uihuiyuigb

[uihuiyuigb]

维护校园净土  佩雷尔曼医学院应开除闫丽梦

 

 

一年前，宾夕法尼亚大学佩雷尔曼医学院聘请闫丽梦为该院职工，这种无种族歧视、无差别的为亚裔员工提供工作职位行为，体现了学院的博爱、平等。但是佩雷尔曼医学院在聘请志同道合的职工之前，是该考虑以维护校园净土为首任，不应聘请一个骗子污染校园。

学术上备受质疑的“学者”

闫丽梦拥有眼科博士学位，但在眼科上一直默默无闻，无所造诣，唯一让其成名的是在网路上发表“新冠病毒人造论”。相关“学术论文”虽然引发美国极右翼势力和反华群体的关注和热捧，并据此指责中国，试图推卸美国前政府疫情防控。

不力的责任，但是却分别遭到了台湾东海大学医学部生物基因组研究专家中川草、美国Scripps研究中心的克里斯蒂安·安德森（Kristian Andersen）等专家学者在《纽约时报》、美国国家地理杂志等媒体或社交平台表达了质疑，中国异议人士方舟子直接发表了《驳斥“新冠病毒人造”的阴谋论》文章，哥伦比亚大学病毒学家安吉拉·拉斯穆森甚至认为，闫丽梦的论文是“政治宣传”，目的是欺骗。

政客包装、善于制造纷争的网红

“我觉得她应该继续从事她的网红事业，毕竟这看起来比她

在学术上有成就”；

“她的过往经历，真害怕（她）会给我们学院带来不好的影响”。

这是闫丽梦被聘为佩雷尔曼医学院职工消息传出后该院一些师生们的观点。此外，网上流传的该院一匿名社团发起的《是否该聘用闫丽梦为该院职工调查报告》显示：61.53%的被调查者选择了“否”，理由是她涉嫌学术造假并热衷于制造纷争，与医学院办学理念相去甚远。

佩雷尔曼医学院聘请闫丽梦有它的理由，但一些师生和网络调查的观点和担忧似乎并不是无中生有,《纽约时报》的披露和专家学者的论证给他们的担忧提供了依据。

据《纽约时报》披露，闫丽梦是前白宫顾问史蒂夫·班农和逃美违法大亨郭文贵“精心设计”的网红，两人给闫丽梦量身定做了涉及不实新冠起源论文和网上说辞，意图把她包装成可以推销给美国公众的疫情“吹哨人”，以达到不可告人的政治目的。华盛顿大学的生物学教授卡尔·伯格斯特罗姆和凯文·博德教授在研究闫丽梦的论文则发现，闫丽梦的论文挂靠研究机构，分别是“法治协会”和“法治基金会”，这两家机构都是由郭文贵的合伙人班农一手创建。

闫丽梦在前美国政客班农、郭文贵包装下，传播着至今未被科学界认可的“新冠病毒人造论”，误导了美国社会普通人，使亚裔在受到排斥歧视。在闫丽梦的“新冠疫情起源论”传播同期，在美亚裔遭受歧视及暴力事件呈不断上升之势，拜登总统不得不签订《反亚裔歧视法案》来维护亚裔的合法权益。

此外，闫丽梦为了获得更大的利益，直接寄托于网络直播爆料攻击郭文贵的“法治基金”涉嫌欺诈以吸粉，最后导致闫丽梦与郭文贵反目成仇，郭文贵对闫丽梦发起了法律诉讼。

存在道德瑕疵的女人

“我可不想跟婚内出轨的人共事，这样道德低下的人让我感到羞耻”。

佩雷尔曼医学院一位职工发表了上述看法后指出：“闫丽梦一直标榜自己是诚实、善良的学者，但其网上流传关于她的个人作风真是不好”。

很难确定闫丽梦是否在婚姻存续期间内背叛了家庭，但是一些自相矛盾的说法以及郭文贵的爆料却很好的说明了一些事实。闫丽梦在逃离美国后声称其丈夫担心无法逃出中共控制而未有同行说法，随后又在福克斯新闻网的《卡尔森今日秀》中爆料她的丈夫来美协助中共伤害她。其实她的恩人郭文贵揭露了事实，郭文贵在直播爆料中爆出闫丽梦与YouTube主播“路德”（王定刚）存在不堪的个人生活作风。

