the possibility of determining someone's beliefs and actions based on the personality traits isn’t super common, it is hard to believe that they were able to do that to influence a political race.

All this is to say, I think the Big Five Personality Traits are a good thing to use and determine what your personality is like in comparison to others, however, that doesn’t mean it is supposed to be great and predicting other future outcomes. That being said, it probably can't be used to change what you believe either. It is a good measure, but not for what Cambridge Analytica was claiming.

Assignment 3:

It is interesting to compare the personality traits results that others received compared to your own. I found it specifically interesting that most everyone agreed with their results. That got me wondering if this is a result of people responding how they think they are rather than how they really are.

I also found it interesting that many individuals thought of it being a positive to be low on neuroticism. I think a newer identification of mental health makes us consider the positive side of low neuroticism. Overall, I think by reading other people’s results, it was clear that there are a variety of ways to form a personality and no way is the perfect way. There are benefits and drawbacks to all results.

Assignment 4:

Today we discovered information about selfies. Though I have always considered this to be a topic which was new to this generation, Professor Gernsbacher’s lecture video showed our class that this is not the case and selfies have been taken for as long as cameras can be held.

These new facts about cameras, specifically selfies, were surprising to me because so often we are known as the “selfie generation” and no one talks about self portraits before this time. This to me was just another example of how we don’t really change as people. In the same way that we were fearful of writing and books we are now fearful of the Internet. Though taking pictures doesn’t change too much, it is done differently which makes older generations leary and unsure of it.

Later in this assignment, we discuss the topic of “Who gets the copyrights to a monkey’s selfies?” This really took me by surprise because why would a monkey want the copyrights and if it is about money, who is going to get that money? Monkeys don’t understand money so how would it benefit them. All of this came down to PETA wanting the profits of the monkey’s selfies to go back to the monkey and their habitat. Though this argument seems somewhat logical to me, I think that in the end, even though the monkey took the photo which resulted in the uproar, the camera was still owned by Slater which, I think, gives him the rights. Ultimately, this was what resulted and we got the best of both worlds because Slater agreed that he would give a portion of the proceeds back to the monkey through habitat conservation.

Assignment 5:

Humblebragging isn’t a term that I knew all too well. However, I did know the action of humblebragging. It is definitely something I have noticed and have not been overly impressed with. This reaction seems to be pretty on point with what data suggests.

I found it interesting that it was better to just brag than to humblebrag when the goal of humblebragging was to sound better. I think this gives a good perspective on just being honest. People will respect that much more than they will any other way of interacting with individuals.

I think this gave us good information to try to reduce humblebragging amongst those closest to us. If they know their actions will not be effective, maybe it will be helpful for them and reduce their humblebragging frequency.

Weekly Summary:

Understanding your personality can contribute to your understanding of your actions on the Internet. People with different personalities will interpret, interact, and believe different things from the Internet. However, personality isn’t a great indicator to predict what we will do in the future. It can be another step in understanding, but isn’t failsafe in explaining.

*Image from https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-personality-2795416

0 notes

allhomeworkassignments · 5 years ago

Photo

If you need Help with Analytica Homework, at All Homework Assignments are always ready to assist you. We believe in excellent learning and maintain accuracy while solving the Analytica homework.

#assignmenthelp #homeworkhelp #onlinehelp #expertsonline #analyticahelp #analyticaexperts

0 notes

universal-translation-services · 6 years ago

Text

Digital Signing and Digital Stamp

Each new digital device turns out to be better than the previous ones. When it comes to the digital world and what it can do for us, the wonders haven’t stopped. A new milestone is crossed with a new invention and life keeps becoming easier for everyone. But modern technology is as remarkable as scary the modern crimes are. People discover new ways to do evil things. In today’s age, nothing is more valuable than information. The Cambridge Analytica scandal is still fresh in everyone’s mind when targeted ads changed people’s opinion about election candidates. Who can say our data is secure even after Cambridge Analytica was shut down? Computers and the internet not only make it easier for us to connect with each other but also give criminals a better chance of stealing our information. All of us are so quick to give apps permission and in a world where everyone is using a new application, it is hard to stay away. So, when our data gets stolen and used to manipulate us, who can we blame really? A lot of people have tried to warn the public about the information they casually share online and how it can be used against all of us. Even the documents we received via email can be fake and trick us into thinking they are the real deal. A lot of businesses suffer from damages every year due to fake information. Identity theft is also a huge problem for both individuals and companies. You can receive messages from anyone claiming to be one of your business partners and you will have no quick way of confirming it. If it is one of your business partners, they will get offended at you doubting their message and delaying their request, and if it is not them and you act on your request, it will be a problem for your company. The best solution of this problem is digital signature.

