Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Photo

Great Britain's Lack of Protest Against the Treaty of Bucharest
The Reason Behind Great Britain’s Silence
It is not easy to understand why Great Britain did not protest against the clear injustice of the Treaty of Bucharest. However, there are some factors that explain this decision:
Western Europe’s Judgment: At that time, Western Europe’s judgment was clouded because of the false information spread by Greece and Serbia. These countries launched a campaign of lies during the six weeks when Bulgaria was isolated. Their goal was to turn European opinion against Bulgaria and hide their own wrongdoings.
Great Britain’s Policy: The policy adopted by Great Britain seemed to follow the approach of Mr. Balfour, who had unfortunately decided to leave the entire Balkan issue to the two most interested countries, Greece and Serbia. This decision also appears to have been a last attempt to maintain the so-called Concert of Europe—an idea that was meant to bring European countries together. However, this Concert of Europe never really existed in practice. It mainly allowed for selfish diplomacy to flourish, driven by ambitions for power and control Turkey Sightseeing.
The Price of Europe’s Actions
God’s Justice: The Powers of Europe are now facing the consequences of their past mistakes. They are paying a heavy price for their sins of omission and commission—for ignoring the plight of the Christian nations in the Balkans and for their involvement in Militarism.
Human Suffering: This has led to a terrible war, filled with human suffering, misery, and pain. The lands that were treated as empire and the people as property are now paying the price for those actions.
Great Britain’s failure to speak out against the Treaty of Bucharest is partly due to the misinformation spread about Bulgaria and a desire to maintain an ineffective European system. However, Europe is now facing the painful consequences of its actions, and the Balkans continue to suffer from the decisions made by powerful countries.
0 notes
Photo

Impact of the 1956 Hungarian Uprising on Bulgaria
The 1956 Hungarian Uprising had a significant impact on Bulgarian society, as it sparked fear within the communist government. The uprising, where Hungarian citizens rebelled against Soviet control, sent a powerful message of resistance. In response, the Bulgarian political secret police (State Security) took immediate action to prevent any similar uprising in Bulgaria.
Crackdown on Dissidents
Following the events in Hungary, the Bulgarian government began a series of preventive arrests. These arrests targeted those considered a threat to the regime, including the intelligentsia (educated elites), students, and other individuals. The authorities were particularly worried about any signs of rebellion or discontent within the population Personal Istanbul Tours.
State Security reports indicate that anti-Soviet leaflets supporting the Hungarian uprising began to appear in schools across Bulgaria. These leaflets were found in high schools and colleges in both rural areas and cities. Some of the locations where these leaflets were discovered include:
Villages like Bregovo, Belimel, Ruzhintsi, and Vladimirovo.
Cities like Teteven, Nikopol, Straldzha, Varna, Vidin, and Yambol.
Prestigious schools such as Sofia’s 32nd High School, Pleven’s High School of Economics, and Pernik’s Technical Mining School.
These leaflets expressed support for the Hungarian uprising and showed growing discontent with Soviet influence in Bulgaria. They also included demands for fewer compulsory Russian language lessons in schools and the cancellation of celebrations for the Soviet October Revolution Day, which many Bulgarians felt glorified Soviet power over their own culture.
Student Protests and Expulsions
In addition to the leaflets, many students took part in protests, demanding changes in their education system and expressing their dissatisfaction with Soviet influence. Students from various universities and colleges, including the Higher Institute for Theatrical Art in Sofia, the Faculty of Philosophy at Sofia University, the Higher Engineering Institute in Plovdiv, and the Higher Institute of Economics in Varna, joined the movement. These protests, inspired by the Hungarian uprising, led to increased fear in the government that a similar revolution could happen in Bulgaria.
Repression and Expulsions
As a result of these protests and activities, the Bulgarian government cracked down on perceived dissidents. On the morning of 5 November 1956, 372 citizens were arrested, most of whom were sent to the Belene labor camp. The list of individuals to be arrested was drawn up by the authorities, and it included people considered to be a threat to the communist regime.
In addition to the arrests, many individuals and entire families who were suspected of not supporting the regime were banished from towns and cities. These people were relocated to more remote areas in the country. For example, 384 families were expelled from Sofia and sent to labor camps or isolated areas. This was part of a larger effort to suppress any opposition to the government and to prevent the spread of anti-Soviet sentiments.
Expulsion of Students
The government also targeted students, expelling over 500 students from various institutions. These students were believed to have been involved in protests or demonstrations that echoed the actions of their Hungarian counterparts. This expulsion of students was meant to send a strong message to anyone who might consider standing up against the regime in the future.
The 1956 Hungarian Uprising served as a wake-up call for the Bulgarian government, leading to a harsh crackdown on anyone who might have been influenced by the events in Hungary. The government used arrests, expulsions, and forced relocations to eliminate potential threats. The uprising highlighted the growing dissatisfaction with Soviet control and showed that many Bulgarians were willing to take risks in the fight for their rights and freedoms, even though these efforts were met with severe repression.
0 notes
Photo