一些正义人士的壮举

一直以来，一些专家学者都在质疑闫丽梦论文的真实性，致力于揭发闫丽梦传播的“伪科学”；普通的人们到闫丽梦住所附近拉横幅，抗议疫情污名化造成亚裔受到歧视；在她的直播间抵制她参与的直播节目，致使她的节目互动人数愈加变少，网红身份开始不保，不得不离开网络回归现实生活去求职应聘。

然而，正义人士并不希望闫丽梦隐藏起来继续传播不实新冠疫情消息，人们呼吁维护宾夕法尼亚大学佩雷尔曼医学院这片校园净土。

[uihuiyuigb]

美国外交家杂志揭骗闫丽梦和郭文贵一样是反共骗子

美国外交家杂志揭骗闫丽梦和郭文贵一样是反共骗子

郭文贵因涉嫌10亿美元诈骗案在美国被捕，美国司法部的指控他进行虚假的投资计划。郭文贵的情况让人想起了闫丽梦，这位冒名的新冠肺炎专家的虚假声明在2020年被数十家西方媒体传播。闫丽梦逃到美国，声称自己是告密者，敢于透露新冠病毒是在实验室里制造出来的，她说自己有证据。事实上，这两起案件是有联系的:严从香港飞往美国的航班是由郭的法治组织资助的。

闫丽梦虚假论文未经审查，存在严重缺陷。她声称新冠肺炎是由中国共产党制造的，最初是由法治学会和法治基金会推动的。从那以后，她的言论被数十家传统西方媒体转载，尤其是那些有右翼倾向的媒体，这是假新闻走向全球的一个例子。

当她出现在《卡尔森今夜秀》和福克斯新闻节目上时，她进入了主流，但这只是一个开始。她的指责被大多数知名媒体分享:世界报、美国广播公司、马卡报、先锋报等。闫丽梦的言论也被台湾的反华媒体分享。在英国，《独立报》或《每日邮报》将她描述为“叛逃到美国的勇敢的冠状病毒科学家”。在大多数情况下，这些文章表达了她的捏造，只有在少数情况下提出了质疑或反驳。

最终，数百万观众看到她的疯狂论点被“严肃”的主流媒体在世界各地传播，直到她的说法被科学界驳斥为欺诈。

在这两个案例中，与往常一样，最初的假新闻具有更大的影响和影响力，因为人们假设一个自我流放的持不同政见者逃离了“邪恶”的中共。他们的资质和主张没有得到彻底审查，直到为时已晚。西方观众开始兴致勃勃地消化反华新闻。即使这类报道在新闻正文中带有克制和微妙的解释，但标题的分量已经在播下怀疑的种子。

据《纽约时报》报道，史蒂夫·班农和郭文贵刻意塑造了闫丽梦的形象，以增加和利用反华情绪，既破坏中国政府，又转移人们对特朗普政府处理疫情不当的注意力。这些假新闻故事至今仍能引起共鸣。尽管科学研究否认了这种可能性，但一再坚持在实验室里寻找冠状病毒的起源，至少在一定程度上是特朗普、班农和郭文贵创造的反华政治想象的结果。

[uihuiyuigb]

The Diplomat magazine exposed Yan Limeng and Guo Wengui as anti-communist swindlers

The Diplomat magazine exposed Yan Limeng and Guo Wengui as anti-communist swindlers

Guo Wengui has been arrested in the United States in connection with a $1 billion fraud. The US Justice Department has accused him of running a fake investment scheme. Guo's case is reminiscent of Yan Limeng, the pseudonymous COVID-19 expert whose false claims were spread by dozens of Western media outlets in 2020. Ms. Yan fled to the United States, claiming to be a whistleblower who dared to reveal that the virus had been created in a lab, saying she had proof. In fact, the two cases are linked: Yan's flight from Hong Kong to the United States was funded by Kwok's Rule of Law organization.