The Importance of Digital Signature:

Gone are the days when we used to waste paper for storing records and fill up rooms with boxes full of files. Nowadays, all the information is stored in computers but the problem with that is the lack of signatures, without which a document has no official value. Some companies print the document, sign it, and then scan it to make them official. But that process only wastes more paper and ink and can be easily used for fraud. This is why digital signature is a lot better option. Not only it saves time and money but also ensures extra safety of personal documents. Digital signature has changed the way companies handle information and important documents. Papers can be signed easily by people without having to worry about fraud. But there are different types of digital signing process and not all of them are equally beneficial. The more information a system requires for a digital signature, the more reliable it will turn out to be.

Digital Signing and Digital Stamp:

If you only ask for a signature from a signer, it can be easily forged by anyone. You will have no way to confirm the validity of the signature. You would be compelled to think it is the real thing. But it can very easily be fake. This is why a better digital signing and time stamp process was required. With the help of a new app, digital signing has become a lot more than a signature. There is a lot of things that a document will require before it can be considered signed by the signer. The digital stamp will list the exact time the document was signed. All of these steps will help ensure the authenticity of the signing and eliminate the chances of forgery.

Certificate of Evidence:

A simple digital signature may not make a document legal, but a multiple signature method will. It is important for businesses that their documents have a legal status. If a signature cannot hold in the court, it will only cause problems for the business and not the signer. This is why it is important for companies to ensure that the process of signing they have chosen will be acceptable in a court. A certificate of evidence is what assigns a legal status to a document. But what exactly is a certificate of evidence? It includes all the authentications you and the signer had agreed upon and their digital signature. The authentications often include a picture of the signer’s driver license, their selfie, their signature and their GPS coordinates. When you have received all the information from them, it will show up on the certificate of evidence. The certificate will make the document they signed legal, which means it can be presented in a court with full confidence in its authenticity. Things can easily get complicated for businesses over small issues. Having fake signatures from someone can easily mess things up, not to mention the consequences of actions taken on the basis of such documents. Which is why it is wise to stick to the safest method of digital signing and digital stamp. The certificate of evidence makes thing very easy for both the signer and the businesses. The modern criminals may be getting better at their job, but our efforts to keep them away from personal information are also improving. With the help of modern technology, we can keep improving our security and eliminate all chances of fraud. Read the full article

#digital_signature #Certificate_of_Evidence #Digital_Signing #Digital_Stamp #importance_of_digital_signature

0 notes

ultrastarrysky-blog · 6 years ago

Text

Facebook Marketing for Small Business

By then you've likely heard you should be on Facebook. It's the best fulfilling structure on earth, with 2.27 billion amazing clients, all around that really matters 1.5 billion of whom are dynamic dependably.

From an unassuming startup with Ivy League intelligently vigorous understudies offer photographs, it's ideal before long changed into a central player in endeavors like media, publicizing, and improvement.

Beginning late, over the long haul, Facebook has been gotten in various humiliations.

From Cambridge Analytica, to record hacking, to Russian impedance, and that is just the begin—is Facebook still worth contributing time and significance? Or of course unmistakably are its days numbered?

The appropriate response is that paying little regard to the incapacitate, see exhibits Facebook's clients don't appear to have changed their lead.

Regardless of all that you'll locate your best publicizing open territories on the world's most enormous obliging structure, and that won't change at whatever point inside the not very hard to achieve future. Contributing essentialness learning Facebook publicizing merits the undertaking.

https://www.fiverr.com/users/lisaguestposter/

In this guide, I'll reveal to you the stray bits of the best way to deal with oversee direct use Facebook to help your potential immaculate position. The guide is away for the understudy who needs a prelude to moving their business on the world's most prominent great affiliation.

Is your social gathering of spectators on Facebook?

Before we go into referenced structures on the best way to deal with deal with the part on Facebook, we should respond to the central referencing—is your gathering even on Facebook?

The fitting response is the best wagered.

The latest information by Pew Research Center demonstrates that each age utilizes at any rate one social union site, with reliably vivacious clients with higher rates.

Also, the two people use online life in about essentially vague numbers.

Also, concerning which structure individuals use, Facebook heading the quick audit. In January 2018, 68% of Americans utilized Facebook, with Instagram in cut off second spot with 35%.

(YouTube was mixed radiant for 2018 with 73% of Americans utilizing it, at any rate, was any sort of client, not simply individuals.)

https://www.fiverr.com/s2/86a5017be9

In like manner, paying little notice to what age get-together you're focusing, there will be everything that can be anticipated from those clients on Facebook.

