#(so we both would have introjected from the same character/s)
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
together-we-are-fnaf · 6 months ago
Text
almost went looking for doubles in the tags just to remember i feel weird around them
4 notes · View notes
Text
Hey, fictive here!
I think my first question to a fictive searching for sourcemates would be: why?
(Ended up kind of addressing the reader as if they were a fictive who wants to seek out sourcemates - i apologise for that, but it made it easier for me to write)
Why do you need to find introjects you share a source with? Why is it something you want?
Is it because you want to talk with someone who went through the same as you? Because they still might not be able to relate to your specific experience. They might have a totally different relation to "canon" than you. Maybe they don't have memories or feelings towards that. Maybe no memories or feelings towards canon or any characters at all. An example: a fictive of the character Hange might have some expectation that I, a Levi fictive, have some sort of feelings, friendly or otherwise, towards them or share memories of us going through hardship together. While I acknowledge that Levi in the manga has a close relationship with Hange, I simply don't (i feel bad about it lol but this is how it is). This could upset both of us, since they might be hurt that I don't share their memories of "us" bonding over shared trauma, and I might be hurt because I feel guilt of not being as close to them as what I feel like I should be
Is it because you miss your friends, family or lover? Because holy shit I get this, but the tough realisation is that those people you miss don't exist and never will. If you meet an introject of the person you miss, they are exactly that - an introject. They aren't the person you long for. They will never be that person. Don't seek out a sourcemate if this is your reason. Example: I didn't seek one out, but when I randomly ran into an introject of the only source character I have any fucking attachment to, I became the biggest mess and was crying until I couldn't breathe - all over a person I had a few short interactions with, but whom I felt like was my soulmate. This lasted months and it's been over a year now and writing this response is making me feel kinda sad again. Fuck I miss that guy, but he's never been real and never will be
Is it because you feel like it could be fun to chat with people whom you have this significant thing in common with? Again, I get it. But just remember that even if you think you are able to distinguish between your own exomemories, canon, and the other fictives, you might still experience what I did - intense grief and heartbreak when you are confronted with the fact that you will never meet those friends/family/lover(s) you had in your exomemories, you will never have that body and those abilities, you will never live in that world. For me, it became a very harsh reality check mixed together with the opposite kinda, where I just wanted to become my own person (singlet, no fusions) and live with Erwin (the guy I love) for the rest of my life. I was in so much pain holy shit and I dont want others to go through this if it can be avoided
I think it can be unhealthy to actively seek out sourcemates, since you might have the wrong expectations and could be hurt, even if you think that you won't. Being friends with sourcemates is all good, though! We are friends with a fellow Levi introject lol (we met him "randomly"), but basing a friendship on the sole reason that you are both introjects from the same work of fiction? That seems like a disaster waiting to happen imo. Maybe it works out for other people! But my personal experiences have been almost exclusively negative
Anyway, it's 4 am and I'm getting too tired to edit this anymore, so sorry that it's long and might not make a lot of sense, but I wanted to give my thoughts on this while I was at the front
maybe this is a controversial opinion, but i don't see the harm in fictives making friends with others from the same source? as long as everyone is respectful of each other?
i do see the potential issue in mixing fictive stuff with kinnie/irl stuff though
idk. ive heard mixed reactions to fictives looking for "sourcemates" and im curious about others' takes?
my questions are— if this is harmful, why? is it truly deeply messing with the trauma of those involved, and if so, how?