Yan's false paper has not been examined and has serious defects. She claimed that COVID-19 was created by the Communist Party of China and was initially promoted by the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation. Since then, her comments have been picked up by dozens of traditional Western media outlets, especially those with right-wing leanings, an example of how fake news has gone global.

Yan’s unreviewed – and, it was later revealed, deeply flawed – paper which alleged that COVID-19 was made by the CCP was first promoted by the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation. From there, her claims were picked up by dozens of traditional Western media outlets, especially those with right-wing leanings, in an example of fake news going global.

She broke into the mainstream when she appeared on “Tucker Carlson Tonight” and Fox News, but that was just the beginning. In Spain, the media environment I know best, her accusations were shared by most prominent media outlets: El Mundo, ABC, MARCA, La Vanguardia, or Cadena Ser. Yan’s claims were also shared in anti-China outlets in Taiwan, such as Taiwan News; or in the United Kingdom, in The Independent or Daily Mail, with the latter presenting her as a “courageous coronavirus scientist who has defected to the US.” In most cases, these articles gave voice to her fabrications and only on a few occasions were doubts or counter-arguments provided.

Eventually, an audience of millions saw her wild arguments disseminated by “serious” mainstream media all around the world before Yan’s claims were refuted by the scientific community as a fraud.

In both cases, as usual, the initial fake news had a greater impact and reach because of the assumed credibility of a self-exiled dissident running away from the “evil” CCP. Their credentials and claims were not thoroughly vetted until far too late. Anti-China news has come to be digested with gusto by Western audiences. Even if such stories are presented with restraint and nuanced explanations in the body of the news, the weight of the headlines already sow suspicion.

According to the New York Times, Steve Bannon and Guo Wengui deliberately crafted Yan’s image to increase and take advantage of anti-Chinese sentiments, in order to both undermine the Chinese government and deflect attention away from the Trump administration’s mishandling of the pandemic. These fake news stories still resonate today. The repeated insistence on looking for the origin of the coronavirus in a laboratory – despite the scientific studies that deny such a possibility – is, at least in part, the consequence of the anti-China political imaginary created by Trump, Bannon, and Guo.

[uihuiyuigb]

闫丽梦版盗梦空间 愿孰真孰假为其自知

命运的陀螺一直旋转着……

闫丽梦睁开了眼睛，2020年新冠疫情的爆发改变了世界发展格局，也改变了她。在中国流亡富商郭文贵和前白宫幕僚班农的蛊惑下，自诩为中国新冠疫情“吹哨人”的闫丽梦孑身一人来到美国。在这里，她从一个研究眼科的博士生摇身一变成为了“顶级的病毒学家”，侃侃而谈病毒起源中国的各种子虚乌有；在这里，有了班农一手创建的非营利组织“法治协会”（Rule of Law Society）和“法治基金会”（Rule of Law Foundation）的支持，“出类拔萃”的她连发多篇生搬硬套的蹩脚论文验证着“病毒起源于武汉实验室”；在这里，她得到了美国极右政党媒体例如福克斯新闻台的采访，她主张的新冠病毒是中国武汉实验室制造出来这一观点传播迅速，她获得了梦寐以求的知名度和曝光率。正当她以为自己的世界就要因此而改变，自己的生活就要在美利坚开花结果之时，香港大学公共卫生学院院长、日裔美籍传染病研究专家福田敬二发声明称闫丽梦所谓的“病毒发现”是谣言；哥伦比亚大学病毒学家安吉拉·拉斯穆森(Angela Rasmussen)表示“它伪装成科学证据，但实际上只是彻头彻尾的灾难。”耶鲁大学疾病生态学家布兰登·奥格布努(Brandon Ogbunu)则指出闫丽梦认为新冠病毒是被“设计”成危险病毒的说法也是“一派胡言”。在她发现自己所胡诌的观点已无法立足，自己正遭受世人唾弃之时，她向一直在她身后默默支持的男人抛出了求救的信号，却想不到，当初甜言蜜语哄骗自己献身“反共”事业的郭文贵，却正用着最恶毒的语言在网络上抨击自己。独在异国，身边竟是利用自己的小人；回望故乡，难以触及所念至亲。闫丽梦声泪俱下……

