victorlincoln-blog - Tumblr blog

victorlincoln-blog · 8 years ago

Text

NR-506 Healthcare Policy Entire Course

Follow Below Link to Download Tutorial

http://projbid.com/downloads/nr-506-healthcare-policy-entire-course/

For More Information Visit Our Website ( https://homeworklance.com/ )

Email us At: [email protected] or [email protected]

NR-506 Healthcare Policy Entire Course

NR 506 week 1 discussion

The Four Spheres of Political Action in Nursing (graded) Please discuss the four spheres of political action in nursing. In addition, please develop a brief argument sharing how these spheres are interconnected and overlapping by applying an example from your practice. What are some ethical considerations here? NR 506 week 2 discussion

Policy-Priority Selection (graded) Identify your selected healthcare policy priority and discuss the rationale for your selection. Describe the model of policy making that you feel would be best applied to your policy issue and the rationale for selecting this modePolicy-Priority Selection (graded)

Discuss an ineffective healthcare policy that you personally experienced in your practice and describe the issues that you feel made it unsuccessful. Using incrementalism as the policy making model, describe how you would work to make it a more effective policy.

NR 506 week 3 discussion

Effective Coalition Leadership (graded) Describe the various elements necessary for effective leadership within a coalition. How does this apply to your professional practice or life? Consider your chosen policy priority. How can you use evidence-based research to demonstrate the relationship of nursing practice to outcomes in your policy priority?

NR 506 week 4 discussion

Challenges in Lobbying Strategies (graded) Discuss the best approach for communicating with your local legislator or policymaker in your policy-priority issue. What is your rationale for this approach? It is vital to communicate effectively in policy and politics. Analyze two communication skills that are critical to implementing your policy-priority issue.

NR 506 week 5 discussion

Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems (graded)

Select two drivers (for example quality, cost, and access) of high performance healthcare systems and apply it to your current work situation. The application could demonstrate the presence of the driver in a positive manner or it could acknowledge the presence of a concern. Levels of Government Involved in Healthcare Policy Making (graded)

Review the assigned article for this week, Buerhaus, P. I. (2010). Healthcare payment reform: Implications for nurses. Nursing Economics, 28(1), 49–54.

An emerging political issue is to change the way healthcare providers are compensated to control healthcare spending. Nurses are the largest group of healthcare providers and can make the greatest impact on the healthcare system. Compare and contrast two advantages versus the disadvantages of the policy to disentangle nursing costs from the patient room charges and/or organization charges. How can this policy affect your policy priority? Is there evidence?

NR 506 week 6 discussion

Using the Media (graded)

Given the power of the media, discuss how you would use an opinion editorial, a personal interview, websites, texting, Facebook, Twitter, and/or blogs to influence public opinion relative to your policy priority. What issues about media and electronic social networking do you need to consider? Why?

NR 506 week 7 discussion

RN as Healthcare Policy Leader (graded)

As a health policy professional leader, communicating with lay audiences is an important skill in promoting the health of the community for master prepared registered nurses. Develop a concise position statement reflecting the research findings and recommendations by experts as they relate to workplace support for breast feeding mothers, medical marijuana services in the community, genetic testing or applications of stem cell research, transgender care, abortion, end-of-life care, or a community service administered by Family Nurse Practitioners (if you pick this one be specific about the type of community service the FNP would work in or manage).

Population Based Care (graded)

Find an article that describes holistic care of a client with a chronic illness. As a leader in healthcare policy, what additional healthcare policy changes would you advocate for to improve the health of this population?

NR 506 week 8 discussion

Global Policy Reform (graded)

Reflect on the concepts and practices you have learned in NR 506 on healthcare systems, politics, and health policy. Read the article that is linked below and share insights as how to make informed decisions on nursing practice and patient outcomes on a global basis. In addition, state how you will apply what you have learned in this course to your upcoming practicum experience. Note: it is welcome but not necessary to post your own references this week in your discussion responses. Enjoy the reading and simply reflect with us.

Read the.proquest.com.proxy.chamberlain.edu/docview/1029876233?accountid=147674″>articleby Kohl, H.W., Craig, C. L., Lambert, E.V., Inoue, S., Alkandari, J.R., Leetonngin, G., Kahlmeier, K. (2012), a systems approach to dealing with the global issue of physical inactivity is discussed.

