#pcmark

[veworunity]

Futuremark pcmark 10

#Futuremark pcmark 10 license

ganeshts: Don't feel like registering on Reddit just for this :).

#Futuremark pcmark 10 license

RyanSmithAT: Thunderbolt is an anyone thing as long as you pay your license fees and pass the conformance tests.I fully expect that we're going to be finding new side channel CPU a… RyanSmithAT: Spectre is the gift that just keeps on giving.RyanSmithAT: Per the authors: "The name is based on the root cause, speculative execution.It looks like your recent website change has outright broken th… ganeshts: Absolutely no trouble setting up Win 11 without a network connection (I've lost count….gavbon86: Ahhh you learn something new every day!.In the gaming workloads, the results are much more varied, with resolution and details level affecting relative performance greatly. Overall, we see the NUC BOX-1165G7 perform strongly in most UL workloads where single-threaded performance matters. Here, we see the 28W TDP version score 2703 and 837 correspondingly. For additional reference, the Beast Canyon NUC with the 65W TDP Tiger Lake processor scored 7117 for the multi-threaded case and 968 for the single-threaded one. Since we have started processing these benchmarks only recently, our sample set for this benchmark is limited. We present the benchmark results for the single and maximum threads case above. The workload is configured to run with different number of threads ranging from 1 to 16 (and a single entry for the maximum number of threads allowed in the system). The benchmark routine attempts to perform the simulation of birds / bird-like objects flocking together using as many advanced capabilities as offered by the processor. Since gaming workloads are often multi-threaded, it makes sense to include this testing as part of the 3DMark suite. UL recently introduced a benchmark to test the multi-threaded capabilities of the CPU in a system. The graph below presents the overall score in this workload for different system configurations. It is less demanding than Time Spy, and is optimized for integrated graphics. The Night Raid workload is a DirectX 12 benchmark test. The graphs below present both numbers for all the systems that are being compared in this review. However, the plain version targets high-performance gaming PCs with a 2560 x 1440 render resolution, while the Extreme version renders at 3840 x 2160 resolution. The Time Spy workload has two levels with different complexities. The graph below presents the overall score for the Fire Strike Extreme and Fire Strike Ultra benchmark across all the systems that are being compared. The Extreme version targets 1440p gaming requirements, while the Ultra version targets 4K gaming system, and renders at 3840 x 2160. Similar to Sky Diver, it uses DirectX 11 (feature level 11) to render frames at 1920 x 1080. The base version is meant for high-performance gaming PCs. The Fire Strike benchmark has three workloads. The graph below presents the overall score for the workload across all the systems that are being compared. The Cloud Gate workload is meant for notebooks and typical home PCs, and uses DirectX 11 (feature level 10) to render frames at 1280 x 720. The graphs below present the various Ice Storm worloads' numbers for different systems that we have evaluated. While the Extreme renders at 1920 x 1080, the other two render at 1280 x 720. All three use DirectX 11 (feature level 9) / OpenGL ES 2.0. It is a cross-platform benchmark (which means that the scores can be compared across different tablets and smartphones as well). This workload has three levels of varying complexity - the vanilla Ice Storm, Ice Storm Unlimited, and Ice Storm Extreme. In this section, we take a look at the performance of the ASRock NUC BOX-1165G7 across the different 3DMark workloads. We use 3DMark to get an idea of the graphics capabilities of the system. Correspondingly, the rendering resolutions are also different. UL's 3DMark comes with a diverse set of graphics workloads that target different Direct3D feature levels. The power plan was set to Balanced for all the PCs while processing the PCMark 10 benchmark. These scores are heavily influenced by the CPU and GPU in the system, though the RAM and storage device also play a part. We benchmarked select PCs with the PCMark 10 Extended profile and recorded the scores for various scenarios. UL's PCMark 10 evaluates computing systems for various usage scenarios (generic / essential tasks such as web browsing and starting up applications, productivity tasks such as editing spreadsheets and documents, gaming, and digital content creation). While PCMark evaluates the system as a whole, 3DMark focuses on the graphics capabilities with emphasis on gaming workloads. This section deals with a couple of UL Futuremark benchmarks - PCMark 10 and 3DMark.

[nationalnahas]

Pcmark 10 crashes on video conferencing

#Pcmark 10 crashes on video conferencing full

#Pcmark 10 crashes on video conferencing free

Design wise, it does look like Microsoft took a few cues from their tablets, and used it for the upper half here, as it does feel almost like a tablet. There are no bevels here, and the edges just falls away cleanly. The Windows logo contrasts against the rest of the finishing with a mirror shine. The lid of the Surface Laptop 4 is made of aluminum, and it gets a nice matte finish that’s just perfect to the touch.

#Pcmark 10 crashes on video conferencing full

I won’t be doing a full in-depth review of the Surface Arc Mouse, but we will be discussing it in a bit.

#Pcmark 10 crashes on video conferencing free

While the mouse doesn’t come free with every Surface Laptop 4, we received a Microsoft Surface Arc Mouse along with our Surface Laptop 4 for testing. It charges via the Surface Connect port, and we will get to that in a bit. I am a bit more torn about the connector for the Surface Laptop 4 though. A faster charging rate for the USB port would have been appreciated, but this is still way more convenient than most laptops already. I really quite like this design as it means that you won’t have to bring several power adapters with you when you travel, as all you need is the Surface Laptop 4’s to charge all your devices. That’s because instead of delivering all 65W to the laptop, 5W is for the USB-A port here. In the case of the Surface Laptop 4’s charger, 60+5W does not equal to 65W. I wish it was just integrated into the user guide itself though, just to save a bit of paper. There’s even a “Caring for your Surface Laptop” guide, which is a nice reminder of sorts to help you take care of the fancy Alcantara keyboard deck. You get the usual stash of documentations, as well as a pretty nifty 60+5W power adapter. In the box, the contents are also pretty standard.