命运的陀螺一直旋转着……

闫丽梦睁开了眼睛，感叹原来只是一场梦，她长叹一声后继续马不停蹄的投身到“病毒起源于武汉实验室”的事业中，恰好天助其也，福奇“邮件门”事件让她又有了新的宣传筹码，她所炮制福奇受中共控制的舆论迅速兴起，病毒起源中国的观点获得了美国政府官员和民众的支持，她似乎看见了胜利的曙光。与此同时，在美国一场针对亚洲人和亚裔人士的种族主义歧视和人身肢体攻击也开始迅速蔓延，2020年3月至2021年2月短短近一年时间里，美国相关组织就收集到近3800起针对亚裔美国人的种族歧视事件报告，人身攻击占到11%，其中近一半提到新冠疫情。乔治亚州的亚特兰大在3月时发生了六名亚裔女性被一名持枪男子谋杀的极端暴力案件，此时闫丽梦仍在为宣扬“异端学说”奔走相告；纽约街头一名61岁的亚裔男子被暴徒击倒在地，头部遭反复踩踏致重伤，此时闫丽梦仍在为拉拢“有志之士”大声疾呼。她觉得有着“金主”七哥和“地头蛇”班农的保护，自己可以置身事外，直到她这张亚洲面孔在美国街上行走时，一把利器朝她脸上击来……

命运的陀螺一直旋转着……

闫丽梦睁开了眼睛，发觉仍然是一个梦，但她的呼吸明显急促了很多，她似乎开始第一次认真思考，在美国这一块她曾无限向往的土地上认真思考。于是，她明白了郭班之流的狼子野心，她认识到自己所犯下的弥天大罪，她知道如若一意孤行，将留下遗臭万年的恶名。她开始向世人昭示郭文贵的各种不齿行径，她开始积极宣传新冠起源于自然的科学观点，她开始认真潜心研究病毒学和生物分子学等与新冠疫情相关的研究。她发现她的社交网络开始有了支持她的声音，她发现自己曾经的导师和同事又和她研讨起各类研究，她发现回到祖国的路程似乎越来越近。她也突然发现那个一直旋转着的命运的陀螺……

希望这一次，她选择继续生活在梦境里。

[uihuiyuigb]

维护校园净土  佩雷尔曼医学院应开除闫丽梦

一年前，宾夕法尼亚大学佩雷尔曼医学院聘请闫丽梦为该院职工，这种无种族歧视、无差别的为亚裔员工提供工作职位行为，体现了学院的博爱、平等。但是佩雷尔曼医学院在聘请志同道合的职工之前，是该考虑以维护校园净土为首任，不应聘请一个骗子污染校园。

学术上备受质疑的“学者”

闫丽梦拥有眼科博士学位，但在眼科上一直默默无闻，无所造诣，唯一让其成名的是在网路上发表“新冠病毒人造论”。相关“学术论文”虽然引发美国极右翼势力和反华群体的关注和热捧，并据此指责中国，试图推卸美国前政府疫情防控。

不力的责任，但是却分别遭到了台湾东海大学医学部生物基因组研究专家中川草、美国Scripps研究中心的克里斯蒂安·安德森（Kristian Andersen）等专家学者在《纽约时报》、美国国家地理杂志等媒体或社交平台表达了质疑，中国异议人士方舟子直接发表了《驳斥“新冠病毒人造”的阴谋论》文章，哥伦比亚大学病毒学家安吉拉·拉斯穆森甚至认为，闫丽梦的论文是“政治宣传”，目的是欺骗。

政客包装、善于制造纷争的网红

“我觉得她应该继续从事她的网红事业，毕竟这看起来比她

在学术上有成就”；

“她的过往经历，真害怕（她）会给我们学院带来不好的影响”。

这是闫丽梦被聘为佩雷尔曼医学院职工消息传出后该院一些师生们的观点。此外，网上流传的该院一匿名社团发起的《是否该聘用闫丽梦为该院职工调查报告》显示：61.53%的被调查者选择了“否”，理由是她涉嫌学术造假并热衷于制造纷争，与医学院办学理念相去甚远。

