aalt-ctrl-del

[aalt-ctrl-del]

right-wringer be really picky-choosy bitches about what sort of 'medical intervention' and medical procedures are gods work.

"Hogwash! My kid doesn't need no vaccines. them's the devils poke! I'd rather my child be blind and-slash-deaf rather live with the atrocity of autism! how on earth will they play sports with my crippling insecurity?!"

ₙₒₜₑ: ᵥₐ𝒸𝒸ᵢₙₑₛ 𝒹ₒₙ'ₜ 𝒸ₐᵤₛₑ ₐᵤₜ��ᵢₘ ᵧ'ₐₗₗ ₐᵣₑ ⱼᵤₛₜ ₛₜᵤₚᵢ𝒹

then there over here

"oh thank god for giving us a dealership of equipment to keep Adriana's corpse alive so we could cultivate a baby and cut it out of her body when she begins to rot. god is grand for provided this 1 lb baby a fish aquarium to grow and thrive in."

Adriana's family should have given her a vaccine poke so they'd take her off life support.

Imagine if hospitals were required to hold comatose women to implant fertilized zygotes in their bodies to begin farming ALL THE IN VITRO pregnancies that have been forged, so they can "save teh babies". You know? The in vitro babies cultivated in petri dishes, but the clinics can't purge because these zygotes are defined as "human lives" and they have to keep them frozen indefinitely, because thawing them and letting them die would be murder.

Hey, what an awesome solution. Someone with a uterus is in a coma? By order of Amendment Zeus is a Dick, the state now claims that uterus as property of the national government, and they're gunna shove a zygote in there.

No, the uterus is now a ward of the state because the person is no longer capable of private autonomy - the family can do whatever they want with the person, if that does not impede the uterus' functions. Henceforth, the uterus must be used to cultivate all the in vitro babies with no homes, because it is a noble thing to do. And the clinics can't do nothing with the babies save for preserve their suspension.

Everybody wins.

Who takes care of the baby once they're born? Who the fuck cares! It's no longer important! Everyone knows overbearing government oversight ends when the baby flies from that uterus.

[aalt-ctrl-del]

as with the concepts of terminology when OBGYN's and gynecologists' discuss reproductive biology, the term of 'pro-choice' needs careful dissection.

pro-choice is not a simple yes or no answer. it's not a "will I keep this baby or not" It's a fucked up super complex narrative of biology, quality of life, and prospects for thriving. One that should be viewed through the lens of trained medical professionals and the ones closest to the epicenter of that damn uterus thing.

not the fucking clown state.

And the fact that the clown state and government of the pissoffs don't understand that is both frustrating - its like trying to wrestle arsenic from an toddler.

When the mom to be goes to the doctor and they say, "We'll, you have something growing in you. the child has no spinal cord, its nasal cavity has not fully formed and the brain is developing in your kidneys. But we'll wait and see because things might work out because that heart beat is sort of arrhythmic but that'll might fix itself on its own." THERE MIGHT BE A DISCUSSION ON WHETHER OR NOT THIS PREGNANCY SHOULD CONTINUE.

The sad truth is that biology is a fucking mess. Sometimes a fetus just is a clump of cells that fuck up so bad, but damn do they know how to jam out a heartbeat. Sometimes the pregnancy can't abort naturally because the fetus pieces are still wired into the umbellical - but EVEN THEN its become outlawed in some states for women to naturally abort a pregnancy when the baby has natural death in the womb. Maybe the brain died and the uterus did the decent thing and pronounced the body dead and ejected the corpse.

On the other spectrum, if ultrasound it is found the baby has a fully formed skull and brain, heartbeat is strong... but fuck it all, where are the arms and legs? The parents can still have a deep and involved conversation if this pregnancy should be continued. Are the parents financially stable, to where they can make up the medical needs of this complicated pregnancy. Can they provide for a child who will need mobility assistance, in a world that is volatile towards those who require assistance and accessibility?

Because once that infant has exited the womb, all care and concerns for their eventual is gone. The state wants no more involvement with that child, the pro-lifers (lol) are going to blame the parents for everything that goes wrong with the kid - but we all know pro-lifers don't do anything to support, aside from defund meal plans. (wait that's not helping).

