Tumgik
the-miller-times · 7 hours
Text
Without a commitment to toning down the incendiary rhetoric, the risk of a catastrophic incident of political violence will only increase.
Adam Johnston
Sep 24, 2024
Political violence has long been a part of American life, but recent events, including a second attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump, have ignited a debate over the role of rhetoric in encouraging such violence.
It should be clear to anyone who has been paying attention since Trump announced his candidacy for president back in 2015 that the left’s consistent use of incendiary language (framing him as a Russian agent, as literally Hitler, and as an existential threat to America and democracy) doesn’t just dehumanize him. It also fosters a volatile climate where political violence against him and his supporters becomes justifiable — especially to individuals who increasingly see themselves as “defenders of democracy” or “anti-fascists.”
The left, however, doesn’t see it that way. In fact, even after a second assassination attempt, Democrats and the media still believe it is not their rhetoric that is to blame for the attempts on Trump’s life, but rather Trump himself.
10 notes · View notes
the-miller-times · 7 hours
Text
Robin Westenra
Sep 24, 2024
With so much going on I have not been following this story. Is it the new Epstein?
Biggest Celeb Names At Diddy White Parties? Latest P Diddy News
LIVE: Diddy & the Hip Hop Cabal—Sodomy, Satan & Selling Souls EXPOSED
Watch HERE
🔴 LIVE: Idols or SLAVES? Hollywood Evil UNMASKED | Hip Hop Cabal Part 2
Watch HERE
The Diddy Indictment is just the TIP OF THE ICEBERG, it goes much deeper | Redacted w Clayton Morris
"The Diddy indictment is PROTECTING the highest people in power" Ian Carroll | Redacted News
Watch HERE
4 notes · View notes
the-miller-times · 7 days
Text
José Alberto Niño
Sep 17, 2024
Under the leadership of President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, the United States has witnessed a concerning uptick in crime rates, raising questions about the administration's commitment to ensuring the safety and security of its citizens. Reports from reputable sources like the Department of Justice and on-the-ground incidents, such as the alarming rise of violent Venezuelan gangs in Aurora, Colorado, paint a grim picture of a nation grappling with the repercussions of poorly implemented policies.
The Biden administration's immigration policies, particularly the controversial CHNB parole program, have directly impacted local communities, leading to unforeseen consequences. As highlighted in an article from Justicereport.net, the recent criminal activities in Massachusetts by migrants who have entered under this program illustrate a significant oversight in the vetting process. These lapses not only compromise public safety but also strain resources and foster resentment in communities forced to cope with the administration's lax border policies.
Moreover, statistics from the Department of Justice, as reported by the New York Post, underscore a national trend of increasing violence. Contrary to the narrative occasionally pushed by the media, the DOJ's National Crime Victimization Survey indicates a stark rise in violent crimes, including aggravated assaults and robberies, from 2020 to 2023.
This increase contradicts the administration's claims of decreasing crime rates and highlights a disconnect between government reports and the experiences of everyday Americans (and in case you were wondering about crime by Haitian “refugees”, look no further than Massachussettes)  
2 notes · View notes
the-miller-times · 7 days
Text
Ryan Routh is a total maniac, but that doesn't rule anything out.
Jordan Schachtel
Sep 17, 2024
Unless you live under a rock, you’ve probably heard about the recent incident involving another attempted assassination against President Trump. I’ve done quite a bit of research on the profile of charged suspect Ryan Routh, and I have some questions about the overall situation.
Was Ryan Routh directed or encouraged to carry out an attack by any domestic or foreign governments?
Routh had countless contacts overseas in Eastern Europe and Asia. He was in constant contact with militants and aspiring warfighters in Ukraine, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, and elsewhere. He spent quite a bit of time in Ukraine in 2022.
On the domestic front, it’s no secret that our politicized law enforcement and intelligence agencies have involved high-profile public figures in past ploys. We must also not forget that elements of U.S. intelligence services dedicated the entirety of the Trump presidency to attempting to destroy the man. Sadly, we can’t rule out the troublesome possibility that Routh (and perhaps Crooks before him) is the upgrade from information operation to kinetic operation.