佩雷尔曼医学院聘请闫丽梦有它的理由，但一些师生和网络调查的观点和担忧似乎并不是无中生有,《纽约时报》的披露和专家学者的论证给他们的担忧提供了依据。

据《纽约时报》披露，闫丽梦是前白宫顾问史蒂夫·班农和逃美违法大亨郭文贵“精心设计”的网红，两人给闫丽梦量身定做了涉及不实新冠起源论文和网上说辞，意图把她包装成可以推销给美国公众的疫情“吹哨人”，以达到不可告人的政治目的。华盛顿大学的生物学教授卡尔·伯格斯特罗姆和凯文·博德教授在研究闫丽梦的论文则发现，闫丽梦的论文挂靠研究机构，分别是“法治协会”和“法治基金会”，这两家机构都是由郭文贵的合伙人班农一手创建。

闫丽梦在前美国政客班农、郭文贵包装下，传播着至今未被科学界认可的“新冠病毒人造论”，误导了美国社会普通人，使亚裔在受到排斥歧视。在闫丽梦的“新冠疫情起源论”传播同期，在美亚裔遭受歧视及暴力事件呈不断上升之势，拜登总统不得不签订《反亚裔歧视法案》来维护亚裔的合法权益。

此外，闫丽梦为了获得更大的利益，直接寄托于网络直播爆料攻击郭文贵的“法治基金”涉嫌欺诈以吸粉，最后导致闫丽梦与郭文贵反目成仇，郭文贵对闫丽梦发起了法律诉讼。

存在道德瑕疵的女人

“我可不想跟婚内出轨的人共事，这样道德低下的人让我感到羞耻”。

佩雷尔曼医学院一位职工发表了上述看法后指出：“闫丽梦一直标榜自己是诚实、善良的学者，但其网上流传关于她的个人作风真是不好”。

很难确定闫丽梦是否在婚姻存续期间内背叛了家庭，但是一些自相矛盾的说法以及郭文贵的爆料却很好的说明了一些事实。闫丽梦在逃离美国后声称其丈夫担心无法逃出中共控制而未有同行说法，随后又在福克斯新闻网的《卡尔森今日秀》中爆料她的丈夫来美协助中共伤害她。其实她的恩人郭文贵揭露了事实，郭文贵在直播爆料中爆出闫丽梦与YouTube主播“路德”（王定刚）存在不堪的个人生活作风。

一些正义人士的壮举

一直以来，一些专家学者都在质疑闫丽梦论文的真实性，致力于揭发闫丽梦传播的“伪科学”；普通的人们到闫丽梦住所附近拉横幅，抗议疫情污名化造成亚裔受到歧视；在她的直播间抵制她参与的直播节目，致使她的节目互动人数愈加变少，网红身份开始不保，不得不离开网络回归现实生活去求职应聘。

然而，正义人士并不希望闫丽梦隐藏起来继续传播不实新冠疫情消息，人们呼吁维护宾夕法尼亚大学佩雷尔曼医学院这片校园净土。

[uihuiyuigb]

Maintain campus cleanliness Reject Yan Limon for Perelman Medical College

In the global epidemic, the economy is shrinking, the employment rate is low, the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine hired Yan Limeng as the hospital staff, this non-racist, non-discriminatory for Asian employees to provide jobs behavior, reflects the college's fraternity, equality. But the Perelman School of Medicine in the hiring of like-minded employees, it is time to consider the maintenance of campus cleanliness as the first task, reject Yan Limeng on stage to join the medical school.