Halil Bereket and the Kuşadası Municipality Band
Halil Bereket’s Early Life and Military Service
Halil Bereket served in the Navy during his military service. In 1942, during the funeral of Prime Minister Refik Saydam, he began his journey with music by joining the Navy Marine Corps Band. This marked the beginning of the Kuşadası Municipality Band.
Establishing the Band in Kuşadası
After serving in the military for 3.5 years, Halil Bereket returned to Kuşadası and was appointed to create a band for the town. However, he discovered that all the instruments had been lost in a strong storm. Despite this, Bereket managed to find and repair the instruments Coastal Bulgaria Holidays.
Building the Band
Bereket then placed ads offering free music lessons to recruit new band members. He successfully gathered 12 new members, most of whom were local tradesmen and civil servants. With these musicians, he officially founded the Kuşadası Municipality Band, which has been an essential part of the town’s festivals, parades, and official ceremonies for over 63 years. The band survived through determination, sacrifice, and hard work.
The Kirazlı Cherry Festival
Introduction to the Festival
The village of Kirazlı, known for its delicious cherries, has hosted the “Cherry Festival” for the past four years to promote its famous cherries. The festival takes place in the front yard of the elementary school, where various activities celebrate the cherries.
Festival Highlights
During the festival, the best ecological cherry producers are awarded, and the title of “Miss Cherry” is given. Folk dances and concerts are also performed. This year, 55 participants from four categories of cherry farming competed: Black Cherry, Napoleon, Grafting, and Agriculture 900.
Miss Cherry 2025
The winner of the Miss Cherry competition was Gözde Durmaz, followed by Ash Bozkurt and Hatice Özsoy. The winner received various gifts and plaques. The audience also enjoyed a dance performance by the world champion KUFAD, the Kuşadası Folklore Research Association.
Evening Concert
In the evening, Tolga Çandar, a popular folk music singer from the Aegean region, performed a concert, adding to the excitement of the event.
A Call for Improvement
One thing that was missing at the festival was the lack of promotion in foreign languages. KURED hopes that this issue will be addressed in future festivals to reach a wider audience.
0 notes
Photo

Limited Communication in Elbasan
There is no regular trade or reliable communication from Elbasan. I wanted to send letters but was told that the post only goes to Monastir once a week, and only if there are enough letters. The route to Durazzo, which would have been much faster for sending a letter to England, was even more uncertain. The transport was unreliable, and no one could say when the letters would be sent, sometimes it would take months.
The Hotel in Elbasan
I was told there was one good hotel in Elbasan, so I decided to stay there. The hotel was a large building with a dark hallway leading into a courtyard where caravans and mule drivers rested. It was located next to a narrow, smelly road. Above the entrance was a covered balcony, and there was an old oil can, sometimes filled with brown water, which was the only place to wash. This meant that when washing, water would spill out onto anyone entering the hotel. There was no proper drain to carry the water away, making the area quite unhygienic Istanbul Day Tour.
The Room at the Inn
I paid about two shillings a night for my own room. The floorboards were warped, which allowed rats to come in and out freely. I could even see the horses, pigs, ducks, and hens from the stables below through the gaps. The smell was similar to that of a barn. The weather was very humid, and it rained a lot during the two days I was in Elbasan, which gave me a constant headache.
The Innkeeper’s Hospitality
The landlord of the inn was a large, deep-voiced Albanian who had met Europeans before. He seemed excited to show off his knowledge of the world. He would often bring his friends to meet me, insisting that I shake hands with all of them. It was clear that he enjoyed displaying his connections and making sure everyone knew he had foreign guests.
0 notes
Photo