65 notes · View notes
kaypeace21 · 4 years ago
Note
do you think it’s possible sarah (hoppers daughter) was an early-formed alter that went dormant before the events of season one? it’d make a lot of sense with how much of hoppers arc in season one was him mourning her and channeling that grief into protecting will (which would make sense since he seems like a protecter to both will and el). love your posts!☺️
Yep . :D
I already discussed all of this in the original did post - how sarah was a “little” (kid ) alter. And how hopper was a protector /introject alter. I also discussed her going dormant as a major possibility in my did theory. My assumption is she either (a) “became dormant” like some alters do- aka they are “gone” sometimes for many years but can return . And this can happen in a myriad of ways - sometimes alters go dormant after they had a simulated death in the inner world . theoretically sarah had such a Death. And so did El. Death isn’t really a permanent thing for alters ...they usually will come back or stay dormant - unless the body of the host dies (or they integrate) . They can’t really die . I think it’s very possible she comes back and Hopper while exploring the various innerworlds of Will’s minds (like the Russian one, the memory scapes , etc ) reunites/ finds her . look at the st s4 movie inspirations. In ‘what dreams may come”  a guy with the guidance of his dead kid explore a heaven like world influenced by a painter’s emotions.We also have the movie ‘inside out’ -which involves “memory islands” (distinct worlds based on a child’s memories) which are influenced negatively by the kid being depressed she moved to California. The characters traveling to these memory islands are constructs of  kid’s mind -and 1 of them also has a guide helping them explore the ‘memory islands’. in  Inception a guy says he’s a construct of a guy’s mind and needs to help him escape the many different Ievels of the dream worlds.The in inception who made the worlds- had dad issues. 'the cell’also had alternate dimensions of a man's mind that a cop explored ( the dimensions were created by a man who was ab*sed by his dad). Movies like inception, matrix, Truman show, total recall, the cell, enter the void, wizard of oz, Peter Pan, hellraiser 2, dream warriors, bill & ted’s bogus journey, and welcome to marwen  also allude to this: because they involve entering simulated abstract worlds usually created/based on happy& traumatic memories/fears.Cough s4 using the movie wizard of oz quote “we’re not in Hawkins (kansas) anymore.While truman show/matrix are more about realizing your reality isn’t real.in bladerunner 2044/total recall it has the theme of false implanted memories… probably relating to hopper realizing he’s an alter and not in “actual Russia.” Before seeing the other segments of the innerworlds with sarah. Like in total recall- the bad ass spy is told all his memories: his wife/ years of marriage,  , his name, are just implanted memories. And she says “you’re life is a dream.” 
In s2 Nancy asks Steve how his “grandpa’s time in the war is a metaphor for your life?” And steve compares the mf to the germans in the war. Dr owens mentions Will has ptsd like “ (vietnam) soldiers’, Hopper saying he had buddies like Will . “In the 70s there was a study that compared the post-traumatic stress symptoms in Vietnam veterans and adult survivors of childhood s**ual ab*se. The study revealed that childhood s**ual ab*se is traumatizing and can result in symptoms comparable to symptoms from war-related trauma.” Hopper isn’t actually in Russia -but in one of the innerworlds (after he jumped through the rift of the machine- into Will’s mind). We’ll see flashbacks but also present circumstances of his imprisonment echo Will’s past with Lonnie (if the movies indicate anything)- being starved, guards getting payed in order to let other prisoners  r*pe a gay prisoner (than claim incorrectly because of his sexuality he wanted it) , as well as a gang of sadist men who r**e others and a warden using that as a threat to be compliant , being thrown in a dark room of solitary confinement and starved when they didn’t obey the warden, the warden being religious, etc. And the Anerican soldiers (in Vietnam) in the movies aren’t much better and do similarly horrific acts to civilians like r**e and bragging/ happily k*lling women, children, and the elderly. The drill sergant in vietnam calling them homophobic slurs & women, and chocking one of the soldiers with one hand, slapping one for not believing in christianity. Tying up a soldier in a bed , gagging him, beating him and saying “remember it’s just a dream.” Only praising them when good in fire arms.(movies : fullmetal jacket, papillon, shawshank redemption, platoon, welcome to marwen, etc ) . My assumption is  flashbacks of his life- will hint he’s an alter of Will’s-the boxes in the basement are “vietnam” ,“dad”, and “ny” (and these are the memories of his we’ll see). And some of the bad characters in said stories will also parallel Lonnie . For instance in s2, Jonathan mentions Indiana writer Vonnegut- In his book ‘slaughterhouse 5′- Vonnegut begins the story of Billy Pilgrim, a man who has “come unstuck in time”. It accounts of Billy Pilgrim's capture and incarceration by the Germans during the last years of World War II, and scattered throughout the narrative are episodes from Billy's life with his dad, and his own wife and kids.Billy is forced to be part of the war and similar things against his free will. The moments start from his childhood when his father throws him in the water to teach him how to swim. He was unwillingly drafted into the war. Later, he is kidnapped by Tralfamadorians  (aliens that are implied to be caused by his mental health issues/trauma) against his will. Therefore, he realizes that this concept is just an illusion.
  And some of the bad characters in said stories will also parallel Lonnie . Like how in ‘peterpan’- the young girl Wendy imagines netherland and the villain -captain hook- is based off her father ( in the movie they have the same voice actors/while in all stage productions the 2 characters are always played by the same actor). Similar to the other s4 film- ‘wizard of oz’ where the wicked witch of th west from the mythical land of Oz (is played by Dorothy’s real life mean neighbor in the real world/kansas). Or ‘in the cell’- every villain from the alternate-mind- dimensions is played by same actor in diff makeup. Not sure if they’d use Ross Patridge (actor of Lonnie) in this way . But it would be very interesting if (In makeup) Ross played many negative people in Hopper’s life/past -as a way to show Will’s past tr*uma.
