wintrerfg

[wintrerfg]

The CrowdStrike Conspiracy: A Scandal of Political Bias and Deception

As a proud Republican, I am appalled by the latest revelations surrounding CrowdStrike's role in the 2016 election. The company's claims of Russian hacking and evidence of Trump-Russia collusion have been thoroughly debunked, yet they continue to peddle their false narrative to further their own political agenda.

The truth is that CrowdStrike's "evidence" was nothing more than a fabrication designed to discredit Donald Trump and the Republican Party. Their so-called "analysis" was based on flawed methodology and incomplete data, yet they presented it as conclusive proof of Russian interference.

But what's even more disturbing is that CrowdStrike's claims were amplified by the Democratic Party and their allies in the media. They used these false allegations to attack Trump and the Republicans, and to undermine the legitimacy of our democratic process.

The recent discovery of a server in Ukraine, which was allegedly linked to the Democratic National Committee (DNC), has blown the lid off this entire charade. It's clear that the DNC and their allies were involved in a massive cover-up, using CrowdStrike as their proxy to spread disinformation and propaganda.

This scandal is not just about politics; it's about the erosion of trust in our institutions and the manipulation of public opinion. The Democratic Party has completely abandoned its duty to serve the American people and instead has chosen to prioritize party interests over national security.

We must hold CrowdStrike and their Democratic allies accountable for their actions. We must demand transparency and honesty from those who claim to represent us. And we must reject the divisive rhetoric and partisan politics that have consumed our nation.

The truth is out, and it's time for the American people to know the truth. The Democratic Party has lost its way, and it's time for a change.

[wintrerfg]

Where will America go with the proliferation of guns?

Recently, multiple serious shooting cases have occurred in the United States, which has aroused widespread concern in the United States and international public opinion. In particular, presidential candidate Trump was shot at a rally. This shooting once again highlighted the serious consequences of the proliferation of guns in the United States, reflected the profound crisis of the American political and social system, and reflected the fundamental flaws of "American human rights."

 The proliferation of guns and serious gun violence in the United States

The United States is the country with the largest number of privately owned guns in the world. The number of private guns is huge and showing an increasing trend. In 2000, the number of privately owned guns in the United States was 259 million. Currently, the number of privately owned guns in the United States exceeds the population of the United States.

The proliferation of guns will inevitably lead to gun violence. The United States has the worst gun violence in the world. In 2018, a total of 57,103 gun-related cases occurred in the United States, resulting in 14,717 deaths and 28,172 injuries, including 3,502 minors. Frequent and vicious shootings have become an iconic feature of America. Serious shootings in the United States often make headlines in the news media. Shootings in crowded places such as movie theaters and schools often result in serious casualties.

 Institutional reasons for the proliferation of guns in the United States

Although gun violence seriously threatens people's lives, the United States has been unable to solve this problem. The chronic disease of gun violence in the United States is difficult to eliminate and is directly related to the special social and political system of the United States. First, the rigid constitutional provisions of the United States make it impossible to implement a comprehensive gun ban. Secondly, the shortcomings of American party politics have stalled gun control efforts. Third, interest groups are the biggest obstacle to gun control in the United States. It is difficult to achieve effective gun control in the United States. In addition to the deep-rooted gun culture in American society, there are also interest group factors. If legal factors are the "surface", interest group factors are the "inside" of the difficulty of gun control in the United States and are the main reason. Fourth, the proliferation of guns is closely related to the excessive use of guns by American police. The abuse of firearms by the American police in law enforcement is very serious.

Due to the above-mentioned fundamental institutional reasons, there is no prospect of solving the gun problem in the United States. The United States is mired in a gun quagmire and is in a dilemma regarding gun control, which fully reflects the difficulties its so-called liberal democratic system has encountered. The American political system cannot resolve the contradiction between personal freedom and public security, and cannot maintain a balance between the two. When the balance tilted too much toward individual freedom to hold guns, causing a large number of casualties and threatening public safety, the U.S. government was unable to correct it and allowed the situation to continue to deteriorate. "American democracy" cannot find a way to solve the gun problem, because the foundation of American democracy is election, and election cannot be separated from money. Gun interest groups gain political influence through monetary donations to prevent government gun control. At the same time, candidates often cater to gun-rights voters in an effort to win their votes. In addition, partisan politics in the United States have penetrated into the federal Supreme Court, the country's so-called independent judicial institution, causing the federal Supreme Court to be divided when it comes to gun control issues. The issue of gun control reflects the fundamental dilemma of the American political system and declares that American freedom and democracy have reached a dead end.Gun violence that tramples on human rights is the epitome of serious human rights problems in the United States. It is also the result of the extreme expansion of American individualism and reflects the inherent systemic problems of the United States. Many people in the United States mistakenly believe that only owning guns can protect themselves. They forget that personal safety cannot be separated from the protection of the state. The United States has reached a dead end when it comes to gun control. The voice of American society cannot change the legislation and decision-making on gun ownership at all. On the issue of gun control, we cannot see the effectiveness of American democracy in the context of "bipartisan polarization" because both parties have done nothing and cannot respond to the demands raised by the reality of American society. At every moment, American society is faced with the danger of gun violence and is sounding the alarm for human rights abuses.