[govindhtech]

Crucial LPCAMM2: 32GB LPDDR5X 7500 Professional Memory

LPDDR5X 7500

Professionals and creators may now experience higher laptop performance with the revolutionary next-generation laptop memory form factor, Crucial LPCAMM2, which includes LPDDR5X mobile memory. With a single module, LPCAMM2 offers dual-channel capability and better bandwidth than DDR5 SODIMMs while consuming up to 58% less active power and conserving 64% of the available space. Compatible with the robust and adaptable Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 mobile workstations, LPCAMM2 is the perfect high-performance memory solution for managing AI PC and sophisticated tasks.

According to Jonathan Weech, senior director of product marketing for Micron’s Commercial Products Group, LPCAM2 is a game-changer for mobile workstation users who want the latest mobile high performance memory technology without sacrificing performance, upgradeability, power efficiency, or space. “They are providing a future-proof memory solution with LPCAMM2, enabling faster speeds and longer battery life to support demanding workloads in AI and creativity.”

Yasumichi Tsukamoto, vice president and distinguished engineer, Commercial Product Solutions Development at Lenovo, stated, “Lenovo’s ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 is the first laptop available in the market that can leverage the newest LPCAMM2 form factor to enable higher performance, faster AI workflows, scalable memory capacity, and improved battery life for mobile workstations and thin and light laptops.” “This potent combination not only improves user experience, but also lowers laptop energy consumption overall thanks to the low power memory found in LPCAMM2 modules.”

LPCAMM2 can achieve lightning-fast speeds of up to 7,500MT/s, which is 1.3 times faster than DDR5 SODIMMs, by employing LPDDR5X memory. In addition to lowering power consumption, this memory form factor increases battery life. As compared to DDR5 SODIMMs, these modules utilise up to 80% less standby power, allowing users to work longer on the road without sacrificing performance.

The 128 bits of CPU bus width are filled by a single LPCAMM2 module, optimising bandwidth for AI workloads and apps and enabling AI-enabled PCs to reach new heights. Based on PCMark 10 tests, users can improve productivity tasks by up to 15% and increase performance by up to 7% for workloads involving the creation of digital material. Since LPCAMM2 is upgradeable, users can quickly change out their modules and expand their memory capacity as needed, in contrast to soldered-down memory. It also has a sleeker, more portable design with a thinner, fan-less construction.

What is LPCAMM2 ?

A new form factor for laptop memory is called LPCAMM2 (low-power compression attached memory module 2). It makes use of LPDDR5X mobile memory, which is a low-power, high-speed version of LPDDR5 memory commonly used in smartphones. This novel strategy offers the following significant benefits:

Lightning-Quick Speeds

The LPCAMM2 can transmit data at up to 7500 MT/s, which is approximately 1.3 times quicker than the DDR5 SODIMM (Small Outline Dual In-Line Memory Module). This results in improved responsiveness for taxing tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, and AI workloads, as well as more seamless multitasking and faster application loading.

Superior Power Efficiency

The lower power consumption of LPDDR5X RAM is one of its main advantages. The LPCAMM2 provides a startling 80% reduction in standby power and up to 58% lower active power usage than DDR5 SODIMM. This leads to greater laptop battery life, enabling users to operate for longer periods of time between charges.

Compact Design

When compared to DDR5 SODIMM modules, the LPCAMM2 has a lower footprint. Laptops that are lighter and thinner can be made thanks to this space-saving architecture without sacrificing memory performance. Furthermore, by being smaller, there is more room within for other parts, which could result in better heat management.

Present Accessibility

A relatively new device, the Crucial 32GB LPCAMM2 LPDDR5X 7500 was only announced by Micron Technology in May 2024. With their ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 mobile workstation being the first to use this technology, Lenovo appears to be the launch partner.

FAQS

How much better is the battery life with LPCAMM2?

Laptop batteries last longer thanks to LPCAMM2’s reduced power consumption, which can be as much as 58% lower while using active power and 80% lower when using standby power. The specific enhancements vary based on the general setup and usage habits of the laptop.

Will the LPCAMM2 improve my laptop’s gaming performance?

While some games can benefit from quicker memory, the overall performance of games is largely dependent on components like the graphics card and CPU. Applications such as video editing and 3D rendering, which largely depend on memory bandwidth, may benefit more from the LPCAMM2.

Read more on govindhtech.com

[keyiva]

3DMark + PCMark 10 + VRMark Steam Key GLOBAL

This bundle includes the following: 3dMark PCMark 10 VRMark 3DMark includes everything you need to benchmark your hardware. With its wide range of benchmarks, you can test everything from tablets and notebooks to the latest 4K gaming PCs. It’s the most powerful and flexible 3DMark we’ve ever created. 3DMark is for gamers, overclockers and system builders who want to get the most out of their…

[bitrise-co-in]

DRAM Free 3D TLC The Lexar NM710 M.2 2280 drive is a Gen4x4 NVMe SSD based on the NVMe 1.4 protocol, which bypasses a DRAM cache to keep the price under $0.10/GB. The 500GB model is rated at 500MB/s sequential read and up to 2600MB/s sequential wri... bitrise.co.in

[phonesprices]