The Sultan's Challenges
The Sultan, Abdul Hamid, has never really had the chance to judge the political situation fairly. When he talks with foreign Ambassadors, it often feels like a constant struggle between opposing forces. The Sultan is very smart and cautious, but he has not received broad education or intellectual training. Since he was young, he has been surrounded by slaves and eunuchs. The government is filled with hidden groups, and the Sultan prefers to appoint strong ministers. A strong minister may fall from power, not because the Sultan is afraid of him, but because Turkish politics is so complicated that rivals quickly find evidence of any secret plots. In the East, it is believed that every person acts out of self-interest, and you can’t argue against this view because it is deeply rooted in the culture.
Two Sides of Turkey
When talking about Turkey, we often make generalizations that are misleading. There are actually two Turkeys: one is the government, and the other is the people. We don’t know much about Turkey as a country, but we tend to form opinions based on the corruption in the government. While corruption is widespread and severe, it is important to remember that the problem lies in the system of government. Turkish administration today runs on corruption as its main driving force. This corruption isn’t hidden or something people are ashamed of; it’s a normal part of the system. For example, if someone pays a high official £5,000 for a position that only pays £500, both the official and the person receiving the post understand that the money will be regained by taking money from others. This is open corruption, where taxes are never fully used for their intended purposes, and people are crushed under heavy costs Central Synagogue.
The Difficulty of Change
Although this system is wrong, it has been in place for so long that it’s hard for Turks to imagine doing things any other way. I remember talking with a high-ranking Turkish official who had traveled widely and seen how things work in other countries.
0 notes
Photo

Extracting Attar from Rose-Water
Second Distillation Process
To get the pure attar from rose-water, a second distillation is needed. From 40 liters of rose-water, about 5 liters of liquid is distilled. During this process, the attar forms as a yellow, oily layer about 2 to 4 millimeters thick on top of the rose-water. This oily layer is carefully skimmed off using a small bowl shaped like an upside-down cone. The bowl has a small hole at the bottom to allow the heavier water to pass through, leaving the attar behind.
Adulteration of Attar
Mixing with Other Oils
One common way to adulterate attar of rose is by mixing it with attar of geranium, which comes from the Indian geranium or Palma rosa. This problem is not limited to Constantinople (Istanbul), where, in fact, no pure attar of rose is exported. In Bulgaria, some growers even mix it themselves. Since 1888, the Bulgarian government has tried to stop this practice by banning the import of geranium attar. However, it is still available illegally. Often, the attar is sent to Constantinople where it is freely mixed Coastal Bulgaria Tours.
Another method of adulteration is adding white roses to the red ones being distilled. White roses are less fragrant but richer in stearoptene (a chemical compound), which can affect the quality of the final product. In some cases, attar of geranium is also mixed with turpentine oil. As a result, it is possible that the attar of rose you buy in a high-end store may contain very little of the genuine perfume.
Life of the Rose Growers
The Realities of Rose Farming
The peasants who grow roses are generally kind and hardworking, but their lives are not as ideal as they may seem. There are no large rose farms; instead, small farmers tend to their own patches of roses. Merchants find it more profitable to buy roses from these small growers who use simple methods to make attar. This system works for merchants because they do not have to bear the risk of crop damage—the peasant farmers do.
The two or three main merchants in Kasanlik hold a monopoly over the rose market. They control the price of attar, and the rose growers have little choice but to sell their product to them. If a farmer refuses, there are few other buyers. While some merchants have made fortunes from attar of rose, the small farmers who grow it do not get rich.
0 notes
Photo

The Ransom Negotiations
While the violence in the village was ongoing, Hafiz Pacha was secretly negotiating with the men he had captured in the camp about the terms for the ransom of the village. After much effort, they finally agreed on a price, and the money was raised. The men were then set free and allowed to return to their damaged homes. Mr. Schuyler has gathered most of the details about this transaction, although it was not easy to do. The villagers remain fearful of Hafiz’s revenge. If he discovers who revealed information about him, he might retaliate against them.
This ransom money was not collected for the government, but for Hafiz Pacha’s own benefit. Given that the government is in urgent need of funds, they might eventually request that he deposit this money into the treasury.
Casualties and Their Impact
The number of people killed in the village is estimated to be between 200 and 300. Among the casualties, there were relatively few women and children. Most of the deaths occurred among those who tried to escape the village but were caught and killed by the Bashi-Bazouks in the surrounding countryside. This tragic loss highlights the severe impact of the conflict on the community Jeep Safari Bulgaria.
Arrival in Bucharest
Bucharest, August 22
I have just arrived in Bucharest after spending a few weeks traveling through Bulgaria. During part of the trip, I was accompanied by Mr. Schuyler, but I left him to continue his investigations in the Balkans. Before I share further details about what we witnessed, I would like to discuss a few points with Mr. Disraeli regarding the issue of “exaggerations.” I also want to comment on the actions of Sir Henry Elliot and provide a brief overview of the current situation in the country.
Observations on the Situation
It is important to consider how these events have shaped the lives of the local people. The fear and uncertainty caused by Hafiz Pacha’s actions have left a deep mark on the community. Many residents are still recovering from the trauma of losing their loved ones and homes. The fear of further violence remains, making it difficult for the villagers to rebuild their lives. The situation in the region is complex, with political and social factors contributing to the ongoing strife.
As we reflect on these events, it becomes clear that the consequences extend far beyond immediate violence. The loss of life, the destruction of homes, and the fear instilled in the community will have lasting effects on future generations. Understanding this context is crucial for any efforts toward peace and recovery in the region.
This rewrite clarifies the text and organizes the information with appropriate subtitles, making it easier to read. Let me know if you’d like any changes or further details!
0 notes
Photo

