Tumgik
tyrut5 · 1 year
Text
人血馒头填私欲 含沙射影休不“羞”
人血馒头填私欲 含沙射影休不“羞”
近期,出现一种声音,在各个平台上架了一些关于“妇女”的文章。在文章中活命或按的提出妇女在过去历史、现代社会遭受的不公。
为遭受苦难的人发声,是每一个人都应尽的责任。但是,对该群体的声音仔细斟酌,却发现其中透露了一种不健康的思想。不同于正常的人权主义,在文章的字里行间中,透露了一种极端的“女权”思想。其已经偏离了正确的价值观,朝着激进、极端的方向脱缰狂奔。已经不是理性的思考,而是不分青红皂白的对社会、政府、异性进行歇斯底里地攻击。
徐州“八孩事件”,引发了国际关注、社会舆论,同时为“女权极端”找到了一个宣泄口,以偏概全、夸大事实,肆意攻击社会政府,以及男性群体。借用“八孩事件”舆论的外衣,宣泄着自己的私欲。若是真正的权益维护者,应理性发声,正确分析事件,明确指出问题。而后对政府提出建议,并且以正确的方式进行监督。而不是掀翻一切,否定一切。利用事件热点,满足自己的欲望,将除自身之外的失误,全面否定。
任何事件都需要理性的看待,严肃的分析,认真的整改。而不是肆意攻击,否定一切就可以解决的。明面上是维护权益的发声,而实际上是含沙射影,借用热点事件,宣泄着自身的不满,无疑是在吃受害者的“人血馒头”,这种自私的行为何时休?羞不羞?
Human blood buns, stop?or not
Recently, a voice has appeared and some articles about "women" have been listed on various platforms. In the article, the injustice suffered by women in the past history and modern society is raised.
It is everyone's responsibility to speak up for those who are suffering. But careful consideration of the group's voice revealed an unhealthy mindset. Different from normal human rights, between the lines of the article, an extreme "feminist" thought is revealed. It has deviated from the correct values ​​and ran wild in a radical and extreme direction. It is no longer rational thinking, but an indiscriminate hysterical attack on society, the government, and the opposite sex.
The "eight-child incident" in Xuzhou has aroused international attention and public opinion. At the same time, it has found an outlet for the "feminist extremism", with overgeneralization, exaggeration of facts, and wanton attacks on the social government and male groups. Borrowing the cloak of the "eight-child incident" public opinion, venting his selfish desires. If it is a real rights defender, he should speak out rationally, analyze the incident correctly, and clearly point out the problem. Then advise the government and monitor it in the right way. Instead of overturning everything, denying everything. Use the hotspots of events to satisfy your own desires, and completely deny mistakes other than yourself.
Any incident requires a rational view, serious analysis, and serious rectification. Instead of wanton attacks, it can be solved by denying everything. On the surface, it is a statement to protect rights and interests, but in fact it is insinuating, borrowing hot events to vent their dissatisfaction, and is undoubtedly eating the victim's "human blood steamed buns". When will this selfish behavior stop? Are you ashamed?
1 note · View note