NR506 week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue Your Policy Priority Issue Guidelines and Grading Rubric Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to: a) identify and reflect upon key concepts related to your planning a policymaker call b) provide empirical evidence to support new insights gained regarding your healthcare policy issue and the policymaking process, and c) present ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner. Course Outcomes This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes: (CO#1) Analyze application of theories to the development of policies that affect nursing and health care. (PO 9, 10) (CO#3) Communicate with policymakers to advocate for effective policies that affect nurses and nursing, consumers, or the health care system. (PO 2, 3, 10) (CO#4) Analyze the historical, ethical, and political contexts of healthcare policy and the consequences of policy implementation. (PO 6, 10) (CO#6) Investigate the interrelationship between policy decisions and evidence-based practice. (PO4, 7, 10) Due DateSunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 3 Total Points:175 points Requirements Assignment Criteria for Presentation: 1. Provide an introduction to your healthcare policy-priorityissue and the title or name of your legislator. 2. Articulate key points under each of the Formulating a Healthcare Policy Ungraded Worksheet #1 sections. 3. Provide a critique of empirical evidence that supports your chosen healthcare policy-priority issue and analysis. 4. Demonstrate the importance and impact of the chosen healthcare policy-priority issue to nursing. 5. Provide concluding statements summarizingthe content. 6. The paper will be a minimum of 4 pages and a maximum offive pages in length,in APA format 6th edition,excluding the title and reference page. Preparing the Paper After completing Formulating a Healthcare Policy Ungraded Worksheet #1, address all areas on the worksheet in the body of a scholarly paper. Include a minimum of five (5) classic or current references published within the past 5 years. Category Points % Description Introduction and Conclusion 35 20 Introduction clearly introduces your healthcare policy- priority issue and the title or name of your designated legislator. Concluding statements summarizing content.

Key Points 40 23 Identification of all key points of your healthcare policy-priority issue (review sections of Healthcare Policy Ungraded Worksheet) are clearly analyzed and fully articulated.

Empirical Evidence 40 23 Provide a critique of empirical evidence thatsupports your chosen healthcare policy issue and analysis.

Impact and Importance to Nursing 35 20 Demonstrate the importance and impact of the chosen healthcare policy issue to nursing.

APA Format 10 6 Text, title page, and references are consistent with APA format.

Writing Quality 15 8 Rules of grammar, word usage, sentence, and paragraph format and punctuation.

Total 175 100 A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

Grading Rubric Assignment Criteria Exceptional (100%) Outstanding or highest level of performance Exceeds (88%) Very good or high level of performance Meets (80%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance Needs Improvement (38%) Poor or failing level of performance Developing (0) Unsatisfactory level of performance ContentPossible Points = 150 Points Introduction clearly introduces your healthcare policy-priority issue. Concluding statements summarizing content are present. 35 Points 31 Points 28 Points 13 Points 0 Points Introduction clearly introduces your healthcare policy-priority issue and the title or name of your designated legislator. Concluding statements summarizing content are present, clear, and well written. Introduction introduces your healthcare policy-priority issue and the name or title of your designated legislator. Concluding statements summarizing content are present. Minor clarity or detail issues. Introduction and conclusion are included; could include more details such as a specific healthcare policy-priority issue that a legislator could act upon or the name or title of the legislator; clarity or improvement of format. Lacking introduction or conclusion. No attempt made at introduction or conclusion.

Identification of all key points of your healthcare policy-priority issue are clearly analyzed and fully articulated. 40 Points 35 Points 32 Points 15 Points 0 Points Key points are well described, and analysis is fully articulated. Key points are described with some lack of clarity, and/or analysis is lacking detail or clarity. Key points are not well described, and/or analysis is lacking detail or clarity. Key points or analysis is missing. Key points and analysis is missing.

Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy-priority issue is clearly critiqued. 40 Points 35 Points 32 Points 15 Points 0 Points Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy- priority issue is clearly critiqued in a comprehensive and accurate manner. Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy- priority issue is critiqued but lacking clarity or not substantive. Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy- priority issue is noted but not critiqued. Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy priority issue is lacking. No attempt made at providing empirical evidence.

Your healthcare policy- priority issue clearly demonstrates the impact and or importance of your issue to nursing or the intended impact to patient outcomes. 35 Points 31 Points 28 Points 13 Points 0 Points Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice is thoroughly discussed. Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice has rare inaccuracy. Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice lacks occasional important elements or specificity. Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice has multiple instances of inaccuracies. Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice has multiple instances of inaccuracies and is vague.

Content Subtotal_____of 150 points Format Possible Points = 25 Points APA Format: Text, title page, and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format 6thedition. 10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 Points Paper is free from APA errors throughout. There are 1-2 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s) There are 3-4 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s) There are 5 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s) There are 6 or more APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s) Writing Quality: Paper is appropriate in length. References include a minimum of 5 scholarly references excluding the course text. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. 15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 Points Paper is appropriate in length. References include more than the minimum number of scholarly references, excluding the course text. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Paper is short/long in length and/or contains a minimum of scholarly references excluding course text, or references utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with1-2 exceptions. Paper is short/long in length and contains only 1 scholarly reference. Additional references are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with 3-4 exceptions. Paper is short/long two or more pages in length and does not contain scholarly references. References utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are not followed with 5 errors. Paper is short/long two or more pages in length and does not contain scholarly references. References utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are not followed with 6 or more errors.

