Kim getting adopted by team X-Hunter enthusiasts, we are winning
130 notes
·
View notes
Someone on twitter theorized that Rhaenyra is likely headed into fanatical cult leader territory and if the writers successfully pull this off, I swear I will forgive them of all their crimes.
18 notes
·
View notes
louis is number 1 and holivia is over
770 notes
·
View notes
Have this shell I made at work
AAAAOGFHGKFHSJDGSHSHS THAT LOOKS DELICIOUS!!!
OMG RGHRHRFHSHJH GIVE IT HERE!!
21 notes
·
View notes
not gonna lie i loooooove all the different flavors of guilt that gunter would have if he gets romantically/sexually involved with corrin.
off the top of my head you've got a choice of:
* guilt over the obvious age difference and yeah, i'm gonna say it: him raising corrin as a father figure (corrin's line lol). it's not *not* a skeevy look. even if they start their relationship years after the game events (doubtful, with his age). personally love how their S-support indirectly acknowledges this with him dancing around a way of getting her to reject him without either one of them acknowledging that he has feelings for her in the first place. mind games right from the start!!! (fuckin. hilariously backfired on the old man when he realizes corrin's even more thirsty for him.)
* sort of related with the above re: the mentor/mentee power differential guilt at bare minimum. this one kind of lessens as corrin grows into the authority of a royal, but it's pretty obvious she still has a authorital respect towards him in every route. i know for sure he'd have occasional pangs of guilt as to if he's taking advantage of her trust there.
* garon's "father""" connection with corrin. >:)c and just. holy fuck the potent hatred gunter has against garon and it bleeding out on corrin in the bedroom. him wanting to possessively mark corrin-as-garon's-heir as his (-and then him having the understandable horror/guilt over that.)
* (conquest-specific) guilt over not telling corrin about his late wife and all the skeletons that would dredge up. i honestly headcanon that in cq he never mentions his history to corrin just to let sleeping dogs lie and avoid painful questions, but it forever remains a kind of albatross around his neck. that's not even counting widower's guilt on some level - he's human, it happens.
* (revelation-specific) guilt over whether anankos manipulated any affections/lust for corrin just to get closer to her... >:3c (what if hell, he's right?)
* revelation also has loads more with guilt over his possessed actions. and then guilt if they're fucking while he's possessed and he can't tell corrin anything. and and and-
* more generic guilt that a commoner (and punished for being a commoner) knight lusting over his liege/princess, especially if you introduce pregnancy/children/heirs as a factor.
* we're straying into blatantly headcanon territory briefly here but [mumbles something about my sadist/top/kinky thoughts >_>]
* more benign guilt over him being obviously older and dying earlier/being dependent on corrin when he becomes invalid. lots of conflicted feelings about wanting her but realizing it's a selfish want when he's going to break her heart by dying at minimum 20+ years earlier even if you introduce some magical shit.
like dear lord
the guilt with the already potent chemistry i see those two having would be one hell of a cocktail of unresolved sexual tension, and i don't think it goes away even if they do consummate it .....
19 notes
·
View notes
step OUTTA the way uglies! the second smartest comment this season just left someone’s mouth. everyone say thank you jacaerys for coming up with the frey plan! standing on bidness!
10 notes
·
View notes
✨ terfs and zionists eat shit & die ✨
sooo… does anyone remember that cipher that got decoded to be an amalgamation of ‘henry rex’ and ‘katherine’, which the scholar (vanessa braganza) identified as being commissioned by catherine of aragon back in 2022? [source 1, source 2]
well, nicola tallis and the npg exhibitions team (lead by charlotte bolland) have identified a matching piece in kh’s inventory that corresponds with the cipher design in question which specifies it was commissioned by katherine howard:
“However, the possibility cannot be discounted that Katherine commissioned the portraits herself, as she seems to have commissioned at least one work from Holbein to proclaim her status as queen. The inventory of her jewels lists ‘one Partelet or collar containing 16 diamonds 20 rubies/and 45 pearls/all set in Goldsmith's work enamelled having a very small chain of gold upon the edge of the same’; a note in the margin records that ‘ten of the same diamonds set in a cipher by the queen’. This description matches one of Holbein's designs for a cipher containing the words ‘Henricus Rex’ and ‘Katherine’ that also incorporates ten diamonds.”
+
“The design for an oval pendant mounted in the centre of the lower section incorporates a cipher with the names ‘HENRICUS REX’ and ‘KATHERINE’. It may have been commissioned by Katherine, as it corresponds to a description of a ‘collar containing 16 diamonds’ in her inventory, which bears the annotation: ‘10 of the same diamonds set in a cipher by the queen’. If the design does relate to this jewel, it provides evidence of Katherine's patronage of Holbein and also a glimpse of her self-presentation as queen. The cipher was among the jewels that Henry took back into his possession in November 1541”
6 notes
·
View notes