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G is the latest iteration in the popular Note series, aiming to offer premium features at a mid-range price. But does it hit the mark, or fall short of its ambitions? Let's delve into the details. Highlights: Powerful Processor: The MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset delivers smooth performance for everyday tasks and even handles some demanding games well. Stunning Display: The 6.7" AMOLED display boasts a 120Hz refresh rate for buttery-smooth visuals and HDR10+ support for vibrant colors. It's curved for a premium feel, though some might find it prone to accidental touches. Fast Charging: The 120W fast charging is one of the fastest in the market, juicing up the phone from 0 to 100% in just 15 minutes. Versatile Cameras: The 200MP main sensor captures impressive detail in good lighting, and the ultrawide and telephoto lenses offer additional shooting options. However, low-light performance could be better. Sleek Design: The phone boasts a premium look and feel with a glass back and IP68 water and dust resistance. Verdict: The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G is a compelling mid-range option with a powerful processor, a stunning display, and super-fast charging. However, software quirks, the lack of stereo speakers, and a price increase compared to previous models hold it back from being a true standout. Ultimately, the decision of whether it's the right phone for you depends on your priorities and budget. Here are some additional points to consider: Are you a gamer who needs top-of-the-line performance? If so, you might want to look elsewhere. Do you value clean software and a bloatware-free experience? You might prefer a phone with a different UI. Is camera quality your top priority? While the cameras are decent, there are phones with better low-light performance in this price range. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Specs Feature Specification Display 6.67" AMOLED, 1220 x 2712 pixels, 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10+ Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra RAM 8GB or 12GB LPDDR5 Storage 256GB or 512GB UFS 3.1 Rear Cameras 200MP main (f/1.8), 8MP ultrawide (f/2.2), 12MP telephoto (f/2.4) Front Camera 16MP (f/2.5) Battery 5000mAh Charging 120W wired Operating System Android 13 (MIUI 14) Connectivity 5G, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, NFC Dimensions 161.4mm x 74.2mm x 8.9mm Weight 204.5g Colors Blue, Black, Silver Price Starting at €450 (prices may vary depending on region and configuration) Additional Notes: The phone also has an in-display fingerprint sensor and face unlock. There is no expandable storage option. The phone has a dual SIM slot but does not support microSD cards. The 120W charger may not be included in all markets. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Benchmark Benchmark Score Source CPU Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) 1109 Mytour.vn Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) 2594 Mytour.vn AnTuTu 9 803,000 Kimovil.com GPU 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 1178 points (7.06 FPS) Mytour.vn Other PCMark Work 3.0 11,714 Mytour.vn Notes: Scores may vary slightly depending on testing conditions and specific phone models. Some benchmarks, like GFXBench, were not available at the time of writing. It's important to consider real-world performance alongside benchmark scores, as benchmarks don't always reflect everyday user experience. I hope this review helps you make an informed decision about the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G! [editorial-rating id="11259"]

[sohagsthings]

OnePlus Nord N30 5G

Who it’s for: The Nord N30 5G is a good option for people on a budget who still want a phone that does more than the bare minimum.

Why we like it:

The OnePlus Nord N30 5G costs less than $300, and it offers a lot of value for that low price. Compared with its predecessor, the Nord N30 has a slightly larger, 6.7-inch high-refresh-rate LCD screen; it also offers a Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 chip with near-flagship performance and a long-lasting battery that can survive more than a day. It runs the latest version of Android with up to two years of security updates, and it supports 5G, so it works on all three major carriers.

Flaws but not dealbreakers:

The Nord N30 has a 108-megapixel main camera lens that shrinks a photo to a 12-megapixel image. But a large megapixel count in cameras doesn’t always equal great photos, as the camera quality isn’t great in the best of scenarios, and it’s even worse in low lighting. In addition, the N30 feels like a downgrade from the N20 in its build quality, trading a matte finish for a glossy plastic one that attracts fingerprints. For more information on the OnePlus Nord N30 5G, read our full guide to the best budget Android phones.

A Striking Visual Experience

The OnePlus Nord N30 smartphone presents a stylish, modern, visually appealing design. Its dimensions are 6.5 by 3.0 by 0.3 inches (HWD), and it weighs 6.88 ounces. The phone is available in a dark Chromatic Gray colorway that doesn’t necessarily stand out but looks classy just the same.

You’ll find a sizable 6.72-inch LCD panel gracing the front. The screen has an aspect ratio of 20:9 and boasts a 2,400-by-1,080-pixel resolution. That makes for a pixel density of 391ppi, which is what we expect from a phone at this price in 2023. The screen has an adaptive 120Hz refresh rate and a 240Hz touch response rate, both of which are above average for $300 phones. Thanks to itds 680 nits peak brightness, I had no issues seeing the screen under all sorts of lighting conditions, including direct sunlight.

OnePlus opted for a glossy plastic panel for the rear, though it mimics the appearance of glass. The polished finish adds a touch of sophistication, but it attracts dust and fingerprints. The camera module is neatly positioned in the upper-left corner of the device. It includes an unorthodox arrangement of two massive round lenses that stand out visually. There’s also an LED flash that’s plainly visible. The midframe is plastic rather than metal.

Respectable Snapdragon Speed

The N30 boasts impressive performance thanks to its Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chip and 8GB of LPDDR4X RAM. This midrange processor delivers a solid user experience, making it suitable for basic multitasking, gaming, and everyday tasks. For storage, OnePlus offers only one model, with 128GB of UFS 2.2 storage. The RAM and storage specs, though, are generations behind what’s current (LPDDR5X and UFS 4.0, respectively), which mostly means they are slower.

In PCMark Work 3.0 benchmark scores, the N30 achieves an impressive score of 10,245. This benchmark evaluates the device’s performance across various work-related tasks, such as web browsing, video editing, and data manipulation. While the score is good, the recent Motorola Moto G Power 5G scored 11,945 on the same test, while the Google Pixel 6a scored a little lower at 9,558.

The OnePlus Nord N30 performs admirably regarding CPU output, as demonstrated by its GeekBench 5 single-core score of 688. For multicore tasks, the Nord N30 achieved a score of 2,044, indicating its good ability to handle resource-intensive applications and deliver smooth multitasking performance. The Moto G Power was in the same range, with scores of 879 and 2,269. The Google Pixel 6a scored a better 1,018 and 2,601 on the same test.

For gaming, there were some slowdowns while playing Genshin Impact, a resource-taxing game, when on the Low graphic settings. It’s playable, but you’ll definitely see frame-rate issues here and there.

While the OnePlus Nord N30 may not match the raw processing power of flagship devices, such as the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (1,545 and 5,078 in Geekbench), it stands out as a reliable performer within its midrange category. Users can expect the device to handle day-to-day tasks effortlessly, offer a decent gaming experience, and provide smooth multitasking capabilities.