How will the federal investigation go?
Federal law enforcement (specifically, the FBI) has a massive conflict of interest in going after Routh, given the DOJ’s simultaneous efforts to attempt to imprison President Trump via a series of endlessly bogus charges. The FBI has become a political tool for Democrats, so there is a major problem with them holding bad guys who target Republicans accountable.
The two charges against Routh involving illegal gun possession are super weak, and there’s a very real possibility that he will serve a minimal prison sentence, despite his sinister intentions. So it’s up to the State of Florida to find justice.
7 notes · View notes
the-miller-times · 8 days
Text
Ben Bartee
Sep 17, 2024
It’s only a matter of time until these get deployed in the “camps for adults” Hillary has promised.
          Related: Six Straight Minutes of Democrats Calling For Re-Education Camps
In the Brave New World, John Q. Taxpayer will subsidize his own psychological abuse in the name of promoting Democracy™, and he can choke on the irony. 
Via The Guardian (emphasis added):
“Whether it is the mistaken idea that the moon landings never happened or the false claim that Covid jabs contain microchips, conspiracy theories abound, sometimes with dangerous consequences.
*See: Russiagate, fully debunked by the Democrats’ own handpicked investigator, Robert Mueller, proven to have been concocted and funded by the Clinton campaign.
1 note · View note
the-miller-times · 9 days
Text
0 notes
the-miller-times · 12 days
Text
By John & Nisha Whitehead The Rutherford Institute
September 12, 2024
“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” — Abraham Lincoln
It is both apt and ironic that the anniversary of 9/11, which paved the way for the government to overthrow the Constitution, occurs the week before the anniversary of the day the U.S. Constitution was adopted on September 17, 1787.
All sides are still waging war on our constitutional freedoms, and “we the people” remain the biggest losers.
This year’s presidential election is no exception.
As Bruce Fein, the former associate deputy attorney general under President Ronald Reagan, warns in a recent article in the Baltimore Sun, “In November, the American people will have a choice between Harris-Walz and Trump-Vance. But they will not have a choice between an Empire and a Republic.”
In other words, the candidates on this year’s ballot do not represent a substantive choice between freedom and tyranny so much as they constitute a cosmetic choice: the packaging may vary widely, but the contents remain the same.
No matter who wins, the bureaucratic minions of the Security/Military Industrial Complex and its Police State/Deep State partners will retain their stranglehold on power.
Neither Donald Trump nor Kamala Harris have the greatest of track records when it comes to actually respecting the rights enshrined in the Constitution, despite the rhetoric being trotted out by both sides lately regarding their so-called devotion to the rule of law.
6 notes · View notes
the-miller-times · 13 days
Text
Former President Donald Trump on Thursday pledged to eliminate taxes on overtime wages if he is elected back to the White House in November. 
Trump has previously promised to eliminate taxes on tips, and social security benefits. All three proposals appear to be part of an effort to woo working-class and senior voters, groups that could be crucial in November's election.
"Today, I'm also announcing that as part of our additional tax cuts, we will end all taxes on overtime," Trump told his supporters in Tuscon, Arizona. "The people who work overtime are among the hardest working citizens in our country. And for too long, no one in Washington has been looking out for them.
"They are police officers, nurses, factory workers, construction workers, truck drivers and machine operators," he continued. "It's time for the working man and woman to finally catch a break, and that's what we're doing, because I think it's a good one. I think it's going to be great for the country."
Trump also claimed that much of the missile defense system that he proposed earlier this year will be built in Arizona.
32 notes · View notes
the-miller-times · 14 days
Photo
Tumblr media
“One of the hardest things in life is having words in your heart that you can’t utter.” - James Earl Jones.