Like also-look at Sarah’s tiger plushie! In chinese mythology/culture: “The tiger is personified by the constellation Orion (interesting given Sara’s interest in space/blackholes). The tiger represents protection over human life (hmm?). Tiger charms were used to keep away evil and disease (that’s awful ironic if she died in the manner she did). In Buddhism, wearing tiger skins during meditations was believed to bring protection from spiritual interference and potential harm while exploring astral dimensions.” HMMMMMMMMM  XD
Kali in the stranger things novel ‘Suspicious Minds’ says…
“I was named after a goddess. She wore a tiger skin and was fierce in battle.”
Then Kali says to Alice (a women who can see future visions): “I love you, Alice. We can be tigers together.”This parallel (in relation to Alice) is fascinating because Kali actually uses her powers to fake Alice’s death- and to trick Dr. Brenner, and allow Alice to escape. The allusion was so realistic, that Terry could even touch the ‘dead’ Alice.
So the tiger symbolism could be a HUGE hint- that Sarah’s death was simulated and she’ll come back and travel the innerworlds/alternate dimensions of Will’s mind (as Hopper’s guide). Hopper about sarah “galaxies the universe-she always understood that stuff.”
Another possibility (theory b) is she integrated with another alter or with Will (which means she can’t return) .Hopper saying about Sarah “the black hole it got her.” Could imply she integrated with the mf/shadow monster? And ,or maybe she will later ?
But... I lean heavily to theory (a) the most , though.
Obviously sarah has a lot of the connections to Will. will and Sarah both being into science, Sarah winning a spelling bee, Will winning the science fair, both being connected to tigers. Both hallucinating something no one else can see and people trying to snap the 2 out of what they’re viewing. Joyce saying as a witch she’ll eat Will. Parallels Hopper saying as an ogre he’ll eat sarah. Hopper, in s1, when seeing Will (with a vine in his mouth) has a flashback of Sarah on a mouth respirator. And he also has a flashback of Sarah when seeing Will’s lion plushie which resembled Sarah’s tiger plushie. And el also had a lion plushie-like Will’s in s1. Hopper monitored both Will and Sarah at the hospital when they were “dying”. Will has a fear of clowns- and Sarah’s hospital gown had clowns on them. All 3 kids draw.
Plus, we all know the parallels of Will to El (Hopper’s new daughter).
I discussed in my did theory that Hopper (as an adult alter) is a form of protector to all the kid alters - el, Sarah, and Will (host/core). And Hopper as an introject-alter (who are alters based on a person the child knows ) are usually put in the system cause the kid assumes that person could protect them . And since original-Hopper was a police man (a little kid could easily assume that). Although, because he’s a “father figure” for the system he has some of Lonnie’s traits- which are reflected in other perpetrator alters/ bad npcs in the system- Brenner, Neil, Billy, the evil’s Russians,etc . So sometimes he acts similar to a Perpetrator alter too . And I listed those examples/bad parallels extensively in the original did post (linked in the beginning).
And I used these quotes from psych papers in my original did post to pretty much sum up Hopper’s use in Will’s system .
“Introjects can also be based off of  figures that the dissociative child found strong, courageous, heroic, or otherwise worthy of being emulated and internalized and could theoretically protect them.”
“Older adult alters are created to serve a nurturing or parenting role, thus serving as a protector. (*protecting Will/el) . However, sometimes their older age is related to taking on the identification of the ab*ser and can therefore take on any of the other more hostile roles too ... Introjects which are mimicking ab*sers are trying to "keep you inline" in order to protect you from external ab*sers. They are copying behaviors shown to them by bad people, not harboring the intent, s*dism or imm*rality of the actual perpetrators.”
I think it pretty much sums up the nuances and motivations of Hopper’s character.
Thanks for the ask, anon :)
43 notes · View notes
strangertheory · 4 years ago
Note
Do you think that portraying a portion of our characters as alters would remove their depth? Would portraying female characters and characters of color as alters of Will remove their agency? This is not my personal opinion but I’ve seen this topic come up as a concern with the DID theory and seeing as you answer every ask so thoughtfully.
DID is a widely misunderstood condition due to the way in which it has been portrayed in a lot of popular media, but also because it is a unique condition that most people have not spent a lot of time learning more about. When fans are ignorant and say incorrect things like “alters aren’t real” they are perpetuating incorrect information about DID and being prejudiced against those who have DID.