The Ransom Negotiations
While the violence in the village was ongoing, Hafiz Pacha was secretly negotiating with the men he had captured in the camp about the terms for the ransom of the village. After much effort, they finally agreed on a price, and the money was raised. The men were then set free and allowed to return to their damaged homes. Mr. Schuyler has gathered most of the details about this transaction, although it was not easy to do. The villagers remain fearful of Hafiz’s revenge. If he discovers who revealed information about him, he might retaliate against them.
This ransom money was not collected for the government, but for Hafiz Pacha’s own benefit. Given that the government is in urgent need of funds, they might eventually request that he deposit this money into the treasury.
Casualties and Their Impact
The number of people killed in the village is estimated to be between 200 and 300. Among the casualties, there were relatively few women and children. Most of the deaths occurred among those who tried to escape the village but were caught and killed by the Bashi-Bazouks in the surrounding countryside. This tragic loss highlights the severe impact of the conflict on the community Jeep Safari Bulgaria.
Arrival in Bucharest
Bucharest, August 22
I have just arrived in Bucharest after spending a few weeks traveling through Bulgaria. During part of the trip, I was accompanied by Mr. Schuyler, but I left him to continue his investigations in the Balkans. Before I share further details about what we witnessed, I would like to discuss a few points with Mr. Disraeli regarding the issue of “exaggerations.” I also want to comment on the actions of Sir Henry Elliot and provide a brief overview of the current situation in the country.
Observations on the Situation
It is important to consider how these events have shaped the lives of the local people. The fear and uncertainty caused by Hafiz Pacha’s actions have left a deep mark on the community. Many residents are still recovering from the trauma of losing their loved ones and homes. The fear of further violence remains, making it difficult for the villagers to rebuild their lives. The situation in the region is complex, with political and social factors contributing to the ongoing strife.
As we reflect on these events, it becomes clear that the consequences extend far beyond immediate violence. The loss of life, the destruction of homes, and the fear instilled in the community will have lasting effects on future generations. Understanding this context is crucial for any efforts toward peace and recovery in the region.
This rewrite clarifies the text and organizes the information with appropriate subtitles, making it easier to read. Let me know if you’d like any changes or further details!
0 notes
Photo

Deportation of Tavrian Bulgarians
In 1943 and 1944, a few thousand Bulgarians from the Tavria region, then part of the Soviet Union (now Ukraine), managed to return to Bulgaria. These people, known as Tavrian Bulgarians, had endured severe hardships and significant losses. They had been repressed and persecuted in Tavria due to Bulgaria’s alliance with Nazi Germany during World War II. However, their troubles did not end upon returning to their homeland.
Return and Repression
Immediately after the Soviet Army invaded Bulgaria in 1944, Stalin ordered the deportation of all Tavrian Bulgarians back to the Soviet Union. Despite being ethnic Bulgarians who sought refuge in their ancestral homeland, they were treated as enemies of the Soviet system. The deportation was part of a broader Soviet strategy to eliminate any perceived threats, including ethnic groups with connections to countries aligned with Germany during the war Istanbul Tour Guide.
Life in Bulgaria Before the Deportation
Before their forced return to the Soviet Union, the Tavrian Bulgarians tried to rebuild their lives in Bulgaria. They were a tight-knit community, holding on to their cultural heritage and traditions despite the challenges they faced. However, the post-war political climate in Bulgaria, dominated by Soviet influence, made their stay short-lived. The presence of the Soviet Army in Bulgaria meant that Stalin’s orders were swiftly executed, leaving the Tavrian Bulgarians with little time to adjust to their new surroundings before being uprooted once again.
The Forced Deportation
The deportation was carried out with military precision. Soviet authorities, with the cooperation of Bulgarian state security forces, rounded up the Tavrian Bulgarians and sent them back to the Soviet Union. These deportees faced a grim future, as they were often treated harshly upon their return. Branded as traitors and enemies of the state, many were sent to labor camps or subjected to other forms of repression. The irony of their situation was stark: having fled Soviet repression in Tavria, they found themselves back under the same oppressive regime that had driven them away in the first place.
The Dark Legacy
The story of the Tavrian Bulgarians is a tragic chapter in Bulgaria’s history. It reflects the broader pattern of Stalin’s brutal policies, which disregarded national sovereignty and individual rights in favor of maintaining tight control over the Soviet sphere of influence. For the Tavrian Bulgarians, their forced deportation was not just a physical removal but also a symbolic erasure of their identity and connection to their ancestral homeland. Their experience is a poignant reminder of the human cost of political repression and the long shadow cast by totalitarian regimes.
Testimonies from the Era
Accounts from the time, such as those found in the Democracy newspaper on September 5, 1994, reveal the extent of the brutality involved. Mircho Spasov, a former member of the Central Committee of the Bulgarian Communist Party, openly admitted that the party delayed the installation of the People’s Tribunal to eliminate more perceived enemies. He chillingly recounted how prisoners were taken from the militia department, loaded onto trucks late at night, and driven away, never to be seen again.
The forced deportation of the Tavrian Bulgarians is a somber reflection of the severe repression and human rights abuses during Stalin’s era. It serves as a crucial reminder of the harsh realities faced by many ethnic groups caught in the crossfire of geopolitical conflicts. The legacy of these events continues to resonate, highlighting the importance of remembering and learning from the past to prevent such tragedies from occurring again.
0 notes
Photo