Format Subtotal_____of 25 points Total Points_____of 175 point

NR506 week 5 Planning Your Visit(Part A)

Planning Your Visit(Part A)

Guidelines and Grading Rubric Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to: (a) identify communication strategies that support an effective policy making-presentation/visit(CO #2);(b) deliver a message andmake recommendations (CO #2,3), and (c) communicate ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner. (CO#3) Course Outcomes This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes: (CO #2) Employ strategies to affect the development, implementation, and consequences of policies at the institutional, local, national, and international levels. (PO 4, 8, 10) (CO #3) Communicate with policymakers to advocate for effective policies that affect nurses and nursing, consumers, or the health care system. (PO 2,3,10) (CO #4) Analyze the historical, ethical, and political contexts of health care policy and the consequences of policy implementation. (PO 6, 10) (CO #5) Advocate for institutional, local, national, and international policies that influence health care and its consumers and nurses and their nursing practice. (PO2,10) Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 5 Total Points: 100points Requirements Assignment Criteria for Presentation 1. Introduce your chosen policy issue, the current status, and an overview of your plan for a legislative visit. 2. Articulate key communication strategies involved in your approach to the legislator including plan, message, and recommendations; see Worksheet 2 and again, the focus is on evidence-based communication techniques for effective healthcare policy visit to the legislator. 3. Provide an analysis of empirical evidence of effective communication strategies and techniques to support an effective visit and follow-up to the legislator. 4. Provide specific examples of the impact and/or importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing. 5. Provide concluding statements summarizingthe content. 6. Paper will be 2-3 pages, excluding title and reference pages, and in APA format 6thedition. 7. Five non-text book references are required as minimum. Preparing the Paper Following completion of Planning Your Visit Ungraded Worksheet 2, target communication strategies that support an effective policymaking visit. Include a minimum of five (5) classic references or current references (published within the past 5 years) that support your policy plan, the message, recommendations, and follow-up. Category Points % Description Introduction and Conclusion 10 10 Introductionbriefly identifies your healthcare policy-priority issue, the policy itself and legislator with a plan for the policymaker visit/presentation. Concluding statements summarize content.

Empirical Evidence 50 50 Empirical evidence identifies effective communication strategies and techniqueswith follow-up supporting your visit to the legislator.

Specific Examples 20 20 Provide specific examples of the impact and/or importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing.

APA Format 10 10 Text, title page, and references are consistent with APA format 6thedition.

Writing Quality 10 10 Rules of grammar, word usage, sentence and paragraph format, and punctuation are followed. Paper length appropriate.

Total 100 100 A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

Grading Rubric Assignment Criteria Exceptional (100%) Outstanding or highest level of performance Exceeds (88%) Very good or high level of performance Meets (80%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance Needs Improvement (38%) Poor or failing level of performance Developing (0) Unsatisfactory level of performance ContentPossible Points = 100 Points Introduction and Conclusion 10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 Points Introduction briefly identifiesyour healthcare/policy-priority issue, policy itself, and legislator with a plan for the policymaker visit/presentation.Concluding statements summarizing content have no inaccuracy. Introduction of your healthcare/policy-priority issue, policy itself, and legislatorwith a plan for policymaker visit/presentation has rare inaccuracy.Concluding statements lack occasional important element or specificity. Introduction of your healthcare/policy-priority issue, policy itself, and legislator with a plan for policymaker visit/presentation lacks occasional important element or specificity.Concluding statements lack occasional important element or specificity. Introduction of your healthcare/policy-priority issue, policy itself and legislator with a plan for a policymaker visit/presentation has multiple instances of inaccuracies or is lacking content.Concluding statements have multiple instances of inaccuracies or lacks content. No attempt at introduction or conclusion.

Empirical Evidence 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 Points Empirical evidence ofeffective communication strategies and techniques with follow-up supporting your healthcare policy-priority visit to the legislator is clearly articulated. Empirical evidence ofeffective communication strategies and techniques with follow-up supporting your healthcare policy-priority visit to the legislator has a few inaccuracies. Empirical evidence ofeffective communication strategies and techniques with follow-up supporting your healthcare policy-priority visit to the legislator has multiple instances of inaccuracies or lacks detail/articulation. Empirical evidence of effective communication strategies and techniques with follow-up supporting your healthcare policy-priority visit to the legislator is missing. No attempt at providing Empirical evidence.

Specific Examples 20 Points 18 Points 16 Points 8 Points 0 Points Provides specific examples of the impact and/or importance of a successful visit/presentationto nursing and has no inaccuracy and is clearly articulated. Provides specific examples of the impact and/or importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing and lacks occasional important elements or specificity and/or lacks clarity. Provides specific examples of the impact and/or importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing and has multiple instances of inaccuracies and/or lacks clarity. No specific examples of the impact OR importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing. No specific examples of the impact AND importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing.

Content Subtotal_____of80 points Format Possible Points = 20 Points APA Format: 10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 Points Text, title page, and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format. There are 1–2 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s). There are 3–4 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s). There are 5 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s). There are 6 or more APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s).

Writing Quality. 10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 Points Paper is appropriate in length. References include the minimum of five (5) scholarly references,excluding the course text.Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Paper is short or long in length and/or contains fewer than 5 but more than 1 scholarly reference, excluding course text, or references utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with1–2 exceptions. Paper is short or long in length and contains only 1 scholarly reference. Additional references are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with 3–4 exceptions. Paper is two or more pages short or long in length and does not contain scholarly references. References utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are not followed with 5 errors Paper is two or more pages short or long in length and does not contain scholarly references. References utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are not followed with 6 or more errors.