“El is her own person! With her own free will!”
- Nancy Wheeler, season 3
DID is a real medical condition. People need to educate themselves more on the topic before they engage in (incorrectly) asserting that El being an alter would somehow make her less important or “less real” than Will. If the theory that Will and El are both part of a DID System is correct: they share the same mind and their brain belongs to them both. They’re two different, separate states of consciousness in their shared mind. Shared.
Alters are not imaginary friends, and they are not hallucinations. Alters are distinct, separate states of identity within a single human brain. A host in a DID System does not “control” other alters. They are not puppets or characters in a fictionalized story that was invented by a person’s imagination. And it’s very important that people treat alters as unique individuals.
Describing an alter as “not real��� is incorrect and ignorant. Alters are just as real as you or me. Fans, when discussing or criticizing the theory that Stranger Things is about a DID System, need to be aware that any time they criticize this theory and say something like “alters are not real” that they’re being prejudiced against real alters in real DID Systems who might read their comments online and be hurt. Alters are each unique individuals, and they are real.
Alters have their own agency. They have real feelings and experiences. They have their own free will. Their sense of identity and their memories and experiences are separate from the experiences of other alters. Even when alters are co-conscious together they will still perceive of those shared experiences differently.
To make a very simplistic analogy: imagine many people living in the same body that sometimes can interact with one another face-to-face in spaces within their shared subconscious mind. (Those spaces are referred to as “internal worlds.”)
Do you consider yourself real? How do you define your identity? You probably, like me, define yourself by the many experiences you have had throughout your life and by your memories and your relationships with other people. That is how Alters develop their sense of identity, too: through their real memories, relationships, and experiences. But a key difference is that they exist together in one mind and body. But they are all real. One alter is not more or less “real” than another alter.
Anyone that takes issue with the concept of El and Will possibly taking turns being conscious in their shared body in the external world might need to be wary of seeming prejudiced against trans identities and experiences. El is a girl and Will is a boy.
Regarding your point about the concept of Lucas potentially being an alter: I personally suspect that Lucas exists in the external physical world as a friend no matter what is going on in the story, but if there were also an alter in the DID System that was named Lucas and was based off of their friend named Lucas, then that alter-Lucas would be understood to perhaps have the same physical appearance within the internal world of the mind but would not have a Black identity in the same way that friend-Lucas does (obviously) because the lived experiences that this alter has would not be the same as a Black person. (This is a very good and complex question. I’m not sure I can do it justice. But it is definitely important to clarify that no, an alter in a DID System is not going to have a racial identity that is equivalent to racial identities and experiences in the external world unless that identity does, in fact, reflect their body’s physical appearance and cultural heritage in the external, physical world.)
Many DID Systems will have alters with different genders, ages, races, etc. but this is not the result of a conscious choice. Hosts, who are simply alters that are in control of the body the most often in the physical external world, don’t consciously “create” their alters or control them in any way. And from what I currently understand about DID (and keep in mind I am just a layperson that has done some research of my own, I’m not a medical professional) the appearance of an alter is speculated to oftentimes be based on a person’s subconscious understandings of traits they’ve observed in the external world that they believe would empower them to deal with a specific traumatic situation better. Their subconscious brain went “Who would be the most capable of dealing with this horrible situation? Who could deal with this more easily?” And this is why oftentimes an alter might be based on a person that they know in their life. I think that it is highly likely that the DID System in Stranger Things might feature many alters based on people that they know in the external world. Friends, family members, local bullies (like Billy Hargrove, perhaps?) etc. Alters based on the subconscious mind’s impression of people from the external world are referred to as introjects. But an alter is not an imaginary friend: that alter then becomes part of their own mind that has taken on these traits subconsciously.
Will as a host in a DID System would not have any conscious control over his alters any more than he has control over any other person in his life: that’s not how DID works. Alters have their own agency. Alters with certain roles have greater access to the DID System than hosts out of necessity, and therefore I believe a case could be made that at times Will is the one that has less agency. In some DID Systems hosts sometimes have absolutely no access to their internal worlds at all, and when they lose consciousness everything is like being asleep for them. And in other cases DID System hosts might have only partial access or a lesser level of awareness in the System’s internal worlds. From what I’ve read each DID System has its own unique structure based on what was needed by them in order to survive certain traumatic events in their shared lives.