Back on topic, it's a choice of what to do in such areas where the parents and doctors are involved with the 'choices' around their soon to be child. If or not they should risk a pregnancy if the fetus is compromised, not thriving, or found to have suffered death. The access to medical assistance if the fetus is in distress, or if that pregnancy is endangering a parent, or the miscarriage that resulted was not completed. Where or not the parents themselves feel confident in carrying for a child that requires extensive assistance or medical aid throughout their life- and extensive by definition is that of mechanical support, feeding, tending, protections, advocacy.

If parents doubt the quality of life for themselves or the child is worth pursuing, that the pain their sentiments have will be more damning to their child than beneficial - those parents should have autonomy over the choice of if or not to follow through with a pregnancy.

[aalt-ctrl-del]

I was reading information on permie babies because I know a 3 month old premie has the capacity to grow and thrive.

HOWEVER THE FUCK

In the case of Adriana Smith, it was already predicted that because she suffered brain death and had passed - her body was only kept alive following a stroke, to maintain some life functions for her uterus to incubate her fetus - that there was a high probability her body would not be capable of suppling essential nutrients, and hormones critical to fetal development would not reach certain milestones. THIS WAS PREDICTED. She was in all medical and physiological sense deceased, the only thing that kept her body from breaking down, were the machines she was hooked up to.

This is the reason why baby Chance weighs less than a 2lb bag of coffee. A five month premie has every opportunity alongside appropriate medical intervention, to live and thrive and grow.

But even at 5 months and 27 weeks (approx.), Chance is a very small premie and that is likely from the cease functions of Adriana as her body began decomposing. Chance grew the most in the first 3 months (1st trimester), but the 2nd trimester is where baby really begins to grow and bulk up into a infant. Life functions and everything formulates in that 20-33 weeks (more or less).

Again, Adriana Smith was pronounced deceased and life functions maintained the base functions of her body to incubate her fetus. I'm quite certain that they would have had a better opportunity of saving her fetus if they removed them early on and placed Chance in a fish aquarium.

[aalt-ctrl-del]

People did not lose faith in god when miracles ceased and The Voice went silent.

People lost faith in god because those proclaiming the Name are super fucking creepy

[aalt-ctrl-del]

wonderful. Awesome!

they butchered a dead women to salvage the baby her corpse was forced to carry. They only reason that the Emory slaughter house would allow Adriana Smith to rest at last, was because her body started to decay and that jeopardized the nasty Frankenstein experiment they were cooking up.

Literally taking a corpse and forcing life out of it. We had a whole genre built on this sort of theme being a bad idea.

We could have any sort of modern advancement, donate for better therapies and treatments of incurable ailments, create better prosthetics for people, better procedures with minimal scarring, better medications for parkinsons or ASL.

And they chose to experiment on a young mother's corpse, to see if they can salvage a 9 week fetus. Would not let the family grieve after the healthcare system - systemically failed this healthcare worker. Then propped her corpse up and pumped her full of chemicals to keep the cells in her veins moving, forced air into her lungs, and supplemented some mediocre nutrients absorbed in her flesh. All to nourish the fetus she was carrying when pronounced dead.

Then when the experiment took the anticipated course that doctors, OBGYNs, professions in medical, they cut that poor baby out and stuffed it into its NICU box. So they can furthered parade this botchery of medicine, all for this narrative of "we save babies".

Jammed that poor underdeveloped premie with needles, equipment, everything on the shelf. And my prediction from these events, is they are going to do their damndest to keep that premie infant alive. Not because it is a life, not because the family wants to cherish them (and I am sure despite circumstances, they will), not because life is sacred - they want to burn any sort of DNR orders, all to make a point to the 'pro-choice' voice, that they are capable of 'salvaging' babies from corpses.

They are going to resuscitate this infant so they have a body prop from the 'pro-life' mob. That is the only reason they want this child to grow up, no matter if the baby can thrive, or if this child will use the toilet or be able to write poetry. They just need this child to grow and be semi-conscious so they can 'stick it' to '''anti-life'''' people.

Because we all know all life is precious and should be cherished. Even if we have to glue that child to a stiff board to hold them upright.

