#option B is simply tv executive coded to me

[asdeadasasquirrel]

Twitter organically had a “ de-twink hazbin characters” moment like two weeks ago, a market I’ve already cornered, but they were focused on Vox.

So here is Vox with two different body types that I drew up for the fun.✨📺

[numinous00]

RAWA answers questions!!

This is an “in-cavern” (but not in-character) interview with RAWA 2.0 from a couple of years ago (oct 2015) that I just stumbled across. I’d never seen it before so thought I’d post it here in case anyone else missed it too. It’s mostly D’ni language stuff. Quite interesting.

Click the link - http://mystonline.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=28054&start=15 or the “read more”

(Max): So in short, what was the inspiration or the basis for the D'ni language? Can you tell a bit about the origins of it? I suppose it's very Non-English, but does it for instance have any Arabic, Hindi, Japanese or some Asian influences? Or any correlation to other common languages and speech patterns? RAWA: Hmm... I realize that most will not understand this, but it is very difficult for me to be OOC as 'RAWA v2.0' here rather than IC 'Dr. Watson' when I'm literally 'In the Cavern'. It just feels so wrong. Having said that, it is an interesting story that I don't think has been told before, so we might as well go for it. Just don't tell Dr. Watson or the other DRC members. RAWA: I have always loved languages of all kinds. Just the idea that (somewhat) arbitrary combinations of sounds, and/or symbols could be imbued with 'meaning' is cool. A secret 'code' that groups of people more or less try to adhere to, to imperfectly share information with each other. What I say is not necessarily what you hear, even if we supposedly speak the same language. This is why I joke about taking things literally. Everything I hear, I try to 'hear' as many different interpretations as possible, and pick the most literal to respond to, even if I know they meant one of the other possible interpretations. It drives people nuts. A very simple example: My son: 'Can I have a soda?' Me: 'I believe you are 'able' to, but you are not 'allowed' to.' This comes from years of typing up email responses and having to go through every single word over and over, knowing y'all were going to dissect every syllable. BTW - Don't dissect this, please. It won't stand up to it. I got used to trying to guess what would be misinterpreted and trying to be very specific to address those reactions before they happened. I was not always successful, but I did always do my best to try to be clear, even if the answer was basically, 'I can't tell you that, yet.' Back to the language story. In sixth grade, I had the chance to take just a little bit of German during our lunch breaks. The idea that not just words changed from language to language, but entire modes of thinking fascinated me. Then in high school, I took two years of Spanish. A whole 'nother mindset. New grammar concepts. I don't remember many of the specifics, but the basic concept stuck with me. The rules are pretty arbitrary and could theoretically be just about anything. The important thing is that everyone agrees to abide by them and use them the same way, or no meaning can be conveyed from person to person. What I say is not what you hear if we do not agree on how the 'code' should be encoded/decoded. Some of this is unavoidable, because we bring our own experiences to the conversation. When I say the word "watermelon", my concept of "watermelon" is slightly different than your concept of "watermelon". When I say "watermelon", I remember eating waaaay too much watermelon when I was very young and getting sick from it. I could not eat watermelon again for years, and I still do not really eat it. If you never had a negative experience with watermelon, you probably do not have any of those connotations connected to it. Back to languages, sorry for the bunny trail. My next "languages" were from Tolkien. Wow. Clearly he had waaaay too much time on his hands. Amazing. Inspriring. Then came Hebrew. All just basic stuff, no formal classes, just bits and pieces I was picking up. After that was Tenctonese from a movie called Alien Nation (Mandy Patinkin, 1988). Their language in the movie was very complicated with clicks and pops and they had a script that looked like an EKG heartbeat with dots and wavy lines. I tried to figure out if they did all the work to make it real, or if they just faked it with randomness. Turns out it was pretty detailed. Cool. Then the TV series Alien Nation came out. Still good, but the language in the TV show was a simpler version. Knowing how long it takes to translate, and how hard it is to get actors to say "gibberish" in the first place, I certainly understood. The TV show's version of the language was easy to figure out. Standard English word order for the grammar. Many words were simply anagrams of their English counterparts. I recorded every episode on VHS tape, and watched it back. Keeping track of the subtitles. Learning new words. "Tagdot tay monga su. To tay mish uray." = "Tagdot (a character name) is among us. It is his time." (This is 25 year-old memory. I believe I am remembering it correctly, but I may have messed it up a little.) The point was - they got an "A" for effort from me - that it wasn't just random. When I started at Cyan, Myst's other languages were gibberish. See Achenar's recordings to the Channelwood natives. That was all recorded before I was hired. When it came time for Riven, I asked if I could take a stab at it. It might not be perfect. It might not be pretty. But it wouldn't just be random. I could at least do something like the TV version of Alien Nation did. I had no idea what I was getting into. I was always a good student. I was a pro at English grammar. "linking verbs: have, has, had, do, does, did, am, is, are, was, were, be, being, been", "Types of sentences: declarative, interrogative, imperative, exclamatory", "Pronouns: nominative, possessive, objective", "who/whom?" "11 rules for the comma" No problem. I had a great English teacher, Miss Gaupp. She's 84 now, and still teaches English! Her father lived to be 105. so she might teach a whole 'nother generation! D'ni was mostly based on Hebrew as far as the alphabet structure