Part of the reason hosts have limited access is because the DID System is an elaborate subconscious coping strategy that the brain has constructed in order to protect hosts from trauma so they can continue surviving and dealing with every day life and taking care of themselves. If hosts were given complete access to the System in the same way that certain alters have access then hosts would be exposed to traumatic memories and experiences that they might not be ready to deal with and that would defeat the entire purpose of the DID System having been established in the first place. Think of it as levels of security access in a building: not everyone has the same access granted on their little door swipe cards. Hosts oftentimes have very limited access because their brain is storing their memories beyond their reach. Alters will each have memories that the host(s) do not.
If any fans dislike the concept of Will being a host in the System because they perceive of this as some sort of “controlling” or “powerful” role in a DID System: hosts generally have to deal with an arguably frightening and intimidating lack of control over their own mind and over the System. Hosts need to establish communication with their alters and trust in order to coordinate shared decision making because they generally, by design, do NOT have access to certain parts of their mind and the internal worlds because they’re not supposed to. The only influence that hosts have on their alters’ decisions is established through communication and agreement just like if you made an agreement to pick your neighbor up from school at 3pm. There’s nothing stopping you from deciding not to do that, but you choose to do so because you’ve established trust with your neighbor and they know they can rely on you.
“Friends don’t lie!” The importance of alters telling the truth to each other would be critical to their shared survival. I should hope nobody is lying if you have no way of being sure what your body had been doing all day while you weren’t conscious in the external world and you need to check in and ask other alters what they did. (Have a great day! Don’t forget to lock the front door. Can you cook some pasta and make sure we eat tonight? Okay, cool. Thanks! Wait: you had a fight with mom? And you didn’t tell us? Not cool! Now we don’t know why she’s angry at us and have no idea what was said. Ugh.)
But to return back to your original question: although I understand that many fans might be unfamiliar with DID and with the concept of alters, I hope that fans would seek to better understand the condition and would not be so deeply disrespectful of real DID Systems that exist and suggest that they’re somehow not “real” because of their condition. Inevitably there will always be those that don’t understand and who don’t respect others’ experiences.
I hope I answered your question sufficiently! This was such a good question, and I’m really glad that you Asked. Thank you!
34 notes · View notes
omnigon · 8 years ago
Text
The animal-headed and animal-like alters are so interesting because they aren’t furries, at all, they don’t conform to any of the general idea of what a furry is, and they quite literally are just animal humanoids, or rather humanoids with animal traits, instead of furry which is more animal in the place of human instead of being an imitation of both animal and human. Leo is not a human or a lion or a combination of the two. He’s a being with a humanlike body, some lion parts like his tail, etc., and the face of a lion (real, not cartoon). The King of Ants is the same way, humanoid body, real animal parts.
Despite consuming furry content for a great portion of my life, it seemed not to impact my psyche in as literal a way as my media introjects would make one assume it would. I don’t identify with furry characters at all, for the most part, yet I’ve been drawn to them for as long as any other furry out there. Alters are interesting in that you cannot control their form. I had no choice in what Leo looks or acts like, and the King of Ants is something that didn’t exist until a few days ago. They manifest as a realistic-looking being instead of the usual cartoons (most of my alters are more abstract than realistic, including literal anthropomorphic shapes and objects, but that’s a whole other can of worms) while furries online are almost invariably cartoony and exaggerated in a way that I feel draws attention away from the animal aspects. 
The simple designs of furries allows people to see more of themselves in them. It’s also the reason cats, wolves, etc are more popular than, say, termites. Humans, as mammals, naturally relate to mammals more than invertebrates and reptiles because they look more “like us”. It’s why I’m weird for liking bugs and identifying heavily with them. Yet in my brain, the animal humanoids that manifest are often literally animals with humanoid traits. The King of Ants looks more like a real bug that I could probably even draw (that frustrates me).
Some of them are just straight-up animals, but exaggerated into something absurd, like the White God who’s a big snapping-turtle looking being with a maze inside her body (mazes come up so often in the system). Some are animal-like but are fictional creatures like dragons. Less dragons than my childhood obsession would point to, but the abounding dinosaurs might explain that. My brain likes dinosaurs because they’re real. I’ve always liked them more, to be honest. Black (like silhoutte black ) wolves with red or white blank eyes. Big Bandit isn’t a wolf all the time, but his alternate form is a black demonic wolf creature, and Heartache is a werewolf with black fur. 