Regarding battery life, the OnePlus Nord N30 is reliable, offering all-day power that can easily keep up with your usage demands. Equipped with a 5,000mAh battery, this affordable smartphone ensures you won’t be left scrambling for a charger.

We tested the battery by streaming a YouTube video over Wi-Fi with the screen brightness set to the maximum. The N30 lasted 11 hours and 18 minutes in this test. For comparison, the Moto G Power outlasted the OnePlus phone with 13 hours and 35 minutes of runtime, while the Pixel 6a lasted 12 hours and 55 minutes. Battery life is one area the Nord N30 could improve upon a little bit.

The OnePlus Nord N30 supports OnePlus’ proprietary fast 50W wired charging, versus the 15W wired charging offered by the Moto G Power, so you can quickly top up your battery when needed. With the included charger, the device can replenish a significant portion of its battery capacity quickly. We filled the battery from empty in 55 minutes, which is great for a battery this large. There’s no wireless charging.

Fantastic 108MP Cameras

One of the standout features of the OnePlus Nord N30 is the camera system. The 108MP, f/1.75 main sensor with electronic image stabilization has a higher resolution than is typically found on budget-friendly devices. (The Motorola Moto G Power 5G has a 50MP main camera.) Last year’s OnePlus N20 featured a 64MP main camera, so this is a big upgrade in the number of pixels.

A 2MP depth camera and a 2MP macro camera support the primary shooter. These aren’t the ultrawide angle and telephoto lenses we prefer to see on modern phones, but they do add to the versatility of the handset in their own way.

Overall, the photos impress. When shooting with the main camera, you almost forget you’re using a $300 phone. The phone bins pictures down by a factor of nine (nona-binning) to 12MP by default, though you can use the Extra HD mode to get full 108MP images if you wish.

Establishing the Connection

The phone doesn’t compromise on connectivity, offering impressive 5G capabilities that set it apart from its competitors. It doesn’t support mmWave 5G spectrum but does include the critical C-band spectrum of US carriers for good speeds.

In our rigorous speed tests, the OnePlus Nord N30 5G demonstrated its ability to harness the power of T-Mobile’s 5G network. In an area with strong T-Mobile 5G Ultra Capacity service, the OnePlus Nord reached download speeds of 762Mbps and upload speeds of 106Mbps. By comparison, the Moto G Power attained 702Mbps down and 98Mbps up. In an area at the edge of T-Mobile’s 5G coverage (without 5G UC), the Nord N30 hit 2.2Mbps down and 0.9Mbps up. The G Power notched speeds of 1.2Mbps down and 0.5Mbps up in the same spot.

We ran similar tests to ensure the phone’s Wi-Fi was up to snuff. First, we placed the Nord N30 and Moto G Power in the same room as our Wi-Fi 6E router (though the phone only supports up to Wi-Fi 5) to see if there was a difference in performance. There wasn’t, with each phone offering speeds of about 600Mbps down and 175Mbps up. The devices also performed similarly at the edge of the router’s range, with the OnePlus getting 10Mbps down and 2Mbps up. Motorola’s budget phone offered 11Mbps down and 2Mbps up in the same spot.

Call quality is nothing short of impressive. Even in a relatively loud room, I could hear the person on the other end clearly, and they could hear me, too. The volume is also quite good, with the earpiece peaking at 78.3dB and the speaker at 93.1dB. This is about what I expect for phones in this price range.

I tested the phone’s stereo speaker quality by listening to “Silent Shout” by The Knife. The phone offered acceptable volume levels and minimal distortion, even during our bass-heavy test track. It wasn’t as crisp and clear as more expensive phones like the Pixel 7a or the Galaxy S23, but it still sounded good.

Finally, OnePlus included the relatively dated Bluetooth 5.1 standard, which works well enough but doesn’t offer the latest range and speed benefits of Bluetooth 5.3. The phone also has NFC on board for mobile payments.

Breathing in Oxygenos

Compared with other Android skins, I’ve always been a big fan of OxygenOS. Unfortunately, it’s become more cluttered and less like stock Android in recent years. However, it’s still one of the better manufacturer overlays, and OxygenOS 13.1 (based on Android 13) found on the Nord N30 5G is solid overall.

OnePlus will offer a single Android version upgrade to the N30 and three years of security updates, which is standard for most phones in this price range. It can’t hang with the Pixel 6a’s three Android versions and five years of security updates. If longevity is your main concern, you’ll want to examine Samsung’s offerings, but if you’re okay with only jumping to Android 14, you’ll be well-served by the Nord N30.

OxygenOS feels good on this handset. It deviates from the stock Android on Google’s Pixel phones, but it’s still aesthetically pleasing and easy to use (and closer to stock than Samsung’s phones). OnePlus includes minimal extra apps out-of-the-box, so you don’t have to waste time deleting stuff to get the phone up and running.

[lomokit]

Top cpu stress test

#Top cpu stress test install

#Top cpu stress test Pc

#Top cpu stress test professional

#Top cpu stress test free

#Top cpu stress test mac

#Top cpu stress test mac

It's compatible with both Intel and Apple silicon architectures so it's ready for all current and future Mac models. We wanted to make a simple to use utility that was useful to the Mac community at large, for everyone to use. No purchase, no in-app purchase and no ads. There's no cost for Endurance: CPU Stress Test. In addition to stress testing, it also shows the current CPU load, battery level, time elapsed for the test, along with all data logged to a CSV file. In fact, it's the perfect companion to TG Pro, which displays all internal temperatures such as the CPU, GPU, battery, etc along with fan speed and control. It's the easiest app for benchmarking how the Mac reacts to increased thermal pressure, along with the battery life. It's easy to customize from between 1-64 threads. Need to test at 50% CPU usage? Choose half the number of threads compared to cores and click run. It will keep the CPU busy from a low percentage or all the way to 100% for as long as it's needed. Instead of opening up Terminal, typing in cryptic commands, or trying to find outdated apps to test the CPU, it's as simple as choosing the number of threads to run and clicking start.