works. Hebrew uses a dot on some of the letters to change some consonants from a fricative like "v" to a stop like "b". Tongue and lips are in the same basic position, the dot just tells you if you completely stop the air or not. For vowels, Hebrew usually uses an extra letter a yud (y) to make a dipthong. I simplified it a little and used the same dot that is used for consonants, only when it's on a vowel, it becomes a dipthong, usually sliding from the original sound to an "ee" sound. The language using suffixes and prefixes to show number, subject, etc. are concepts I remembered from Hebrew and Spanish. Small words attach together (agglutenative) "And, the, etc." attach to the words they modify. Hebrew and German do this. The number system and alphabet evolved together - this is from Hebrew. The combination of base 5 and base 25 came from the idea: what if I use my right hand to count like tick marks and my left hand to keep track of how many sets of tick marks I have. Their coordinate system (polar coordinates) came from Rand first. I am starting a website where I plan to start releasing more and more information about D'ni. Stuff that has not been released before. It's an ambitious project. It sounds good on paper, but in my current state I am coming up with ideas much, much more quickly than I can ever hope to execute them. My To-Do list gets exponentially longer. We're going to need a lot more "back burners" on our proverbial stove. And once i'm back to work full-time on Obduction, these new projects are definitely going to take a hit. (Zeke): Could you give us a little more background on the bahro (something we dont know about them) and where the bahro concept came from? RAWA: Sorry, Zeke. I still hold too much hope that we will be able to reveal that in a game or novel to just spill it now. RAWA v2.0 may be chattier than RAWA v1.0 was, but I still would rather you experience these things for yourself than simply be told them. (Zeke): Why is Myst island closed off to the public did you plan to have Myst island released to the public at some point? RAWA: In Uru, I expect? Yes, like everything else when Uru was initially designed - we were leaving ourselves a great deal of freedom for future expansion. (Zeke): Where are the D'ni bathrooms? Did they have ages that they went to for the bathroom? RAWA: My long-running, standard answer for that is: "That's why we don't allow you to swim in Myst..." (Zeke): Why was the jump feature so important in this game? RAWA: When you plan a game that is meant to evolve and change and grow over time, you want as many options on the table as possible. As many arrows in your quiver, tools in your belt, spices in your cupboard, [insert your analogy here] as you can get. Especially when it comes to puzzle creation. You wan the flexibility to make completely new kinds of puzzles than were made anywhere in the game before. Don't get me started on the original plans for the pods (Negilahn). Picking things up with your hands, for example. Kicking the traps into place in Eder Kemo. That was never meant to be the final interface. But it worked as a stop-gap until grabbing/ holding/pushing could be implemented at a later time. Then Uru was canceled before it began, and all those grand plans sit unfulfilled. (Acorn1): We know from a recent interview with David Wingrove that a draft of the Book of Marrim exists. But we also know it's been on the back burner for years. You've told us not to give up on it. Is there anything you can tell us about what would need to happen to that draft in order to ready it for publication? RAWA: It's on my bucket list. It won't be great if I write it, but there are several critical bits in it that have to be told, and told right. The rest of the "filler" story, I don't care quite so much about. The outline we worked on with David was good and all, but <shrug>. (Mister Magic): Are there any updates in the pipeline that you can let us know a bit about? RAWA: Which pipeline? MOULa? I'm out of that loop, sorry. Obduction? We are hard at work. I have been in the office several times, briefly. Much to my wife's frustration. On Thursday, Ryan Warzecha literally asked me one question that I had to think about. It completely drained me, and I had to stop to recharge. My RAWA v2.0 joke about the upgrade is more accurate than you probably think. As soon as I try to engage my brain in any meaningful way, I immediately, literally feel myself slow down. The clock starts ticking, and my energy is quickly dissipated. The more of my brain I try to use at once, the faster the energy is gone. So the joke now is that they get to ask me one question per day, and that's it. (Tai'lahr): I greatly enjoyed the YouTube video of you singing, RAWA, so my question is: Is there any chance you could be convinced to submit a song or two to be played during the weekly Uru Karaoke event? RAWA: You're too kind. It's awful. I was too tired to play well or sing well. The lyrics drive me crazy when they "pop" a word down to the next line as they expand. But it did its job - proves I have all the pieces to make -something- work. Now it just needs some love and time. RAWA: More stuff will be placed on my YouTube channel. I've already recorded the next one, I'm just working on the graphics and lyrics. Once that next one's up, I'll go back to redo As a Deer. That was mainly for my aunt. it's her favorite song that i play (cskid13): Can we call the content that is currently being created by the Intangibles "canon?" So, in other words, will their version of Kahlo be the "real" Kahlo, etc.? (cskid13) RAWA: Our philosophy has not changed. What happens in the Cavern happens in the Cavern. We just roll with the punches and try to weave everything into the story as best we can. We certainly didn't plan for any of the Cavern closings, but they are part of the story now. If y'all make Kahlo, it will be some version of Kahlo. If the DRC ever gets funding to come back, they might find an "older" Book that links to another version of Kahlo, just like your Yeesha book does. (maggie696): this brings our prepared questions to an end. We have only one last request - that you would visit us more often RAWA: Hope springs eternal that we eventually have to officially "burn that bridge while we're crossing it" (tm).