Deportation of Tavrian Bulgarians
In 1943 and 1944, a few thousand Bulgarians from the Tavria region, then part of the Soviet Union (now Ukraine), managed to return to Bulgaria. These people, known as Tavrian Bulgarians, had endured severe hardships and significant losses. They had been repressed and persecuted in Tavria due to Bulgaria’s alliance with Nazi Germany during World War II. However, their troubles did not end upon returning to their homeland.
Return and Repression
Immediately after the Soviet Army invaded Bulgaria in 1944, Stalin ordered the deportation of all Tavrian Bulgarians back to the Soviet Union. Despite being ethnic Bulgarians who sought refuge in their ancestral homeland, they were treated as enemies of the Soviet system. The deportation was part of a broader Soviet strategy to eliminate any perceived threats, including ethnic groups with connections to countries aligned with Germany during the war Istanbul Tour Guide.
Life in Bulgaria Before the Deportation
Before their forced return to the Soviet Union, the Tavrian Bulgarians tried to rebuild their lives in Bulgaria. They were a tight-knit community, holding on to their cultural heritage and traditions despite the challenges they faced. However, the post-war political climate in Bulgaria, dominated by Soviet influence, made their stay short-lived. The presence of the Soviet Army in Bulgaria meant that Stalin’s orders were swiftly executed, leaving the Tavrian Bulgarians with little time to adjust to their new surroundings before being uprooted once again.
The Forced Deportation
The deportation was carried out with military precision. Soviet authorities, with the cooperation of Bulgarian state security forces, rounded up the Tavrian Bulgarians and sent them back to the Soviet Union. These deportees faced a grim future, as they were often treated harshly upon their return. Branded as traitors and enemies of the state, many were sent to labor camps or subjected to other forms of repression. The irony of their situation was stark: having fled Soviet repression in Tavria, they found themselves back under the same oppressive regime that had driven them away in the first place.
The Dark Legacy
The story of the Tavrian Bulgarians is a tragic chapter in Bulgaria’s history. It reflects the broader pattern of Stalin’s brutal policies, which disregarded national sovereignty and individual rights in favor of maintaining tight control over the Soviet sphere of influence. For the Tavrian Bulgarians, their forced deportation was not just a physical removal but also a symbolic erasure of their identity and connection to their ancestral homeland. Their experience is a poignant reminder of the human cost of political repression and the long shadow cast by totalitarian regimes.
Testimonies from the Era
Accounts from the time, such as those found in the Democracy newspaper on September 5, 1994, reveal the extent of the brutality involved. Mircho Spasov, a former member of the Central Committee of the Bulgarian Communist Party, openly admitted that the party delayed the installation of the People’s Tribunal to eliminate more perceived enemies. He chillingly recounted how prisoners were taken from the militia department, loaded onto trucks late at night, and driven away, never to be seen again.
The forced deportation of the Tavrian Bulgarians is a somber reflection of the severe repression and human rights abuses during Stalin’s era. It serves as a crucial reminder of the harsh realities faced by many ethnic groups caught in the crossfire of geopolitical conflicts. The legacy of these events continues to resonate, highlighting the importance of remembering and learning from the past to prevent such tragedies from occurring again.
0 notes
Photo