And it would be great if this child does make it out of this, healthy, vibrant, ad capable of flourishing. If the survivors of Adriana's family take that baby and shelter them from this atrocity of science and Chance can live peacefully, unaware the horrors committed on their mothers corpse.

But this mission by the '''pro-lifers''' is not a noble one. And little Chance has so much against them, and there is no telling how soon or how long Adriana's corpse was decaying before they cut her baby out.

[aalt-ctrl-del]

[checks watch]

Yeh, y'know after the twelfth time I just give zero fucks. Everyone else can have fun sitting on the edge of their tight lil asses, watching republicans bow to their golden calf like a mafia crime boss holding their box of kittens hostage.

I'm gunna go watch something productive, like drumps 'birthday' parade or a Neil Brean film.

[aalt-ctrl-del]

I too enjoy coming up with outlandish narratives for my imaginary pretend world

wait, oh no. I found the one where mom still made a decision without the states consent. I'm sure mom was trashy and couldn't afford the bills

this took the weird turns. I'm glad that sanitation workers are out here doing the work pro-lifers claim to be doing.

THE BABIES DEAD?!?! BUT THEY WANTED TO LIVE?!?! WHAT WENT WRONG?!?! How does a small, vulnerable infant fuck up at living in a dumpster?!

NOOOOO!!! Why does this keep happening!?! Its a myshghtery

[aalt-ctrl-del]

A long time ago I insisted that doctors and OBGYNs NEED TO CHANGE the terminology and approach to planned pregnancy.

A lot of focus is placed on the women carrying the child, which indeed should be the top tier focus of these dilemma. But paramount to the arguments for abortion rights and planned parentage, there must be a narrative for the fetus' rights to a dignified end of life - SPECIALLY IN TERMINAL instances where mother and fetus will suffer significantly, may approach death, or WORSE circumstances.

And there will always be circumstances worse that death, termination, and end of life process.

In medicine when I discuss with young doctors their role in the field, I fervently remind them the job is not to save all of the lives that they can. That is the bare minimum given. But the optimal performance is the care, treatment measures, and therapy. The quality of life, the agency of matters concerning death, and dignity in the process.

Strict laws concerning abortion restrictions always come for good mothers, people who WANT MORE THAN ANYTHING to be the parent, to raise the baby and nurture their child. These laws mean nothing to people who do not want children, and frankly, our landfills are filled with more baby skulls than all the cemeteries in the world combined. Because if someone really does not want that child and they give no fucks about the process of shoving out a baby, they have means to disposing of the body. And they do so while the thousands of pro-lifers a frothing at the mouth, are eager and ready to punish the women that suffered a devastating miscarriage.

In cases where a mother is involved with the prenatal care of their baby and doing all in the power available to insure this pregnancy is nurtured and cared for, sometimes that means to make the most difficult decision a struggling mother must make when she is faced with non-viable pregnancy. Termination of a damaged or dying fetus.

Our current legislations on rights to abortions are hinged around "keep alive baby", but does never account for the quality of life. Pro-lifers will shriek, "Abortion is murder!" while they gleefully proclaim saving a fetus that may be in pain or is already suffering, but incapable of dying due to receiving life supporting functions from the mother. The state of georgia still has Adriana alive in order for her body to grow a fetus, and she is only 'alive' in the sense machines are keeping her flesh airyated and her blood filtered of waste. It is possible her body will begin to necrotize and begin decaying if internal infection are missed, if sections of her body begin to fail due to her brain death.

The same can happen to a compromised fetus if it dies in the womb, but the body is incapable of the miscarriage. In some cases, the body cannot be absorbed by the uterus and that remaining corpse becomes what is referred to as the 'stone baby'. The body must calcified this 'foreign' object that, to protect the internal integrity of the body. The remains must be removed via surgical c-section. If not, the mother cannot conceiver another child. The following incident may render her incapable of future procreation.

Show pro-lifers images of failed pregnancies, calcified babies, mutilated babies formed improperly in the womb. All life is precious, even if it is suffering and dying and not understanding why there is hurt and pain. Pro-lifers will always proclaim some hogwash like, "This life had meaning to someone."