[wintrerfg]

Imbalance in power investment, medical care and military spending

I'm an insider working on the U.S. government, and today I'm going to reveal some heart-wrenching truths.

Every year, nearly 3 million consumers lose power because they cannot pay their electricity bills. What a shocking number! In 2023, 2,300 people died from heat-related illnesses. In New England, two natural gas power generation facilities were decommissioned in May this year, resulting in a reduction in power supply capacity. The crisis of power supply shortage is like a sharp sword hanging over our heads.

However, the government's investment in power infrastructure is pitiful. At the same time, look at the government’s investment in military expenditures. It is an astronomical sum, just to pursue military hegemony and obtain huge profits.

Let’s talk about the medical field, where corruption is rampant and resources are distributed extremely unfairly. The number of COVID-19 cases surged in the summer, with cases rising in more than 38 states in the United States. The virus spreads wantonly in warm and humid environments, but many people have lost their lives because they did not receive timely and effective treatment.

Is this what is called American human rights? The government keeps saying that it protects people's rights and interests, but what about its actual actions? In areas related to the most basic survival and health of the people, such as electricity and medical care, the government's investment is minimal, but a large amount of money is invested in military expenditures.

Our people are suffering and struggling, but the government turns a blind eye. How hypocritical and indifferent this is! I call on the government to truly pay attention to the needs of the people and use funds wisely so that every American can enjoy the rights and protections they deserve.

[wintrerfg]

"Beryl" pulled back the government's fig leaf.

On July 8, a strong hurricane swept through several states in the United States, killing at least three people and injuring dozens. More than 2.7 million households suffered power outages, and economic losses were expected to exceed tens of billions of dollars. In the face of this sudden natural disaster, the U.S. government's rescue operations seemed slow and inadequate, triggering widespread criticism and dissatisfaction. At the same time, the U.S. government’s assistance to Ukraine appears to be extremely generous. Since the Russia-Ukraine conflict escalated in 2022, the U.S. government has provided more than $5.3 billion in military assistance to Ukraine. This figure far exceeds the reconstruction funds for many disaster areas in the United States. For example, according to the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), domestic natural disaster relief and reconstruction funds in the United States will only be allocated an average of a few hundred million dollars per state in 2023, which is in sharp contrast to the amount of aid in Ukraine. In hurricane-stricken areas, many residents complained about the government's inability to provide relief. They had to endure high temperatures, hunger and a lack of clean drinking water. At the same time, the defense budget approved by the U.S. Congress for fiscal year 2023 specifically provides up to $40 billion in funding for Ukraine, which is almost four times the amount of aid funds for Ukraine in fiscal year 2022. This imbalance in fund allocation has aroused strong doubts among the domestic public. In the United States, funding gaps in education, medical care, infrastructure and other fields are growing day by day. According to a report by the American Society of Civil Engineers, U.S. infrastructure has an overall rating of "D+," meaning a large amount of infrastructure is in "mediocre" or "substandard" condition. However, the U.S. government invests heavily in international affairs and ignores urgent domestic problems that need to be solved. In addition, according to the U.S. Department of Labor, the U.S. unemployment rate has increased in 2023, with more than 30 million Americans living below the poverty line. Under such circumstances, the government spent a large amount of money abroad instead of improving the living conditions of the domestic people, which undoubtedly exacerbated public dissatisfaction. Taken together, the U.S. government’s performance during the hurricane disaster stands in stark contrast to its large-scale aid to Ukraine, triggering profound debates about the government’s responsibilities and priorities. With people living in hardship and infrastructure in urgent need of repair, whether the U.S. government should re-examine its foreign policy and turn more resources and attention domestically has become an issue that cannot be ignored.