Format Subtotal_____of20 points Total Points_____of100 points

NR506 week 7 Policymaker Electronic Presentation Policymaker Electronic Presentation Guidelines and Grading Rubric Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to: (a) identify and reflect upon key concepts related to your policymaker visit (CO #3); (b) provide empirical evidence to support new insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policymaking process (CO #6); and (c) present ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner (CO #3). Course Outcomes This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes: (CO#1) Analyze application of theories to the development of policies that affect nursing and health care. (PO 9, 10) (CO#3) Communicate with policymakers to advocate for effective policies that affect nurses and nursing, consumers, or the health care system. (PO 2,3, 10) (CO#6) Investigate the interrelationship between policy decisions and evidence-based practice. (PO 4, 7 10) Due Date:Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7 Total Points:275 points Requirements Assignment Criteria for Presentation 1. Describe your visit/presentation, including any PowerPoint presentation materials that you utilizedduring your policymaker visit. Limit these slides to five slides in this project (of the 15 total slides). This includes any handouts that you left with the policymaker. 2. Discuss the response of the policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s). 3. Reflect on the process, follow-up plans, insights gained about the issue and process, and support with evidence. 4. Describe possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing. 5. Provide concluding statements summarizingthe content. 6. Develop a 15-slide PowerPoint presentation with speaker notes in APA format, not including title and reference slides. Write speaker notes sufficient enough to enable someone to take over or give the presentation other than you. Preparing the Presentation After completing Policymaker Visit Ungraded Worksheet 3, develop an electronic presentation to describe, analyze, and reflect upon your policymaking visit. Include 5 slides from thePowerPoint presentation that you would have used during an actual policymaker visit. Include a minimum of five (5) classic or current references within the past 5 years that specifically support insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policymaking process. Category Points % Description Visit Description 50 18 Clearly describes the policymaking visit/presentation (includes no more than 5 slides from actual presentation) Policymaker Response 50 18 Slides and speaker notes discuss responses of policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s).

Reflections on Process 50 18 Reflections on process (including supportive evidence), follow-up, and insights gained (issue and process) are clearly described in slide and speaker notes.

Future Opportunities 50 18 Describe possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting/presentation and their importance to nursing.

Conclusions 45 16 Concluding statements summarize content.

APA format 15 6 Slides, speaker notes, and references are completely consistent with APA format.

Presentation/Writing 15 6 Slide and speaker notes content are accurate.Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone.Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Balance among space, words/graphics, and color is effective.

Total 275 100 A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

Policymaker Response 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 Points Slides and speaker notes discuss response of policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s) and is clearly articulated. Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has rare inaccuracy. Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response occasionally inaccurate or lacks occasional important elements or specificity. Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has multiple inaccuracies or lacks sufficient level of detail. Slides and speaker notes do not discuss the policymaker response.

Reflections on Process 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 Points Reflections on process (including supportive evidence), follow-up,and insights gained (issue and process) are clearly described in slide and speaker notes. Reflection on process, supportive evidence, follow-up, and insights gained has rare inaccuracy within slides and speaker notes. Occasionally inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks occasional important elements or specificity. Reflection on process, evidence, follow-up, and insights is inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks sufficient detail. There is no reflection on process.

Future Opportunities 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 Points Clearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing. Describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing with need for further detail or clarity. Clearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting but no mention of importance to nursing. Minimal description of possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and no discussion of importance to nursing. Does not describe possible future opportunities or their importance to nursing.

Conclusion 45 Points 40 Points 36 Points 0 Points Concluding statements summarize content in a clear and articulated manner. Concluding statements summarizing content have rare inaccuracy or lack of minor details/clarity. Concluding statements lack occasional important element or specificity. Concluding statements have multiple instances of inaccuracies or little detail. No conclusion.

Content Subtotal _____of 245 points Format Possible Points = 30 Points APA format 15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 Points Slides, speaker notes, and references are completely are free from APA errors throughout. There are 2-3 APA format errors. There are 4-6 APA format errors. There are 6-7 APA format errors. Eight or more errors in APA, grammar, spelling and syntax and/or citations are missing Presentation/Writing 15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 Points Slide and speaker notes content are accurate.Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Balance among space, words/graphics, and color is effective. Presentations slides are professional in appearance and tone with rare exceptions.Slides are+1 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content with rare repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack minor detail or clarity. Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone with occasional areas needing improvements in style.Slides are+2 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content with occasional repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack detail or clarity. Most presentation slides are not professional in appearance and tone with numerous areas needing improvements in style.Slides are+3 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content withmultiple repetitions of slides or lack significant detail. Presentation includes numerous crowded slides and has no flow.

Format Subtotal _____of 30 points Total Points _____of 275 points

#NR-506 Healthcare Policy Entire Course

0 notes

victorlincoln-blog · 8 years ago

Text

NR505 Advanced Research Methods: Evidence-Based Practice

Follow Below Link to Download Tutorial

http://projbid.com/downloads/nr505-advanced-research-methods-evidence-based-practice/

For More Information Visit Our Website ( https://homeworklance.com/ )

NR 505 Full Course

NR505 week 1 discussion

Write a quantitative research question using the PICO(T) model about a health or safety issue observed in the Ironridge or Summerville community or your practice setting.Conducta search of the literature for the quantitative research question. (Remember you can use this topic and quantitative research article as part of your Research Summary Table assignment).Provide a brief summary of your quantitative research article.