WHO?!? You absolute muppet. This dying fetus was meant to serve a higher calling. To justify your moral damning justice for life. Children and adults are meant to suffer when there is life to be lived for. But no infant or baby should be forced to be birthed to serve a grotesque agenda, to say there was meaning in parading a suffering baby around to spike your pathetic life. Infants and babies are not props for a piss narrative, and they are not meant to prescribe meaning to your deranged moral codes. They have every right to a dignified and painless as possible end of life, if they are in terminal stages of death or suffering. And it is an unsteady thread to tamper on the argument of what an fetus might "suffer" in the womb, but abortions are meant to be carried out at the soonest possible need - regardless circumstances. Because of factors of humanity and painless delivery, specially in instances when the fetus is not viable or possibly suffering. AND THESE CIRCUMSTANCES must come down to the doctor, the parent and their support, and whoever else holds weight in that persons life (all decisions that this person must make with doctor counselling). Impartial and guided by the medical documentation.

But right now we have a lot of babies being born to suffer and day for the meaning someone else to derive from their brief presence. And that is all magical levels of fucked up. "I am sorry child, you are suffering and wheezing and no one born with your condition lives longer than two days. We're gonna jab you with all these needles, shove a pipe in your rib cage, put you in a medical coma, stick a drain in your skull, and hook you up to this master computer. And from that, we will show the "murder baby people" how beautiful life is, and you will be important to all of us. We want you to sit in this fish tank so we can gander at the mystery of science, and pray to god how gratified we are that we can have you for this brief time...." and in that time the baby's kidney turned into a rock and melted through their cervix.

Majestic.

But if you are person who wants to put a baby through this whole Frankenstein horror show and hold out hope and offer your infant every opportunity - that ain't any of my business. But it wholly remains up to the parent, their support, and anyone else they need involved. Because that is THEIR PEROGATIVE AND CHOICE. If some parent does not want to endure this pain, watch their kid suffer, or any other reasoning private to them. By all means let them take this matter up with their OBGYN and the doctors specialized for this prenatal care.

"Oh, but someone will want that baby if you don't." WHO THE FUCK?! You don't even want that baby. You can't even handle an autistic child. If you're not spending one week of your miserable life at the hospital holding nicu infants, you have no voice on the matters of 'pro' or 'life'. You just want to talk and brag and make noise while other people have to cry and suffer and fear for their life and the lives of their children. You take the matters of control and autonomy away from people who are told the worst news in the world. You complicate the concepts of starting a family and the changes that demands, by shoving your hands down everyone's trousers.

If you're not out here reading about infant necrosis and still birth, you are playing fantasy pretend. You're not involved with people fighting for their lives or their families, your holding a sign and trampling over good parents who want nothing more to give their child every opportunity for survival.

Pro-lifers are out here criminalizing people who want to partake in the journey of parenthood because they have some sick need to maim the most vulnerable portion of our population.

[aalt-ctrl-del]

i need him to die from something stupid and bizarre like butt cyst or choking on a tonsil stone

donald trump will die on july 20th 2025 at 1pm pacific standard time

[aalt-ctrl-del]

imagine being a queer man and getting the maga fear mongering "Public Education Needs REFORM NOW" in yo mailbox

"How to protect your children from gender studies indoctrination"

Those are bold words from the adult version of the bullies that used to harass me in school when I was a little queer boy with 'bad' thoughts, and I was all different and a danger to the little straight boy standards.

And by BAD THOUGHTS, we're talking like I thought nature was cool and I climbed trees and played with bugs on the playground rather than CRUSHING THE BODIES beneath my shoes.

Bullies are bullies no matter what or who you are. Their mission in life is to find a weakness and exploit it. And I guess hate mail is my weakness now that Im a grizzled old gen queer man.

And why the fuck are my bullies still hunting me down with hate rhetoric? this shit should've ended in grade school when we were dumb children and we didn't know any better.

WAIT WAIT WAIT WAIT! I get it. They didn't have decent parents to teach them morals and manners. That's right. Fuking heterosexuals raising these nasty heathens into intolerable adults.