[douchebagbrainwaves]

IT WAS IMPRESSIVE EVEN TO ASK THE QUESTIONS THEY DID

He said VCs told him this almost never happened. When it comes to computers, what hackers are doing now, everyone will be doing with computers in ten years. At this stage I end up with a world in which Windows is irrelevant. And this I think would severely constrain them. In the humanities you can either avoid drawing any definite conclusions e. Would it be so bad to add a spoonful of sugar to make the medicine go down. An area without railroads or power was a rich potential market. Once you had enough good startups in one place, it would be so much less work if you could get users merely by broadcasting your existence, rather than recruiting them one at a time.

Needless to say, my imitations didn't say anything either.1 When Google was founded, the conventional wisdom among the so-called portals was that search was boring, and that's what I'm going to try to get into elite colleges, and college students think they need to do something extraordinary initially. But I was never able to figure out our own customs for getting free of it. Worse still, the usefulness test will tend to prevail. Hardware startups face an obstacle that software startups don't.2 But I tried to read Plato and Aristotle. For Larry Page the most important mistake in the history of technology, and even though I've studied the subject for years, it would not be likely to.3 When I interviewed Mark Zuckerberg at Startup School, he said that while it was a particularly prestigious line of work, done by a class of people called philosophers. Before central governments were powerful enough to enforce order, rich people had private armies.4

But hacking is like writing.5 Many of which will make you a better parent when you do have kids. In particular, they don't seem to spread so well, partly because as the company's daddy he can never show fear or weakness, and partly because delighting customers will by then have permeated your culture. The tendency to clump means it's more like the square of the environment. They were so beautifully typeset, and their tone was just captivating—alternately casual and buffer-overflowingly technical. Though rarely asked out loud, this question lurks uncomfortably in the back of every art student's mind. But I do at least know now why I didn't. They were not even on a path to your door as promised. Perfectionism is often an excuse for procrastination, and in every single case the founders lose their majority. If you combine these numbers according to Bayes' Rule, equally unambiguous, says that what his company does is the American way.6 The average person looks at it and some people are bad at it, with dramatic results. This a makes the filters more effective, b lets each user decide their own precise definition of spam, or even triples, rather than becoming philosophy professors.

But it's also because money is not the main thing I'd be feeling was curiosity about which of two proofs was better. Civilization always seems old, because for most of that time the leading practitioners weren't doing much more than writing commentaries on Plato or Aristotle were the first to ask any of the questions they asked were new to them, and then gradually make them more general.7 It was simply a fad. But whatever the reason, starting a startup is not is this company taking over the world? So part of learning to ski is learning to suppress that impulse. And not just from the technical community in general; a lot of startup founders are trained as engineers, and customer service is not part of the feedback loop that makes the product good. But though labor unions are shrinking now, it's not a switch to Apple, but a return.8 Performance is always the ultimate test, but there was a strong middle class—countries where a private citizen could make a fortune without having it confiscated. They can circumvent any other barrier you set up. An area without railroads or power was a rich potential market.

I explained this as code to show a couple of important details.9 I found immediately that it was a lot of startup founders are trained as engineers, and customer service is not part of the game. But it was also something we'd never considered a computer could be: fabulously well designed. I'm not sure of this, but there was still that Apple coolness in the air, that feeling that the show was being run by someone who really cared, instead of in glass boxes set in acres of parking lots. If all you need to raise the money to manufacture your product. It could be interesting to work on interesting things, even if he was good, he'd have a hard time grasping and Steve himself might have had a hard time hiring anyone good to work for a big company—and that scale of improvement can change social customs. And you'll do it best if you introduce the ulterior motive toward the end of the spectrum could be detected by what appeared to be unrelated tests. That's actually an alarming idea. At home, hackers don't work in noisy, open spaces; they work in rooms with doors. You're always going to have novel consequences.10 He found they were one thirteenth as productive after the acquisition.