You will not be able to see other’s posts for this forum until you have posted your response to the threaded discussion thread.

NR505 week 2 discussion

Review the differences in predictive and prescriptive studies and select a predictive or prescriptive article that you found in your literature search. What are the independent variables (IV), dependent variables (DV), and mediating variables (MVs) that you find in the article? How do determining IVs, DVs, and MVs help you discern the theory tested in the research? In your particular article, what risk factors are identified, or what recommendations are provided?

NR505 week 3 discussion

Plan a Qualitative Study (graded)

Write a qualitative research question using the PICO(T) model using the P (population), I (abstract concept), O (outcome), and T (time) from the PICO(T) model about an issue from your practice setting. Conduct a search of the literature for a qualitative research article that would answer your qualitative research question. What qualitative research design (Phenomenology, Grounded Theory, Ethnography) did you select and why? Provide a summary of the study. How will you make sure that the information you obtain is trustworthy? How is trustworthiness in qualitative research similar and different from reliability and validity?

NR505 week 4 discussion

What are the various types of sampling, along with their advantages and disadvantages? As we think about sampling and ethical practices, review these two documents on ethical issues in research:

· Tuskegee syphilis study at.cdc.gov/tuskegee/”>http://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/

· An overview of questionable studies: Resnik, D. (2012). Research ethics timeline (1932-present). Retrieved from.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/timeline/index.cfm”>http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/timeline/index.cfm

What are the implications of this information with respect to the recruitment of human subjects in a study related to your chosen issue?

NR505 week 5 discussion

Inferential Statistics (graded)

Complete a PICO(T) search on a topic that pertains to your practice setting. Select one of the articles from your search. Identify the descriptive statistics. Then describe the inferential tests that were used in the article (in other words, t-tests and chi-squares). Given the p-values related to the tests, how do you interpret the results? Are they statistically significant, also clinically significant? What are the recommendations based on this paper? Share some alternate explanations (mediating or intervening variables) for the results of the study. If your chosen study does not contain inferential tests, then choose a different article that does contain inferential tests so you can participate in the discussion.

NR505 week 6 discussion

Evidence-Based Models (graded)Read the box above about Mr. Lowell and his facility. As an advanced practice nurse, you will looking at various evidence based practice models and choosing two of them to compare and contrast here. After you compare and contrast them, discuss which one you would recommend to this facility and why? Remember to support your posts with scholarly research in APA 6th ed format.

NR505 week 7 discussion

Quality, Safety, and Costs (graded)

Class, this week I would like for you to think about a patient scenario related to our Summerville scenario. Mr. Lowell is especially concerned about a costly high infection rate in surgical patients at St. Louis Medical Center, along with a lack of concern about patient’s psychological needs. He has read about the efforts of the QSEN Institute (.org/”>http://qsen.org) to promote quality and safety. He was surprised to see that patient concerns are inherent in the quality improvement conversation. Place yourself in the role of nurse educator to help the new staff education director and the clinical practice council study both problems. How would you explain the relationships among quality, safety, and costs to the director and staff? How would you demonstrate the importance of nursing care in addressing this issue? What outcome variables would you recommend?

NR505 week 8 discussion

What specific skills and knowledge that you gained through this course will be most important as you plan and implement your practicum project? Describe a concrete way in which you anticipate using these skills and knowledge.

NR505 week 3 Research Summary Table

Research Summary Table

Guidelines with Scoring Rubric

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is for the student to learn to assimilate, analyze, critique, and summarize original research articles. In other words, select a report of a single, original study.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

(CO 2) Formulate and analyze nursing/clinical problems related to nursing and other disciplines. (PO 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)

(CO 3) Synthesize for dissemination the research findings from nursing and related disciplines. (PO 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11)

Due Date:Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 3

Total Points Possible: 165 Points

Requirements

Through this assignment, the student will

1. 1. Conduct a systematic search of relevant databases to find research-based evidence related to a nursing problem (CO 2);

2. 2. Construct a summary table of four peer-reviewedquantitative single original studies, indicating the purpose, sample, design/level of evidence, findings, and limitations of each (CO 3); and

3. 3. Summarize the findings of the four studies as a whole (CO 3).

Preparing the Table

Conduct a PICO(T) search on the nursing problem related to your practice setting.Select the four most recent peer-reviewed studiesthat describe original research in a single study (do not select a meta-analysis, systematic review of research, or integrative literature review). Refer to the Types of Articles Found in the Nursing and Healthcaredocument in the Course Resource section to make sure that you are using the correct document.

Construct a table summarizing the four most credible and recent studies, using the Research Summary template on the next page (also found in Course Resource Section). Analyze each article and provide the following information in brief format: purpose of the study; type of sample and number of participants; design of the study, along with the level of evidence; findings of the study; and limitations of the study.