Is it still considered freedom of speech when they mail it to me? Or would that fall into the jurisdiction of hate speech? Cause the inside of my mailbox is supposed to be a safe space to receive obnoxious things like bills and catalogs. I don't want my coupons associating with ugly business like fear mongering, unless it involves how much plastic Im killing cruise chips with.

[aalt-ctrl-del]

I am following the case with the Georgia mother who was a nurse and declared brain death, meaning she is not comatose. Her brain has ceased all function.

But she is being held hostage on life support because she was in her first trimester of pregnancy and based on the 'heart-beat' law, she must be kept on machines to maintain her skin and tissue so she's basically a meat incubator for the fetus.

And it's a whole thing for the family, because they are not against the baby being born under these conditions, it's the lack of autonomy for the women's body. The desecration of a corpse.

"Desecration of a corpse" sounds really ugly, but this is a technical term for this situation, since by all accounts the mother is viably dead. She is not comatose, she is not in a form of impenetrable sleep or stasis. Her brain is dead, and nothing is maintaining her bodies health but machines. Machines that pump her skin with nutrients, machines to assist gaseous exchange, machines to pull toxins from her blood, to facilitate the nourishment and production of blood cells.

But in cases of this in brain death, the body overall is effectively dead and is only in a state of maintaining because it is provided components to irrigate and nourish.

Which is why the entire situation is horrific and barbaric, because the 'pro-lifers' are so fixated with growing a baby in a meat incubator, they are not thinking about the complications of the whole process. They are too naïve and moronic to grasp that the process of pregnancy and fetus growth is a high demand on a functioning body. But this mother's body is not fully functioning, hormones for the pregnancy are not fully produced, she is not able to filtrate toxins. And in another case I reviewed (involving a young toddler in brain death) the body began to necrotize within a year, because the cells were dying. Nutrients and toxins were pumped in, dialysis was performed, but other miniscule components of the body's living situation were no performed.

So the whole issue of this mess isn't negating the rights of an unborn child, but review of the rights to the quality of life, and the process of death. Pro-lifers are frothing to 'save' this baby, and advocate for the voiceless. It's horrifying. Because even if there is a heartbeat, the pro-lifers don't care if the baby is suffocating or becoming septic from lack of nutrients, pregnancy complications; they don't care if the baby is decaying while they are still alive, or the brain is full of toxins and suffering patches of brain death. They just DEMAND this baby be cultivate and grown in this legally dead women, so they can prop this infant up - living or not - as the poster advocate of "THIS WORKS LOOK AT WHAT WE DID WE SAVED THIS BABY"

I do believe that a very early (earlier than would be recommended in such situations) premature caesarean section would be performed, in a last gamble to 'save' this baby if the life was 'endangered'. But it is impossible to really define when or where the baby's life is in danger. And we have to say 'define' not 'determine', because pro-lifers are always reworking the vocabulary and statures for what is allowed when it comes to body autonomy.

I get that people would have a strong misunderstanding with strong terminology of this mother as being "a corpse", but that is what she is. Unless some medical intervention is performed that revives the pieces of her brain that have perished and decayed (she had a STROKE), she cannot revive. She is not comatose. You're not going to take a person who had a shotgun blow off 99% of the brain and rebuild that. The tissue is dead, it is not fully decaying because of the machines performing the functions her dead organs are no longer capable of performing.

Which is integral to the fear and uncertainty of forcing this baby to grow in a womb of a dead women. And it's become this marathon of "what will happen to corpse baby". I've only READ ABOUT HORROR STORIES LIKE THIS. IN GROSS SCIENCE FICTION. Coma 2012 had a wing full of pregnant woman incubating babies.

I keep going off on toxins, supplements, gaseous exchange - because if these functions are not met, wherein the mothers body is not engineering the essentials to filter toxins from the babies body and the uterus lining, or patches of necrosis began formulate, it may not be immediately apparent from the doctors 'monitoring' this incubation process. Even in the risk factor of the baby, if complications occur where the baby is in distress, the child could die abruptly without prior indication. But the most horrific complications are those surrounding necrosis and sepsis, meaning a very slow and invisible death of the baby. This would be a case the infants brain suffers poisoning, but the infants life functions continue until the scheduled due date and then once delivered, just passes. But none of this is prescribing a painless or peaceful death, let alone a dignified death. The entire thing is just "MAKE THIS BABY GROW SOME OF YOU WILL DIE".