Use Disk Cleanup and defragmentation.Endurance: CPU Stress Test solves the problem of having a way to test the thermal limits or battery life of a Mac.

Here are seven ways you can improve computer speed and its overall performance. In short, 3.5 to 4.2 GHz is a good speed for processor. What is a good CPU speed?Ī good processor speed is between 3.50 to 4.2 GHz, but it is more important to have a single-thread performance. Under higher load, such as when playing a game, rendering a video, or other intensive tasks, your CPU consumes more power and, thus, runs at a higher temperature. When the CPU is idle, or not being used by any program, a healthy temperature is anything under or around 50 degrees Celsius (122 degrees Fahrenheit). No amount of key pressing or mouse clicking will get a response from the PC. You may hear the fans and disk drive running, but the screen may remain completely blank. A computer with a bad CPU won't go through the usual "boot-up" process when you turn the power on. In raytracing, an image is generated by tracing the path of light as pixels in an image plane and simulating its effects with virtual objects. It is an online multicore CPU Stress test tool to benchmark computer performance using raytracing. Select the CPU graph and look at the top right corner. SilverBench is another CPU Stress Test created under the project available for Windows. The easiest way to check for an Intel CPU is by looking for an 'Intel Inside' sticker on your computer, or by going to the Performance tab in Task Manager.

#Top cpu stress test Pc

If you need a PC for complex rendering, real-time graphics, or gaming, we recommend using our popular 3DMark benchmark to measure and compare system performance. We recommend a PCMark 10 Digital Content Creation score 3450 or higher. What is a good CPU benchmark?įor editing photos, video, or other digital content. There are numerous things you can do to keep your PC cool, including: Keep your PC well-ventilated. Your processor shouldn't be hotter than 75☌/167☏, nor significantly colder than 20☌/68☏. If your CPU hits its critical limits, the PC will shut down before any harm can be done. Is stress testing safe? Unless you're running these stress tests for a month, you're probably fine.

#Top cpu stress test install

You do not need to install or configure anything - the test works directly in the browser. “CPU Benchmark Online” is a processor performance test allowing you to test online your CPU speed and to find out how fast is your processor in comparison to others.

#Top cpu stress test professional

The professional edition comes with various additional tests, including USB ports, webcams, microphones, and tape drives. It tests CPU, GPU, RAM, SSDs, hard disk drives, optical drives, printers, network ports, and sound cards.

Keeping this tab in the background (don't close it), switch to other applications or tabs, and do what you do as usual. PassMark BurnInTest allows you to stress test all the major subsystems for endurance, stability, and reliability.

Start the CPU Stress Test at maximum load and wait 30-60 seconds.

So, to run a CPU stability test you have to: CoreTemp, AIDA64, and IntelBurn Test are the best CPU Stress test software. PCMark10, BurnIn Test, HeavyLoad, and Intel Extreme Tuning Utility are the top tools for stress testing of PC. Prime95 is useful in CPU and RAM stress testing. Adia64 is another tool used to carry out CPU stress testing.Ĭinebench can be used for CPU and GPU stress testing.

#Top cpu stress test free

IntelBurnTest is a free stress test tool that will push your processor to the limit while simultaneously showing you how stable your component is. Various tools exist to carry out stress testing on CPUs.

How do I stress test my CPU Windows 10?.

[sterbanana]

Memory for macbook pro 2011

#MEMORY FOR MACBOOK PRO 2011 UPGRADE#

#MEMORY FOR MACBOOK PRO 2011 PRO#

#MEMORY FOR MACBOOK PRO 2011 FREE#

#MEMORY FOR MACBOOK PRO 2011 PRO#

You can then use this information on Crucial or another site to figure out the type of memory your Macbook Pro takes. This will show the MacBook Pro year and model, such as 15-inch MacBook Pro early 2011. After installing Windows 7, we ran PCMark Vantage in Boot Camp and saw a score of 7,648 thats tops in. Two Thunderbolt 3 ports) MacBook Pro (13-inch, Early 2011) MacBook Pro (13-inch, Late 2011.

#MEMORY FOR MACBOOK PRO 2011 FREE#

Crucial Memory and SSD upgrades - 100 Compatibility Guaranteed for Apple MacBook Pro Systems - FREE US Delivery Free shipping Shop the latest deals. There was a major flaw in the AMD Radeon GPUs included with that model years logic board which seemed to cause GPU failure either due to overheating, internal chip problems, BGA solder joints getting broken, or a combination of the above. If you don’t want to use the scanner, click on the Apple logo in the toolbar. Our 15-inch MacBook Pro came with a 2.2-GHz Intel Core i7-2720QM processor and 4GB of RAM. Crucial Memory and SSD upgrades - 100 Compatibility. The 2011 MacBook Pro has, for almost a decade, been the exception to that rule.The system scanner can detect your system and any available upgrades, as well as tell you how much RAM is already installed. The easiest way to check if your MacBook Pro supports 16GB of RAM is to visit.