Preparing the Summary

Briefly (2-4 pages; not including cover page and reference page(s)) summarize the results of the four studies as a whole. Follow this outline:

1. I. In a short paragraph, restate your research question and describe your search strategy. (10 points)

2. II. Analysis of the designs used in the studies presented in your research summary table. (10 points)

III. Where do these studies fall on the LevelsofEvidence table? What is the significance of this information?(10 points)

1. IV. Based on these studies, what are the findings? What is the answer to the research question?How well do the studies answer or fail to answer the question? Provide rationale to support your answer.(10 points)

2. V. Howwas eachsample selected and how many participants in the studies. Is this number adequate? Why or why not? (10 points)

3. VI. Overall, what are the limitations of the study, and how can these limitations be overcome in subsequent studies? (10 points)

VII. Based on these findings, is the evidence that you found on your topic strong enough to suggest a change in practice or an idea for practice? Why or why not?Please provide a rationale for your answer.(10 points)

Provide your references, formatted in APA style, after the summary. Include the doi number for each article. Submit a permalink of each article you have chosen for this assignment (directions on how to obtain a permalink are located in the Course Resource section).

Instructions for setting up your paper in APA 6th edition format.

Look at the example document for this assignment. Start your paper as you would other APA 6thedition format professional papers. Copy and paste the table into your APA paper. This should allow your paper to remain in a vertical format. Your paper should be one document.

Research Summary Table (template provided in separate document)

NR505 week 5 Critique of Systematic Research Review

Critique of Systematic Research Review (SRR)

Guidelineswith Scoring Rubric

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to provide students with practice in identifying, reading, and critiquing systematic research reviews related to nursing. A systematic review is defined as “A summary of evidence, typically conducted by an expert or expert panel on a particular topic, that uses a rigorous process (to minimize bias) for identifying, appraising, and synthesizing studies to answer a specific clinical question and draw conclusions about the data gathered (Melnyk&Fineout-Overholt,2011, p.582).

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to

(CO 3) Synthesize for dissemination the research findings from nursing and related disciplines. (PO 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11)

(CO 4) Compare and critique quantitative and qualitative designs and methodologies for research studies. (PO 4, 7, 9, 11)

Due Date:Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 5

Total Points Possible:175 Points

Requirements:

1. 1. Choose an SRR that pertains to your practice setting.Describe the relevance of the nursingresearch problem addressed in a SRR to practice. (CO 3, 6)

2. 2. Critique the levels of evidence of the studies used in the SRR, specifically the designs of the studies included. (CO 6)

3. 3. Critique the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiqued. (CO 6)

4. 4. Describe the overall findings of the studies, as summarized in the SRR. (CO 3, 6)

5. 5. Critique the conclusions of the SRR, with implications for your current practice andfuture research. (CO 3, 6)

6. 6. Utilize the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to locate a true SRR for this assignment.

7. 7. Paper length should be between 4-6 pages (not including cover page and reference page(s).

Preparing the paper

Consult your faculty member if you are uncertain about whether your article is a true SRR. If it is not, your grade will be affected because you will not be able to address all of the above objectives.

Important: Submit a copy of the systematic research review that you are critiquing as a separate document before submitting your paper.This will help Turnitin from returning a high similarity percentage on your written work. Remember to keep Turnitin similarity to 24% or less or you will be deducted points on APA.

References

Melnyk, B.M., &Fineout-Overholt, E. (2011).Evidence-based practice in nursing &healthcare(2nded.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott, Williams,& Wilkins.

Turnitin®

This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin.You learned about Turnitin in your NR500 course, so you should be familiar with how to access it. Additionally, you will find an instructional announcement about Turnitin® in the course and in the Student Handbook.

Category

Points

Description

Describes the relevance of the research problem addressed in the SRR to practice.

14.28

Fully describes the relevance of the research problem

Critiques the research rigor of the studies used in the SRR (see lesson’s levels of evidence).

14.28

Fully critiques the rigor of the studies used in the SRR

Critiques the levels of evidence, specifically the designs of the studies included in the SRR.

14.28

Fully critiques the levels of evidence of the studies included in the SRR

Critiques the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiqued.

14.28

Fully describes the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiqued

Describes the overall findings of the studies, as summarized in the SRR.

14.28

Fully describes the overall findings of the studies summarized in the SRR

Critiques the conclusions of the SRR, with implications for your current practice and future research

14.28

Critiques the conclusions of the SRR, with implications for current practice andfuture research

Grammar, punctuation, and spelling reflect format written work.

5.71

Grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with rules for formal written work.

APA formatting

5.71

APA formatting is correct

Submit a copy of the systematic research article you are critiquing.

2.85

Submits a copy of the permalink of the systematic research article that you are critiquing

175

100%

A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

NR505 Analysis and Application of Clinical Practice

Analysis and Application of Clinical

Practice Guidelines & Scoring Rubric

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to provide an opportunity for students to apply and disseminate information based on practice summaries. The most common type of practice summary in healthcare is the clinical practice guideline (CPG).