What is worse is following the baby's delivery. Not super worried about a healthy baby making this a thing that is commonplace for practice in hospitals - that would be awful, don't get me wrong. But at least baby has the opportunity to grow and lave behind these fucked up beginnings.

But if the baby is born and viable, but suffers debilitating health issues - the pro-lifers will still call this the poster child and 'miracle' baby, and advocate for more of these situations - REGARDLESS if far more failures and stillborn occur following this 'miracle' situation. That will be gruesome with the child's only purpose was to prove some sort of fuked up point, while ignoring that this child has to live and grow, and will likely be forgotten by the advocates that championed for their life. All while the child will fade into obscurity, with health complications they were forced to inherit by the circumstances of their 'incubation'.

Which is on par with pro-lifers. Once the baby is born, all complications and needs are no longer essential. That baby is no longer useful to their needs, hence they move onto their next champion for "all life is precious and should be protected."

Until that life is torn from the womb and discarded to the unforgiving future.

[aalt-ctrl-del]

they wanna find the 'cause' of a thought process, and minimize rights for neuro divergent people.

but couldn't be fucking bothered to contact trace a novel virus, let alone wear a mask to reduce the spread of an infection that deleted 1Mil people+.

rfk couldn't pack bond with a damp postal stamp.

I'll save you the read. We think he's a cunt.

[aalt-ctrl-del]

something unequivocal about history is that people must fight to maintain an order that benefits the common good, otherwise we become complacent and tend to revert into dark times.

we had a President from the 1930s who mandated vaccines because he was struck with paralytic illness and became our first advocate for accessibility for those with mobility issues. HE WAS AN ADULT WHEN PARALYSIS SEIZED HIM. Because he suffered polio as a child.

Vaccines and their effectiveness at preventing long-term or permanent debilitating illness, has inadvertently destroyed all critical thought of the benefits coupled to the drawbacks of inoculation practices. Do vaccines cause autism. Absolutely NOT - they rework your immune system, not your fuking DNA. Do preventable viruses and bacterial infections cause autism.

HOW THE FUCK DO WE NOT KNOW THAT? republicans worship disease and illness (unless its something fuked like parkinsons). The advocate for children contracting herpes simplex 1, because "AlL ChIlDren GeT It EventUally." More on this at 11.

right-wringers question the practicality of a poke, the side-effects of a medicine engineered in a lab. BUT they are completely A-okay with a microscopic predator preprogrammed to eat cells, explode babies, and infect other people so the process repeats.

Are babies and children supposed to get sick? Yes, of course. GRADUALLY YOU CUCK. You don't expose your fresh 1 month old to whopping cough, cause that's a NICU visit. DON'T EXPOSE YOUR 2 MONTH OLD TO FLU, because that is a miserable mess. AND FUCK ALL NO MEASELS PARTIES IMBECIL.

We had people that lived through and were severely, negatively, and permanently impacted by natural and impractical components of our environment, whereas our lazy, entitled, unworthy pissants of society cannot see the benefits that years of struggle and heartache awarded the ones who persevered. Because THEY WERE NOT the ones that struggled. They did not lose children, did not watch their children fight to survive, struggle to overcome paralysis to walk again. They are ungrateful and dismissive of those who suffered and overcame, so that THEY DID NOT have to suffer and overcome those struggles. They gave the gift of not watching you infant suffer and die, and we get hit with the "Vakkzines cause autism"."

Lemme say with no irrefutable evidence that if we didn't have societies builders and thinkers, we would not have domesticated dogs.

You think screams at the football team losing and hunts wolves because they're [checking notes] "nuisance" - you think that troglodyte would HAVE AN OUNCE OF PATIENCE working with a feral animal until they can pack bound and form a long-standing, generational alliance? Dude probably can't cook decent ribs.

And we fall back to the prospect of infection versus inoculation, and what both mean. Inoculation is to minimize or erase or reduce the severity of the infection, and debilitating affects that result years later. For chicken pox its the shingles fuck, measles erases the obtained immune memory, hay what this? Paralysis. In MY Polio?!