CARTER™️ Magazine carter-mag.com #wherehistoryandhiphopmeet #historyandhiphop365 #cartermagazine #carter #jamesearljones #hbd #blackhistory #blackhistorymonth #history #staywoke https://www.instagram.com/p/CKKxyRkrWWY/?igshid=2h76blyk0di2
28 notes · View notes
the-miller-times · 14 days
Text
Vice President Kamala Harris issued a slew of false claims and hoaxes that ABC debate moderators did not fact check during Tuesday’s debate against former President Donald Trump.
(Article by Alana Mastrangelo republished from Breitbart.com)
Here are 21 false claims and hoaxes that Harris uttered on live television, in front of millions of Americans:
1. “Very fine people” hoax
Harris claimed Trump called neo-Nazis in Charlottesville “very fine people,” a widely known hoax that Democrats continue to repeat, despite it being debunked for years by numerous outlets, including by the left-wing fact checking website Snopes.
2. Project 2025 hoax
Harris accused Trump of wanting to implement Project 2025. This is false. Trump has repeatedly stated that he has nothing to do with it and hasn’t even read it.
Trump promptly corrected Harris on the debate stage, saying, “I have nothing to do — as you know, and as she knows, better than anyone — I have nothing to do with Project 2025. I haven’t read it, I don’t want to read it, purposely. I’m not going to read it.”
“I have nothing to do [with it],” Trump added. “Everybody knows I’m an open book. Everybody knows what I’m going to do: cut taxes very substantially, and create a great economy like I did before.”
3. False claims on Trump trade deficit
Harris claimed “the Trump administration resulted in a trade deficit” that was “one of the highest we’ve ever seen in the history of America.” This is patently false.
The trade deficit climbed to around $653 billion in Trump’s final year as president, in part because of depressed global demand for U.S. goods and services and a U.S. economy that recovered sooner than most other developed economies.
But the trade deficit nev
20 notes · View notes
the-miller-times · 28 days
Text
Mark Zuckerberg is squealing to the press that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris “repeatedly pressured” him to censor content on Facebook before and during their time in the White House. Zuckerberg was a willing participant who openly censored his platform for over four years. Suddenly, Zuckerberg is coming forward to admit that caved to the pressure and worked alongside Biden-Harris to turn his social media platform into a propaganda machine.
“I believe the government pressure was wrong and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it,” Zuckerberg wrote in the letter dated Aug. 26 and posted on the committee’s Facebook page and to its account on X. Anyone who published “disinformation” was censored. You were not allowed to question the COVID narrative and anyone who did was deplatformed. The CEO noted that Biden and Harris even asked him to censor those who were posting memes or joking about anything regarding the pandemic. Zuckerberg stated that in hindsight, he would not allow the White House to use his platform to trample over the First Amendment.
The White House released a statement saying that it did what was best to “protect public health and safety.” As Bobby Kennedy said, the government will ALWAYS state they are looking after public safety when they remove our rights. “Our position has been clear and consistent: we believe tech companies and other private actors should take into account the effects their actions have on the American people while making independent choices about the information they present,” according to the spokesperson.
Not only did Facebook/Meta work to reshape the COVID narrative, but they helped to form the Russian disinformation narrative against Trump and hide the Hunter Biden laptop story ahead of the 2020 US Presidential Election. The social media platform demoted any reporting from the New York Post to protect Joe Biden’s image, with Zuckerberg saying is has “been made clear that the reporting was not Russian disinformation, and in retrospect, we shouldn’t have demoted the story.” Furthermore, the Biden-Harris tyrants asked Facebook for help with “electoral infrastructure.” “The idea here was to make sure local election jurisdictions across the country had the resources they needed to help people vote safely during a pandemic,” he stated.
So for over four years, Mark Zuckerberg knew that his organization was willingly complacent in spreading actual disinformation to reshape public perception. They even deplatformed former President Donald Trump in addition to spreading LIES to make the public believe that he stole the 2016 US Presidential Election from Hillary with the help of Russia. Now, Zuckerberg said he is coming forward to say that he was simply bullied by the establishment. No – Mark Zuckerberg was complacent in his crime and waited too long to speak out. Perhaps he is worried facing his day in court under a Trump victory, or maybe he is reluctant to watch his wealth vanish under a Kamala presidency. Either way, Biden and Harris should also be held responsible for blatantly ignoring the Constitution and making free speech a punishable offense.