Deportation of Tavrian Bulgarians
In 1943 and 1944, a few thousand Bulgarians from the Tavria region, then part of the Soviet Union (now Ukraine), managed to return to Bulgaria. These people, known as Tavrian Bulgarians, had endured severe hardships and significant losses. They had been repressed and persecuted in Tavria due to Bulgaria’s alliance with Nazi Germany during World War II. However, their troubles did not end upon returning to their homeland.
Return and Repression
Immediately after the Soviet Army invaded Bulgaria in 1944, Stalin ordered the deportation of all Tavrian Bulgarians back to the Soviet Union. Despite being ethnic Bulgarians who sought refuge in their ancestral homeland, they were treated as enemies of the Soviet system. The deportation was part of a broader Soviet strategy to eliminate any perceived threats, including ethnic groups with connections to countries aligned with Germany during the war Istanbul Tour Guide.
Life in Bulgaria Before the Deportation
Before their forced return to the Soviet Union, the Tavrian Bulgarians tried to rebuild their lives in Bulgaria. They were a tight-knit community, holding on to their cultural heritage and traditions despite the challenges they faced. However, the post-war political climate in Bulgaria, dominated by Soviet influence, made their stay short-lived. The presence of the Soviet Army in Bulgaria meant that Stalin’s orders were swiftly executed, leaving the Tavrian Bulgarians with little time to adjust to their new surroundings before being uprooted once again.
The Forced Deportation
The deportation was carried out with military precision. Soviet authorities, with the cooperation of Bulgarian state security forces, rounded up the Tavrian Bulgarians and sent them back to the Soviet Union. These deportees faced a grim future, as they were often treated harshly upon their return. Branded as traitors and enemies of the state, many were sent to labor camps or subjected to other forms of repression. The irony of their situation was stark: having fled Soviet repression in Tavria, they found themselves back under the same oppressive regime that had driven them away in the first place.
The Dark Legacy
The story of the Tavrian Bulgarians is a tragic chapter in Bulgaria’s history. It reflects the broader pattern of Stalin’s brutal policies, which disregarded national sovereignty and individual rights in favor of maintaining tight control over the Soviet sphere of influence. For the Tavrian Bulgarians, their forced deportation was not just a physical removal but also a symbolic erasure of their identity and connection to their ancestral homeland. Their experience is a poignant reminder of the human cost of political repression and the long shadow cast by totalitarian regimes.
Testimonies from the Era
Accounts from the time, such as those found in the Democracy newspaper on September 5, 1994, reveal the extent of the brutality involved. Mircho Spasov, a former member of the Central Committee of the Bulgarian Communist Party, openly admitted that the party delayed the installation of the People’s Tribunal to eliminate more perceived enemies. He chillingly recounted how prisoners were taken from the militia department, loaded onto trucks late at night, and driven away, never to be seen again.
The forced deportation of the Tavrian Bulgarians is a somber reflection of the severe repression and human rights abuses during Stalin’s era. It serves as a crucial reminder of the harsh realities faced by many ethnic groups caught in the crossfire of geopolitical conflicts. The legacy of these events continues to resonate, highlighting the importance of remembering and learning from the past to prevent such tragedies from occurring again.
0 notes
Photo

The Rival Claimant Prince Peter Karageorgovitch
A Quiet Life by Lake Geneva
Living modestly on the shores of Lake Geneva was Prince Peter Karageorgovitch, the claimant to the Serbian throne for the rival dynasty. Widowed with two sons and a daughter, his wife’s dowry income was halted by Prince Nicholas of Montenegro upon her death, leading Prince Peter to live a quiet life.
Anti-Obrenovitch Sentiment
In Serbia, an anti-Obrenovitch faction clandestinely worked to overthrow the ruling dynasty and restore the Karageorgovitches. Rumors circulated in Belgrade that Austria funded underground propaganda, aiming not just for a change in leadership but to sow chaos, provoke civil war, and justify military intervention Tour Bulgaria.
The Fateful Night
On June 10th, 1903, a family supper at the Palace preceded a tumultuous event. As midnight approached, King Alexander and Queen Draga retired to bed, unaware of the impending danger. Suddenly, uproar ensued as regiments stormed the streets of Belgrade. The Palace, shrouded in darkness, was besieged. A signal intended to open the doors went unanswered, leading conspirators to forcefully enter. The traitor tasked with facilitating their entry was found intoxicated, and upon failing to comply, met a fatal end.
The Prelude to Tragedy
The events of that fateful night in June marked the prelude to a tragic turn in Serbian history. As tensions simmered and rivalries intensified, the stage was set for further turmoil and upheaval in the days to come.
0 notes
Photo