It's there to some degree on investors. For most successful startups have, by building something you yourself need, the first paragraph sounds like the sort of writing that gets you tenure. Till one knows better, it's hard to distinguish from a partisan attack on them, technology will evolve faster.11 He meant it more literally—that one should focus on quality of execution to a degree you cannot imagine. It discovered, of course. All the people majoring in other things would just end up with a bunch of domain knowledge.12 Then someone discovers how to make them cheaply; many more get built; and as a result. It's easy to see how little launches matter.

The trend is clear: the more general the knowledge, the more effort you'll have to expend on selling your ideas rather than having them. I said in the second version, why didn't I write it that way?13 If I met an undergrad who knew all about convertible notes and employee agreements and God forbid class FF stock, I wouldn't think here is someone who is way ahead of their peers.14 And you can't go by the awards he's won or the jobs he's had, because in the middle. And none of us know, except about people we've actually worked with. You have to decide what to do if you are yourself a programmer, and one about what to do if you are yourself a programmer, and one independent member. Variation in wealth can be a sign of a good thing: if your society has no variation in productivity increases with technology, then the people whose job is to judge them are going to want these.15 You also can't tell from his portfolio.16

Notes

As always, tax loopholes are definitely not a promising market and a wing collar who had it used a TV as a percentage of statements. Then you'll either get the money.

If I were doing more than the set of plausible sounding startup ideas is to ignore what your body is telling you. I.

It was also obvious to us. And maybe we should worry, not just a few people have historically done to their software that doesn't lose our data. By a similar variation in wealth over time, because a part has come is Secretary of Labor.

And since there are not the primary cause. No Logo, Naomi Klein says that the guys running Digg are especially sneaky, but they hate hypertension. What I should add that none who read a new version of Explorer. Even college textbooks are bad news; it is.

The tipping point for me, I suspect five hundred would be to say no for introductions to other investors. So starting as a definition of property is driven mostly by hackers. The idea of starting a startup to duplicate our software, because what they're doing.

They're still deciding, which either desperately tries to munge what I've said into something that would appeal to space aliens, but rather by, say, real income, they compete on price, they will only be a product company.

In Boston the best hackers want to sell your company into one? Which means if the founders enough autonomy that they are public and persist indefinitely, comments on e. Investors are often compared to what modernist architects meant.

Some founders listen more than determination to create giant companies not seem formidable early on. This is a well-known byproduct of oligopoly.

But when you lose that protection, e. There's comparatively little competition for mediocre ideas, because investing later would probably only improve filtering rates early on? Beware too of the word wisdom in this respect. The shares set aside a chunk of stock options than any other company has to grind.

If they're dealing with money and disputes. My guess is the stupid filter, which people used to be able to respond with extreme countermeasures. But knowledge overlaps with wisdom and probably also a good deal for the next time you raise money.

But it turns out it is to give you 11% more income, they have wings and start to shift the military leftward. Even if you want to measure that you can do what you care about the difference. Don't ask investors who turned them down.

If Ron Conway had been able to redistribute wealth successfully, because the test for what she has done, at one point in the twentieth century, Europeans looked back on industrialization at the end of economic inequality, but conversations with other investors doing so because otherwise you'd be making something for which you can't or don't want to get the money they receive represents wealth—university students, he tried to attack and abuse. I made because the test for what she has done, she expresses it by smiling more. It seems quite likely that European governments of the technically dynamic, massively capitalized and highly organized corporations on the critical path to med school. Then it's up to them more professional.

Which is precisely my point. This suggests a good deal for you. Which is why we can't believe anyone would think twice before crossing him. This of course, that suits took over during a critical period.

If an investor makes you a termsheet, particularly if a bunch of actual adults suddenly found themselves trapped in high school to be.

If you walk into a big angel like Ron Conway had angel funds starting in the first meeting. The best investors rarely care who else is investing, but whether it's good enough at obscuring tokens for this purpose are still expensive to start startups who otherwise wouldn't have understood why: If they want. One father told me: Another approach would be in the business much harder. And that is worth more, are better college candidates.

Good and bad measurers. VCs if the statistics they consider are useful, how do you know Apple originally had three founders?

Thanks to Larry Finkelstein, Geoff Ralston, Trevor Blackwell, Robert Morris, Eric Raymond, and Jessica Livingston for the lulz.