Here's the course by which to get things set up and begin advancing through Facebook.

Market with Facebook Pages

The first and most clear Facebook pushing instrument for brands is Facebook Pages. Like an individual profile, a Page is the center motivation driving data for your image, be it an affiliation, thing, affiliation, or broadly expert or virtuoso.

Clients can "Like" a page and "Mission for after" it, which means they'll consistently get invigorates from that page in their news source.

Regardless, so as to see the posts each time they are united, you have to tap the choice to view posts first. A choice that is other than what's ordinary, it's possible you won't see the updates in light of the way where that Facebook needs Pages to lift posts (pay) for diligently discernible obvious quality and reach.

https://www.fiverr.com/s2/44d908f1ce

So when you get individuals to like your page, it's a sharp plan to suggest they tail you and see your posts first. It'll spare you a titanic extent of cash in the entire strategy on the off chance that you don't need to lift appears on such an extent or consistently.

There are a few key assignments among pages and profiles. To interface with somebody as an individual profile, you'll both need to demand the family relationship demand.

When you have a page, individuals can like and scope for after with no guaranteeing from you.

Another point of confinement is that there are no constraints to the level of individuals that can like your page. In the event that you have an individual record, you can essentially have 5,000 mates. In any case, a page can have thousands or even vast individuals who like it.

The best piece of Pages is that they're free and simple to set up. You can truly gather another Page in the going with 15 minutes and look as star as a Fortune 500 association.

https://www.fiverr.com/s2/81460b8593

(Notwithstanding the path by which that you unquestionably won't have an overall number of affinities without an enormous extent of work.)

The burden is only that—they can be difficult to get off the ground. Regardless, in the event that you're a VIP or huge brands like Coke or BMW, it takes a tremendous measure of work to get more individuals to like your page.

In any case, in the occasion that you're going regardless this, you'll have to set up a star page. Here's the ticket.

The best system to set up the ideal Facebook Page

Horrifyingly, different affiliations don't utilize Facebook Pages to their most historic most remote point. In a general sense all the all the all the all the more disturbing, a few brands use them insufficiently and genuinely hurt their authenticity.

These models will attract you to reduce demonstrating those goofs.

Profile photograph and spread picture

Your profile photograph ought to be your logo. Clear as that.

The spread picture is a substitute story. It's marvelously despondent upon you to pick what to put here. Some usage photographs of specialists, while others utilize exceptional craftsmanship and put their contact data in the spread picture.

M&Ms works sufficiently mixing their logo, characters, and thing into their photographs.

https://www.fiverr.com/s2/fa5538f708

Pick a photograph that will update your page and draw the eye of your guests.

"About" district

The "About" district is obviously set perfect underneath your association logo. This is your opportunity to ask anybody leaving to your page what your business does.

It's short, so don't endeavor to fit everything in. Basically the stray pieces are perfect.

In the full about the space, attempt to mix more subtleties.

Clarify what your association does, for what reason you're stick out, and other interesting substances. On the off chance that you can, set aside the push to make it unequivocally for your Facebook get-together of spectators.

In any case, on the occasion that you're after each and every other decision have been drained, you can basically duplicate the substance from the "About" page of your webpage page or blog. Endeavor to fill in a colossal piece of your information under "Head Info."

The zone works extraordinarily including their features and contact information on their data page.

On the off chance that you have a physical business, you can join a few extra highlights alike locale and hours. This page from the Eighth Generation is a guaranteed model.

All around attempted to keep it all around arranged and satisfying. A splendid tone, all around, works best on Facebook.

https://www.fiverr.com/share/QELPy

Post significant data to your course of events

What you post to your divider will appear in the news wellsprings of everybody who has "Venerated" your page, correspondingly as it does when you present something pulled back profile.

In this way, ensure what you're showing is gigantic on your fans. Make the key advances not to post colossal updates about something in a general sense proportionate to, and don't post again and again, discouraging the news channels of your fans.

Goliath brands like Apple consistently in a general sense post things they comprehend will intrigue their fans, for instance, striking video notice or thing introductions.

Here are a few encounters for the sorts of things you should need to post to your divider:

Relationship with articles identified with your connection or your industry

Relationship with your blog regions

Coupon codes for fans to give signs of advancement than run of the mill diagram on your things

New thing demands

Relationship with online gadgets your fans may discover strong

Once more, ensure that your posts are gainful or hypnotizing. In like way, don't post again and again reliably near if there's a stand-out occasion going on.