#MEMORY FOR MACBOOK PRO 2011 UPGRADE#

The higher 16GB MacBook Pro RAM upgrade kits cost more, but are worth it for users that want the biggest boost in performance. If you look on Apple’s website they list 8GB of RAM as the MacBook Pro RAM limit for most models, but for models as old as 2011, it is possible to add up to 16GB of RAM. Aside from adding a SSD to the MacBook Pro this is the easiest and most cost-effective way to avoid buying a new MacBook Pro for another year or so. This MacBook Pro 2011 specs include a pre-installed MacOS X 10.6.6 (10J3210), 2.0 GHz Intel Core i7 2635QM (Sandy Bridge) processor, and dual graphics processors an AMD Radeon HD 6490M with 256 MB of dedicated GDDR5 memory and an Intel HD Graphics 3000 graphics processor that shares 384 MB of memory with the system. Many old MacBook Pro computers from 2010, 20 only come with 4GB of RAM, but can handle up to 16GB.īy upgrading you will see big boosts in speed and performance. Wireless web testing conducted by Apple in October 2011 using preproduction 2.8GHz dual-core Intel Core i7based 13-inch MacBook Pro units. 1GB1 billion bytes actual formatted capacity less. Apple officially supports a maximum of 8 GB of RAM, but third-parties have determined. If you own an older notebook, a MacBook Pro RAM upgrade can boost performance.Ī MacBook Pro RAM upgrade can extend the life of an aging notebook by a year or two for many users, and is often an area where buyers skimp during configuration at the initial point of purchase. Memory available to OS X may vary depending on graphics needs. Standard RAM: 4 GB Maximum RAM: 16 GB Details: 4 GB of RAM is installed as two 2 GB modules, no slots free.

[govindhtech]

Micron 2500 SSD: M.2 NVMe PCIe Gen 4 SSD with QLC NAND

Most value and user experience for regular computing to help you get the most out of your everyday computing experience, the Micron 2500 SSD offers a best-in-class user experience, increases user productivity, and outperforms competing drives in PCMark 10 benchmark testing. The first 232-layer QLC NAND in a client SSD is only offered by Micron and offers the highest density and layer count in the market. It is also the densest OEM-production the NAND.

With class-leading PCIe Gen4 performance that outperforms the competition, you can get more out of your applications. For regular computing demands, the Micron 2500 SSD provides a good mix of storage performance and affordability.

Micron 2500 SSD fits daily storage needs It is the first client SSD in the world to use 200+ layer QLC NAND and leads the industry with best-in-class everyday computing user experience, QLC value, and performance that outperforms comparable TLC and QLC based SSDs.

Top-notch user interface for regular computer use with its excellent user experience benchmark scores, speed-boosting enhanced caching for quicker write performance, and a wide choice of form factor and capacity options, the Micron 2500 SSD dominates the competition.

QLC figure. TLC output. Small-scale innovation The Micron 2500, a top-tier QLC SSD, outperforms TLC- and QLC-based SSDs from competitors in sequential and random read/write performance, with sequential read speeds of up to 7,100 MB/s and random read IOPS of up to 1 million.

First consumer SSD with 200+ QLC NAND layers The first company to supply OEMs with SSDs made of QLC NAND with the highest density and layer count is Micron. With ONFI rates of up to 2,400 MT/s, this is the densest NAND in the world, enabling the creation of speedier SSDs.

Sophisticated Micron 2500 SSD features 232-layer QLC NAND Micron 3D Hardware-based encryption using AES 256 bits15 Defence against power outages (data at rest) Controlled heat management by the host Optimising performance with expedited caching Thermal SMBus S.M.A.R.T. Commands for basic management (BMC) FW turned on without a reset Block sanitization and cryptoerasure Support for power-loss signals TCG Pyrite 2.01, TCG Opal 2.02 Tool for managing Micron Storage Executive SSD Key advantages of the Micron 2500 SSD Storage that boosts everyday programme productivity

The Micron 2500 SSD is engineered to optimize your productivity by providing the finest user experience possible for the daily applications you utilize.

It comes in a wide variety of M.2 form factors are available in sizes up to 2TB, ranging from 22 × 80mm to a single-sided 22 x 30mm.

The SSD with industry-leading performance and low cost With best-in-class storage performance designed for daily computing, the Micron 2500 SSD outperforms all of its TLC and QLC rivals.

It is the first QLC SSD in the world and is based on Micron QLC NAND. It can reach PCIe Gen4 maximum performance of 7,100 MB/s sequential read.

Advanced NAND improves SSD performance and usability For the second consecutive year, Micron is the first to supply SSDs to OEMs with the highest density and greatest layer count QLC NAND! 300+ layer QLC NAND is 33% denser than micron 232-layer TLC NAND and allows for 30% higher density than micron previous generation 176 layer QLC NAND.

Leading the industry With 2,400 MT/s speed, SSD performance is among the best in its class. Great user experiences in thin and light notebook PCs, mobile devices, and anywhere else that performance and value are required together are powered by Micron 200+ layer QLC NAND.

Superior adaptability and user experience The Micron 2500 SSD offers the greatest user experience among its competitors’ TLC and QLC NAND-based SSDs, according to PCMark 10 testing results. For maximum versatility, it comes in three small, M.2 single-sided form factors with capacities of up to 2TB.

Serious value and performance With a sequential read speed of up to 7,100 MB/s, the Micron 2500 is the first QLC SSD in the world. It outperforms competitors in terms of overall performance, regardless of whether they utilise TLC or QLC NAND.

The top NAND in the world Excellent NAND goes into making amazing SSDs. Using the densest NAND available, the Micron 2500 SSD accelerates daily workloads with a 2,400 MT/s ONFI speed, contributing to the development of best-in-class SSD performance for OEM PCs.

Read more on Govindhtech.com

[fobanana]

Mac air battery life 2011

#MAC AIR BATTERY LIFE 2011 PRO#

#MAC AIR BATTERY LIFE 2011 WINDOWS 7#

#MAC AIR BATTERY LIFE 2011 FREE#

#MAC AIR BATTERY LIFE 2011 PRO#

MacBook Pro (early 2011) (2.2GHz Core i7-2720QM, Radeon HD 6750M, under Windows 7) MacBook Air (mid 2011) (1.7GHz Core i5-2557M, Intel HD Graphics 3000, Under Windows 7) So, it's still no gaming rig, but it is the sort of machine you wouldn't think twice about trying to do some serious business on. PCMark Vantage clocked in at 9,484, actually higher than the 15-inch Pro's 8,041 when we tested it, though the Air's 3DMark 06 score was considerably lower thanks to the limited graphics prowess here, just 4,223.