The repetition of certain traits and characteristics has not gone unnoticed. I’m not sure what it “represents” or whatever, but there are many kinds of animals that come up more than once. Lions, Snakes, Wolves, Tyrannosaurs, Storks/ Some other long-necked water bird like that,  Possums, Pterosaurs, and some bugs like Centipedes and Ants are all represented in at least one alter, some with several alters (or even a whole “race”) sharing chacteristics of one animal or another. Like the Gems, most of which have pertosaur wings and reptillian traits apart from what they “should” look like. The “humans” by default are actually werewolves, which I find interesting. There isn’t a single “normal person” in the whole damn system. We have a possessed washing machine and literal robots but not a single normal human being.
I know to a lot of people that would sound like some “speshulness” thing, but to me it feels like it’s because I wasn’t socialised properly as a child. I related to animals as an escape from the human(s) who kept mistreating me, and over time my focus was on monsters, animals, and beings over humans, and that got internalised because it’s not like my ability to be attached to people was saved at any point. In fact, the real world (and the humans in it) mistreated me even HARDER after I was 10 (an important age in the system), at which point the deal was sealed. This is all compounded by the fact that I am an autist, which naturally lended a certain level of social retardation and low empathy on top of my ongoing, neverending mistreatment. Drawing creatures was the only way I could cope, and I kept doing that and it seemed like that’s now what my brain gets attached to, mostly. The less human the silhouette, the more my brain relates to it. It’s bizarre, but the minimalist lifeform (simple silhouette, polygonal, even, with limited humanlike/familiar body parts) has fascinated me for so long now. I can’t get over it. It’s why I love bugs like slugs, nematodes, and flatworms. They’re simple and unlike us as humans in almost every way. But they’re alive and capable of making their own decisions.
It’s hard to describe why I love such simple silhouettes or why I think that shapes-with-some-human-parts-but-not-very-many are so fucking amazing. Something about them gives me a sense of ultimate familiarity. “That’s me”, “That’s my kind” etc., none of this is conscious at all. It’s just there. It’s why Bill liked looking at pictures of himself so damn much. It’s what we relate to. It’s what we are now, in a sense. It’s why there are so many triangular alters, even those unrelated to Bill, the original triangle. Why there are so many cyclopses and why I love and relate to them so much is a mystery, however.
0 notes
strangertheory · 4 years ago
Note
To distract yourself from the recent frustating and annoying events...
I wanted to talk to you on your take on the DID theory. Since David Harbour has mentioned a lot that Hopper is going to have in season 4, a sort of Gandalf ressurection/rebirth type of arc, that a lot movies that inspired this season are going in your favour.
If we see a Hopper being transformed by his arc, growing into a better person and realising he is part or in the process of realising he is part of a system or subsystems (and given the nature of Gandalf's character)...
Do you think his function in said systems/subsystems could change ?
He's always been what you could describe as a protector, gatekeeper and even caretaker alter at times for Will. (Possible an introject and adult alter.)
Do you think he could become an Internal Self Helper alter, someone who has a lot knowledge of the system/subsystems, traumas, internal workings and all of the other alters ?
Same would go for El, since she paralleled both Will and Hopper.
*For context: I got this Ask a long time ago and so this is being posted many, many weeks after it was submitted to me. I'm unsure what frustrating and annoying events were being referred to but I'm happy to say I'm not aware of any current ones that I'm dealing with. (My apologies for the delayed reply @0aurelion-sol0 !)
Whether or not an alter could switch from being a protector to an internal self helper, or whether an alter could serve both roles, what conditions might serve as the catalyst for that change in their role within their system, and how likely it might be that Hopper's role might change significantly from what it currently is (presuming, of course, that this theory about the story is correct) isn't a topic that I feel especially knowledgable about. I don't think this is something that I am in a position to speculate on extensively myself.
That being said, from my limited understanding and research as a singlet, I believe I have heard that alters can often have more than one role within their system, and the way in which they serve those roles can vary and change a lot depending on the system's unique history and experiences since every system is unique. Your question and hypothetical seems like a very interesting line of speculation, but I don't see myself as equipped to offer any reliable answers for you.
The only thing I feel fairly confident in guessing, at least regarding the possible intentions of the writing team behind Stranger Things, is that based on David Harbour's consistent use of the term "protector" when referring to Hopper, I think it's very reasonable to hypothesize that Hopper is perhaps currently a protector alter. I agree with your thoughts on that, and I agree with @kaypeace21 's speculation that Jim Hopper is probably a protector if the story is about a system.