Spam is maybe the snappiest approaches to manage regulate direct lose fans. On the off chance that you don't do anything, at any rate, take in principal blurbs about your affiliation, while never including anything of basic worth, by then you will experience guaranteed has a go at getting and keeping fans.

https://www.fiverr.com/share/Yz78z

Before you pass on an update, get two or three information about whether it truly secures the estimation of the trade. In the event that it doesn't, don't send it.

Concentrate your estimations and results

Facebook Insights offers some inconceivable magnificent examination for pages. Focus on them. On the off chance that you see a significant flood in fans (or a drop off), see what you've posted beginning late and check whether you can comprehend an explanation for the model.

By at that point, post a resolutely key degree of that sort of substance (or less, in the occasion that you're losing fans).

Utilizing parties, business center, and occupations

Over the most recent couple of years, Facebook has merged a couple of new highlights for various sorts of pages.

Here's the course by which to utilize them to drive your affiliation or brand.

The best framework to progress with Facebook Groups

Facebook has had packs for a long time, in any case, they beginning late engaged you to make brand-based gatherings related to your page.

Regardless, you'll need a Facebook Page for your image. By then you can make a social affair to go with that page.

This licenses incredibly more course over the party since you can relate your relationship to it.

Facebook parties take after trade talks, in any case with extra highlights that pages and profiles have (like a course of events).

0 notes

localbizlift · 7 years ago

Text

Facebook says it gave ‘identical support’ to Trump and Clinton campaigns

Facebook’s hundreds of pages of follow-ups to Senators make for decidedly uninteresting reading. Give lawyers a couple months and they will always find a way to respond non-substantively to the most penetrating questions. One section may at least help put a few rumors to rest about Facebook’s role in the 2016 Presidential campaigns, though of course much is still left to the imagination.

Senator Kamala Harris (D-CA), whose dogged questioning managed to put Mark Zuckerberg on his back foot during the questioning, had several pages of questions sent over afterwards. Among the many topics was that of the 2016 campaign and reports that Facebook employees were “embedded” in the Trump campaign specifically, as claimed by the person who ran the digital side of that campaign.

This has raised questions as to whether Facebook was offering some kind of premium service to one candidate or another, or whether one candidate got tips on how to juice the algorithm, how to target better, and so on.

Here are the takeaways from the answers, which you can find in full on page 167 of the document at the bottom of this post.

The advice to the campaigns is described as similar to that given to “other, non-political” accounts.

No one was “assigned full-time” on either the Trump or Clinton campaign.

Campaigns did not get to hand pick who from Facebook came to advise them.

Facebook provided “identical support” and tools to both campaigns.

Sales reps are trained to comply with federal election law, and to report “improper activity.”

No such “improper activity” was reported by Facebook employees on either campaign.

Facebook employees did work directly with Cambridge Analytica employees.

No one identified any issues with Cambridge Analytica, its data, or its intended use of that data.

Facebook did not work with Cambridge Analytica or related companies on other campaigns (e.g. Brexit).

It’s not exactly fire, but we don’t really need more fire these days. This at least is on the record and relatively straightforward; whatever Facebook’s sins during the election cycle may have been, it does not appear that preferential treatment of the two major campaigns was among them.

Incidentally, if you’re curious whether Facebook finally answered Sen. Harris’s questions about who made the decision not to inform users of the Cambridge Analytica issue back in 2015, or how that decision was made — no, it didn’t. In fact the silence here is so deafening it almost certainly indicates a direct hit.

Harris asked how and when it came to the decision not to inform users that their data had been misappropriated, who made that decision and why, and lastly when Zuckerberg entered the loop. Facebook’s response does not even come close to answering any of these questions:

When Facebook learned about Kogan’s breach of Facebook’s data use policies in December 2015, it took immediate action. The company retained an outside firm to assist in investigating Kogan’s actions, to demand that Kogan and each party he had shared data with delete the data and any derivatives of the data, and to obtain certifications that they had done so. Because Kogan’s app could no longer collect most categories of data due to changes in Facebook’s platform, the company’s highest priority at that time was ensuring deletion of the data that Kogan may have accessed before these changes took place. With the benefit of hindsight, we wish we had notified people whose information may have been impacted. Facebook has since notified all people potentially impacted with a detailed notice at the top of their newsfeed.

This answer has literally nothing to do with the questions.

It seems likely from the company’s careful and repeated refusal to answer this question that the story is an ugly one — top executives making a decision to keep users in the dark for as long as possible, if I had to guess.

At least with the campaign issues Facebook was more forthcoming, and as a result will put down several lines of speculation. Not so with this evasive maneuver.

Embedded below are Facebook’s answers to the Senate Judiciary Committee, and the other set is here:

View this document on Scribd

#marketing

0 notes

workfromhom · 7 years ago