#MAC AIR BATTERY LIFE 2011 WINDOWS 7#

We also threw Windows 7 on there, Boot Camp making it easy, and ran through a further suite of benchmarks to see how it fares there. MacBook Air (late 2010) (1.83GHz Core 2 Duo, GeForce 320M) MacBook Pro (early 2011) (2.2GHz Core i7-2720QM, Radeon HD 6750M / Intel Graphics 3000) Honestly, that wasn't much of a concern before thanks to the lack of power, but now. We still found its resolution to be more than adequate for most tasks but just a bit limiting for anyone working on photos or doing anything where pixels really count. Contrast is helped by the glossy sheen here - and no, you still can't option out a matte unit. We spent our time testing the 13-incher and, as before, it continues to impress when it comes to contrast, brightness, and viewing angles, which are plenty wide enough to enable two-person, coach-class viewing of that latest episode of Top Gear. When it comes to displays nothing has changed: the 13-inch model features a 1440 x 900 glossy, LED-backlit panel while the 11 still does 1366 x 768. Intel HD 3000 graphics power the lot and stock processors include 1.6GHz and 1.7GHz Core i5's, though a 1.8GHz Core i7 is available for $100 more. SSDs are standard across the board, starting at 64GB for the 11 and going up to 256GB for the top-shelf 13-inch. On the memory front, 4GB of DDR3 memory is found on all but the base 11-inch model, which gets by with half that. The backlit keyboard is nice, and the addition of Thunderbolt could be a boon in 12 months or so, but its the new selection of processors that really turn the Air into a serious machine, as you'll see when we talk benchmarks in a bit. Step inside the case and you'll find the most important changes here: new Intel Core i5 and i7 ULV processors.

#MAC AIR BATTERY LIFE 2011 FREE#

Like before, the omission of these ports leaves the Air free to pinch down to a delicious taper beneath the keyboard, thin enough to make for a decent cleaver when no proper blade can be found - or when you just can't be bothered to find one. All other ports have been deemed unnecessary by Apple's designers and therefore relegated to myriad USB adapters for things like Ethernet - though if you start relying on those you'll likely need to start packing a USB hub as well. On the left you'll find a 3.5mm headphone jack, the MagSafe power connector and. The 11-inch model is likewise emblazoned, but sadly has still not been granted an SD reader, something restricted to the bigger 13. This 10Gb/sec interconnect has become standard fare on all new machines coming out of Cupertino, a fact that should help to accelerate the so-far tardy uptake in support from accessory manufacturers. On the 13-inch model you'll still have to make do with but one USB port on the left and one on the right, but now that latter one is flanked by a Thunderbolt connector, Apple's implementation of Intel's Light Peak standard. The outside of this 2011 refresh of the MacBook Air is virtually indistinguishable from that which came before it.

[pixeltrust]

Micro android shareit 1b

#Micro android shareit 1b for free

#Micro android shareit 1b how to

Works awesome!įYI, should work with Mallincam Micro EX and AVS DSO-1 if you have the RS485->RS232->Bluetooth converters.Įdited by Charles Copeland, 21 September 2014 - 12:13 PM. SDHC MMC RS-MMC Micro SDXC UHS-I Cards for PC Laptop Mac IPad Android Tablet Phone.

#Micro android shareit 1b for free

May put it in Google Playstore for freeload, if I can figure it out. UGREEN SD Card Reader, 2-in-1 USB C Micro SD Card Reader, Memory Card. If you send me your gmail address, you can directly load program to your Android phone from my responding email. If you want it, email me and I'll send it to you. Step 1: Insert the SD card, and when the notification pops up, hit the Set Up button.

#Micro android shareit 1b how to

I was unable to attach Android App to this post since limited by 500K and this. Here’s how to install the microSD card as internal storage. FREE Shipping on orders over 25 shipped by Amazon. You have to pair with bluetooth device in Android settings->bluetooth before you run this program and link. Micro SD Card 1TB Memory Card 1024GB TF Card with Adapter Class 10 High Speed Micro Card for Android Phones/PC/Computer/Camera. Then, you simply have to visit the ‘Hard Drive’ folder on your PC and select the files that you wish to transfer to the. Step 3 - A program called File Explorer will open all the files in your device. Step 2 Please wait for your computer to read the device. That said, it seems to work great on my old 2.2 Froyo Android phone. Step 1 First of all, plug in your Android device via a USB device to the PC. The choice of OVER 300 million users from 200 countries. The 10W charger is also slow as you’d think. Supports Android, iOS (iPhone/iPad), Windows Phone, Windows XP/Vista/7/8/10, and Mac OS. In our PCMark Work 2.0 testing, the phone ran for 10 hours 36 mins (with 20-percent juice remaining), something which we have seen from this size of a battery. Micromax In 1b’s 5000mAh should easily cover your daily round. For devices with A/B partition system, use the following commands: fastboot. Micromax In 1b Audio, Battery, and Connectivity. Flash the patchedboot.img to install Magisk and root your Android device: fastboot flash boot patchedboot.img. Run the following command in the open command prompt. I make no guarantees and claim no liability if this crashes your phone. Hold the Shift key and click on the right mouse button to open the command window/PowerShell. This was written with MIT App Inventor for Android. This works with the "LN300 bluetooth control modification" I created a few days ago. data is de-identified and aggregated, or when you direct us to share it. Just wrote an Android App for bluetooth control of LN300 video camera. Solved: Can someone explain to me why the Android Fitbit app needs access to my.