"[The Duffer Brothers (Matt and Ross Duffer), are] very responsive to the fan response [but also] a step ahead with the script. [Audiences will] see a lot of your favorite characters doing the thing that you love them for ... but you'll also see them twist it and turn it into other colors and other flavors. And one of the great things that you can see with Hopper is that he was a protector, he's a man of justice [and] he now has become a prisoner." - David Harbour
If anyone from a system who has been interested in the theory that Stranger Things is about a system would like to add their own insight and thoughts on this subject, your knowledge would be (as always!) much appreciated, and I'll be sure to share your Ask and tag @0aurelion-sol0 and link back to this post for context.
6 notes · View notes
strangertheory · 4 years ago
Note
Will and El are technically the same person? Along with Hopper? Did I get that right? This is so confusing.
Hello there! Thanks for Asking.
My current hypothesis regarding what might be happening in Stranger Things is that we are following a story about a DID System and that many characters in the series are perhaps alters and hosts (separate states of consciousness and identity within one human mind) dealing with trauma memories and seeking to learn to work together to protect one another and the DID System as a whole.
The short answer to your question is: only if you perceive of alters (different states of consciousness that have their own individual sense of identity and self) that are sharing the same human mind as being “the same person.” Generally those with DID will refer to themselves as being “multiple,” as being hosts in a DID System, as being alters or as having alters etc. Each alter will have their own distinct memories and life experiences that they’ve lived (both in the external world and the internal worlds that might exist in their mind) and that are part of who they know themselves to be just as individuals with a single state of consciousness have built their sense of identity over many years of lived experiences.
kaypeace21 and I might be (?) the only two bloggers on Tumblr analyzing the concept that El, Will, and Hopper (and potentially many other characters) are all sharing the same mind and are part of a DID System (but if there's anyone else I'd enjoy following their blog!)
@kaypeace21‘s hypothesis is that the writers of Stranger Things are telling a fictional sci fi / fantasy story that, like in X-Men or Akira (etc.), involves characters with superpowers and psychic abilities. Her theory is that because Will has both dissociative identity disorder and psychic / supernatural abilities that he has unintentionally and subconsciously brought his alters, his trauma memories, and his internal worlds to life and they’ve escaped his mind and are now in the real world and in Hawkins.
Although I do consider @kaypeace21′s hypothesis that everything has been brought to life and has emerged from Will’s mind into Hawkins by supernatural means (like David Haller’s / Legion’s alters do in X-Men) to be a very well-argued theory and analysis of what might be happening in Stranger Things, I have recently pushed my own hypothesis regarding what is happening in the story towards questioning whether the supernatural events and superpowers of Stranger Things might exist exclusively within internal worlds in our characters’ subconscious. I’m unsure of how much of their “real” physical world we have seen yet in the series if I follow this train of thought, and how much of it is memories that are symbolically playing out in an internal world of their mind. In short: I think there might be a certain level of consciousness and wakefulness at which they’re all still in the same body that we have perhaps not fully seen or realized yet because of the creative way that the series is telling the story (although this might have been imaginatively represented in season 2 when Will and/or the Mindflayer are conscious/unconscious at the Lab with Dr. Owens.)
Perhaps El and Will only appear separately and can only interact with one another in internal worlds, while co-conscious, or within liminal spaces between wakefulness and unconsciousness because Hawkins is not always their “real” world but is an internal world in their shared brain. Maybe Hawkins is similar to the Upside Down, which I also believe is a mental construct, but more comfortable since it’s meant to be a home for alters to live rather than a place that trauma has been hidden away. I think that El is a gatekeeper in the DID System. And I currently hypothesize that Hopper is also possible part of that same DID System and that Hopper is a protector and potentially also a gatekeeper. (Hopefully I will find the time to write a new post about Hopper sometime in the near future.)
The questions that I keep asking myself are: what if some moments in the story are not actually taking place in the ‘real world’ even within the Stranger Things universe? What if many moments in the series so far have been fantastical because they were moments in characters’ lives that were re-imagined by their subconscious mind in order to cope with trauma? Not hallucinations (because as Hopper says “these aren’t nightmares, it’s happening”) but imaginative re-workings of "what happened” in their life that are easier for their mind to process. PTSD and internal flashbacks and also reworked memories that manifest themselves more symbolically and metaphorically within fantastical internal worlds.
Many movies on the Stranger Things 4 Video Store Friday movie list encourage me to continue questioning the boundaries between Stranger Things characters’ physical lives and what they might be experiencing as flashbacks or as memories within internal worlds and different states of consciousness. A few films on the list which inspire me to question what might be going on in Hawkins and what Hopper, El, and Will (and many other characters) might be dealing with include Altered States, The Fisher King, The Matrix, Inside Out, Inception, The Truman Show, What Dreams May Come, Drop Dead Fred, The Cell, The Neverending Story, and many others.