5 notes · View notes
the-miller-times · 29 days
Text
3D ANIMATION OF TRUMP ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT!
523 notes · View notes
the-miller-times · 29 days
Text
Tumblr media
92 notes · View notes
the-miller-times · 29 days
Text
It is without question the most significant development in the 2024 presidential race - other than the surprise withdraw of President Joe Biden.
Roger Stone
Aug 27, 2024
The endorsement of Republican Donald J. Trump by lifelong Democrat Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is without question the most significant development in the 2024 presidential race—other than the surprise withdraw of President Joe Biden, who it is now clear was forced out of the race by the leaders of his own party who were painfully aware of his rapid mental and physical deterioration, which they had successfully concealed from the American people for most of his presidency.
Incredibly, the people who have been harping on their protection of "democracy" used an entirely undemocratic process to force Joe Biden from the race and to elevate a candidate that no Democrat primary or caucus voter actually voted for. Not only did they not let Robert F. Kennedy fairly compete for their nomination, but they then turned around and anointed a candidate with virtually no public support.
Despite the best efforts of the mainstream media to characterize RFK Jr. as a "nut," and the shameful denunciations of members of his own family who evidently think that it is forbidden to depart from progressive Left ideology, Kennedy established himself as a tireless candidate, whose candidacy from the beginning was based on an agenda larger than just his own ambition.
12 notes · View notes
the-miller-times · 1 month
Photo
Tumblr media
Assassination attempts against US presidents
by geoglobal_
583 notes · View notes
the-miller-times · 1 month
Text
Eric Zuesse (blogs at https://theduran.com/author/eric-zuesse/)
I wrote this on 1 August 2019, when Senator Harris was preparing to run in the Democratic Party’s Presidential primaries, and before she decided not to do it because it was already clear that Democratic primary voters were liking her less and less the more that they were learning about her actual political policies and record. Her policies are the same today as they were then, and this is what they were then, and this is why she is hiding from reporters, instead of being interviewed by them:
——
California U.S. Senator Kamala Harris (who until recently was California’s Attorney General) is a gifted prosecutor, but that doesn’t qualify a person to be the type of person who will make a good U.S. President. An American President needs very different gifts than that, and she unfortunately doesn’t possess those.
This article is only for Democratic Party voters who are considering possibly to vote for that candidate.
Wikipedia, in its article on Senator Harris, provides an honest and documented summary of her positions on the issues. I shall start here by presenting, from that comprehensive summary article, the issues on which I believe that she most clearly is unfit, from the standpoint of progressives. These are the issues that the Democratic Party is supposed to stand for, and that the Republican Party is supposed to stand against. I shall show that, on these core issues, she is actually more of a Republican than a Democrat. (She, like Joe Biden and Pete Buttigieg, is making her electoral appeal to RepubliCratic voters, as these passages will document clearly.)
First, however, I should mention that the billionaires who own, and whose companies advertise in, and who otherwise effectively control the hiring and firing at, all of the mainstream news-media, are entirely satisfied with Joe Biden to become the Party’s nominee. However, they are equally satisfied with Kamala Harris to be that; so, both of those candidates have been doing very well fundraising on Wall Street. This means that both of them will be in this electoral contest until its very end. Many of the other candidates will drop out, but they won’t. Democratic Party voters who prefer a “middle ground” nominee” will be voting overwhelmingly for one of these two; they are satisfied for the nation’s billionaires to control the U.S. federal Government, as has, in fact, been the case ever since at least 1980.
6 notes · View notes
the-miller-times · 1 month
Text
The ventilators were a death sentence.
Tumblr media
Remember this with the next plandemic they launch
295 notes · View notes