#scamber turd

[queermediacollector]

ew not someone supporting scamber turd on my dash.

[zomburrito]

Things Scambuser Turd stans say. Part THREE.

[thelefoulefamilyhome]

Johnny finally got justice

[itsjusttoasted]

iO unfollowing Turd on insta.

Kaplan deleting her tweets supporting Scamby.

Wonder what all this could mean 👀 😂

[honestytruthfreedom2]

I watched the Dave Chapelle the Closer.

And seriously. Trans people are upset because he touched on things they KNOW they are wrong about.

Their hypocrisy is ridiculous.

The change in mood when he mentioned his friend Daphne who killed her self after 6 days possibly due to relentless bullying from the trans community spoke volumes.

Considering the struggle you community has had, I expected better

Just because someone doesn't agree with you does not mean they are against you.

Grow up.

Also amber heard is an abuser.

[thecreepiestcarrie]

I've been quite bewildered as to how Johnny Depp lost his appeal against the clearly-biased judgement of Judge Nicol so I went through the official Court of Appeal Judgement. And what did I find there? More examples of this bias against Johnny.

I now have an answer to my question of how did Johnny lose the appeal, with all of the knowledge that we gained during this trial taken into consideration - how could it be upheld that the Sun calling him a 'wife beater' was factually correct?

Because Nicol went the way that the money and all of his not-so-covert connections told him to.

It was Rigga Morris, girl. Completely rigged. You don't just take on Rupert Murdoch's empire and win, even if you have the truth and a wide selection of the public on your side.

Basically it's 14 pages of 'Nicol said this and it's true so nyeh' and the court of appeal just dodging the many holes in his logic/judgement. Nicol is right, Johnny is wrong and everything Scum ever did wrong has a reasonable explanation and she's definitely not a gold digger and that's all that matters. No matter what Scamber says at any point in time, she is correct. Did she just contradict herself? No, she didn't, this is actually what she meant...

Page 3, section 1: Mr Depp did extensive damage to a house which he had rented and wrote offensive graffiti about Ms Heard (shown in photographs), some in paint and some in his own blood. While it does not necessarily follow that angry and jealous behaviour of this kind would involve physical violence against Ms Heard, the Judge evidently regarded it as making her allegations more likely to be true. section 2: He does not explicitly admit acts of assault against Ms Heard, but again the Judge regarded the admissions as making it more plausible that he did in fact commit such acts

A heavy feature of this judgment is the shit-ton of assumptions that are made and then stubbornly stuck to without a clear line from the evidence to the conclusion that was reached.

Page 4, section 10: Mr Caldecott’s (Johnny's barrister) first complaint concerned the treatment of what he said were clear admissions by Ms Heard, recorded in taped conversations, that she had more than once herself been the aggressor in incidents of physical violence between her and Mr Depp. [...] he said that the admissions were important because it was Ms Heard’s evidence throughout that she never initiated any physical violence against Mr Depp (as opposed to responding to violence from him): if that was untrue it was bound to put in question the credibility of her evidence about what happened.

Page 5, section 13: The admissions apparently made in these tapes were relied on in the closing submissions on behalf of Mr Depp at the trial as one of the general matters adversely affecting Ms Heard’s credibility, and the Judge addressed the point [...]

Shit Judge Nicol says:::::

"In her evidence, Ms Heard said that she did sometimes throw pots and pans at Mr Depp but only to try and escape him and as a means of self-defence. She also said at times in Argument 2 she was being sarcastic."

"In my view no great weight is to be put on these alleged admissions by Ms Heard to aggressive violent behaviour. [...] nonetheless true, that these conversations [the taped confrontations] are quite different to evidence in court. A witness giving evidence in court does so under an oath or affirmation to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Questioning can be controlled by the judge. Questions which are unclear can be re-phrased. If a question is not answered, it can be pressed (subject to the court's control) and if still unanswered may be the proper object of comment. None of those features applied to these conversations which, in any event, according to Ms Heard had a purpose or purposes different from simply conveying truthful information. (para 175)"

You can't put weight on to the taped conversations/confessions from Scamber because they did not take place in court... Okay, sure, why not, let's pretend that's how you operate. If that was the case, how come the circumstances behind the creation of the evidence for her case isn't questioned/doesn't impact on how much weight he allocates to them? Why does he disallow the tapes to sway him? But then pays full attention to Scamber's evidence of texts to family/friends and writings in her diary? Selective hearing, but more like selective weighing.