[phonesprices]

The POCO X6 Pro is shaping up to be a solid mid-range smartphone with a good processor, a long-lasting battery, and a decent camera. Display and Design: The POCO X6 Pro expected to boast a gorgeous 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a smooth 120Hz refresh rate for an incredibly immersive viewing experience. This means you'll enjoy buttery-smooth visuals, whether you're scrolling through social media, gaming, or watching videos. In terms of design, leaks suggest the phone will sport a sleek and modern look with a rectangular camera module on the back, housing three sensors, and an LED flash. The phone expected to be available in multiple color options, catering to different preferences. Performance and Internals: Powering the POCO X6 Pro rumored to be the MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra processor, a powerful chipset that can handle demanding tasks with ease. This means you can expect smooth performance for everyday use, multitasking, and even some light gaming. The phone is expected to come in two RAM variants: 8GB and 12GB, allowing you to choose the one that best suits your needs. For storage, you'll have options ranging from 128GB to 512GB, providing ample space for your apps, photos, videos, and more. Camera:  POCO X6 Pro is said to boast a triple-camera setup on the back, with a 64MP main sensor that features optical image stabilization (OIS) for capturing sharp and detailed photos even in low-light conditions. Accompanying the main sensor will be an 8MP ultrawide camera for capturing stunning landscape shots and large group photos, and a 2MP macro camera for getting up close and personal with tiny subjects. Battery and Other Features: POCO X6 Pro  expected to pack a large 5500mAh battery, which should easily provide a full day of power on a single charge. And when it does run low, the phone's rumored 67W fast charging will get you back up and running in no time. Android 14 operating system with POCO's custom HyperOS 1.0 on top, the phone is expected to deliver a smooth and user-friendly experience. Overall, the POCO X6 Pro shapes up to be a compelling option for smartphone users looking for a powerful, versatile, and stylish device without breaking the bank. With its impressive display, capable processor, decent camera setup, and long-lasting battery, the X6 Pro is worth keeping an eye on.  POCO X6 Pro specifications  Specification Details Display 6.67-inch AMOLED, 120Hz refresh rate, 1220 x 2712 pixels (QHD+) Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra RAM 8GB or 12GB Storage 128GB, 256GB, or 512GB Rear Camera Triple camera: 64MP main (OIS), 8MP ultrawide, 2MP macro Front Camera 16MP Battery 5500mAh, 67W fast charging Operating System Android 14 with HyperOS 1.0 Dimensions 160.4 x 74.3 x 8.1mm Weight 198g SIM Dual SIM (Nano-SIM) Network 5G, 4G LTE, Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.3, NFC Sensors Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass Colors Black, White, Mint (rumored) Price To be announced Release Date Rumored for January 2024 Please note: These specifications are based on rumors and leaks and are subject to change. The official specifications will be confirmed upon the phone's launch. POCO X6 Pro Benchmark Benchmark POCO X6 Pro (rumored) Comparison Device 1 Comparison Device 2 AnTuTu v10 1,526,328 1,450,000 (Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro) 1,550,000 (Realme GT Neo 4 Lite) Geekbench 5 (Single-core) ~900 850 (Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro) 950 (Realme GT Neo 4 Lite) Geekbench 5 (Multi-core) ~3500 3200 (Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro) 3600 (Realme GT Neo 4 Lite) 3DMark Wild Life ~4500 4200 (Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro) 4700 (Realme GT Neo 4 Lite) PCMark Work 3.0 ~13,000 12,500 (Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro) 13,500 (Realme GT Neo 4 Lite) Important notes: These scores are based on leaks and expectations and may vary from the actual benchmark results once the phone is released. Benchmark scores are not the sole measure of a phone's performance.

Real-world usage and user experience can also be influenced by factors like software optimization and battery life. It's always advisable to compare multiple benchmarks and read reviews to get a comprehensive understanding of a phone's overall performance. I hope this expanded information gives you a better understanding of what the POCO X6 Pro has to offer. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask! [editorial-rating id="11101"]

[longgo]

Prosync tablet

Prosync tablet pro#

Each is useful in its own right but here's a short list of applications you'll want to keep running.

Prosync tablet pro#

The Aorus X7 Pro comes with plenty of little system management tools, giving users easy access to laptop settings and firmware updates. Even the Alienware 18 held on by just a few more minutes for a total of 1 hour and 57 minutes of run time while unplugged. The MSI GT72 Dominator did marginally better lasting just 2 hours and 18 minutes. With regular use browsing between seven tabs in Chrome, writing in Microsoft Word, chatting in Skype and Hipchat, all while streaming tunes on Google Music, the Aorus X7 Pro only ran for 2 hours and 5 minutes. The slim gaming rig only lasted a short 1 hour 53 minutes while running our PCMark 8 battery life benchmark tests. Gaming machines have never been lauded for their long battery life, and going with a thin chassis has cut the run time of the X7 Pro even shorter. Worse yet, you can barely hear the speakers over the blaring fans, which makes a headset a necessity. For starters you'll be hard pressed to actually locate any actual speaker grills but it is outfitted with two speakers at the front and two additional subwoofers located on the laptop's underside.ĭespite all the tweeters, playing music on this machine sounds tinny and begins to distort even when just turning the system volume up to 20. Unfortunately the audio setup on the Aorus X7 Pro leaves much more to be desired. The MSI GT72 Dominator was able to achieve 37 fps in Metro: Last Light. Comparatively, the Alienware 18 was not able to break past 30 fps and only ran the game at 26.67 fps. We use Metro: Last Light as benchmark test, because it's a resource intensive game that brings most mobile gaming rigs to their knees, and yet Aorus thin gaming machine was able to play the game with every setting on Ultra at 43.67 frames per second. This dual-970 machine is also a smooth performer when playing games. By comparison, the MSI GT72 Dominator completed the same benchmark with 8,323 points using a single Nvidia 980M graphics card. While the Alienware 18 equipped with two Nvidia 880M in SLI was only able to rack up 8,323 points in Fire Strike, the Aorus X7 Pro has risen to the top with 10,451 points. Thanks to the laptop's dual GPU set up and speedy processor, we've finally recorded a Fire Strike that's over 9,000. The Aorus X7 Pro broke benchmark records left and right in our usual gauntlet of tests.

PCMark 8 Battery Life: 1 hours and 53 minutes.

Cinebench CPU: 639 points Graphics: 142 fps,.

Here's how the Aorus X7 Pro fared in our benchmark tests: