#i had actually just given up but I don’t even follow any cr blogs (sorry cr blogs who follow me this is why. I have a list of you for when | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

5ecardaday · 6 years

Note

I'm new to homebrewing, and I want to know if you have any tips or tricks on how to make monsters, items, magic, classes etc. Any help is appreciated!

Sure, I’d love to help. I’ll go ahead and put all of the advice under a read more though, since it’ll be kind of long and I don’t wanna clog up uninterested dashboards.

For making monsters, the best place to start is absolutely page 274 of the DMG. Contrary to the obvious, I would actually recommend tossing out the rules for determining the CR of your monster based on its attack, damage, etc. They’re long and difficult to use, a full 20 steps, and may leave you feeling locked in to using only the abilities provided in the chart it gives, rather than trying to branch out and design your own. Instead, use the table on pg. 274, meant for quick monster stats- it’s all I’ve ever felt the need to use.

As some people have pointed out, the chart isn’t spot on, but it’s not meant to be, and it’s just close enough. When making a monster, I start with the CR, then try to make sure what I end up with lands near those ranges. If some fall a little bit, or even a lot, above the recommended values, decrease other ones instead. If your monster has a high AC, consider reducing its health a bit, or keep its health high but make it slow, with few attacks and lower damage output. I rarely use the chart anymore, and instead found overtime that I basically internalized the ranges I kept working with.

When designing a magic item or spell, it’s back to the DMG again. If you have an idea for an item, check the abilities it gives against some spells with similar effects, then compare the levels of those spell(s) against the chart on pg. 284, which says what levels of spells match to what rarity of item. It also works in reverse, and if you want an item of a certain rarity, you can determine some basic ideas using the effects of spells that match to that rarity level.

Spells themselves have a “damage per spell level” table on the next page, pg. 285, that I use all the time still to check the range of a damaging or healing spell. Non-damaging spells are just best compared to other spells of levels close to what you want, to see how similar in strength such an effect might be. Beyond that, you just have to consider the balance a given spell might have on any type of campaigns and parties. If you make a spell that acts as a roleplaying tool for finding clues in an investigation, consider how strong the given effect would be in a campaign focused on dungeon-delving adventure, and then how the same spell might work in a noir-themed campaign focused on detective work, and try to strike a balance between the two.

No matter what you’re designing though, consistency in flavor is the key to making it shine. If you make a monster, don’t redesign the wheel. How many times have you seen a large, armor plated hulk who swings with his claws/fists, and has a secondary focus on grappling? How many monsters of that type can you pick from the 5th Edition Monster Manual alone? But take away the grapple-focus, and give it a reaction that let’s it curl into a ball instead, increasing its AC and giving it resistance to damage. Given you’re likely pairing such a creature with a spellcaster anyway, give the caster some basic healing spells, and now you have a unique threat. Or keep the grapple-focus, but lower its armor, and instead give it a reaction to puff spikes from its body. Now when creatures hit it, it can use a reaction to turn the tables, dealing damage to them in turn, but also immediately damaging any creature it might be holding. Your players may think twice about rushing in to use physical attacks, and now they need to think through the challenge the monster presents.

If you make a spell or an item, the same rule applies. You know what item I hate from the 5e DMG? The circlet of blasting. I made the mistake of giving one to a player once for an important personal quest as a reward, and they never used it. Why? Because it’s boring, both mechanically and flavorfully. I later had another quest alter the circlet, breaking it and causing the jewels to fall out. A blacksmith the players helped offered to reforge it, and made it into a pair of glasses with the jewels at the edges- same effect, stats no different, but now they’ve used their “Cyclops eye beams” several times.

Make sure what you design, either a spell or a magic item, feels unique from other items in the game, and that it’s ability is something you’d want to use given the chance. Spells are hard in this way because they have a wide design space when you first look at them, which becomes more narrow as you realize 5e tries to make sure casters can’t do anything and everything- a drastic change from older editions.

This “uniqueness factor” is the single most important part of a class or subclass. If it ends up unbalanced, the people who playtest it or users in places such as r/unearthedarcana will let you know. But only if they look at it first- and they won’t give it so much as a glance if they don’t fall in love with the concept. Because of this, don’t just copy-paste abilities from other (sub)classes, because you’ll wind up with a boring, muddled concept with no clear direction or identity.

If you struggle finding a concept that feels interesting, don’t despair. Take a moment and look at the world around you for inspiration. My (very obvious) go-to is Magic cards- I’ve turned them into a whole concept of their own at this point, with rules I follow, both on a mechanical and flavor level, based on the rules inherent in the design of both 5th Edition and Magic. I’ve also got another blog, @powerattackpublishing, where I’ve made content based on other pop-culture, from video games to books. The real world and all its history can also be a powerful inspiration. My friend @kor-artificer recently made a Highwayman Rogueish Archetype for DM’s Guild, based on the local history of where they live, and it’s full of fantastic flavor. Even other RPG’s can offer great inspiration- games such as Shadowrun and Pathfinder seem like obvious choices, but other less-likely games can be full of hidden gems.