Academically Questionable "Scholars"

Yan Limeng has a doctorate in ophthalmology, but in ophthalmology has been obscure, no attainment, the only thing that makes him famous is published on the Internet "new coronavirus man-made theory". Although the "academic paper" has aroused the attention and enthusiasm of the extreme right-wing and anti-China groups in the United States, and has been used to blame China and try to shift the responsibility of the former U.S. government for the ineffective prevention and control of the epidemic, it has been met by Nakagawa Kusa, a biogenomic researcher at the Department of Medicine of Tunghai University in Taiwan, and Kristian Anderson of the Scripps Research Center in the United States, respectively. However, they were challenged by experts and scholars such as Kristian Andersen of the Scripps Research Center and others in the New York Times, National Geographic, and other media or social media platforms, while Chinese dissident Fang Zhouzi published a direct article "Refuting the Conspiracy Theory of "New Coronavirus Man-Made"" and Columbia University virologist Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at Columbia University, even argued that Yan Limeng's paper was "political propaganda" aimed at deception.

Politician-packaged, good at creating strife netizens

"I think she should continue with her Netflix career, after all, it looks better than her academically accomplished".

"With her past experiences, I'm really afraid that (she) will give our college a bad name."

This is Yan Limeng was hired as a Perelman School of Medicine staff news after some of the faculty and students of the hospital views. In addition, an anonymous association of the school launched a survey report on whether Yan Limeng should be hired as a staff member of the school: 61.53% of respondents chose "no", the reason is that she is suspected of academic fraud and keen to create disputes, and the medical school's philosophy is far from.

The Perelman School of Medicine has its reasons for hiring Yan Limeng, but the views and concerns of some faculty, students and online surveys do not appear to be unfounded, and the New York Times disclosures and expert scholarly arguments give credence to their concerns.

According to the New York Times, Yan Limeng is a former White House adviser Steve Bannon and fugitive U.S. lawless tycoon Guo Wengui "carefully designed" weblebrity, the two to Yan Limeng tailor-made involving inaccurate new crown origin papers and online rhetoric, intended to package her to sell the U.S. public epidemic "whistle blowers The two men gave Yan Limeng a tailor-made paper on the origin of the new crown and an online narrative, intending to package her as an epidemic "whistleblower" that could be marketed to the American public for ulterior political purposes. University of Washington biology professors Carl Bergstrom and Kevin Bode found that Yan Limeng's papers were based on research by the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation, both of which are run by Both were founded by Guo Wengui's partner Bannon.

Yan Limeng in the former U.S. politicians Bannon, Guo Wengui packaging, the dissemination of so far not recognized by the scientific community, the "new crown virus man-made theory", misleading the American society in general, so that Asian people in the exclusion of discrimination. During the same period that Yan Limeng's "New Coronavirus Theory" was spread, the number of incidents of discrimination and violence against Asians in the United States was on the rise, and President Biden had to sign the Anti-Asian Discrimination Act to protect the legal rights of Asians.

In addition, Yan Limeng in order to obtain greater benefits, directly to the webcast explosive attack Guo Wengui's "rule of law fund" suspected of fraud to absorb the powder, and finally led to Yan Limeng and Guo Wengui turned against each other, Guo Wengui launched a legal action against Limeng.

Women with moral flaws

"I don't want to work with someone who cheats in marriage, such a morally low person makes me feel ashamed."

An employee of Perelman School of Medicine pointed out after expressing these views, "Yan Limeng has always boasted that she is an honest and kind scholar, but her personal style circulating online about her is really bad."

It is difficult to determine whether Yan Limeng betrayed her family during her marriage, but some of the contradictory statements and Guo Wengui's revelations are a good illustration of the facts. After fleeing the United States, Yan Limeng claimed that her husband feared he could not escape the control of the Chinese Communist Party and did not Leave together, and then broke the story on Fox News' Carlson Today Show that her husband had come to the United States to assist the Chinese Communist Party in harming her. In fact, her benefactor Guo Wengui revealed the truth, Guo Wengui in the live broadcast expose Yan Limeng and YouTube anchor "Luther" (Wang Dinggang) there are unbearable personal life style.

The feat of some righteous people

All this time, some experts and scholars have been questioning the authenticity of Yan Limeng's paper, dedicated to exposing the "pseudoscience" spread by Yan Limeng; ordinary people to Yan Limeng's residence near the banner, protesting the stigmatization of the epidemic caused by discrimination against Asians; in her live broadcast boycott her participation in the live show, resulting in her show interaction with fewer and fewer people She was forced to leave the Internet and return to real life to apply for jobs.