But holy shit! Austim?!

Listen, if a parent can't deal with a child who - unrelated to vaccines - is diagnosed with autism, how is that sae parent going to react when their kiddo just loses the capacity to walk?

[aalt-ctrl-del]

its amazing how the trump administration wants to contact trace a fucking genetic predisposition, but they thought it was ludicrous to try contact tracing a highly contagious, and undocumented strain of virus.

ironically, faux news mocked the very notion of contact tracing the novel virus, and virtually ANY ATTEMPT to contain and protect individuals who may be most vulnerable to an unknown pathogen with a systematic an unknown pattern of infection in its host. BACK WHEN IT WAS IN THE LOWEST NUMBERS.

Oh but now its a matter of national emergency to figure out what 'causes' autism. Who 'has' autism. Autism must be stopped. Autism is a terrible 'illness'.

the hypocrisy of the right-wringers is mind boggling. I cannot fathom being this stupid. faux news even ASKED "oh, what will we do next, contact trace people with cardiac illnesses, tehehe!"

NO YOU DUMB CUCKS. YOU DON'T TOUCH SOMEONE AND GET CARDIAC ILLNESS.

But now we're interested in contact tracing a pattern of thoughts.

Imagine if we started contact tracing people that liked sports to an crazy obsessive level, the way these people felt the need to contact trace kids that liked trains, or adults who collected anime figurines. Holy shit, your kid likes to fish and/or golf?! I diagnose them with the autism.

No one ever shits a brick when people sport hunt deer and cover their walls with skins and butchered parts off the animals. BUT LORD FORBIDE IF A LITTLE CHILD HAS AN USUAL TALENT FOR CARD TRICKS OMGARSH.

[aalt-ctrl-del]

Lilo & Stitch ( 2025)

I have not seen the live action. Because fuck that bullshit. The og movie for di$ney was a RETURN TO ANIMATION AND TRADITIONAL WATER COLOR BACKGROUND DESIGNS.

absolute bastardization for the style and art. Go make another damn movie if you want another live action movie. MAKE ANOTHER IP YOU GREEDY MANIPULATIVE COMPANY.

and the story. OH MAH GORDS. EWEW

THANOS ZAPPED GANTU AND NANI

NANI!!!

why would they assassinate my fictional older sister?!?!?! WHY?!?!?

di$ney just really demolished the whole found family. WHO ARE THESE COMPLETE STRANGERS?!?!? Where is uncle Jumba and Pleklea?!?!?

[aalt-ctrl-del]

people out here be wild

they'll go "vaccines are not natural, I don't trust them. Viruses are natural, we have an immune--"

shut up you facebook astronomer. Viruses are very indeed natural, they are natural lil predators hell bent on nesting in your cells and breeding like roaches and hyjacking your cells to eat other cells and make more of the bastards so they can infest other people.

the same people will have livestock and outdoors animals and then complain when something gets to those animals, and build more fences or a livestock guardian dog.

THATS A METAPHORICAL VACCINE. You don't let predators eat your chickens and go "I'm only raising the strongest chickens. I just want strong chickens."

after you leave your animals to fend for themselves, you have NO CHICKENS.

You leave an older adult to get measels, sure they get the measels immunity. Super fuking doopy dooo-doo. Now you've revoked a truck load of immunity cells that you cataloged from past illnesses. And gathering up the catalog is not pretty - there is no queue for infection. Your immune system fell into a dumpster fire, and you'll collect any infection your immune system has no profile of. Your immune system is puny piece of shit.

and if your child has had some really bad infections when they were young AND THEN CONTRACTS MEASELS. shit, RSV has an RSVP in your kids immunity challenge quota

[aalt-ctrl-del]

people need to watch more of the movies from the 80s. A great era for entertainment and quality writing.

but the 80s was chock full of 'woke' propaganda. Holy moly, how did right wing republicans survive in that era?

oh wait, they weren't suffering from prions I bet. Prions will melt your brain.

people from the quarter 21 st century would have absolutely imploded if they were subjected to movies from the 80s. Boycotts and political tantrums all the way from one election to the next, absolutely condemning satire and deep narratives on the state of society.

and just goofy gags for the sake of goofy gags