Identifying these concepts and deciding where to take them can be difficult and intimidating at first, but the more you do it again and again, the easier it becomes. My skills as both a writer and a game designer vastly increased when I began reading and studying games other than D&D and look-alikes, and even more so in the 8 months since I started producing content every single day. No matter what, keeep making things, and if you get stuck on a concept, be willing to move on. No matter how much you like the idea- move on. No need to abandon it entirely; just come back later. But once you’ve made something else, or several other things, you might discover some strong ideas to use for the things you moved on from that make them work better.

This turned out to be incredibly long, now that I’m looking at it, sorry for that. If you’ve read all the way through it though, and you’ve found it the slightest bit helpful, then I’m glad for that. Hopefully this gives people some advice on not just where to start, but how to keep going, and even some advice on how to make things that aren’t D&D-related at all. The concept of being unique and fun to play is definitely not restricted to one roleplaying game.

#sierra-fujin #5e card asks #dnd homebrew #homebrewing tips #5e homebrew

88 notes · View notes

marie85marketing · 7 years

Text

Quality Over Quantity: Repurpose Your Best Ideas and Distribute Them Far and Wide

I hate to be the one to break this to you, but …

Your audience does not need your ideas.

Sorry to disappoint you.

It’s true though.

Your audience is exposed to plenty of ideas. Everywhere they turn online and offline, they are bombarded with ideas. Ideas, ideas, ideas. Mostly filler and fluff.

Think about yourself. Do you need any more ideas to consume and consider?

No.

What you need are someone’s best ideas. And what your audience needs — in fact, all that your audience needs — are your best ideas.

The ideas that cut through the crap and clutter to make a difference

The ideas you’ve thought through, spent time with, and sculpted

The ideas that are closer to finished products than initial impressions

And you should invest more time distributing these premium ideas further and wider, in different ways and in different places. You shouldn’t simply hit Publish and then run to the next idea.

This way you can meet more of your current audience members where they are and you increase the likelihood of reaching potential audience members with your best work.

Let me show you an example of how I’m doing this on one of my sites …

It all starts with a blog post

Given my responsibilities here at Rainmaker Digital, and being a new dad, I don’t have a ton of extra capacity for side projects.

So when I do have an idea worth sharing over at The Assembly Call, I want to maximize the impact and distribution of that good idea. I can’t afford to spin my wheels.

In the immortal words of Sweet Brown:

“Ain’t nobody got time for that.”

This is why I’ve shifted my strategy and begun taking one well-thought-out idea and repurposing it into several different types of content, distributed in many different places.

The idea is given birth in a blog post. Why? Because I do my best thinking when I’m writing.

Writing forces me to clarify my thoughts in a way that I’m never able to by simply ruminating, or even talking.

I need to sit down, think, write, edit, think a little more, edit a little more, and chisel the idea from rough stone into something smooth and polished.

A lot of the fluff, filler, clutter, and crap gets removed, and then I feel much more comfortable turning the idea loose in the world.

(This process also makes me more prepared to speak extemporaneously about the topic in the future — a very useful side benefit for a project that involves a podcast and radio show.)

You may be different. You may thrive working it all out in your head. You may find that you clarify your ideas best by talking them out. I urge you to learn what works best for you and follow it.

But for me, it starts with writing. Hence why I began a blogging series titled “3-Point Shot” — where, basically, I take a topic of interest to IU basketball fans and come up with three useful observations about it. Simple. Consistent. Repeatable.

Sometimes I know what the observations will be before I start writing. But usually the process of conducting basic research, and then synthesizing it into three clearly articulated ideas, reveals new insights that are useful to me and, in turn, to my audience.

I write the first draft. Sometimes I rewrite or rearrange parts. Then I edit and proofread. Soon thereafter I hit Publish. The entire process usually takes 60–75 minutes.

Now I have a blog post, usually in the 1,000–1,250 word vicinity, that I can distribute via social media, use to attract search traffic, and send to our email list.

One piece. One format. A few distribution channels.

All done? Hardly. I’m actually just getting started.

The beautiful part of this strategy is that the most difficult and time-intensive part is now done. I developed a high-quality idea — it’s not just something I slapped together in 15 minutes as a cheap traffic grab.

Next, it’s time to leverage this fully-formed idea into a blitzkrieg of distribution.

The blog post becomes a podcast episode (and video!)

Keep in mind as we go through this example that the specific steps and channels that work for me over at The Assembly Call may not necessarily be the steps that you need to take.

That site is built around a podcast, and we’re also trying to grow our YouTube audience. Therefore, getting content out to our podcast audience and publishing more content to our YouTube channel are priorities. That might not be true for you.

But the big idea that I’m describing here — combining the power of quality over quantity with repurposing and smart, widespread distribution — will work for you. Just take the basic principles and apply them to your situation.

The next basic principle for me is this: turn the blog post into a podcast episode … and there just so happens to be a way that I can do that while simultaneously creating a video version too. Score!

When time is of the essence (and when isn’t it?), you have to take any chance you can to work smarter, not harder.

So here’s what I do:

Double-check my microphone cables and settings, and do a test recording. (Always, always, always do a test recording!)

Open up my Assembly Call episode template in GarageBand, so I can record locally.

Create a YouTube Live Event to broadcast the recording live.

Open up the blog post in a web browser, so I have it ready for reference.

Tweet out the link to the YouTube Live Event, so anyone who is interested can watch the live recording. (For what it’s worth, I’ve never had fewer than 16 people watch live online, and occasionally that number is up in the 50s and 60s.)

Hit Record in GarageBand, hit Start Broadcast on the YouTube Live Event, welcome the audience, and start reading the blog post.

From time to time while reading, I’ll interject something extra — the kind of comment that might have been a footnote to the written piece. But for the most part I just read the blog post verbatim, trying to sound as casual and conversational as I can.

I was worried when I first starting doing this that our podcast and YouTube audiences wouldn’t be too enthused about this content since it’s just me (without my co-hosts) and I’m basically just reading something they could get on the blog.

My worries proved to be unfounded. The response has been unequivocally positive.

I’ve received numerous tweets and emails thanking me for finding a way to deliver this written content in the preferred consumption medium for podcast listeners, which make up the majority of our audience. These folks would never get to see or hear the content otherwise.

And it is so easy to do. The entire time investment to record and post the podcast is about 30–35 minutes:

5 minutes to set up

15–20 minutes to record

10 minutes to publish the podcast (the YouTube Live Event is automatically archived on our YouTube channel for on-demand viewing)

Furthermore, while our blog posts only publish in one place — our blog — we are set up to distribute our podcast episodes far and wide, with only a few button clicks required.

Every episode goes to:

iTunes

Google Play

TuneIn Radio

Stitcher

iHeartRadio

Spreaker

SoundCloud

This doesn’t even account for the many individual podcast apps that scrape places like iTunes for podcast feeds. (For example, I use Podcast Addict on my Android device, and The Assembly Call is available there even though I never signed up or submitted it there.)

And here’s a fun, little side benefit …

One of my favorite bonuses about tweeting out links to podcast episodes over blog posts is that people can consume the content right there in their Twitter feed.

Look at this tweet. All someone has to do is hit the play button, and the episode will play right there in the Twitter feed. Less friction, less distance between my audience being intrigued and then actually consuming my content.

Turn one quality blog post into a traffic and attention engine

So if you’re scoring at home, we’ve now gone from one blog post, one distribution channel, and a few traffic sources to:

A blog post

A podcast episode

A video

At least 11 different distribution channels

Countless traffic sources

And here’s the crazy thing … it could be more.

I could:

Repurpose the blog post someplace like Medium, or as a guest post

Create a slide presentation for SlideShare

Find additional video channels besides YouTube

Extract clips of the audio for a service like Clammr

Make clips or GIFs from the video to post in visual channels like Instagram

And on and on.

The main reasons I don’t do those are a) time and b) because I’d get diminishing returns.

I’ve tried to be strategic about investing the limited time and effort resources I have for this project into the channels that will deliver the best and most immediate returns. SlideShare, for example, isn’t going to do much for a sports audience, but it may be a great option for you.

What’s been the impact of all this? It’s only been a month, but already:

I added 400 new email subscribers

We doubled our YouTube subscribers (in just a month!)

Traffic to our blog increased by 31.91 percent

Podcast downloads in just March of 2017 (the majority of which was during the off-season, when attention is usually lower) were nearly equal to the combined total of January and February

What you should do next

Ask yourself if you’re maximizing the distribution of your best ideas.

Not your best blog posts, but your best ideas.

Because if you have an idea that’s a winner, but it’s only distributed via text as a blog post, then you’re missing out on a wide range of additional attraction options.

Can you turn your blog post into an audio recording? Can you then turn that audio recording into a video — even if you just use a fixed image rather than filming yourself (like I do here)?

Or, if you have a great podcast episode, can you go the other way and turn it into a blog post? If you already create transcripts for your podcast episodes, this is incredibly simple to do.

The bottom line is that rather than focusing on the quantity of the content you publish, you should invest more time in creating fewer, higher quality pieces of content … and then find efficient, scalable ways to distribute these high-quality pieces to as many nooks and crannies of the web as you can.

You’ll reach more people with your best ideas in the way they’re most comfortable consuming content.

And there’s no better way to build an audience and authority, brick by brick, than that.

The post Quality Over Quantity: Repurpose Your Best Ideas and Distribute Them Far and Wide appeared first on Copyblogger.

0 notes

hypertagmaster · 7 years