The first season of Stranger Things had a lot of artistic and thematic strength in its mystery and layers of ambiguity, but I suspect that once Stranger Things was renewed and they knew that they could have multiple seasons they began planning how to reveal what’s going on behind the curtain of mystery in a meaningful way by the end of the story.
The big question is: what has been happening in these characters’ lives? Am I “overthinking things” as some of my friends have told me? Is it really “not that deep?”
Here are a few blogposts that I have written on this topic in which I explore some of my thoughts regarding what might be happening in the series if Stranger Things is about a DID System, internal worlds, and alters dealing with trauma:
🧠 What is going on with the eerie parallels between Will and El?
👀 My response to an Ask: "Do you think there’s any relation or symbolism between a Brenner and Lonnie other than being shitty/abusive father figures?"
🦸‍♀️ My response to an Ask: "What are the source of their powers?" in which I share my "first layer" and "second layer" meta theories/thoughts (re: The DID Theory) + a brief follow-up Ask regarding the concept that El's powers might only exist in internal worlds if she is a fictive alter
🏞 My response to an Ask: What do you think is going to happen with the Upside Down especially if Will and El's connection grows? 
In this post I briefly address how El, if she were a teenage girl alter that exists in an internal world of the mind but who is sometimes conscious in Will’s body in the “real world”, would have experiences comparable to those of a trans girl
Truthfully: I am at the point that I speculate that nearly all of the characters exist as alters either exclusively or are introjects which are alters based on people that the DID System knows that exist in the external world. But I realize that would be quite the plot twist and might push the question of “what is real?” farther than some fans might be willing to go.
I recognize that this is a lot of information and theoretical content and blog links to provide to you in response to your general Ask but I wanted to offer you reference points and direct you to other blog posts regarding this theory in case you wanted to learn more about the evidence and analyses that led me and a few other bloggers to these hypotheses. If you have any other questions regarding my theories regarding what might be happening in Stranger Things (whether that’s this topic or others) please don’t hesitate to send me another Ask or to DM me directly. I always enjoy talking about ideas with other fans. :)
If this concept interests you I know that kaypeace21 would greatly enjoy sharing her own theories with you and answering any questions you have. I highly recommend that you visit her blog, read her posts, and message her if this topic interests you because my thoughts are often very different from hers and you might enjoy reading both of our blogs for two different theories based around the same hypothesis: that Will has dissociative identity disorder and that this influences all events in the series. If you are interested in reading about her current analysis that hypothesizes that superpowers are real in Stranger Things, that Will has dissociative identity disorder, and that both monsters and some other characters have emerged from Will’s subconsciousness into the “real world” of Hawkins then I recommend reading these two blogposts that she wrote: 🧠 Part 1: Will Created the Mindflayer and Upside-Down Theory + Part 2: Some of your favorite characters are Will’s split personalities (psych/narrative analysis) CW: abuse, sexual assault, psychological trauma (a content warning is also noted before the section in the post itself.)
I do agree with many aspects of kaypeace21′s theories and I think she explains how dissociative identity disorder might influence many events of the story so far in a way that I do find compelling, but the critical difference between our hypotheses is that kaypeace21 currently proposes that Stranger Things features characters with DID that also have superpowers (like David Haller in X-Men) but I currently think that the vast majority of what we have seen on screen in the series so far is “not real” and exists only within characters’ minds and I do not believe that El has any superpowers except when she is within internal worlds. (And that’s a fairly notable difference.) I also don’t think that the Mindflayer exists as a blobby mass of melted people except within internal worlds in their mind. I wonder if the vast majority of season 3 took place entirely in an internal world version of Hawkins and when Will said “what if we locked him out here with us?” to El that he might have been more accurate if he had said “what if we locked him IN here with us?” in very simple terms: I want to know if Will has actually woken up yet from being sedated in season 2 at all, or maybe whether he's sometimes present in the external world but then sometimes switches back to the internal world, etc. (But perhaps the events of season 4 will invalidate this thought of mine. I look forward to seeing what happens!)
Thank you again for your message. I hope my response wasn’t too rambling, that I didn’t repeat myself too much, and that it remained coherent in spite of how late at night I am writing this. I might return and edit this in the morning. (I’m wrapping up this reply at 12:56 AM but I started writing this at 10PM. Time flew by! Time for sleep.) Goodnight :)
15 notes · View notes