Page 6, section 14: Mr Caldecott submitted that the reasoning in para. 175 showed a fundamentally flawed approach to fact-finding because it gave an unjustified special priority to the status of witness evidence. [...] He also said that the Judge’s approach in this regard was inconsistent, because in many other instances he placed great weight on contemporaneous materials when making a finding against Mr Depp.

It's true and I'm glad he said it, but in the next section, the court of appeal knocks this down. They are sticking to Nicol's bullshit story and they are sticking to it until the ship is completely sunk to the bottom of the ocean with Titanic.

Section 15: We do not believe that that is a correct understanding of what the Judge was saying [...] In our view it is clear that the Judge was making a more specific point about the weight to be attached to these particular statements because of the particular circumstances in which they were made.

Page 12, section 40: If the statement in Ms Heard’s witness statement that the $7m “was donated” to charity [...] is to be understood to mean literally that the full $7m had already been paid, that is clearly contradicted by the further evidence, and her statement was accordingly misleading.

But that doesn't call her credibility into question? Nicol believes Scamber when she says her taped confessions were sarcastic, but doesn't believe that Johnny was speaking in exaggerated falsities when texting a friend about his abuser - Nicol picks and chooses which tone to pay attention to in order to suit his own agenda.

-----

These are just some exerts that I thought were interesting and show the nature of the judgement. I'm not sure how much I will be posting about the UK case anymore (I do have some posts about specific issues sitting in my drafts (about the James Cordon appearance casting doubts over all of AH's admissions, about the audio tapes and why they are ridiculously important, about Johnny's MRSA), but nothing like the other deep dives I was doing), because as I've stated before, I have become convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt of Johnny's innocence and because now that this judgement has been handed down by the Court of Appeals, the whole UK case is all over red rover so it doesn't seem super relevant to keep going on about this trial that is now dead and buried. The evidence that I have gone through and posted here, I can make sense of that. But this judgement and any thing in a similar vein, there's no chance of me ever making sense of that, so shall I just quit while I'm ahead? Yes.

[gellert-sparrow]

Hey remember when Amber Heard told Johnny Depp he was a “washed up, old, fat man” and that he was “going to die alone because nobody cared about him”, and then he joined Instagram and gained more followers in ten days than she’s had for three years even with a quarter of hers being bots? Because I do and I think it’s beautiful.

[babylittlescarlett]

Mainstream media and gossip sites should not be silent about Johnny Depp right now!

WHY the mainstream media and gossip sites are silent right now? They were all so busy when Scamber was making her claims but now, when the truth finally came out, they say/write NOTHING. Their behavior is pathetic. I hope Johnny gets support and love from his friends and family members. It must have been a nightmare to live day by day with this bed pooping psychopath of a woman.

[yourfriendlypyrovampire]

Cardi B keeps showing people that she isn't a good person but people will do mental gymnastics to defend her.

[imeverywoman420]

People who believe amber: evidence, facts, logic, common sense

Depp stans: scamber TURD

[intombedarc]

dude anybody who’s still defending scamber turd can bounce farrrr away from me

[zomburrito]

Things Scambuser Turd stans say. Part FOUR.

They are now attacking Joe Quinn?! Wtf?? He didn't do anything! And just because you hate a couple of his fans you're gonna call him ugly?? Grow up.

[raerana]

i never mentioned anything or care about this case, sorry that were frothing at the bit..... goldigging is not a crime

Hello again turdbot💖

You claim not to care about the amber heard case yet you came after me for calling her a gold digger? Sure, Jan. But by all means, defend immorality because facts and reality aren’t in your favor. You sure are frothing at the mouth and chomping at the bit to defend her.

Thank you for reminding me of another crime abuser turd committed that I sadly failed to include in my previous post! Extortion. Extortion is very much gold digger adjacent behavior. Examples of extortion include: demanding money and property from your spouse on short notice and threatening to go public with a falsely obtained domestic violence restraining order. Gee I wonder who did that. Certainly proven gold digger scamber turd wouldn’t commit such a crime *gasp* 🫢

[honestytruthfreedom2]

Because Amber Heard is a Pig.

[council-of-phantoms]

Max isn't a big fan of this very disliked celebrity either *coughs* SCAMBER TURD *coughs* but one picture won't hurt.

Inspired by the Black, White, and Blood comic series.

[juanitasupreme]

I'm always shocked to learn that most people calling Amber : scamber, Turd or whatever childish nickname are people in their late 20's/30's. Like they are the most committed to do so