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to

(CO 3) Synthesize for dissemination the research findings from nursing and related disciplines (POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 9); and

(CO 6) Utilize the principles of evidence-based practice to propose strategies that can address nursing issues (POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9).

Due Date:Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7

Total Points Possible:200 Points

Requirements:

Through this assignment, the student will

Develop summary of a clinical practice guideline. (COs 3, 6)

Preparing the paper

You will develop a summary that you could use within an evidence-basedpractice (EBP) committee or related venue to share with your colleagues. This paper will be 2-4 pages in length.

· Select a clinical practice guidelines that addresses an issue pertinent to your practice setting.

· Search the literature and evidence-based practice websites and databases to find a recent clinical practice guideline (no more than 5 years) related to the issue you select. The course Webliography provides websites where you can find clinical practice guidelines, but there are many others available in specialty-organization websites.

· Analyze and critique the clinical practice guideline. Use the Clinical Practice Guideline Summary Template in Course Resources to develop your paper. Components include:

o scope and purpose of the clinical practice guidelines;

o stakeholder involvement;

o rigor of development;

o clarity and presentation

o applicability

o editorial independence

· Attach URL address of the Clinical Practice Guidelines on the reference page of your paper.

· Note: Thetemplate isan outline to assist you in setting up your paper so you will be sure to address those topics in your paper in addition to other information to meet the criteria for this assignment. Your paper should be in APA 6th ed format. Do not copy and paste the template into your paper.

The summary sheetis amended from the AGREE instrument on page 200 of Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt (2015). Your summaryshould be approximately 5–6 pages long (Paper lengths do not include cover page or reference page(s).

Category

Points

Description

Scope and Purpose

12.5

Describes the scope and purpose of the document. Includes the health question(s) covered by the guideline

Stakeholder Involvement

12.5

Describes the stakeholder involvement in the development of the document. Identifies the target population.

Rigor of Development

12.5

Critiques the rigor of the development of the document. Describes the systematic methods used to develop the guideline. Include level of evidence of the studies used to develop the guideline.

Clarity & presentation (Recommendations)

12.5

Provides thekey recommendations of the document. Discusses different options for managing the condition or issue in the guideline.

Application

12.5

Identifies facilitators, barriers, costs, and outcome measurement for application of the document.. Identifies key monitoring and/or auditing criteria (outcomes)

Editorial Independence

12.5

Discusses conflict of interest and how competing interests of the CPG group members recorded and addressed.

Summary

12.5

Summarizes how the CPG answers the key clinical questions presented in the CPG. Discusses how the student, as the advanced practice nurse, would apply the CPG in practice.

Uses appropriate grammar, syntax, and spelling

No more than 2 errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling.

APA 6th Edition

No more than 2 APA 6thedition errors.

Attach pdf file of the Clinical Practice Guidelines

2.5

A pdf copy of the Clinical Practice Guidelines submitted.

Total

200

100%

A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

Grading Rubric

Assignment Criteria

Exceptional

(100%)

Outstanding or highest level of performance

Exceeds

(88%)

Very good or high level of performance

Meets

(80%)

Competent or satisfactory level of performance

Needs Improvement

(38%)

Poor or failing level of performance

Developing

(0)

Unsatisfactory level of performance

ContentPossible Points = 175 Points

Scope and Purpose

25 Points

22 Points

20Points

10 Points

0 Points

Describes the scope and purpose of the document. Includes the health question(s) covered by the guideline

Describes the scope and purpose of the document but has occasional missing information.

Describes the scope and purpose of the document with a minimal amount of information presented.

Weakly describes the scope and purpose of the document.

Does not include the scope or purpose of the health question covered by the guideline.

Stakeholder Involvement

25 Points

22 Points

20Points

10 Points

0 Points

Describes all of the stakeholders involvement in the development of the document. Identifies the target population

Describes the stakeholder involvement in the development of the document with occasional information missing.

Describes the stakeholder involvement in the development of the document with a minimal amount of information presented.

Does not describe the stakeholder involvement in the development of the document OR does not identify the target population.

Does not describe the stakeholder involvement in the development of the document AND does not identify the target population.

Rigor of Development

25 Points

22 Points

20Points

10 Points

0 Points

Critiques the rigor of the development of the document. Describes the systematic methods used to develop the guideline. Includes level of evidence of the studies used to develop the guidelines. Elaborates on rigor of development.

Critiques the rigor of the development of the document. Describes the systematic methods used to develop the guideline. Includes the levels of evidence of the studies used to develop the guidelines. Some occasional important information is missing.

Does not critique the rigor of the development of the document. Does not describe the systematic methods used to develop the guideline. ORDoes not include the levels of evidence of the studies used to develop the guidelines.

Does not critique the rigor of the development of the document. Does not describe the systematic methods used to develop the guideline. ANDDoes not include the levels of evidence of the studies used to develop the guidelines.

Clarity & Presentation

(Recommendations)

25 Points

22 Points

20Points

10 Points

0 Points

Provides theall key recommendations of the document. Discusses different options for managing the condition or issue addressed in the guideline. Elaborates on the clarity and presentation of the recommendations.

Provides thekey recommendations of the document.

Discusses different options for managing the condition or issue addressed in the guideline. Missing some occasional important information.

