Tumgik
#are pro-endogenic systems of all CDD statuses. but that isn't entirely relevant to our main point it is only tangential to our main point.
anendoandfriendo · 5 months
Text
3 - 4 in the morning thoughts right now but we wonder how many plural systems out there are saying they're asexual aromantic or similar when they're actually just...collectively sysian*.
Mainly the thought process here is: a lot of the struggles are the same on a surface level, but following the actual reasoning is completely different honestly.
Also, if you're like us and you start out as a much smaller system, it's entirely possible you won't even notice and it ends up functionally the same until your system population basically explodes (assuming it even does) and then someone goes "oh wow, that person is gorgeous actually can I kiss/fuck them??? How does that work in my own head??? Does it even have to be the same physically as an external-world relationship or are there certain processes I can straight up ignore????" and that's when at least a few people figure it out.
And then, like, there is the fact sysian and plurillean are umbrella terms the way achillean, sapphic, and delphinean are umbrella terms, so if you use the split attraction model the way it is supposed to, you could technically also have different sexualities for the inner world and outer world + whatever other orientations you have and be something like sysian lesbian/plurillean heterosexual, sysian gay man/external world ONLY you are demisexual instead (still gay but the modifier is that demi part), and other weird shit that even queers being queer, because we will be honest, plurality makes everything fucking WEIRD even by normie queer standards.
*obligatory disclaimer you can be both, asexuality is a valid sexuality, aromantic is a valid romanticism/romantic attraction and because headmates are separate people you can have, for example, three headmates and all are sysian but one is pansexual demiromamtic and one is asexual alloromantic and one is bisexual heteroromantic. Or smth like that. At minimum our very very last paragraph above should have made this very clear, but, at the same time — this IS the "piss on the poor" website.
7 notes · View notes