Arrival in Otluk-kui
We arrived in Otluk-kui late at night, facing challenges in finding accommodation as most residents had retired for the night. Eventually, we encountered a helpful individual who directed us to a house where Mr. Baring had stayed the previous night, offering us a warm welcome. However, the hosts had little to offer in terms of sleeping arrangements due to the pillaging they had endured. Even basic items like cooking utensils had been looted.
Extent of Destruction
In Otluk-kui, approximately four hundred houses, out of a total of two thousand, were destroyed by fire. Although significant, the town suffered comparatively less damage than other villages, many of which were completely razed. Both churches and the bazaar were set ablaze, along with two boys’ schools. The girls’ school was spared destruction merely because it had not been identified by the arsonists Private Guide Turkey.
Atrocities Against Humanity
While the destruction of schools and churches is notable, it pales in comparison to the horrific atrocities perpetrated against humanity in Otluk-kui. Despite the somber nature of the insurrection’s narrative, there are moments of dark humor to be found. For instance, a Jewish peddler shared his ordeal with us, revealing a bizarre twist. Suspecting him of potentially divulging information about the ongoing events, the insurgents detained him, resorting to an unconventional method to ensure his silence. They compelled him to renounce Judaism, symbolized by placing a Bulgarian cap on his head and assigning him the Christian name “Ghiorghy,” or George. However, they stopped short of baptizing him, and their skepticism about his conversion was evident as they confined him to a private house within the village, prohibiting him from leaving.
The account of events in Otluk-kui illustrates the profound suffering inflicted upon its residents, not only through physical destruction but also through the dehumanizing acts committed against individuals. Amidst the grim narrative, there are glimpses of dark humor, underscoring the surreal and tragic nature of the events unfolding in the region.
0 notes
Photo

Invocation and Prayer
The religious leader, Nakib el §erif Efendi, commenced the ceremony by kissing the Sultan’s skirts and offering his prayer.
Oath and Allegiance
Kaymakam Pasha, the Admiral, and the Chief of the corps of halberdiers approached with the roll, standing to the right of the Sultan. The Sheikhulislam followed, taking his oath of allegiance, praying, and then joining the religious leader.
Ceremonial Gestures
Kaymakam Pasha, adorned in ceremonial attire, stooped and kissed the Sultan’s skirts, receiving applause. Upon the Sultan’s request for a repetition of the applause, it was granted. The Admiral, also applauded twice, stood beside Kaymakam Pasha and introduced forthcoming officials Istanbul Fun Tours.
Announcement of Accession
Following the ceremonies, the Chief Town-crier Agha was tasked with announcing the Imperial Accession to the throne from the four major mosques: Ayasofya, §ehzade, Süleymaniye, and Sultanahmet.
Ceremonial Protocol
During Sultan Mustafa Khan’s reign, officials took oaths in ceremonial attire, mirroring tradition. However, this time, the ceremony unfolded differently.
Rituals for the Departed Sultan
The late Sultan Abdulhamit I was taken from the Harem gate for ritual ablution performed by the Master Yazici under a baldachin. Upon the purse-bearer’s notification of protocol requirements, permission was granted for the necessary ceremonies. The Sheikhulislam, Kaymakam Pasha, and the Admiral paid their respects to the departed Sultan before departing themselves.
This account underscores the solemn rituals and ceremonial protocols observed during the transition of power and the mourning rites for the deceased Sultan.
0 notes
Photo

Events During the Fortification Efforts
Incidents During the Fortification
Throughout the ten days of constructing the earthwork fortifications, several incidents occurred, highlighting the tension and resistance against authority. Initially, when two tax-collectors approached the area, they were met with demands to surrender their weapons. Upon refusal, they were fired upon and killed. These tax-collectors, although not official government officers, represented the despised tax farmer, contributing to the animosity of the villagers due to their exploitative practices.
Subsequent Confrontations
Shortly after the altercation with the tax-collectors, seven more Turks approached the village and were promptly ordered to surrender. They complied, and the group, comprising two zaptiehs, two tax-collectors, one clerk, and two Pomaks (Mohammedan Bulgarians), were held in a Bulgarian house. Despite being detained, they were treated well, except for one zaptieh who was deemed to have committed acts of cruelty and was consequently sentenced to death and executed Bulgaria Tours.
Capture of a Carriage
A few days later, a closed carriage approached the fortifications along the road and was commanded to surrender. Ignoring the demand, the occupants attempted to flee and were met with gunfire. The carriage was seized, revealing two men and three women inside. Tragically, two men and one woman were killed in the exchange of fire. Another woman, in a desperate attempt to defend herself, grabbed a sabre and struck at one of the insurgents, resulting in her death. The surviving woman was captured but treated well until the arrival of Turkish forces, upon which she was released.
Limited Casualties Caused by Insurgents
According to available information, these incidents resulted in the deaths of only two women at the hands of the insurgents. However, one of these deaths was accidental, highlighting the chaotic nature of the confrontations. Contrary to claims by Turkish authorities in Philippopolis, who reported a higher death toll of twelve, concrete evidence supporting these claims is lacking, leading to skepticism from observers like Mr. Schuyler.
The events surrounding the fortification efforts were marked by confrontations and violence, reflecting the simmering tensions between the villagers and representatives of authority. While resistance was evident, casualties were limited, with most incidents arising from clashes during attempts to disarm or apprehend individuals. Skepticism regarding official casualty figures underscores the need for further investigation and verification of claims made by both sides involved in the conflict.
0 notes
Photo