Provides thekey recommendations of the document.

Discusses different options for managing the condition or issue addressed in the guideline. Briefly elaborates on the clarity and presentation of the recommendations.

Does not provide or provide thekey recommendations of the document. ORDoes not discuss different options for managing the condition or issue addressed in the guideline.

Does not provide or provide thekey recommendations of the document. ANDDoes not discuss different options for managing the condition or issue addressed in the guideline.

Application

25 Points

22 Points

20Points

10 Points

0 Points

Identifies facilitators, barriers (real or potential), costs, and outcome measurement for application of the document. Identifies key monitoring or auditing criteria (outcomes).

Identifies facilitators, barriers (real or potential), costs, and outcome measurement for application of the document. Identifies key monitoring or auditing criteria (outcomes). Some occasional important information is missing.

Briefly Identifies facilitators, barriers (real or potential), costs, and outcome measurement for application of the document. Identifies key monitoring or auditing criteria (outcomes).

Does not Identify facilitators, barriers (real or potential), costs, and outcome measurement for application of the document. ORDoes not identify key monitoring or auditing criteria (outcomes).

Does not Identifies facilitators, barriers (real or potential), costs, and outcome measurement for application of the document. ANDDoes not identify key monitoring or auditing criteria (outcomes).

Editorial Independence

25 Points

22 Points

20Points

10 Points

0 Points

Discusses conflict of interest of group members. Discusses how competing interests of the CPG group members are recorded and addressed. Addresses how the views of the funding body are kept from influencing the content of the guideline.

Briefly discusses conflict of interest of group members. Briefly discusses how competing interests of the CPG group members are recorded and addressed. Briefly addresses how the views of the funding body are kept from influencing the content of the guideline.

Does not discuss conflict of interest of group members. Does not discuss how competing interests of the CPG group members are recorded and addressed. ORDoes not address how the views of the funding body are kept from influencing the content of the guideline.

Does not discuss conflict of interest of group members. Does not discuss how competing interests of the CPG group members are recorded and addressed. AND

Does not address how the views of the funding body are kept from influencing the content of the guideline.

Summary

25 Points

22 Points

20Points

10 Points

0 Points

Summarizes the paper. Discusses whether or not the CPG answers the key clinical question(s) presented in the CPG and elaborates. Discusses how the student, as the advance practice nurse, will apply the CPG in practice with specific examples.

Summarizes the paper. Discusses whether or not the CPG answers the key clinical question(s) presented in the CPG. Discusses how the student, as the advance practice nurse, will apply the CPG in practice. Some occasional important information is missing.

Briefly summarizes the paper. Briefly discusses whether or not the CPG answers the key clinical question(s) presented in the CPG. Briefly discusses how the student, as the advance practice nurse, will apply the CPG in practice.

Does not summarize the paper. Does not discuss whether or not the CPG answers the key clinical question(s) presented in the CPG. ORDoes not discuss how the student, as the advance practice nurse, will apply the CPG in practice.

Does not summarize the paper. Does not discuss whether or not the CPG answers the key clinical question(s) presented in the CPG.ANDDoes not discuss how the student, as the advance practice nurse, will apply the CPG in practice.

Content Subtotal____/175 points

FormatPossible Points = 25 Points

Uses appropriate grammar, syntax, and spelling

10Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

No errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling

1-2 errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling

3-4 errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling

5 or more errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling

6 or more errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling

APA 6th edition

10Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

No APA 6thedition errors

1-2 APA 6thedition errors

3-4 APA 6thedition errors

5 APA 6thedition errors

6 or more APA 6thedition errorsORTurnitin similarity percentage on student written work is higher than 24%.

Attach pdf copy of the Clinical Practice Guideline

5 Points

0 Points

Pdf file of the Clinical Practice Guideline attached

No pdf file of the Clinical Practice Guideline attached

Format Subtotal____/25 points

Total Points_____/200 points

#NR505 Advanced Research Methods: Evidence-Based Practice

0 notes

victorlincoln-blog · 8 years ago

Text

NR505 Advanced Research Methods: Evidence-Based Practice

Follow Below Link to Download Tutorial

http://projbid.com/downloads/nr505-advanced-research-methods-evidence-based-practice/

For More Information Visit Our Website ( https://homeworklance.com/ )

Email us At: [email protected] or [email protected]

NR505 Advanced Research Methods: Evidence-Based Practice

NR 505 Full Course

NR505 week 1 discussion

You will not be able to see other’s posts for this forum until you have posted your response to the threaded discussion thread.

NR505 week 2 discussion

NR505 week 3 discussion

Plan a Qualitative Study (graded)

Write a qualitative research question using the PICO(T) model using the P (population), I (abstract concept), O (outcome), and T (time) from the PICO(T) model about an issue from your practice setting.Conduct a search of the literature for a qualitative research article that would answer your qualitative research question. What qualitative research design (Phenomenology, Grounded Theory, Ethnography) did you select and why? Provide a summary of the study. How will you make sure that the information you obtain is trustworthy? How is trustworthiness in qualitative research similar and different from reliability and validity?