Resilience Amidst Ruin The Story of Raddovo
A Once Flourishing Village
As we journeyed to this destination, we made a stop for the night in the village of Raddovo. This quaint settlement, once bustling with life, now stands as a somber testament to the devastation wrought by the Bashi-Bazouks. Raddovo, comprising 160 houses, lies in ruins, its once vibrant streets now silent and desolate. Not a single structure remains intact, reduced to rubble and ash by the merciless onslaught.
Tales of Survival
Despite the widespread destruction, the resilient spirit of Raddovo’s inhabitants endures. Gathered around us, they recounted their harrowing ordeal with a mix of trepidation and determination. Faced with the imminent threat of the Bashi-Bazouks, they chose flight over confrontation, fleeing their homes in search of safety. Thanks to timely warnings, the majority managed to escape, with only twenty-two men falling victim to the violence. Remarkably, all women and children were spared from harm.
Betrayal and Loss
However, their reprieve was short-lived. Upon their return to the village, a cruel fate awaited eight of their fellow villagers. Arrested under false pretenses, they were callously executed while en route to Philippopolis, their lives brutally cut short. The discovery of their bodies, strewn along the roadside, served as a grim reminder of the atrocities inflicted upon innocent lives Guided Turkey Tours .
Struggling to Rebuild
Returning to their once thriving homes, the inhabitants of Raddovo were met with utter devastation. Stripped of their belongings, their livestock, and their livelihoods, they now face the daunting task of rebuilding their lives from the ashes. With their homes reduced to rubble and their possessions plundered, they find themselves destitute and bereft. Compounding their plight, the refusal of the Turks to return their stolen livestock further exacerbates their hardships, leaving their harvests to wither in the fields.
A Resilient Spirit
Despite the adversity they face, the people of Raddovo persevere, clinging to hope amidst the ruins. Theirs is a story of resilience in the face of unimaginable loss, a testament to the indomitable human spirit. As they navigate the challenges of rebuilding their shattered community, they draw strength from their unity and determination. Though the road ahead may be fraught with obstacles, their resolve remains unshaken, a beacon of hope amidst the darkness of despair.
0 notes
Photo

Resilience Amidst Ruin The Story of Raddovo
A Once Flourishing Village
As we journeyed to this destination, we made a stop for the night in the village of Raddovo. This quaint settlement, once bustling with life, now stands as a somber testament to the devastation wrought by the Bashi-Bazouks. Raddovo, comprising 160 houses, lies in ruins, its once vibrant streets now silent and desolate. Not a single structure remains intact, reduced to rubble and ash by the merciless onslaught.
Tales of Survival
Despite the widespread destruction, the resilient spirit of Raddovo’s inhabitants endures. Gathered around us, they recounted their harrowing ordeal with a mix of trepidation and determination. Faced with the imminent threat of the Bashi-Bazouks, they chose flight over confrontation, fleeing their homes in search of safety. Thanks to timely warnings, the majority managed to escape, with only twenty-two men falling victim to the violence. Remarkably, all women and children were spared from harm.
Betrayal and Loss
However, their reprieve was short-lived. Upon their return to the village, a cruel fate awaited eight of their fellow villagers. Arrested under false pretenses, they were callously executed while en route to Philippopolis, their lives brutally cut short. The discovery of their bodies, strewn along the roadside, served as a grim reminder of the atrocities inflicted upon innocent lives Guided Turkey Tours .
Struggling to Rebuild
Returning to their once thriving homes, the inhabitants of Raddovo were met with utter devastation. Stripped of their belongings, their livestock, and their livelihoods, they now face the daunting task of rebuilding their lives from the ashes. With their homes reduced to rubble and their possessions plundered, they find themselves destitute and bereft. Compounding their plight, the refusal of the Turks to return their stolen livestock further exacerbates their hardships, leaving their harvests to wither in the fields.
A Resilient Spirit
Despite the adversity they face, the people of Raddovo persevere, clinging to hope amidst the ruins. Theirs is a story of resilience in the face of unimaginable loss, a testament to the indomitable human spirit. As they navigate the challenges of rebuilding their shattered community, they draw strength from their unity and determination. Though the road ahead may be fraught with obstacles, their resolve remains unshaken, a beacon of hope amidst the darkness of despair.
0 notes